研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Saw in game "America Oudan Ultra Quiz"

Google N-gram Corpus Counts

フェルミニウム	No matches

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts

フェルミニウム	2

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェルミニウム</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

daij, meikyo

See comments on 大好き.
I added the "refined taste" sense in 2018 but it's archaic. I've replaced it with the "好色。色好み" sense, which is in all the kokugos, including meikyo.

@@ -15,3 +15,7 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1257240">嫌い・きらい・1</xref>
-<gloss>that one likes</gloss>
-<gloss>(one's) favourite</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1257240">嫌い・1</xref>
+<gloss>liking</gloss>
+<gloss>being fond of</gloss>
+<gloss>to one's liking</gloss>
+<gloss>to one's taste</gloss>
+<gloss>preferred</gloss>
+<gloss>favourite</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>that one is in love (with)</gloss>
-<gloss>that one is romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>liking (romantically)</gloss>
+<gloss>being in love with</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -34,3 +39,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>the way one likes</gloss>
-<gloss>(as) it suits one</gloss>
+<gloss>as one likes</gloss>
+<gloss>as it suits one</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +43 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -40,3 +45,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1373010">数寄</xref>
-<gloss>refined taste</gloss>
-<gloss>elegant pursuits</gloss>
+<gloss>lecherous</gloss>
+<gloss>lustful</gloss>
+<gloss>salacious</gloss>

Suggested sth similar for 大好き

@@ -16,4 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>liked</gloss>
-<gloss>well-liked</gloss>
-<gloss>favourite</gloss>
-<gloss>favorite</gloss>
+<gloss>that one likes</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) favourite</gloss>
@@ -24,3 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>in love (with)</gloss>
-<gloss>loved</gloss>
-<gloss>romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>that one is in love (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>that one is romantically interested (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>beloved</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

It's a messy one. I think it's best just to leave it as it is for now.

＊ Oxford dictionary of linguistics:
"‘theta roles’ Term in *Government and Binding Theory for semantic
roles such as *agent or *patient: cf. case roles. Also written ‘θ-roles’: the
theta stands for earlier ‘thematic’, itself derived from *theme (3) for no
principled reason."

So they are just semantic roles?
Theta-roles are new to me, that's why I ask.


＊ Oxford dictionary of linguistics:
"transitive (Construction) in which a verb is related to at least two
nouns or their equivalent, whose semantic roles are characteristically
those of an *agent and a *patient: e.g. that of She (agent) carried him
(patient). A transitive verb is one which takes or can take such a
construction: thus carry, or carry in its basic sense."


.

Before I give my take, note that I have not come into contact with government and binding theory or actual syntactical theory beyond the basics, prior to this. So I'm learning as I type.
This means I don't really mean to harp on this too much, I'm more so trying to gain a better unterstanding here.

＞ The English translation reflects this lack of object relation: "I apologize for the rudeness," not "I apologize the rudeness."
This cannot be regarded as an argument. 
If I were to take German, there "to apologize" is in fact transitively used, and the translation from Japanese would possess that feature. 
Yet that is not evidence for the Japanese construction involving a transitive verb.


＞ (a) Burzio's generalization "All and only the verbs that can assign a theta-role to the subject can assign Accusative Case to an object." (Burzio, 1986).
＞ A transitive verb assigns a theta-role to its object, which typically undergoes or is affected by the action (a).
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I get what this intends to prove here.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are various theta roles, right? Agent, theme, goal, etc. , and they specify the relation established by the predicate to its arguments.

So let me grab one of the examples and attempt to visualize my understanding.
1 [彼女(agent)]は[先生(experiencer)]に[遅刻したこと(theme)]を謝った.
Here 謝る assigns the theta role "agent" to the logical subject of the clause, 先生 is assigned "experiencer" and  is a dative (indirect) object, whilst 遅刻したこと is assigned "theme" and is an accusative (direct) object.
So in this sentence 謝る acts as a ditransitive verb to me, and should fulfill the generalization you've brought forth.

