I don't think this needs a [gai1] tag.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

アーミー	37207	97.6%
アーミィ	897	2.4%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

アカデミー	1742347	99.3%
アキャデミィ	0	0.0%
アカデミィ	3240	0.2%
アキャデミー	0	0.0%
アカデミ	8175	0.5%
アキャデミ	0	0.0%

@@ -9 +9,6 @@
-<reb>アキャデミィ</reb>
+<reb>アカデミ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アカデミィ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs has 2 senses, daijr 3.

I agree the French lsrc isn't needed.

@@ -13,2 +12,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">académie</lsource>
-<gloss>academia</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>academia</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijirin (not French), Daijisen (both English and French), Gakken (not French)

Most refs don't say this is from the French "académie". I'd be happy to drop it.

I've merged it.

アシンメトリックデザイン	81	100.0%	1015820
アシンメトリック・デザイン	0	0.0%
アシメトリックデザイン	0	0.0%
アシメトリック・デザイン	0	0.0%

merge or delete?

Merging 1015790.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アシメトリックデザイン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アシンメトリック・デザイン</reb>

gg5, daij, meikyo

@@ -9 +9,11 @@
-<gloss>ecstasy</gloss>
+<gloss>ecstasy (emotion)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(religious) ecstasy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>ecstasy (drug)</gloss>
+<gloss>MDMA</gloss>

ニューアカデミズム	1445

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニュー・アカデミズム</reb>

Merged

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ ラッキー │ 3,318,243 │ 99.5% │
│ ラッキィ │    16,437 │  0.5% │ - sk
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I agree. In this case they work well.

@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>nice</gloss>
-<gloss>score</gloss>
-<gloss>bingo</gloss>
+<gloss>nice!</gloss>
+<gloss>score!</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo!</gloss>

We often include exclamation marks on these sorts of interjections (but we're not consistent). GG5 does the same. Not sure which style I prefer but I do like that the exclamation marks make the PoS immediately obvious just from reading the glosses.

the exclamation mark is implied by the "int" itself

@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>nice!</gloss>
-<gloss>score!</gloss>
-<gloss>bingo!</gloss>
+<gloss>nice</gloss>
+<gloss>score</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo</gloss>

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>genetics</gloss>
-<gloss>study of heredity</gloss>
+<gloss>(study of) genetics</gloss>

gg5, prog, sankoku

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

daijr

I think this is better.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>sound range</gloss>
-<gloss>singing range</gloss>
+<gloss>range (of a voice or instrument)</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>compass</gloss>

https://spring-js.com/expert/5777/
https://note.com/rick_japanese/n/nf056a849284f

Not just music, also used in linguistics.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>sound range</gloss>

Iwakoku's second sense: 俗に、音の高さ。「―が狂う」

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

In music, this is simply known as an interval.
I think we need a second sense for colloquial usage.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>(pitch) interval</gloss>
+<gloss>interval</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pitch</gloss>
+<gloss>key</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>pitch interval</gloss>
+<gloss>(pitch) interval</gloss>

daijr, meikyo, luminous, wisdom, jawiki

I think this is just one sense.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,5 +15,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>scientific technique</gloss>
+<gloss>technology</gloss>
+<gloss>scientific techniques</gloss>

G n-grams: 1761642

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/蒲焼
蒲焼を	24,037	
蒲焼きを	11,635

Indeed.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>蒲焼き</keb>
+<keb>蒲焼</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>蒲焼</keb>
+<keb>蒲焼き</keb>

it does not, the ngrams work by segmentation and there is no such thing as a partial match of a segment

蒲焼	339,779		
蒲焼き	192,323	-move up

339,779	- 192,323 = 147,456

actually I think 蒲焼 contains the hits from 蒲焼き too, in that case 蒲焼き is more common.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>蒲焼</keb>
+<keb>蒲焼き</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>蒲焼き</keb>
+<keb>蒲焼</keb>

