@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai2</re_pri>

エスタブリッシュメント	15290	91.1%
エスタブリシュメント	282	1.7%
イスタブリッシュメント	1207	7.2%
イスタブリシュメント	0	0.0%

merge

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<reb>イスタブリッシュメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

gg5, wisdom

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the Establishment</gloss>
+</sense>

Could be tagged ik

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かつ</reb>

* OED: https://www.oed.com/dictionary/katsu_n (newly added)
* Cambridge: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/katsu

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>katsu</gloss>

Putting that xref back.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1037730">カツレツ</xref>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1037730">カツレツ</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>

ジグソーパズル	474598	95.4%
ジグゾーパズル	15061	3.0%
ジクソーパズル	5338	1.1%
ジクゾーパズル	354	0.1%
ジグソー・パズル	1706	0.3%
ジグゾー・パズル	306	0.1%


ジグソーパスル	290

enwiki
A jigsaw puzzle (with context, sometimes just jigsaw or just puzzle)

@@ -9,9 +8,0 @@
-<reb>ジグゾーパズル</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ジクソーパズル</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ジクゾーパズル</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +13,17 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジグゾーパズル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジクソーパズル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジクゾーパズル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジグソーパスル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -25,0 +34,2 @@
+<gloss>jigsaw</gloss>
+<gloss>puzzle</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジグゾー・パズル</reb>
+</r_ele>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +17,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジグソー・パズル</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ステップ・バイ・ステップ</reb>

split

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>splint</gloss>
-</sense>

ティッシュペーパー	93127	93.8%
ティッシュ・ペーパー	1314	1.3%
ティシュペーパー	4830	4.9%
ティシュ・ペーパー	49	0.0%

merge

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ティシュペーパー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ティッシュペーパー	93127
ちり紙	        29340

Dropping x-ref.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1612710">塵紙</xref>
@@ -17 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>facial tissues</gloss>

yes, google images returns plenty of what i would call 'tissue paper'

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>not actual "tissue paper" in English</s_inf>
-<gloss>(a) tissue</gloss>
+<gloss>tissue paper</gloss>
+<gloss>tissue</gloss>

daijr

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1124600">ポークカツレツ</xref>

ポークカツ	6145	94.0%
ポークかつ	389	6.0%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ポーク・カツ</reb>

マネジメント	3979744	86.8%
マネージメント	604874	13.2%
メネジメント	154	0.0%

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Daijr & GG5

The refs have マネージメント as the main entry and マネジメント as a cross-reference. WWW users prefer マネジメント by a ratio of 7:1. Sort-of understandable, as マネジメント is closer to the original English.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>マネージメント</reb>
+<reb>マネジメント</reb>
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>マネジメント</reb>
+<reb>マネージメント</reb>

メンチカツ	191488	83.0%
ミンチカツ	30611	13.3%
めんちかつ	4297	1.9%
メンチかつ	4377	1.9%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

The practice that's developed is to mark the source gairaigo as wasei, and not the abbreviation. In this case we didn't have the source form as an entry, and since Daijirin has an entry marked wasei, it's probably OK.
I've now proposed an entry for メンチカツレツ/ミンチカツレツ, so the wasei tag can go there.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">mince cutlet</lsource>
+<xref type="see" seq="2825869">メンチカツレツ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

again, do we usually mark words that contain a Japanese 
abbreviation of a gairaigo as wasei?

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6521132
渦中のNewJeans、今夜の『Mステ』に生出演…

渦中の	65117	  
渦中の人	10179	  
渦中の人物	9638	  
渦中の人物が	5049	  
渦中の人物が生出演	4688	  
渦中の人物が生	4688	  
渦中の親方	2500	  
渦中の町田康	2157	  
渦中の町田	2157	  
渦中の町田康が	2156	  
渦中の町田康が都内	2147

"scandal-struck"

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij gg5

@@ -19,2 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>convulsions</gloss>
-<gloss>upheaval</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(in the middle of a) scandal</gloss>
+<gloss>controversy</gloss>
+<gloss>quarrel</gloss>
+<gloss>turmoil</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 応える　 │ 1,224,108 │ 99.9% │
│ 報える　 │       742 │  0.1% │ (daijr, nikk)
│ 徹える　 │        66 │  0.0% │ (meikyo, saito)
│ こたえる │   431,931 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

i think this is the usual format

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +22,0 @@
-<stagk>応える</stagk>
-<stagk>報える</stagk>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>occ. written as 報える</s_inf>
@@ -32,2 +33,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1211310">堪える</xref>
-<s_inf>sometimes 堪える</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827352">堪える・こたえる・1</xref>
+<s_inf>occ. written as 徹える</s_inf>

gg5, prog, wisdom, koj, daij, meikyo, shinmeikai

i'm not sure they need to be split at all.  it's really just an extended use and no other source splits.  i suggest it just be replaced with "to meet (e.g. demands, expectations)"

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>to answer</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet (e.g. demands, expectations)</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +32 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1211310">堪える</xref>
@@ -31 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>to take its toll</gloss>
+<gloss>to affect</gloss>
+<gloss>to take a toll</gloss>
@@ -37,14 +40,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagk>応える</stagk>
-<stagk>報える</stagk>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to live up to</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>応える</stagk>
-<stagk>報える</stagk>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to reward</gloss>
-</sense>

Suggest splitting 'live up to' and 'to reward' into their own definitions, as they are 
drastically different from 'to respond'.

