フェードアウト	106417	75.2%
フェイドアウト	35078	24.8%

Merging 2448190.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>フェイドアウト</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェイド・アウト</reb>

smk

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1109560">フェードイン</xref>

フェードアウト	106417
フェード・アウト	2884
GG5, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェード・アウト</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13,2 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
+<field>&tv;</field>
@@ -10,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>dissolve</gloss>

not in common use

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>FO</gloss>

フェードイン	24039
フェイドイン	2754

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェイドイン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

smk

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1109550">フェードアウト</xref>

フェードイン	24039	93.2%
フェード・イン	1761	6.8%
GG5, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェード・イン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
+<field>&tv;</field>

not in common use

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<gloss>FI</gloss>

ホームステイ	850800	99.6%
ホームステー	3597	0.4%

I feel like adding a "staying with a host family" gloss but maybe it'd be superfluous?

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホームステー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

https://aoni.jp/note/market-price/#:~:text=「リターン」とは、クラウド,重要なポイントでもあります。
「リターン」とは、クラウドファンディングの支援者（出資者）に商品やサービスをお返しすることです。

https://dime.jp/genre/1721006/
「体験型リターン」を打ち出すクラウドファンディングが人気の理由

This is the word camp-fire.jp uses which is the largest crowdfunding site in Japan. Kickstarter terminology is "reward."

@@ -33,0 +34,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>reward (in crowdfunding)</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13,7 @@
+<gloss>return</gloss>
+<gloss>restoring</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14 +21 @@
-<gloss>return (tennis, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>return (in tennis, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>comeback</gloss>
-<gloss>reinstatement</gloss>
+<gloss>profit</gloss>
+<gloss>gains</gloss>

GG5,ルミナス

@@ -12,0 +13,12 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>return (tennis, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>return (key)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>comeback</gloss>
+<gloss>reinstatement</gloss>

koj
①戻ること。戻すこと。
so vt vi prob?

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

恐れ入る	33902	95.1%
畏れ入る	748	2.1%
恐れいる	933	2.6%
畏れいる	67	0.2%

@@ -8,0 +9,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>恐れいる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Revising glosses.

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>to beg pardon</gloss>
-<gloss>to be much obliged</gloss>
+<gloss>to beg someone's pardon</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to be much obliged</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to be thankful</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>to be filled with awe</gloss>
-<gloss>to be surprised</gloss>
+<gloss>to be greatly impressed</gloss>
+<gloss>to admire</gloss>
@@ -36,2 +37,6 @@
-<gloss>to be disconcerted</gloss>
-<gloss>to be embarrassed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be dumbfounded</gloss>
+<gloss>to be confounded</gloss>
+<gloss>to be stunned</gloss>
+<gloss>to be fed up (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be defeated</gloss>
+<gloss>to be beaten</gloss>

It's a messy one. I think it's best just to leave it as it is for now.

＊ Oxford dictionary of linguistics:
"‘theta roles’ Term in *Government and Binding Theory for semantic
roles such as *agent or *patient: cf. case roles. Also written ‘θ-roles’: the
theta stands for earlier ‘thematic’, itself derived from *theme (3) for no
principled reason."

So they are just semantic roles?
Theta-roles are new to me, that's why I ask.


＊ Oxford dictionary of linguistics:
"transitive (Construction) in which a verb is related to at least two
nouns or their equivalent, whose semantic roles are characteristically
those of an *agent and a *patient: e.g. that of She (agent) carried him
(patient). A transitive verb is one which takes or can take such a
construction: thus carry, or carry in its basic sense."


.

Before I give my take, note that I have not come into contact with government and binding theory or actual syntactical theory beyond the basics, prior to this. So I'm learning as I type.
This means I don't really mean to harp on this too much, I'm more so trying to gain a better unterstanding here.

＞ The English translation reflects this lack of object relation: "I apologize for the rudeness," not "I apologize the rudeness."
This cannot be regarded as an argument. 
If I were to take German, there "to apologize" is in fact transitively used, and the translation from Japanese would possess that feature. 
Yet that is not evidence for the Japanese construction involving a transitive verb.


＞ (a) Burzio's generalization "All and only the verbs that can assign a theta-role to the subject can assign Accusative Case to an object." (Burzio, 1986).
＞ A transitive verb assigns a theta-role to its object, which typically undergoes or is affected by the action (a).
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I get what this intends to prove here.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are various theta roles, right? Agent, theme, goal, etc. , and they specify the relation established by the predicate to its arguments.

