@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>ギブアンドテーク</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ギブアンドテーク</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

We usually place all nakaguro versions after the non-nakaguro versions.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ギブ・アンド・テイク</reb>
+<reb>ギブアンドテーク</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ギブアンドテーク</reb>
+<reb>ギブ・アンド・テイク</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| ギブアンドテーク　　 |    592 |  2.3% |
| ギブアンドテイク　　 | 19,496 | 75.0% |
| ギブ・アンド・テーク |    909 |  3.5% |
| ギブ・アンド・テイク |  4,987 | 19.2% |

Reordering

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ギブアンドテイク</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ギブ・アンド・テイク</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,3 +13,0 @@
-<reb>ギブアンドテイク</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ギブ・アンド・テイク</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ギブ・アンド・テイク</reb>
+</r_ele>

I don't think it's a noun. The dictionaries don't have a バルト entry, only バルト海, バルト三国, etc.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -9 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>rushes</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ラッシュ・プリント</reb>

daijs:（俗語）相手に関心や興味を持たなくなる。相手から気持ちが離れる。「これを口にすると女性が—・く」

Daijs and sankoku have this sense.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1982820">惹く・ひく</xref>
@@ -29,0 +29 @@
+<s_inf>also written as 惹く</s_inf>
@@ -60 +60 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1419370">弾く・ひく</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. written as 弾く</s_inf>
@@ -149,0 +150,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>to be put off (by someone's words or behaviour)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be turned off</gloss>
+<gloss>to recoil (in disgust, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cringe</gloss>
+</sense>

Fron the edict-jmdict email list:
---
Would it be appropriate to ask if we could add a new sense for 引く: "to be put off (by someone or something)"?

Per https://takashionary.com/hiku/ which links this usage to some senses in Jmdict (3 and 7: "to draw back"). Also seen in (don't judge me) page 6 of this manga, available for free preview: https://bookwalker.jp/deefb1c8c3-4abc-45d3-abdc-8ef72457b01b/
---

I think this is preferable to x-refs.

@@ -126 +126 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1595086">退く・ひく・1</xref>
+<s_inf>also written as 退く</s_inf>
@@ -136 +136 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1595086">退く・ひく・2</xref>
+<s_inf>also written as 退く</s_inf>
@@ -145 +145 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1595086">退く・ひく・3</xref>
+<s_inf>also written as 退く</s_inf>

daijs: https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/何も_(なんも)/

なんもない	66091
なんもしてない	15928	  
なんもなかっ	10969

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんも</reb>

gg5, daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>nothing (with neg. verbs)</gloss>
-<gloss>not any</gloss>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>(not) anything</gloss>
+<gloss>(nothing) at all</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) any</gloss>
+<gloss>nothing</gloss>
@@ -22,3 +24,11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>and everything else (with noun plus "mo")</gloss>
-<gloss>all</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...も何も</s_inf>
+<gloss>and everything else</gloss>
+<gloss>and all</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...なくてもいい, ...ことはない, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>(not) at all</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) in the least</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) especially</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) to that extent</gloss>

4 of the 5 sentences are for the new sense 2.

daijs splits "corrosion (of a metal)" and rot, decay

@@ -23,0 +24,9 @@
+<gloss>rot</gloss>
+<gloss>decay</gloss>
+<gloss>erosion</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,3 +34,0 @@
-<gloss>erosion</gloss>
-<gloss>rot</gloss>
-<gloss>decay</gloss>

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<stagk>腐食</stagk>

Ah, I didn't notice it was a separate entry.

@@ -29,0 +30,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2452820">腐生</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>saprophagy</gloss>

Daijirin 3e and Koj 6e both have entries for 腐食 (separate from their 名・スル entries for 【腐食・腐蝕】) which redirect to 腐生.

I've only skimmed the discussion but personally I still think "wanting" is better and more helpful than the original "wanted". As Jim and Alan seem content with this version as well, I think it's time to let this rest.

Apologies but I must insist that, for the reasons previously listed, it is the worst set out of the three.
I have thus far tried, without apparent success, to focus on the alternative glosses' merits. 
However, I think this point can also be made by trying to find the current gloss' merits instead.