かば焼き  49,931   8.4% -sK
蒲焼き　 192,323  32.3% 
蒲焼　　 339,779  57.0% -move up
かば焼　   3,111   0.5% -sK
かばやき  10,724   1.8%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>かば焼き</keb>
+<keb>蒲焼</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>蒲焼</keb>
+<keb>かば焼き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

使い物	370372	97.7%
使いもん	8037	2.1%
つかいもん	856	0.2%

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>使いもん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +28,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つかいもん</reb>

遣い物	        11,380		
遣い物にならない	35
--
使い物にも最適	926		
遣い物にも最適	211

Meiyko says "「遣い物」とも" for sense 2. The other kokugos have no sense restrictions.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>遣いもの</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<stagk>使い物</stagk>
@@ -23,2 +28,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1894370">使いものにならない</xref>
-<s_inf>usu. in the negative</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1894370">使い物にならない</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. with neg. sentence</s_inf>
@@ -29 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>遣い物</stagk>

使い物	370372	85.6%
使いもの	50809	11.7%
遣い物	11380	2.6% daij. not marking rK because of sense 2

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>使いもの</keb>
+<keb>遣い物</keb>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<keb>遣い物</keb>
+<keb>使いもの</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

oops

@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf46</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +17,2 @@
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf46</re_pri>

gg5, prog, daij

"one fourth" is 四分の一.

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>division into four pieces</gloss>
-<gloss>one fourth</gloss>
+<gloss>dividing into four</gloss>
+<gloss>quartering</gloss>

shinsen: 自他サ

Noun gloss

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>divide into four pieces</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>division into four pieces</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom, daij, meikyo

Added sense.
I don't think the x-ref is needed. That sense doesn't always appear in that form.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>to get rid of</gloss>
+<gloss>to take away</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>to eradicate</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1345630">除いて・のぞいて</xref>
@@ -24,0 +25,7 @@
+<gloss>to leave out</gloss>
+<gloss>to omit</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to kill (a traitor, opponent, etc.)</gloss>

Suggested by a regular correspondent. Seems reasonable.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1345630">除いて・のぞいて</xref>

daij

daij have one additional sense, 邪魔者などを殺す / じゃまな人などを殺す

GG5, etc.

Two quite clear senses.

@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>to eliminate</gloss>
+<gloss>to eradicate</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 上板　　 │ 52,368 │ 97.1% │
│ 上げ板　 │    864 │  1.6% │
│ 揚げ板　 │    331 │  0.6% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ 揚板　　 │    222 │  0.4% │ - sK
│ あげいた │    123 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Daijr: "上(げ)板・揚(げ)板", Ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上板</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>揚板</keb>

Progressive

Progressive has "彼の犬は人懐っこい His dog likes people". Using "man" to indicate "person" seems somewhat outdated English to me, at least in the context of a dictionary definition.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>(animals) taking kindly to men</gloss>
+<gloss>(animals) taking kindly to people</gloss>

G n-grams:
人懐っこい		109328
人なつっこい	 56880
ひとなつっこい	  6896
--
人懐こい  	 37926
人なつこい 	 22257
ひとなつこい	  2319

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人なつこい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<re_restr>人なつこい</re_restr>

gg5, wisdom, daij, meikyo
吹っ飛ばす	51,681	87.7%	
ふっ飛ぶ	        6,871	11.7%	
吹っとぶ	        378	0.6%

Added senses.

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ふっ飛ぶ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>吹っとぶ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to blow off</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +25,14 @@
+<gloss>to be blown away</gloss>
+<gloss>to go flying</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5b;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to disappear</gloss>
+<gloss>to vanish</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5b;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to rush</gloss>
+<gloss>to hurry</gloss>

gg5, daij

"communist hunting" feels a bit 直訳 to me.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>communist hunting</gloss>
+<gloss>communist witch-hunt</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>red scare</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 赤狩り　 │ 17,998 │ 84.9% │
│ アカ狩り │  1,379 │  6.5% │ - add, sK
│ 赤狩　　 │  1,235 │  5.8% │ - add, sK (daijr)
│ 赤ガリ　 │     53 │  0.3% │
│ 赤がり　 │     51 │  0.2% │
│ アカ狩　 │     49 │  0.2% │
│ あかがり │    435 │  2.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アカ狩り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>赤狩</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 絶頂する │ 777 │
│ 絶頂して │ 313 │
│ 絶頂した │ 180 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

not in my refs

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

gg5

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>acme</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Especially in manga, it seems.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/絶頂
used various times in the wiki article for オーガズム: 
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オーガズム
絶頂する	777
絶頂し	745
~3.8 million google hits for 絶頂する