So let me grab one of the examples and attempt to visualize my understanding.
1 [彼女(agent)]は[先生(experiencer)]に[遅刻したこと(theme)]を謝った.
Here 謝る assigns the theta role "agent" to the logical subject of the clause, 先生 is assigned "experiencer" and  is a dative (indirect) object, whilst 遅刻したこと is assigned "theme" and is an accusative (direct) object.
So in this sentence 謝る acts as a ditransitive verb to me, and should fulfill the generalization you've brought forth.

Yet a sentence like this is also perfectly fine (taken from massif):
2 [僕(agent)]は[君(goal)]に謝らなければならない。
In this sentence 謝る acts as an unergative (intransitive verb assigning an agent that acts with intention) verb.


Or am I missing something?


＞ - 謝る is syntactically intransitive because the subject's action does not affect or act upon another entity.
Would that not refer to semantics? Also in sentences like 1 the "excusing" definitely affects another entity, namely the "先生".
Another important criterion to transitivity in semantics is volition, which is present with 謝る (unlike with 驚く), which convinces me that there is an agent-patient dynamic with the former, but not with the latter, where it would be stimulus-experiencer.


Furthermore, transitivity is not really black-and-white, as thompson and hopper have pointed out in their 1980 paper on transitivity:
https://romanistik.uni-freiburg.de/raible/Lehre/2006/Materialien/Hopper_Thompson.pdf



I would again propose that having both tags is probably the best, or shall I say "least complicated" course of action.
Transitivity tags should be given out in reference to the usage in the target language, so a Japanese verb and its transitivity must be analyzed in a Japanese framework.
Hence the tags should mirror the status quo of 国語学, which it most likely wouldn't if we just tagged it as a 自動詞.

(a) Burzio's generalization "All and only the verbs that can assign a theta-role to the subject can assign Accusative Case to an object." (Burzio, 1986).

Finding formal papers that discuss the abstract or thematic use of を, where it introduces non-affected, conceptual objects can be difficult. Most of the linguistic resources I've found aren't public and don't really touch on the topic heavily, so I'll provide my own reasoning.

A transitive verb assigns a theta-role to its object, which typically undergoes or is affected by the action (a). In Japanese, however, transitivity doesn't work in exactly the same way. 他動詞 can be thought of as any verb that can take an object marked by を, but not all を are equal. For example, verbs like 焦る, 謝る, 心配する, and 驚く can take a を-marked phrase, but the "object" in these cases doesn't undergo or receive the action in the usual sense.

I think that's where the confusion happens.

- 謝る is syntactically intransitive because the subject's action does not affect or act upon another entity.
- The を phrase (e.g., 失礼を謝る) can mark the cause, reason, stimulus, or domain of the action, not an affected object.
- The English translation reflects this lack of object relation: "I apologize for the rudeness," not "I apologize the rudeness."
- Therefore, even though を appears, it marks the trigger of the action rather than an object, so the verb remains intransitive in both structure and meaning.

＞ 謝る is intransitive and never takes a true direct object.
＞ In this sentence, the を is not marking a direct object; instead, it indicates what the apology is about and can be understood roughly as "about" or "for" in English.

Do you have references for this? I was unable to retrieve this sense from dictionaries. It seems very english-derived.
To my knowledge only "移動や時間の経過を表す自動詞" (Meikyo) and intransitive verbs in a starting point construction (e.g. 家を出る) can take を (and still be intransitive). 
Also, the english translation being an intransitive construction is not a criterion.
While DOJG also has also a fourth usage for を, "A particle that marks the cause of some human emotion.", 謝る doesn't really fall into that category in my eyes.
The examples DOJG gives contain verbs of emotion that are frequently tagged as transitive or bitransitive by references (e.g. 喜ぶ, 恐れる, etc.).


＊ Data
Massif:
｛を謝る｝＝ 524
｛に謝る｝＝ 3899 (false hits possible)

BCCWJ:
｛を；謝る｝＝ 11
｛に〈格助詞〉；謝る｝＝ 36

References that have 自動詞 ＝ Nikkoku
References that have 他動詞 ＝ Sankoku, SankokuGendaiGairai, Oukoku, Smk, Meikyo, Shinsen
References that have 自他動詞 ＝ Kojien, Gakken Kokugodaijiten, Iwakoku