For example, I once again bring up this: Assume all three candidates(wanting, want, wanted ) are all equally valid in regards to semantics and syntax and then try to translate a few sentences with ほしい using each of them - I think you will agree that the translations with the current gloss sound significantly more awkward than either of the rest.
This prompts the question: if they are all equally meritorious but 'wanting' has the singular demerit of being the most unnatural, what is it that makes it the most suitable choice over the others, which harbour no such fault?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

Non, you have recently submitted some very good and thoughtful suggestions to several entries, and I hope that you will continue to contribute to jmdict. If our editors do not wish to spend more time considering this entry, then that's the end of the discussion. Please bear in mind that we're all volunteers, that engaging in arguments can be very taxing on the time and energy of others, and that the happiness of our long-time contributors is more important than any particular entry.

Once more, apologies, I am fully aware that this must be a nuisance but I cannot agree with the decision to close this as none of the points I made were rebuked nor the question I raised answered.
As it stands, the decision to reject 2308129 seems to be one without any objective backing as the translation criteria I have brought up now and previously against the current glosses is the same one that the very editor who closed it has just used as support for minor alterations to the proposed での entry.

So, I again ask: translate any sentence with 'want', then do the same with 'wanting'; disregard 'wanted' altogether if you wish to.
食べ物が欲しい = I want food
食べ物が欲しい = I (am) wanting food?
I think that which is the most natural translation is evident. But if so, what is it that makes the latter a better choice over the former?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/モジュラリティ

Probably OK to just hide it

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

モジュラリティー	187

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>モジュラリティー</reb>

モジュラリティ	608	100.0%
モジュラリテイ	0	0.0%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>Ｊストローク</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Entry created

Internet InterORB Protocol
Internet InterORB Protocol
0 n-grams.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

Old service from Internet Initiative Japan> no longer relevant.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

Seems to be just "ISAPI" in Japanese.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

0 n-grams. The few WWW hits are from here.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISODE

Quite old and never used now.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

Already at 2435500.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

daijs; 日経パソコン用語事典

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ｉＣＯＭＰ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Intel comparative microprocessor performance</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

0 n-grams.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

I assume you meant to delete it.

0 n-grams.

In JMnedict as 国際電気通信連合電気通信標準化セクタ.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

daijs

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＤＬ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイ・ディー・エル</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -8,0 +16,6 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2862125">国際日付変更線</xref>
+<gloss>international date line</gloss>
+<gloss>IDL</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -9,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>interface definition language</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

daijs; KOD (redirect to データ･センター)

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＤＣ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイ・ディー・シー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -9,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>Internet data center</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&internet;</field>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Message_Access_Protocol
RP, 英和コンピューター用語辞典

Many/most email systems use it.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＭＡＰ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>Internet Message Access Protocol</gloss>

Entry created

Old SGI version of Unix. Long gone.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

daijs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1394

Sony's version of Firewire.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ｉ．ＬＩＮＫ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>i.LINK</gloss>
+<field>&tradem;</field>
+<gloss>i.LINK (IEEE 1394 connection type)</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Performance_File_System

Ancient file system.

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

Stopped releases in 2008.

2 googits for "Ｊイニシエータ"

Entry created

From the Japan Electronic Industries Development Association. Now long forgotten.

Entry created

0 n-grams. Virtually all hits from here.

Probably should have been ジェイディービーシー - it gets no hits either.

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Development_Kit

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＪＤＫ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジェイ・ディー・ケー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -9,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>Java Development Kit</gloss>

Entry created

ｉモード/アイモード is in the names dictionary, and is copied into JMdict for release. 
This entry can be dropped.

iモード（アイモード、i-mode）は、NTTドコモ（以下、ドコモ）の対応携帯電話（フィーチャーフォン）にてキャリアメール（iモードメール）の送受信やウェブページ閲覧などができる世界初の携帯電話IP接続サービスである。新規受付を2019年9月30日で終了  ... (wiki)

We don't have an entry for iモード, which is in daijs.

アイモードサービス	No matches

Entry created

Not just computing.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<field>&electr;</field>
+<gloss>I/O</gloss>
@@ -22 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>I/O</gloss>

daijr/s, etc.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>Ｉ／Ｏ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>I/O</gloss>

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>アイ・オー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

I think that's better. Not in my particles book.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Daijs says 連語. exp?