Not in my kokugos but this sense definitely sees use.

@@ -27,0 +28,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>orgasm</gloss>
+<gloss>climax</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr/s sankoku, gg5, prog

Added sense.
とんがる is a [ck] (colloquial kana) candidate.

@@ -32,0 +33,11 @@
+<gloss>to be on edge</gloss>
+<gloss>to be nervous</gloss>
+<gloss>to be irritable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be touchy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be sharp (of a voice, words, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be harsh</gloss>
+<gloss>to be angry</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +46,7 @@
-<gloss>to be on edge</gloss>
-<gloss>to be touchy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be provocative</gloss>
+<gloss>to be radical</gloss>
+<gloss>to be rebellious</gloss>

I see we have a separate entry for the 〜った form, but the ratios are the same for the 〜って forms anyway.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 尖った　　 │ 152,633 │ 51.1% │
│ 尖がった　 │  13,948 │  4.7% │
│ 尖んがった │     310 │  0.1% │
│ とがった　 │  88,929 │ 29.8% │
│ とんがった │  43,099 │ 14.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

A bit too common to hide 尖がる.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

尖る　　 11,399  34.6% 
尖がる　  1,060   3.2% -sK
尖んがる     41   0.1% -sK
とがる　 17,617  53.4% 
とんがる  2,849   8.6%

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<re_restr>尖る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>尖がる</re_restr>

daijs daijr

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>leasehold land</gloss>
+<gloss>leased territory</gloss>
+<gloss>foreign concession</gloss>

Noting that 處 is actually the old form of 処, not 所.
So there are six two-kanji compounds here: 〈台／臺〉〈所／処／處〉

daijr

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>finances</gloss>

Rare kyūjitai.

台所	2180239	100.0%
臺處	0	0.0%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, ルミナス, etc.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 売り払っ　 │ 55,084 │ 97.6% │
│ 売払っ　　 │    699 │  1.2% │
│ 売りはらっ │    674 │  1.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>売りはらう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

"sell out of" is also misleading.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to sell out of</gloss>
+<gloss>to sell off</gloss>

物好き　 321,883  50.5% 
もの好き 309,551  48.6% 
物数奇　     331   0.1% -rK（デジタル大辞泉）
ものずき   5,496   0.9%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

--> noun glosses

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>whimsical</gloss>
+<gloss>fancifulness</gloss>
+<gloss>whimsy</gloss>

daij, 斎藤和英大辞典, ALC, 新和英中辞典, Luminous

@@ -26,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>whimsical</gloss>
+<gloss>(having) strange tastes</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>religious ecstasy</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +14,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>rapture</gloss>

乖離　 318,131  79.7% 
かい離  12,795   3.2% -sK
かいり  68,057  17.1%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

sankoku, shinkoku

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

All the kokugos have 蜻蛉 for かげろう.
Probably not ふゆう for 蜉蝣. Splitting it out.
I don't think "ephemeropteran" is needed.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蜻蛉</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +12 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふゆう</reb>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>ephemeropteran</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>ephemerality (of human life)</gloss>
+<gloss>ephemerality (of life)</gloss>
@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<stagr>かげろう</stagr>
@@ -31 +30 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1585910">蜻蛉・とんぼ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1585910">トンボ</xref>
@@ -35 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>damselfly</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5: かげろうの命　an ephemeral existence [life].