Smk: 〈だれニ（なにヲ）謝る〉

To me the following examples, taken from various references, look perfectly transitive:
「うそを言ったことを謝る」
「人に罪を謝る」
「弟の不始末を姉が謝る」
「彼女は先生に遅刻したことを謝った」(e.g. replacing を with に here seems weird/ungrammatical to me)



Interestingly my 古語 references have 謝る is intransitive.
It seems 謝る came from 誤る, which was originally the intransitive pair to 過つ, which appears to have fallen out of use.
(Wiktionary, Nikkoku, Koj)

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Another problem is that the english concepts of transitive/intransitive may not perfectly map onto 他動詞 and 自動詞, as pointed out be the following usage note on wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/他動詞

"The terms transitive and intransitive are somewhat misleading in reference to Japanese. The English terms are generally used to refer to the syntax or structure of a sentence, and whether the verb in the sentence is followed by an object. The Japanese terms refer to the semantics or meaning of the verb, and whether the action of that verb is happening to or upon something else. The Japanese term 自動詞 (jidōshi) literally means “self-acting word”, and 他動詞 (tadōshi) literally means “other-acting word”, in reference to this semantic consideration.

For instance, in English, the verb ate in the simple sentence “I ate” would be considered an intransitive verb, because it is not followed by an object.

However, in the corresponding Japanese, the verb 食べた (tabeta, “ate”) in the simple sentence 私は食べた。 (“Watashi wa tabeta.”) would not be considered a 自動詞 (jidōshi), but would instead be considered a 他動詞 (tadōshi, literally “other-acting word”), as the underlying semantics or meaning of the verb 食べる (taberu, “to eat”) conceptually require an object: when one eats, one eats something, even if left unstated.

This semantic focus is the underlying mechanism by which verbs in sentences like 私は食べた。 (Watashi wa tabeta. - “I ate.”) are still considered 他動詞 (tadōshi, glossed as “transitive”) even when there is no stated object (because the fundamental meaning of the verb implies action by the subject upon something else), and verbs in sentences like 道を歩く。 (Michi o aruku. - “[I] walk the street.”) are still considered 自動詞 (jidōshi, glossed as “intransitive”) even when there is an explicit object marked with the object or accusative particle を (o) (because the fundamental meaning of the verb only implies action by the subject itself in a way that does not affect the noun marked by を)."
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

＞ for example, tagging 焦る as transitive [...]
Here I see multiple references having a 自他動詞 tag, with meikyo splitting out a transitive sense.
But that's an issue for another time.




.

When I saw this submission I was away from home, but I wanted to look into this a bit.

Based purely on references there are insufficient grounds for tagging this as just intransitive.
Perhaps a linguist could perform tests for transitivity here, but I sadly can't.
Our best bet is most likely having this as [vt,vi].

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>to be stumped (by)</gloss>

Looks good. Good luck with the sentences.

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom, daij, meikyo

This entry needed some work.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>to be able (in a position) to do</gloss>
-<gloss>to be up to the task</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to be possible</gloss>
+<gloss>to be permitted (to do)</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +36,16 @@
-<gloss>to be ready</gloss>
-<gloss>to be completed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be good at</gloss>
+<gloss>to do well</gloss>
+<gloss>to be proficient (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be capable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come into existence</gloss>
+<gloss>to form</gloss>
+<gloss>to appear</gloss>
+<gloss>to come up (of a matter)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be born</gloss>
+<gloss>to make (a friend)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get (a girlfriend, free time, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +59,4 @@
+<gloss>to be constructed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be formed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be established</gloss>
+<gloss>to be set up</gloss>
@@ -49,2 +68,4 @@
-<gloss>to be good at</gloss>
-<gloss>to be permitted (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be finished</gloss>
+<gloss>to be completed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be done</gloss>
+<gloss>to be ready</gloss>
@@ -55 +76,18 @@
-<gloss>to get (a friend, boyfriend, etc.)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to grow (of a crop)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be produced</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be mature and well-balanced</gloss>
+<gloss>to be of fine character</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as できている</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be by nature</gloss>
+<gloss>to be born ...</gloss>
@@ -62 +100 @@
-<s_inf>commonly as できている</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as できている</s_inf>
@@ -71,7 +108,0 @@
-<gloss>to grow</gloss>
-<gloss>to be raised</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -79 +110 @@
-<gloss>to become pregnant</gloss>
+<gloss>to get pregnant</gloss>

daijs, daijr

Besides the "to come to be" sense, the entry is also missing the "to come out" and "to appear" meanings; both existing as far back as the original 出来（いでく）

@@ -60,0 +61 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Sense 5 daijs
８ （ひそかに）性的関係を結ぶ。恋愛関係になる。「―・きた仲」「二人は―・きている」

Sense 7 is certainly real and not a "shortening of 赤ちゃんができちゃった".
daijs
（俗に）妊娠する。
nikk:
⑤ (特に、主語を明示せずに用いる俗な言い方) 妊娠する。
※四十歳の男（1964）〈遠藤周作〉「あたし、できたらしいの。どうするの」

Added it as a new sense before "to get (sexually) involved with".