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>expresses incredulousness, disbelief, irony etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>expresses incredulousness, disbelief, irony, etc.</gloss>

Oops, meant this one

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<dial>&kyu;</dial>

kyoto is in kansai

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>
@@ -10,2 +11,1 @@
-<dial>&kyb;</dial>
-<gloss>(at sentence end) expresses incredulousness, disbelief, irony etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>expresses incredulousness, disbelief, irony etc.</gloss>

saw it as ２人して

also other entries that contain 二人 have ２人 as a form

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２人して</keb>

GG5: 二人して意地を張り合ってたらどうしようもないじゃないか " You won't get anywhere if both of you「refuse to budge ［stick to your guns］ like that．

I think it's worth recording.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>both (of you, them, etc.)</gloss>

一人して	2047
二人して	191740
三人して	2118
四人して	263
みんなして	72763

in several example sentences in daij/nikk. Nikk's 板チョコ for example:"（1925）〈細田源吉〉三「二人して板チョコを
買っちまったんだって」" or 恋物語: "塔影（1905）〈河井酔茗〉恋物語「恋物語、二人して読む」"

Worth having? As して is an unusual particle (and our して entry is frankly not very helpful). And of course this 
stands out quite a bit, being nearly 100 times as common as 一人して or 三人して.

理屈抜き	67,811
理屈ぬき	18,145

Also in daijs and koj.
"not related to logic" sounds a bit awkward to me.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>理屈ぬき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +18 @@
-<gloss>not related to logic</gloss>
+<gloss>without logic</gloss>

Yes, noun alone wasn't working.

理屈抜き	67811	  
理屈抜きに	29773	  
理屈抜きで	28819	  
理屈抜きの	6113	  
理屈抜きに面白い	1977	  
理屈抜きに楽しめる	1882	  
理屈抜きで楽しめる	1500	  
理屈抜きに楽しい	1343	  
理屈抜きに面白いの	812	  
理屈抜きで楽しい	811	  
理屈抜きで嬉しい	808

Most of our -抜き entries are [n] (some, like, サビ抜き are adj-no,n)

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>coolcation (vacationing in a region with a cool climate)</gloss>
+<gloss>coolcation (vacation in a region with a cool climate)</gloss>

https://www.newsnationnow.com/travel/coolcations/

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<gloss>coolcation</gloss>
-<gloss>vacationing in a region with a cool climate</gloss>
+<gloss>coolcation (vacationing in a region with a cool climate)</gloss>

eij

https://www.nikkei.com/nkd/industry/article/?DisplayType=1&n_m_code=141&ng=DGXZQOCB266J90W4A620C2000000
旅行業界で「クールケーション」と呼ばれる新たなトレンドが広がっています。

https://www.vogue.co.jp/article/coolcationing-vol3
この夏、心地よい風と静かな森、湖を求めて北海道を目指す。【今年の夏はクールケーションvol.3】

I too feel it's more of a grammar point than the usual form of expression we'd include, however I still think it's useful as an entry. That's why I approved it initially. I think it can stay.

I disagree, I do not see how 助詞＋の would be any more obvious to a beginner than any 助詞＋は combination - in fact, I would say it is less because where as では is often introduced earlｙ with ではない, での, からの and ての are not. 
If the dictionary hopes to be useful, it will need to cross over grammar and morphology at times, the grammars of english and Japanese are just too wildly different for many expressions to be taught in isolation - and yet, that is not the case here, all we have is a translation, we are not mentioning grammar nor morphology within the entry.

And again, we have many entries analogous to this situation in the [exp] tag：そう言えば・1982210、くじを選ぶ・2406890、その人・ 2832864、その事・2665570、ごく普通・2861349、ずっと前に・2038440、す可き・1006200、are all the sum of the parts, not in any kokugo I own, and are still included within the corpus. And those are just a few I gathered from the く up to そ pages.

では, をば and からに are in the kokugos and have non-obvious meanings whereas での is just the sum of its parts. I don't think many beginners would have difficulty parsing it in context.
To me this feels more like a grammar point than an expression that belongs in a dictionary.

I think it's useful for beginners, per Non. I don't it's reasonable to just show a beginner our entries for で and の and expect them to figure out what での means/how it's used. Maybe we should have entries for からの, までの, からへ and への as well.

”五人でのお茶会”　= Quantificational delimitative
”3時間での小旅行” = Temporal quantificational delimitative
”器具でのご使用” = Instrumental


Note: none of these sentence fragments are my own, they were pulled from various different google results of "での"

We do have entries for combinations of particles, では, をば, からに, etc. are just that. What is true is that we do not have 格助詞+の constructions, but we do have multiple entries which are just inflected terms made from identifiable morphemes that are analogous to this situation.
Personally, I think this entry might have some value for an unexperienced person who runs the risk of thinking it is a single morpheme and going off on a wild goose chase for some obscure particle called "での".
Consider, for example, that students are often taught that の attaches to nouns with no mention of the possibility of these particle compounds.