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<stagr>ふゆう</stagr>

G n-grams:
蜉蝣	25273
蜻蛉	113308
かげろう	85633
ふゆう	33429
カゲロウ	47531

I can't find any evidence that 蜻蛉 is read かげろう. It usually has the (gikun) reading とんぼ.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>蜻蛉</keb>
@@ -15 +12,4 @@
-<re_restr>蜉蝣</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カゲロウ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1585910">蜻蛉・とんぼ</xref>
@@ -30,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
@@ -9,3 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>

生垣　　 105,251  66.1% 
生け垣　  52,356  32.9% 
生け籬　       0   0.0% -rK（デジタル大辞泉）
いけがき   1,737   1.1%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij
G n-grams:
生け垣	52356
生垣	105251
生け籬	No matches

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>生垣</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<keb>生垣</keb>
+<keb>生け籬</keb>
@@ -21 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

The latest edition of shinmeikai describes ぐわい as a 口頭語的表現. The [ok] tag might not be appropriate.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 具合　 │ 6,139,304 │ 98.1% │
│ 工合　 │    35,817 │  0.6% │ - rK
│ 具合い │    51,949 │  0.8% │ - sK
│ 工合い │       276 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ ぐあい │    18,942 │  0.3% │
│ ぐわい │    13,271 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +23,0 @@
-<re_restr>具合</re_restr>
-<re_restr>工合</re_restr>
@@ -29 +29,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

具合	6139304
工合	35817
具合い	51949
工合い	276

We could split, but I think the "ok" on ぐわい is really sufficient.
The n-gram count for 具合い is surprisingly high. I suspect many people are just using it for what should be 具合.

none of my kokugo dictionaries has ぐあい=具合い.

we could also split this into two entries: ぐあい with 具合い/工合い as [io] and ぐわい as an [arch] entry with all four headwords

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>工合</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<keb>工合</keb>
+<keb>工合い</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21,2 @@
+<re_restr>具合</re_restr>
+<re_restr>工合</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +26,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぐわい</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

91 sentences, mostly for sense 2.

It would be messy. ザクザク has 3 other senses.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1005370">ザクザク・1</xref>

Shouldn't this be merged with ザクザク?

Quiet

ザックザック	17508	23.0%
ざっくざっく	5580	7.3%
ザックザク	36773	48.3%
ざっくざく	16203	21.3%

Just ate some potato crisps labelled ザックザクの.. Perhaps it only applies to the first sense.

@@ -3,0 +4,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ザックザク</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ザックザック</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ざっくざく</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijs

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 掻い摘んで　 │ 13,116 │ 15.4% │
│ かい摘んで　 │    722 │  0.8% │ add sK
│ かい摘まんで │    432 │  0.5% │ add sK
│ 掻い摘まんで │    122 │  0.1% │ add sK (meikyo)
│ 掻いつまんで │     50 │  0.1% │ add
│ 掻摘んで　　 │     37 │  0.0% │ add (weblio, koj)
│ 搔い摘んで　 │     30 │  0.0% │ add rK, not oK (sankoku, koj, etc.)
│ 搔い摘まんで │      0 │  0.0% │ add sK
│ かいつまんで │ 70,484 │ 82.9% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>搔い摘む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>搔い摘まむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +21 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +25 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,2 +28,2 @@
-<keb>搔い摘む</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>掻いつまむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,3 +32,2 @@
-<keb>搔い摘まむ</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>掻摘む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Yes.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

should かい摘まむ have io too?