The entry feels a little incomplete. There should probably be a "to be born" sense (or gloss?) too. "to come into existence"

@@ -54,0 +55,5 @@
+<gloss>to get (a friend, boyfriend, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -56 +61,3 @@
-<gloss>to become intimate</gloss>
+<s_inf>commonly as できている</s_inf>
+<gloss>to become (sexually) involved (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to become intimate (with)</gloss>
@@ -69,0 +77 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

I encountered it in the context of library books.

gg5, prog, daij

I'm not seeing it either.
Not just properties.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>subleasing</gloss>
-<gloss>subletting</gloss>
+<gloss>sublease</gloss>
+<gloss>sublet</gloss>
+<gloss>lending (something one has borrowed) to someone else</gloss>

Not sure where またかし came from. I don't see it in my refs. The n-gram counts for "またかし" seem to be false positives.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ に又貸し　 │ 1,509 │ 68.7% │
│ にまた貸し │   642 │ 29.2% │
│ にまたがし │    44 │  2.0% │
│ にまたかし │     0 │  0.0% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ を又貸し　 │ 1,052 │ 68.7% │
│ をまた貸し │   432 │ 28.2% │
│ をまたがし │    48 │  3.1% │
│ をまたかし │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>またかし</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 又貸し　 │ 10,114 │
│ また貸し │  8,734 │ - add (seen on netflix)
│ またかし │  9,647 │
│ またがし │    499 │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>また貸し</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I don't think these glosses are needed. The JEs don't have them.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>conscentious</gloss>
+<gloss>conscientious</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>upright</gloss>
-<gloss>fair</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I think the "reasonable" is broader than price.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>conscentious</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonable (e.g. price)</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>reasonable (price)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>conscentious</gloss>

prog eij
daijs has 良心的兵役拒否

could maybe be 2 senses

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>reasonable (price)</gloss>
+<gloss>honorable</gloss>
+<gloss>conscentious</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 背理 │ 5,902 │ 99.1% │
│ 悖理 │    51 │  0.9% │ - rK (kokugos)
╰─ーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, koj

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悖理</keb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>esp. ステイ</s_inf>

Making sense 1 clearer.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>sojourn</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>esp. ステー</s_inf>

gg5:〔滞在〕 a stay.
daijr: 滞在すること。泊まること。「ショート-―」「ホーム-―」
ステーで固定	1,417		
ステイで固定	40

ステイ does have that meaning.
The kokugos have ステイ for "滞在すること" and ステー for the prop/support. I don't think they should be merged.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>stay</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijs, ルミナス, RP

Not a stay at someone's house, etc.
ステー should be [rk] as it's in references?

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>prop</gloss>
+<gloss>support</gloss>

ホームステイ	850800	99.6%
ホームステー	3597	0.4%

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ステー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

The 飛び出し in 飛び出しナイフ comes from the first sense of 飛び出す: "内側や中から急に飛んで出る".

@@ -32,8 +32,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1485350">飛び出す・1</xref>
-<gloss>dashing out (e.g. children into the street)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1485350">飛び出す・3</xref>
-<gloss>something that thrusts out</gloss>
+<gloss>jumping out</gloss>
+<gloss>running out (e.g. into the street)</gloss>
+<gloss>dashing out</gloss>
+<gloss>springing out</gloss>

Might help.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1485350">飛び出す・1</xref>
@@ -35,0 +37,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1485350">飛び出す・3</xref>

GG5: 〔(道路などに)飛び出すこと〕 running out 《into the street》
中辞典: 子供のとび出し事故多し. 【掲示】 Numerous accidents due to children running into the street.
飛び出しナイフ a switchblade; 《英》 a flick knife.

Maybe two senses?