Now, I realised that this entry was incomplete as で's delimitative and instrumental uses can also be used attributively. I added [2] to cover the instrumental uses and [3] to cover the delimitatives but I am not sure how clear the first gloss of [3] is.
Maybe we could drop [3] by saying that something like「五人でのお茶会」is an extension of [2]: "Tea meeting by 5 people" = "Tea-party of 5 people" but it seems a bit of a stretch for something like "30分での判定".
Alternatively, all glosses could be replaced with an explanation of the etymology and cross references, that should be enough for the reader to assemble the meaning by themselves while avoiding any confusion.

@@ -10,0 +11,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>(that is done) with</gloss>
+<gloss>(that is done) by</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>(that is) of (a quantity, number)</gloss>
+<gloss>(that) spans (a certain time)</gloss>

性格がいい	17221

Glosses would need some work, not that common, A+B, no refs or rationale provided.

??

I don't think that adds anything.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>alrighty then</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>alrighty then</gloss>

Use ASCII single quote character(')

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>now, let’s see</gloss>
+<gloss>now, let's see</gloss>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>well then...</gloss>
+<gloss>well then ...</gloss>

My mistake. We currently have 22 entries that use the "-" character (ＣＤ-ＲＯＭ, ＣＯＶＩＤ-１９, Ｋ-ＰＯＰ, etc.).

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>谷山－志村予想</keb>
+<keb>谷山-志村予想</keb>

Should probably have an entry for モジュラリティ定理 too.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/谷山–志村予想
>> 今日ではモジュラー性定理またはモジュラリティ定理（modularity theorem）と呼ばれ[1]、…

Using a fullwidth hyphen in the kanji field. AFAIK we don't use half-width characters.
Since this entry refers to the conjecture, I think we need to gloss it the other way around.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>谷山–志村予想</keb>
+<keb>谷山－志村予想</keb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>modularity theorem (formerly the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture)</gloss>
+<gloss>Taniyama-Shimura conjecture (former name of the modularity theorem)</gloss>

谷山志村予想	34 <- more WWW hits for this form

The "conjecture" was proved; thus becoming a theorem.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>谷山志村予想</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>Taniyama-Shimura conjecture</gloss>
-<gloss>modularity theorem</gloss>
+<gloss>modularity theorem (formerly the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture)</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>たにやましむらよそ</reb>
+<reb>たにやましむらよそう</reb>

I suggest you check the n-grams for these kokugo-only terms. They are often never or rarely used in modern Japanese.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 国語大辞典; 広辞苑 第六版

daijisen: サミズダート〖ロシアsamizdat〗ソ連時代の地下出版物。また、その出版所。

https://kotobank.jp/word/プラウダ出版所-1407335
>> プラウダ出版所（読み）ぷらうだしゅっぱんじょ

https://kotobank.jp/word/自由ロシア出版所-1336614
>> 自由ロシア出版所（読み）じゆうろしあしゅっぱんじょ

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/外国語出版所
>> 外国語出版所（がいこくごしゅっぱんしょ、ロシア語: Издательство иностранной литературы＝外国語文献出版所、英語: Foreign Languages Publishing House）

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミール出版所
>> ミ―ル出版所（ミールしゅっぱんしょ、ロシア語: Издательство «Мир»、英語: Mir Publishers）

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────╮
│ 出版所 │      1,799 │
│ 出版社 │ 17,374,505 │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────╯

The encyclopedia on kotobank prefers the -じょ reading, but wikipedia uses -しょ. I guess either is fine.
All the web hits are about state-run publishers from the Soviet Union. I assume this word was used as an alternative to 出版社 to avoid the "private company" meaning of the 社 kanji.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>publishing house</gloss>
+<gloss>publishing house (esp. state-run)</gloss>

研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -3 +2,0 @@
-<ent_seq>5063600</ent_seq>

バルチック	31,030	95.4%	
バルティック	1,496	4.6%

Not a place.