I think the "io" tags should be kept.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>A-grade product</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１級品</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

NHK accent has 言づかる

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────╮
│ 言づかった │ 20 │
│ 言づかって │ 29 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────╯

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>言づかる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

See my comment in this entry from 2024-01-04.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>託る</keb>
+<keb>託かる</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>託かる</keb>
+<keb>託る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

OK

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 言付かっ　 │ 1,606 │ 40.0% │
│ 託っ　　　 │ 1,438 │ 35.8% │ probably at least some false positives with 託つ 
│ 託かっ　　 │    62 │  1.5% │
│ ことづかっ │   907 │ 22.6% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ から言付かっ　 │ 391 │ 56.2% │
│ から託っ　　　 │  90 │ 12.9% │
│ から託かっ　　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ からことづかっ │ 215 │ 30.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

託る is also in gakkens kokugo and obunsha, i dont think its irregular and seems more popular than 託かる

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>託かる</keb>
+<keb>託る</keb>
@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<keb>託る</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>託かる</keb>

Oops, for some reason I thought that 託る was the form in the kokugos and only GG5 had 託かる.
Yes, 託かる should be visible. [io] for 託る is fine.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>no use</gloss>
+<gloss>of no use</gloss>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>not fit for its purpose</gloss>
+<gloss>not fit for purpose</gloss>

使いものにならない	21615	13.6%
使い物にならない　	137837	86.4%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>使いものにならない</keb>
+<keb>使い物にならない</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>使い物にならない</keb>
+<keb>使いものにならない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

hits

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>使いものにならない</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>not fit for its purpose</gloss>

焼ごて　    279

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼ごて</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 焼きごて │ 6,813 │ 60.8% │
│ 焼きゴテ │ 2,668 │ 23.8% │
│ 焼き鏝　 │ 1,547 │ 13.8% │
│ 焼鏝　　 │   180 │  1.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きゴテ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>established (existing) policy (procedure(s))</gloss>
+<gloss>established policy</gloss>
+<gloss>existing procedures</gloss>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オオコノハズク
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_scops_owl
>> The Japanese scops-owl (Otus semitorques) is a small owl species in the family Strigidae, or true owl family.
>> The Japanese scops-owl is closely related to the Indian scops-owl (Otus bakkamoena) and was once thought to be the same species.[citation needed]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 大木葉木菟　　 │     0 │
│ 大木葉木兎　　 │     0 │
│ 大木葉ズク　　 │     0 │
│ 大木葉ずく　　 │     0 │
│ オオコノハズク │ 2,373 │
│ おおこのはずく │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

Seems the nomenclature has changed.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<reb>おおこのはずく</reb>
+<reb>オオコノハズク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11,2 +12 @@
-<reb>オオコノハズク</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>おおこのはずく</reb>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>collared scops owl (Otus bakkamoena)</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese scops-owl (Otus semitorques)</gloss>

Entry created

I can't be bothered arguing.

くかだち doesn't make sense as a search form.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

Daijisen: 《「くがたち」「くかだち」とも》

I'd hide it.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 探湯　　 │ 1.540 │ 40.3% │
│ 盟神探湯 │ 1.033 │ 27.0% │
│ 誓湯　　 │    51 │  1.3% │[rK]
│ くかたち │   648 │ 16.9% │
│ くがたち │   528 │ 13.8% │
│ くかだち │    26 │  0.7% │Afaics this is only mentioned in daijs, I think [rk] is appropriate here if it's going to be kept
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>誓湯</keb>
+<keb>盟神探湯</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>盟神探湯</keb>
+<keb>誓湯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

No reason to hide those readings. They're in the major refs.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>time sharing system</gloss>
-<gloss>TSS</gloss>
+<gloss>time-sharing system</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タイムシェアリング・システム</reb>

Entry created

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/時分割

Splitting into senses.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2306860">タイムシェアリング</xref>
@@ -15 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>time-division (e.g. multiplexing)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&telec;</field>
+<gloss>time division (multiplexing, multiple access, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>time-division</gloss>
+<gloss>time-division (e.g. multiplexing)</gloss>

eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>time-division</gloss>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/タイムシェアリングシステム

Daijr redirects to タイムシェアリングシステム.
The "TSS" acronym doesn't appear to be common.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2306870">タイムシェアリングシステム</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>Time Sharing System</gloss>
+<gloss>time-sharing system</gloss>

Entry created

G n-grams: 58

We have an entry for 時分割多重.