@@ -26,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to live up to</gloss>
-<gloss>to reward</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +37,14 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>応える</stagk>
+<stagk>報える</stagk>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to live up to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>応える</stagk>
+<stagk>報える</stagk>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to reward</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 寸でのところで　 │  5,820 │ 20.6% │ move up
│ すんでの所で　　 │  4,512 │ 16.0% │
│ 寸での所で　　　 │  2,014 │  7.1% │ add sK
│ 既の所で　　　　 │    123 │  0.4% │ add rK
│ 已の所で　　　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ add (daijs, gendai)
│ 已のところで　　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ すんでのところで │ 15,744 │ 55.8% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<keb>既の所で</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +12,4 @@
+<keb>既の所で</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16 +17,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>已の所で</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijs "既の所でで命を救われた"
eij: "すんでのところで救出される"

Also used for actions that actually happened. Feels like a separate sense to me.

Daijs and Koj have 既の所 (without the で). Daijr includes the で. Do we need a new entry?

@@ -25,0 +26,3 @@
+<gloss>only just</gloss>
+<gloss>barely</gloss>
+<gloss>just in time</gloss>

Odd

求む	845610	92.7%
求ム	36724	4.0%
もとむ	29752	3.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>求ム</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

A bit hasty adding the "arch".

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>often now as ...(を)求む</s_inf>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

koj, daij

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1229350">求める・1</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,15 @@
+<gloss>to wish for</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1229350">求める・2</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to request</gloss>
+<gloss>to demand</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1229350">求める・3</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -15,1 +31,12 @@
-<gloss>to request</gloss>
+<gloss>to search for</gloss>
+<gloss>to pursue (pleasure)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hunt (a job)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v2m-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1229350">求める・4</xref>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to purchase</gloss>
+<gloss>to buy</gloss>

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>串カツ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くしかつ</reb>
-<re_restr>串かつ</re_restr>
@@ -22 +17 @@
-<gloss>deep-fried skewered meat and vegetables</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">deep-fried skewered meat and vegetables</gloss>

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>deep-fried skewered meat and vegetables (usu. pork and negi)</gloss>
+<gloss>kushikatsu</gloss>
+<gloss>deep-fried skewered meat and vegetables</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Let's just add it.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/3b20be225d2b8cc3a36a30b1dd8a90738b12c5b3
「好みの女児を探して刺した」

好みの 	3808422	  
好みの問題	180554	  
好みの色	159233	  
好みの味	133733	  
好みのタイプ	108098	  
好みのもの	97515	  
好みの方	96743	  
好みの色や	80520	  
好みの色やテイスト	76706	  
好みの色やテイ	76706	  
好みのお	72920	  

smk example 「お━の〔=自分で食べたいと思う〕料理をお選びください」

adj-no on both senses? or a separate sense?

gg5, chujiten, prog, daijr/s

Splitting into senses.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2018680">お好み・おこのみ</xref>
@@ -20,0 +20,7 @@
+<gloss>fancy</gloss>
+<gloss>fondness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>wish</gloss>
+<gloss>desire</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>preference</gloss>

住職	491359
住職は	30866
住職が	47836
住職する	81
住職して	262

Let's just drop it.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

vs,vi is kind of awkward on sense 1 considering the gloss but having a second sense reading "being chief prist" is maybe not much of an improvement

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

add [vi] (sankoku, etc.)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 乗り合わせ │ 97,115 │ 95.7% │
│ 乗りあわせ │  3,172 │  3.1% │ add
│ 乗り合せ　 │  1,232 │  1.2% │ add
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗りあわせる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乗り合せる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

先まわり	3,547

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>先まわり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5
►僧籍に入る　be formally entered as a monk or nun in the registry of a sect of Buddhism.
►僧籍を離脱する　have one's name removed from the registry of a sect of Buddhism.
kokugos

not sure how to gloss but "priesthood" by itself seems to miss out on some important stuff

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>priesthood</gloss>
+<gloss>priesthood registry</gloss>

[vt]: sankoku, iwakoku, meikyo, smk, etc (all senses)

Sankoku has a fourth sense regarding substitution in the context of digital / computer file contents.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daij