Yet a sentence like this is also perfectly fine (taken from massif):
2 [僕(agent)]は[君(goal)]に謝らなければならない。
In this sentence 謝る acts as an unergative (intransitive verb assigning an agent that acts with intention) verb.


Or am I missing something?


＞ - 謝る is syntactically intransitive because the subject's action does not affect or act upon another entity.
Would that not refer to semantics? Also in sentences like 1 the "excusing" definitely affects another entity, namely the "先生".
Another important criterion to transitivity in semantics is volition, which is present with 謝る (unlike with 驚く), which convinces me that there is an agent-patient dynamic with the former, but not with the latter, where it would be stimulus-experiencer.


Furthermore, transitivity is not really black-and-white, as thompson and hopper have pointed out in their 1980 paper on transitivity:
https://romanistik.uni-freiburg.de/raible/Lehre/2006/Materialien/Hopper_Thompson.pdf



I would again propose that having both tags is probably the best, or shall I say "least complicated" course of action.
Transitivity tags should be given out in reference to the usage in the target language, so a Japanese verb and its transitivity must be analyzed in a Japanese framework.
Hence the tags should mirror the status quo of 国語学, which it most likely wouldn't if we just tagged it as a 自動詞.

(a) Burzio's generalization "All and only the verbs that can assign a theta-role to the subject can assign Accusative Case to an object." (Burzio, 1986).

Finding formal papers that discuss the abstract or thematic use of を, where it introduces non-affected, conceptual objects can be difficult. Most of the linguistic resources I've found aren't public and don't really touch on the topic heavily, so I'll provide my own reasoning.

A transitive verb assigns a theta-role to its object, which typically undergoes or is affected by the action (a). In Japanese, however, transitivity doesn't work in exactly the same way. 他動詞 can be thought of as any verb that can take an object marked by を, but not all を are equal. For example, verbs like 焦る, 謝る, 心配する, and 驚く can take a を-marked phrase, but the "object" in these cases doesn't undergo or receive the action in the usual sense.

I think that's where the confusion happens.

- 謝る is syntactically intransitive because the subject's action does not affect or act upon another entity.
- The を phrase (e.g., 失礼を謝る) can mark the cause, reason, stimulus, or domain of the action, not an affected object.
- The English translation reflects this lack of object relation: "I apologize for the rudeness," not "I apologize the rudeness."
- Therefore, even though を appears, it marks the trigger of the action rather than an object, so the verb remains intransitive in both structure and meaning.

＞ 謝る is intransitive and never takes a true direct object.
＞ In this sentence, the を is not marking a direct object; instead, it indicates what the apology is about and can be understood roughly as "about" or "for" in English.

Do you have references for this? I was unable to retrieve this sense from dictionaries. It seems very english-derived.
To my knowledge only "移動や時間の経過を表す自動詞" (Meikyo) and intransitive verbs in a starting point construction (e.g. 家を出る) can take を (and still be intransitive). 
Also, the english translation being an intransitive construction is not a criterion.
While DOJG also has also a fourth usage for を, "A particle that marks the cause of some human emotion.", 謝る doesn't really fall into that category in my eyes.
The examples DOJG gives contain verbs of emotion that are frequently tagged as transitive or bitransitive by references (e.g. 喜ぶ, 恐れる, etc.).


＊ Data
Massif:
｛を謝る｝＝ 524
｛に謝る｝＝ 3899 (false hits possible)

BCCWJ:
｛を；謝る｝＝ 11
｛に〈格助詞〉；謝る｝＝ 36

References that have 自動詞 ＝ Nikkoku
References that have 他動詞 ＝ Sankoku, SankokuGendaiGairai, Oukoku, Smk, Meikyo, Shinsen
References that have 自他動詞 ＝ Kojien, Gakken Kokugodaijiten, Iwakoku

Smk: 〈だれニ（なにヲ）謝る〉

To me the following examples, taken from various references, look perfectly transitive:
「うそを言ったことを謝る」
「人に罪を謝る」
「弟の不始末を姉が謝る」
「彼女は先生に遅刻したことを謝った」(e.g. replacing を with に here seems weird/ungrammatical to me)