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_access_method

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>multiple access methods (FDMA, TDMA, CDMA)</gloss>
+<field>&telec;</field>
+<gloss>multiple access method</gloss>
+<gloss>channel access method</gloss>

Entry created

符号分割多元接続方式	606		
符号分割多元接続	        1,694    - in jmdict

Just 符号分割多元接続 + 方式.

Entry created

OK. I reindexed the sentences linked to this.

I don't think this is needed now that the 同時に entry has been expanded.

I'm reasonably comfortable with this one. Very common, and useful for learners.

not in gg5, koj, daij, (etc.) as a proper headword

see comment on jmdict 2644290.  surely the entry for 同時 will suffice?

Makino and Tsutsui, Intermediate, p. 471

init/promote

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<gloss>haemochromatosis</gloss>

yahoo enc, gg5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 血色素症　　　　　 │   116 │
│ ヘモクロマトーシス │ 1,692 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

yahoo enc, eij

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ てへへ │  17,186 │  6.8% │ add sk
│ てへ　 │ 118,913 │ 47.2% │
│ テヘヘ │  11,202 │  4.4% │ add sk
│ テヘ　 │  51,035 │ 20.3% │
│ てへっ │  29,993 │ 11.9% │ add (sankoku, pixiv)
│ テヘッ │  23,537 │  9.3% │ add
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>てへへ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11 +8 @@
-<reb>テヘヘ</reb>
+<reb>テヘ</reb>
@@ -14 +11,13 @@
-<reb>テヘ</reb>
+<reb>てへっ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テヘッ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>てへへ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テヘヘ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

A very fine point. I don't think a tag is that necessary.

"i don't think an [int] can be [on-mim].  it's the sound itself, not a word representing such a sound"
I think てへへ IS originally a written representative of a sound of laughter that doesn't actually sound exactly like てへへ. Either 
way, isn't it at minimum "mimetic" of a sound?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>ehehe</gloss>
+<gloss>ehehe (embarrassed laugh)</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">embarrassed laugh</gloss>

後を継ぐ　	29191	59.2%
跡を継ぐ　	15098	30.6%　daijs nikk
あとをつぐ	471	1.0%
あとを継ぐ	3719	7.5%
後をつぐ	456	0.9%
跡をつぐ	342	0.7%

might be　that 後を継ぐ is considered incorrect

@@ -5,0 +6,15 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>跡を継ぐ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あとを継ぐ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>後をつぐ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>跡をつぐ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Eij, GG5 examples.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>to pick up the torch</gloss>

Weblio英語表現辞典, eij
prog: "後を継ぐ （人の）take  over from..., succeed;（職務・地位
を）take...over, succeed to...."
eプログレッシブ英和中辞典:  "re・place 1 …に取って代わる，入れ替わる，…の
後を継ぐ..."
新グローバル英和辞典: "come after.. （1）..の後[次]に来る, ..に続く, 
..の後を継ぐ ..."

I've reindexed the sentences.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1362390">新聞紙・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1362390">新聞紙・2</xref>

塗工紙 アート紙　コート紙　マット紙　印刷紙　光沢紙　普通紙　加工紙　 パラフィン紙 印画紙
are all entries but these are not


防湿紙	456
防水紙	6738
糸入り紙	21
ターポリン紙	201
アスファルト紙	34
ネオポリン紙	0
クロス紙	390
ネオポリン紙	0
万能ムシロ紙	0
ポリサンド紙	0
クロスサンド紙	0
ポリラミネート紙	26
防錆紙	990

(mostly from here:
https://www.kaibara-kakosi.co.jp/products/coated-paper/ )

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>paper</gloss>

Keeping open to remind me to fix the sentence indices.