Added sense.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&math;</field>
@@ -20,0 +22,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>substitution</gloss>
+<gloss>displacement</gloss>
+</sense>

By convention we need to have a corresponding priority tag on the reading as well

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>

豚カツ	73614	3.0% bordering on rK!
豚かつ	12869	0.5%
とんかつ	1941006	79.7%
とんカツ	7916	0.3%
トンカツ	400020	16.4%

とんかつ is the most common form, so it should lead. But the correct form is とんカツ as カツ is a loanword.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +13,2 @@
-<reb>とんカツ</reb>
-<re_restr>豚カツ</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<reb>とんかつ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<reb>とんかつ</reb>
-<re_restr>豚かつ</re_restr>
+<reb>とんカツ</reb>

I suggest putting it back more-or-less the way it was, like this. I'm not too fussed about the tag being on the "wrong" reading.

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<reb>とんカツ</reb>
+<re_restr>豚カツ</re_restr>
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -13 +18 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_restr>豚かつ</re_restr>

とんカツ	7916
とんかつ	1941006

Or do we keep とんカツ because it's reasonably common? And if so, should it come before or after とんかつ? And do we still need the restrictions?

Could be sk.

not in my refs

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふかっこう</reb>

不格好　　 31,789  33.2% 
不恰好　　 60,481  63.1% 
無格好　　    119   0.1% -sK, not in my refs
ぶかっこう  3,431   3.6% 
ふかっこう      0   0.0%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,2 +18,0 @@
-<re_restr>不格好</re_restr>
-<re_restr>不恰好</re_restr>

GG5, 中辞典

Hope this is clearer.

@@ -22 +22,4 @@
-<gloss>trading name of stocks and securities</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>trading name (on a stock exchange)</gloss>
+<gloss>issue</gloss>
+<gloss>security</gloss>

銘柄	8204712	99.9%
名柄	4428	0.1%

what does sense 2 mean?

gg5, daij

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>to swindle</gloss>
+<gloss>to dupe</gloss>
@@ -30 +31,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2038140">宥め賺す</xref>
@@ -33 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>to soothe and humor (humour)</gloss>
+<gloss>to soothe</gloss>
+<gloss>to calm</gloss>

ｍｋ 騙す・▽欺す・▼瞞す

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<keb>欺す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -10 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 木漏れ日 │ 300,440 │ 61.2% │
│ 木洩れ日 │  50,156 │ 10.2% │
│ 木もれ陽 │  26,719 │  5.4% │ add
│ 木漏れ陽 │  10,380 │  2.1% │
│ 木もれ日 │   8,883 │  1.8% │ add
│ 木洩れ陽 │   4,762 │  1.0% │
│ こもれび │  89,710 │ 18.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>木もれ陽</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>木もれ日</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
 木漏れ日	300440
 木洩れ日	 50156
 木漏れ陽	 10380
 木洩れ陽	  4762
 こもれび	 89710

no need for [oK]

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>木洩れ日</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,4 +13,0 @@
-<keb>木洩れ日</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

据え置き	384479	93.0%
据置き	22651	5.5%
すえおき	4027	1.0%
すえ置き	1770	0.4%
据えおき	353	0.1%

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>すえ置き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, Daijr

Not at all clear from the noun form.

@@ -23,0 +24,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>unredeemed</gloss>
+<gloss>unredeemable</gloss>
+<gloss>irredeemable</gloss>
+<gloss>deferred</gloss>
+<gloss>stationary</gloss>
+</sense>

I agree.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +35 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -37,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

i see 転 only in koj
sense 5 only in daijr/s, etc.
all senses seem [uk]

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -14,1 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

OK

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/e9a6e841a60a98ccaa4d9a123c0d9c2b899c7efc
こう話すのは、“住職のなりすまし”被害を受けたと訴える東大阪市にある「西方寺」僧侶。井尻雄二郎さん（62）。

daijs
② 他人のユーザーIDやパスワードを盗み、その人になりすましてネットワーク上で活動すること。...スプーフィング。


成り済まし	23637	5.5%
成りすまし	109949	25.5%
なりすまし	296424	68.8%
成済まし	540	0.1%
成済し	0	0.0%
成り済し	0	0.0%



\
成りすましメール	801	11.8%
なりすましメール	5965	88.2%

Def not only/mainly used in computer-related contexts

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成りすまし</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>成りすまし</keb>
+<keb>成済まし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>forgery (e.g. of email)</gloss>
-<gloss>spoofing</gloss>
+<gloss>masquerading (as somebody else)</gloss>
@@ -22 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>masquerade (esp. for evil purposes)</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>spoofing</gloss>
+<gloss>forgery (e.g. of email)</gloss>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Seems to be only/mainly used in computer-related contexts, but Daijirin's gloss is more general.