Interestingly my 古語 references have 謝る is intransitive.
It seems 謝る came from 誤る, which was originally the intransitive pair to 過つ, which appears to have fallen out of use.
(Wiktionary, Nikkoku, Koj)

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Another problem is that the english concepts of transitive/intransitive may not perfectly map onto 他動詞 and 自動詞, as pointed out be the following usage note on wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/他動詞

"The terms transitive and intransitive are somewhat misleading in reference to Japanese. The English terms are generally used to refer to the syntax or structure of a sentence, and whether the verb in the sentence is followed by an object. The Japanese terms refer to the semantics or meaning of the verb, and whether the action of that verb is happening to or upon something else. The Japanese term 自動詞 (jidōshi) literally means “self-acting word”, and 他動詞 (tadōshi) literally means “other-acting word”, in reference to this semantic consideration.

For instance, in English, the verb ate in the simple sentence “I ate” would be considered an intransitive verb, because it is not followed by an object.

However, in the corresponding Japanese, the verb 食べた (tabeta, “ate”) in the simple sentence 私は食べた。 (“Watashi wa tabeta.”) would not be considered a 自動詞 (jidōshi), but would instead be considered a 他動詞 (tadōshi, literally “other-acting word”), as the underlying semantics or meaning of the verb 食べる (taberu, “to eat”) conceptually require an object: when one eats, one eats something, even if left unstated.

This semantic focus is the underlying mechanism by which verbs in sentences like 私は食べた。 (Watashi wa tabeta. - “I ate.”) are still considered 他動詞 (tadōshi, glossed as “transitive”) even when there is no stated object (because the fundamental meaning of the verb implies action by the subject upon something else), and verbs in sentences like 道を歩く。 (Michi o aruku. - “[I] walk the street.”) are still considered 自動詞 (jidōshi, glossed as “intransitive”) even when there is an explicit object marked with the object or accusative particle を (o) (because the fundamental meaning of the verb only implies action by the subject itself in a way that does not affect the noun marked by を)."
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

＞ for example, tagging 焦る as transitive [...]
Here I see multiple references having a 自他動詞 tag, with meikyo splitting out a transitive sense.
But that's an issue for another time.




.

When I saw this submission I was away from home, but I wanted to look into this a bit.

Based purely on references there are insufficient grounds for tagging this as just intransitive.
Perhaps a linguist could perform tests for transitivity here, but I sadly can't.
Our best bet is most likely having this as [vt,vi].

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>to be stumped (by)</gloss>

About 250 Googits, with lots of valid hits. [obs] is probably OK.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 上働き　　　 │ 119 │100.0% │
│ うわばたらき │   0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯
Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 上働き │ 5 │100.0% │This makes me think that most of the 119 hits in the 2007 ngrams are jmdict based
╰─ーーー─┴───┴───────╯

0 hits in all NINJAL corpora

Only in Saito apart from babylon, not in nikkoku

No direct search hits, apart from JMdict based sites.

.

I think this should be tagged either [rare] or [obs]

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Babylon Japanese-English

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>cleaning lady</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

I didn't add [rK] in my last edit because 脱出す had some significant counts, but those numbers are probably misleading.

脱（け）出す〈こと／ため／方法／の／には〉
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 脱出すこと　 │   0 │
│ 脱け出すこと │ 767 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────┤
│ 脱出すため　 │   0 │
│ 脱け出すため │ 589 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────┤
│ 脱出す方法　 │   0 │
│ 脱け出す方法 │ 234 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────┤
│ 脱出すの　　 │ 177 │
│ 脱け出すの　 │ 199 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────┤
│ 脱出すには　 │   0 │
│ 脱け出すには │ 180 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────╯

抜け出す 315,045  97.9% 
脱け出す   3,866   1.2% -rK (daijs)
ぬけだす   2,743   0.9%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