The counter isn't an abbreviation.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +15,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>counter for newspapers</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2841121">中東呼吸器症候群</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>

デジタル大辞泉

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826896">年を食う・としをくう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2826896">年を食う</xref>

Aligning

@@ -34,2 +34 @@
-<s_inf>oft. used when someone is older than expected</s_inf>
-<gloss>to grow older</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (than expected)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 年食っ　 │ 25,002 │ 35.0% │
│ 年くっ　 │ 15,031 │ 21.0% │ add (maybe false positives?)
│ 歳食っ　 │ 12,753 │ 17.9% │
│ 歳くっ　 │ 12,708 │ 17.8% │ add
│ 年喰っ　 │  3,025 │  4.2% │ add sK
│ 歳喰っ　 │  2,275 │  3.2% │ add sK
│ としくっ │    559 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

aligning with 年を食う

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>年くう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +20,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歳くう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +34,2 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<s_inf>oft. used when someone is older than expected</s_inf>
@@ -26 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>to be very aged</gloss>

I'm quite relaxed about including dropped-を constructions - anything (within reason) to help people, and there's always the text-glossing activities. Yes, I think we'd class it as an expression.

It's not a note on usage but meaning. We don't use notes for that.

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<s_inf>oft. used when someone is older than expected</s_inf>
-<gloss>to grow older</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (than expected)</gloss>

daijr, meikyo

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 年を食っ　 │ 6,387 │ 36.8% │
│ 歳を食っ　 │ 3,580 │ 20.6% │
│ 年をくっ　 │ 3,151 │ 18.2% │ add
│ 歳をくっ　 │ 2,630 │ 15.2% │ add
│ 歳を喰っ　 │   795 │  4.6% │ add sK
│ 年を喰っ　 │   755 │  4.4% │ add sk
│ としをくっ │    52 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

added [id]
added [sK] to 喰 entries as i'm not a fan of keeping them visible, i don't think they're very useful but you can obviously revert it
the point is "older than one would have expected", i think a note would be better here (i phrased it awkwardly, this is not my thing)
i don't think "to be very aged" is correct, only koj has it

@@ -10,0 +11,8 @@
+<keb>年をくう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歳をくう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +32,3 @@
-<gloss>to grow older (esp. older than other people in the same group or situation)</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<s_inf>oft. used when someone is older than expected</s_inf>
+<gloss>to grow older</gloss>
@@ -24 +35,0 @@
-<gloss>to be very aged</gloss>

OK, passing for now.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1585910">蜻蛉</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1585910">トンボ</xref>

daij

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Middle East Respiratory Syndrome</gloss>
+<gloss>Middle East respiratory syndrome</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

知恵蔵mini, デジタル大辞泉 https://kotobank.jp/word/中東呼吸器症候群-192163

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>arrival in Brazil</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>arrival in Brazil</gloss>

来伯	7736

I think that count is enough to justify the entry.

You don't normally see 来 with foreign locations because Japanese people would usually be *going* to those places, not "coming" (来る). You'd say 訪米, 渡米, etc.
But I'm interested to see the n-gram counts as well.

I'd like to sit on this until the ngrams are back.
We do have entries like 来京; although it's probably a kanwa matter, I wonder about adding a 
"coming to; arriving in" sense to our 来/らい entry.

アシンメトリック	822	48.5%
アシメトリック	873	51.5%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アシメトリック</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijs
アシンメトリック	822

https://www.fashion-press.net/news/79925
ミニマムなワンピースはアシンメトリックなシルエットを基調として...

OK, let's drop it.

even ignoring the entry's rarity, [rK] is only be used if the form contains kanji not present in any of the common forms

the カ変 conjugation is irregular and is only used by 2 verbs - 来る/くる (modern japanese) and 来/く (classical japanese)
[vk] seems to be exclusively used for the modern 来る

"まうでく" is the old kana orthography which we generally don't include in jmdict. The [ok] tag is for a different purpose.

The [vk] tag doesn't exactly fit. According to the 古語辞典 on weblio, this word inflects like｛こ／き／く／くる／くれ／こ（こよ）｝ which is similar to a normal カ変 verb but not quite. The plain form is く rather than くる, and the imperative is こ rather than こい. I'm not sure what verb tag we would use.

All senses of this word are archaic. Unfortunately these sorts of entries don't make great starting points for new contributors. Setting aside whether or not this word should be in jmdict at all, I don't think this submission is currently up to standards. I'm not exceptionally interested in classical Japanese, so I'd rather just drop it.