@@ -32 +32,5 @@
-<gloss>something that leaps or thrusts out</gloss>
+<gloss>dashing out (e.g. children into the street)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>something that thrusts out</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>とび出し注意</keb>
+<keb>とび出し</keb>

飛び出し注意	12248	93.2%
飛出し注意	510	3.9%
飛出注意	54	0.4%
とび出し注意	269	2.0%
飛びだし注意	59	0.4%

gloss isn't great

@@ -8,0 +9,16 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛出し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とび出し注意</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛びだし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛出</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15 +31 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2131340">鰓呼吸</xref>
+<field>&physiol;</field>

肺呼吸	13394
はい呼吸	25

Just noting this - not worth sK.

Entry created

I don't think we need to explain what it is.
Don't see a need for the x-ref.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2131330">肺呼吸</xref>
-<gloss>branchial respiration (breathing using gills)</gloss>
+<gloss>branchial respiration</gloss>

GG5 has えら呼吸, Diajs & Nikk have 鰓呼吸.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>鰓呼吸</keb>
+<keb>エラ呼吸</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>エラ呼吸</keb>
+<keb>鰓呼吸</keb>

鰓呼吸	1179	7.8%
えら呼吸	4860	32.0%
エラ呼吸	9168	60.3%

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>エラ呼吸</keb>

Entry created

I've merged them.

dup of 1109550

Entry created

dup of 2003170

Entry created

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&anat;</field>

koj, daij, gg5

see comment on 2662890

daijr: 船舶職員として必要な技術。

I think GG5's gloss is sufficient.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>seafarer skills</gloss>
-<gloss>seamen's competency</gloss>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>seamanship</gloss>

海技	26422
海技大学校
daijs nikk

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>game with with slim chances of winning</gloss>
+<gloss>game with slim chances of winning</gloss>

負け試合	61452
GG5: lost game

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>losing a match</gloss>
-<gloss>match with slim chances</gloss>
+<gloss>lost game</gloss>
+<gloss>game with with slim chances of winning</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>unlikely-to-be-won match</gloss>
+<gloss>match with slim chances</gloss>

daijisen

GG5

値段設定	105362
eij

abbr tag not needed here. We're giving the etymology as "non-deli(cacy)", not "abbr. of ノンデリカシー".

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Oxford: having or showing a lack of sensitive understanding or tact

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>indelicate</gloss>

ノンデリ  76

Correction.

https://news.infoseek.co.jp/article/koigakumachicon_408537/
ノンデリ  100

@@ -9,0 +10,2 @@
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">non-deli(cacy)</lsource>

音楽大学	124764
音楽大	21050

Useful for glossing.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5154034</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,6 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Ongakudai</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1183760">音楽大学</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>college of music</gloss>
+<gloss>school of music</gloss>
+<gloss>music college</gloss>

Probably an abbreviation of 音楽大学

I feel it's important in all these ハラ and ハラスメント to include something like "as a form of harassment"

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>grumpy or displeased behaviour (making others uncomfortable or upset)</gloss>
+<gloss>grumpy or displeased behaviour (making others uncomfortable; as a form of harassment)</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/wiAuh35tkDYVS1dY/?mibextid=Nif5oz

FB ref.

https://sanyokai-clinic.com/kokoro/5481/
不機嫌ハラスメントとは、不機嫌な態度をとって周囲に不快な思いをさせたり、気を遣わせたりして、精神的に苦痛を与えることです。 通称「フキハラ」とも言われ、本人が意図している・していないに関わらず、起きてしまいます。
フキハラ	100

Came up in a FB group discussion.

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/モルック-2133573

I'd expect a Finnish lsrc, but daijs doesn't indicate it.

https://molkky.jp/molkky/

Daijs has this. I think we can move it to the main dictionary. There's a "Japan Mölkky Association".

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5746792</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -6 +4,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -9 +7,2 @@
-<misc>&product;</misc>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&tradem;</field>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

KOD【商標･スポーツ】 〔フィンランド発祥の野外投擲(とうてき)競技〕 Mölkky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mölkky
https://www.kobe-np.co.jp/news/hanshin/202405/0017668743.shtml

The family name goes first for people who were alive before the Meiji period.
We don't need exact dates for historical figures.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Michihira Nijō (1287-1335.2.27; advisor to Emperor Go-Daigo)</gloss>
+<gloss>Nijō Michihira (1287-1335; advisor to Emperor Go-Daigo)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/二条道平

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>二倏道平</keb>
+<keb>二条道平</keb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Nijō Michihira</gloss>
+<gloss>Michihira Nijō (1287-1335.2.27; advisor to Emperor Go-Daigo)</gloss>

Jou/jou fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Nijou Michihira</gloss>
+<gloss>Nijō Michihira</gloss>