〈抜（け）／脱（け）／ぬけ／ヌケ〉〈出／だ〉す

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 抜け出す │ 315,045 │ 93.0% │
│ 脱け出す │   3,866 │  1.1% │ - (sankoku, daijs, koj)
│ 抜出す　 │   1,466 │  0.4% │
│ 脱出す　 │   9,431 │  2.8% │
│ 抜けだす │   4,654 │  1.4% │
│ 脱けだす │     976 │  0.3% │
│ ぬけ出す │     724 │  0.2% │
│ ぬけだす │   2,743 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Adding and arranging forms in the order listed above.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>抜けだす</keb>
+<keb>脱け出す</keb>
@@ -14 +14,10 @@
-<keb>脱け出す</keb>
+<keb>抜出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脱出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>抜けだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 脱けだす │     976 │ 57.4% │
│ ぬけ出す │     724 │ 42.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脱けだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぬけ出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

wiki

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>kyanite</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

生きとし生ける者	3080	6.0%  - ran into this, adding sK
生きとし生ける物	5886	11.5%
生きとし生けるもの	42053	82.4% - moving up

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>生きとし生けるもの</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>生きとし生けるもの</keb>
+<keb>生きとし生ける者</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Entry created

Agree.

split

@@ -14,7 +13,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2805920">長点・ちょうてん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2832001">トン</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>dash (in Morse code)</gloss>

sankoku: 二つ。トゥー。
shinsen

ワンツースリー	11632	55.1%
ワントゥースリー	192	0.9%
ワン・ツー・スリー	9106	43.1%
ワン・トゥー・スリー	190	0.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トゥー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2832001">トン</xref>

GG5

More general.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&physiol;</field>
+<field>&biol;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 三省堂国語辞典　第七版

Is this correct tag for this entry?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>

Entry created

OK if it's current.

dated tag is not appropriate for Heisei era 死語, right? I think 激同 is still current though

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/はげど
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13298832678

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はげど</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Mazegaki addition (maze2)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ヒル石</keb>

Mazegaki addition (maze1)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひる石</keb>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, eij, gg5

研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, eij, gg5

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, eij, gg5

コージェライト	759	92.0%
コーディアライト	66	8.0%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

wiki

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コーディアライト</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Codierite</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2454970">菫青石</xref>
+<gloss>cordierite</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/菫青石

Wikipedia page indicates that Japanese word 菫青石 has the same meaning.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, daij, gg5, eij

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, daij, gg5, eij

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

koj, gg5, eij

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

gg5

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

prog, daijs, nipp

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>しょうちょうせき</reb>
+<reb>せいちょうせき</reb>
@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>common feldspar</gloss>

wiki

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Kagaku

gg5 wiki

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Kagaku, Eijiro

gg5 wiki

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Eijiro, Kagaku

gg5

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

wiki gg5

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Kagaku

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>malacolite</gloss>

gg5 wiki

盾に取る	1384	73.4%
盾にとる	501	26.6%

N-gram

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for SPY×FAMILY.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>盾にとる</keb>

chujiten, prog
daijs: 防御物として、その陰に隠れる。「立木を―・る」

Also used with its literal meaning.
We don't use transitivity tags for expressions.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -15 +14,10 @@
-<gloss>to take as grounds (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use as an excuse</gloss>
+<gloss>to use as grounds (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use to one's advantage</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to use as a shield</gloss>
+<gloss>to shelter behind</gloss>
+<gloss>to hide behind</gloss>

GG5: を盾に取って on the strength of…; on grounds of…; on the grounds 《that…》

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to use (something) as an excuse or pretext</gloss>
+<gloss>to use as a pretext</gloss>
+<gloss>to take as grounds (for)</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

世界大百科事典第二版; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Google N-gram Corpus Counts

角閃安山岩	148

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts

角閃安山岩	23

Not a great translation.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Daijisen points to 貴柘榴石.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

国語大辞典

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヌーマイト

0 n-grams. 22 Googits.