Is hist correct for sense 1...?
We don't use [ok] in arch entries. We don't use [rK][rk] in entries that are rare (whether they are tagged as that or not)

I don't think the note is needed. One xref is enough.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>sound change of older 'maideku'</s_inf>
@@ -33 +31,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2862609">参出来</xref>
@@ -36 +33,0 @@
-<s_inf>sound change of older 'maideku'</s_inf>

Reverso

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>differentiating</gloss>

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/274978
https://community.hubspot.com/t5/自社のヒント-ナレッジ共有/訪問者によってWebサイトのコンテンツを出し分ける-クイック解説-5/m-p/886907

出し分け	1496	66.6%
出しわけ	81	3.6%

Possibly not.

is the note needed given that it's prefix, says "action" and there's an example?

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijr: 動詞に付いて，激しい勢いでその動作をする意を表す。「―とぶ」「―かける」「―とばす」
吹っ飛ばす	51,681		
ふっ飛ばす	4,797		
吹っ飛ぶ	        139,265		
ふっ飛ぶ	        6,871		
吹っ切れる	12,447		
ふっ切れる	813

I'd go with this.
Not uk.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1011020">吹っ切れる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2432230">吹っ飛ばす・1</xref>
@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>adds emphasis to a verb</gloss>
+<s_inf>before a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates that the action is done forcefully</gloss>

i copied from 打っ/2698210 for consistency

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ファイバーグラス　 │ 12,301 │ 96.5% │
│ ファイバーガラス　 │    267 │  2.1% │ - from 1107670
│ ファイバー・グラス │    174 │  1.4% │
│ ファイバー・ガラス │      0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ファイバーガラス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

EntL1107670?

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
ファイバーグラス	12,301		
ファイバー・グラス	174

I have proposed ほむべき as an entry.

saito: ほむべき〔誉むべき〕〈形〉Worthy of praise; deserving of praise; praiseworthy; commendable; laudable

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ほむべき │ 2,938 │ 86.8% │
│ 誉むべき │   277 │  8.2% │
│ 褒むべき │   169 │  5.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -18,3 +19 @@
-<gloss>to compliment</gloss>
-<gloss>to speak well of</gloss>
-<gloss>to speak highly of</gloss>
+<gloss>to laud</gloss>

daijt/GG5
daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
誉む	70	11.1%
褒む	37	5.9%
ほむる	378	59.8%　
ほむれ	147	23.3%

I looked for non duplicated conjugated versions instead of just ほむ, because there are other words spelled ほむ. Is that right to do so?

Stumbled across this word in the book I'm reading, thought it might be worth an entry?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>bricking (of a smartphone, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>bricking (e.g. of a smartphone)</gloss>

I've seen this word a lot. I think it's more col than sl.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14,2 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>bricking</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>bricking (of a smartphone, etc.)</gloss>

Daijisen: "俗に".
文鎮化	158

Maybe more common now.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

daijs, wiki

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/科技
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/テクノロジー
>> テクノロジー（英語: technology）または科学技術、科技、技術学とは
G n-grams: 68,122

Split from 1585900.
smk tags this as〔古〕.

gg5, daij, koj, RP
込め物	262		
込物	607		
込めもの	68

OK. We have quite a few 性的XX entries.

i think it got more common in recent years, 性的ＤＶ and 性的強要 have a lot of hits on google

A+B and not very common. Needed?

性的強要	366
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/3678a8baeefbd1a5b63c61b66eb8f220dee454ec
女性への性的強要はなかったと主張している松本側ですが、

GG5

meikyo 三省堂国語辞典　第八版
カネ払い	468	2.8%
金払い	16355	97.2%

[biol[] is general enough.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&biol;</field>

eij "biological invader"

https://www.nies.go.jp/biodiversity/invasive/
侵入生物データベース


侵入生物	1197

should it be tagged bot and zool? or bio? or fine as-is?