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バルティック</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Daijirin: シロアリを防ぐこと。

Most WWW pages about it mention シロアリ.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>termite control</gloss>

防蟻	35401

防アリ	250

saw in product name on monotaro

daijs
腐朽菌	13879	80.1%
木材腐朽菌	3447	19.9%

daijs, wiki

https://game365.click/onlinegame/slg-simulation-game→-a-comprehensive-guide/
SLGとはシミュレーションゲームの略称で、

https://kotowaka.com/game/slg/
SLGとは、「シミュレーションゲーム」という意味です。

https://chico-shikaku.com/2023/06/slg-meaning-in-game/
結論から言うとゲームにおける「SLG」とは「シミュレーションゲーム」のことです。

daijs
腐朽菌   	13879	80.1%
木材腐朽菌	3447	19.9%

GG5, 中辞典, etc.

prog

国際日付変更線 530

gg5, daij, koj

gg5, prog, wisdom

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5699999</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,3 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Rikujōkyōgijou</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>athletic field</gloss>
+<gloss>athletics stadium</gloss>

Jou/jou fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Rikujoukyōgijou</gloss>
+<gloss>Rikujōkyōgijou</gloss>

kyou fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Rikujoukyougijou</gloss>
+<gloss>Rikujoukyōgijou</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コクサン

GG5

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>1059560</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -5,0 +5 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11,6 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Sea Beam (company name)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>C-beam</gloss>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>SeaBeam (sonar device)</gloss>

Split? Or delete sense 1?

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シー・ビーム</reb>

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2277980</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＡＢ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +8 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
@@ -10,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Internet Architecture Board (part of the IETF)</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヴァレリー・サブリン

We use "manga artist" in other entries.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Junji Ito (1963.7.31-; manga author)</gloss>
+<gloss>Junji Itō (1963.7.31-; manga artist)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/伊藤潤二

Terrible book.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2862126</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8 +7,2 @@
-<reb>レッド・オクトーバーをおえ</reb>
+<reb>レッドオクトーバーをおえ</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/レッド・オクトーバーを追え

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Network_Information_Center
https://www.nic.ad.jp/
https://kotobank.jp/word/JPNIC-4061

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2302180</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＪＰＮＩＣ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +8 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
@@ -10,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Japan Network Information Center</gloss>

Entry created

I think so.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2064590</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -5,0 +5 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>

move to the name dic?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Jemaah Islamiyah</gloss>
+<gloss>Jemaah Islamiyah (Islamist militant group)</gloss>

Yes, that's about twice as common.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jemaah_Islamiyah

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>Jemaah Islamiyah</gloss>

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ジェマー・イスラミア</reb>
+<reb>ジェマーイスラミア</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ジェマーイスラミア</reb>
+<reb>ジェマー・イスラミア</reb>

GG5

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2278250</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＴＵ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイ・ティー・ユー</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,2 +14 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
@@ -10,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>International Telecommunication Union</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

The sentence "因みに森鴎外は口偏の方を好んだようです。" worked in the Text Glossing. It broke 森鴎外 into 森 + 鴎外 because 森 is in JMdict, and the correct match there takes priority over the lower-ranking one of 森鴎外 in JMnedict.

This is already an entry in jmnedict (5410049).
I don't think we normally mention birth names of people known primarily by aliases unless the birth name is particularly important.
Jim will have to answer the question about the text parsing feature of WWWJDIC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mori_Ōgai
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/森鷗外

I came across this name on the page at
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/2626958.html
in the following context:
"日本では、明治時代から[口加口非]と珈琲(初出は江戸時代の宇田川榕庵『博物語彙』)が並んで用いられました。因みに森鴎外は口偏の方を好んだようです。それが次第に中国とは異なって玉偏の方が選ばれ、定着しました。この玉偏は、コーヒー豆を玉に擬えたものとも言われています。"
Text Glossing did not parse the name, and I confirmed it is not yet in the database.
Question: is it encyclopedic (and thus preferably omitted) that 森鴎外 Mori Ōgai is the pen name of a person who was named 森 林太郎 Mori Rintarō by his parents, or is this kind of information desired/required in the name dictionary?

https://www.inet.co.jp/english/
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アイネット_(システムインテグレーター)
アイネット	15663

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2278390</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,3 +7,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>INET</gloss>
+<misc>&company;</misc>
+<gloss>I-NET Corporation</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created

OK

I think this belongs in the names dictionary.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2278200</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,3 +6,0 @@
-<reb>アイ・シー・キュー</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -12 +7,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15,3 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>ICQ (messaging service; 1996-2024)</gloss>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>ICQ (instant messaging client)</gloss>

Only just stopped.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＩＣＱ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイ・シー・キュー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -10 +17 @@
-<gloss>ICQ</gloss>
+<gloss>ICQ (messaging service; 1996-2024)</gloss>

Flagging initialism entries that need work or should be thrown out

Entry created