Very obscure. Not really a Japanese term.

https://kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2003165/files/KU-0600-20111231-08.pdf

https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/books/R000000025-I012850006895618

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feindstrafrecht

Daijirin has this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-liner_program
>> In computer programming, a one-liner program originally was textual input to the command line of an operating system shell that performed some function in just one line of input.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ ワンライナー　 │ 3,764 │
│ ワン・ライナー │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>one-liner</gloss>
+<gloss>one-liner (program)</gloss>

https://qiita.com/mnoguchi/items/e2c64d79ca9978bbe14c
https://en-ambi.com/itcontents/entry/2018/05/08/110000/
https://wa3.i-3-i.info/word16775.html
https://monobook.org/wiki/ワンライナー
https://e-words.jp/w/ワンライナー.html

GG5

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>picrasma wood</gloss>

ニガキ	1468	60.1%
苦木	974	39.9%

https://kotobank.jp/word/苦木-484866#w-591092
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニガキ

daijs, wiki

三葉空木	72	4.2%
ミツバウツギ	1661	95.8%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミツバウツギ
https://kotobank.jp/word/三葉空木-638790#w-638790
https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/staphylea-bumalda/

daijs, wiki

サンカヨウ	14398	95.7%
山荷葉	648	4.3%

https://kotobank.jp/word/山荷葉-513066#w-513066
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サンカヨウ

daijs, wiki

バイケイソウ	9029	98.5%
梅蕙草	133	1.5%

https://kotobank.jp/word/梅蕙草-598686#w-598686
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/バイケイソウ
https://plantlust.com/plants/14123/veratrum-oxysepalum/

daijs, wiki

GG5: 〔ユリ科の多年草; 日本固有; 同属の総称〕 a 「white [false] hellebore; Veratrum stamineum var. stamineum.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>Veratrum stamineum (false hellebore species)</gloss>
+<gloss>white hellebore (Veratrum stamineum)</gloss>
+<gloss>false hellebore</gloss>

コバイケイソウ	14188	98.9%
小梅蕙草	158	1.1%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コバイケイソウ
https://kotobank.jp/word/小梅蕙草-503671#w-503671

daijs, wiki

GG5

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミツバオウレン
https://kotobank.jp/word/三葉黄蓮-638791#w-638791

ミツバオウレン	3177	97.2%
三葉黄蓮	90	2.8%

daijs, wiki

split from 2184060

VERY rare.

NEW斎藤和英大辞典

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

新語時事用語辞典

Trimming.
Also the name of a book.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レンタル・フレンド</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<gloss>someone hired to act as a friend for a specific time and purpose, such as for an event or for companionship</gloss>
+<gloss>someone hired to act as a friend for a specific purpose</gloss>

https://www.clientpartners.jp/service/00884.html

GG5

キクザキイチゲ	12338	93.6%
菊咲一華	841	6.4%

nikk, wiki

https://kotobank.jp/word/菊咲一華-2027160#w-1929718
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キクザキイチゲ

GG5

ハクサンイチゲ	10280	97.9%
白山一華	133	1.3%
白山一花	85	0.8%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハクサンイチゲ
https://kotobank.jp/word/白山一華-600184#goog_rewarded

daijs, wiki

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 先占権者 │ 0 │  NaN% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───┴───────╯
Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 先占権者 │ 0 │  NaN% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───┴───────╯

0 references apart from GG5
The https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/先占 on 先占 doesn't use it either
No direct search hits

A few hits in the NDL
Also found this, which might be close to its meaning:
https://www.try-it.jp/chapters-11953/lessons-11956/point-2/

Appears in at least two early showa era law/foreign law dictionaries, but I don't have access to the full work to see the actual glosses.

.

Obscure GG5 word
"Occupant" is too broad, maybe this?
I suppose there is no context since this probably wasn't encountered?

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>occupant</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>occupant (of unclaimed territory)</gloss>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Strait

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Proliv Karskoye Vorota (channel)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kara Strait</gloss>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Tatarskii Proliv (channel)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tatar Strait</gloss>

Possibly an entry too for just ディープエル.

The Wikipedia page only uses the romaji. Not a lot of hits on Google for "ディープエル翻訳"

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＤｅｅｐＬ翻訳</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepL翻訳