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>spoofing</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>a masquerade</gloss>
+<gloss>masquerade (esp. for evil purposes)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

See どこの馬の骨 entry.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>often どこの〜</s_inf>

╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ ウマの骨 │ 699 │
│ うまの骨 │  73 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ウマの骨</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 馬の骨　　 │ 53,458 │ 98.3% │
│ 馬のほね　 │      0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 dropping
│ 馬のホネ　 │    212 │  0.4% │ 🡠 adding
│ うまのほね │    724 │  1.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>馬のほね</keb>
+<keb>馬のホネ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 冬枯れ　 │ 47.070 │ 94.7% │
│ 冬枯　　 │  2.512 │  5.1% │add ; saito, smk, shinsen
│ ふゆがれ │    110 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
Sankoku and daijr give [vs,vi].
Saito gives [adj-no] usage for the second sense:
〈名〉Winter-blight:(=の) wintry; bleak

Also multiple kokugos specify give "特に二月..." for the third sense.

Mostly split into two seperate senses, sankoku gives three and I would prefer that. 
I don't feel like sense 1 and 2 go well together in a single sense.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冬枯</keb>
@@ -13,2 +16,13 @@
-<gloss>wintry desolation</gloss>
-<gloss>poor business conditions</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>withering of vegetation in winter</gloss>
+<gloss>winter decay</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>winter-blight</gloss>
+<gloss>bleakness of winter</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>business slump in winter (esp. in February)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 浅知恵 │ 19.881 │ 92.3% │
│ 浅知慧 │  1.208 │  5.6% │add ; [sK]
│ 浅智恵 │    285 │  1.3% │add ; [sK]
│ 浅智慧 │    158 │  0.7% │add ; Saito, Sankoku, Smk, Shinsen ; [rK]
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>浅智慧</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>浅知慧</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>浅智恵</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>shallow wit</gloss>
+<gloss>superficial view</gloss>
+<gloss>insufficient consideration</gloss>

あさぢえ	1469
あさじえ	288
あさちえ	No matches

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あさじえ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

死に水を取る	285	
死水を取る	48		
死に水を取っ	269			
死水を取っ	74

I prefer GG5's gloss.
We don't typically have x-refs to synonyms.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1832930">末期の水</xref>
-<gloss>water used to moisten the lips of a dying person</gloss>
+<gloss>water given to a dying person</gloss>

All the kokugos give something around the lines of 臨終に唇をしめしてやる水。
Sankoku even directly refers to 末期の水.
Synonymous with 末期の水.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 死に水　 │ 3.413 │ 49.0% │
│ 死水　　 │ 3.188 │ 45.7% │add ; smk, oukoku, iwakoku, shinsen ; some duplicates with しすい
│ しにみず │   371 │  5.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>死水</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>give water to a dying person</gloss>
-<gloss>water given to a dying person</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1832930">末期の水</xref>
+<gloss>water used to moisten the lips of a dying person</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 忌引　 │ 10.569 │ 52.2% │moved up ; sankoku etc.
│ 忌引き │  9.067 │ 44.8% │
│ きびき │    624 │  3.1% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
Sankoku a.o. : きびき［忌引］｟名・自サ｠⇒ [vs,vi]

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>忌引き</keb>
+<keb>忌引</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>忌引</keb>
+<keb>忌引き</keb>
@@ -15 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>absence from work (school) due to mourning</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>absence from work or school due to mourning</gloss>
+<gloss>secluding oneself in mourning</gloss>

ティッシュペーパー	93127	93.8%
ティッシュ・ペーパー	1314	1.3%
ティシュペーパー	4830	4.9%
ティシュ・ペーパー	49	0.0%

merge

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

ALC, Cross

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>deliberate attack</gloss>
+<gloss>premeditated crime</gloss>
+<gloss>deliberate crime</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>to soothe and humor (humour)</gloss>
+<gloss>to soothe and humor</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 宥めすかし　 │  1,501 │  6.9% │
│ 宥め賺し　　 │    461 │  2.1% │ add rK
│ なだめすかし │ 19,861 │ 91.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

N-grams

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>宥め賺す</keb>
+<keb>宥めすかす</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>宥めすかす</keb>
+<keb>宥め賺す</keb>

just a guess. なだめる is [uk], and neither of the kanji in this belong to the zyouyou set, so it makes sense that this one would be usually written in kana too.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I guess that works as [col].

Sorry for the carelessness. "(though resume with てな)" = "a [previous] thought resumed by using てな as a quoting structure"

sankoku:
てな　連語
「話」と言うような。「間に合わない、てなことになっては困る」

daijs:
て‐な

［連語］
１ 《接続助詞あるいは格助詞「て」＋間投助詞「な」。文末に用いる》…ということだな。…てね。「合格したんだってな」
２ 「とい（言）うような」の音変化。「てなことを言ってその場をごまかす」

I think something was lost with daijs' two senses of てな in the previous edits. 　な in the second sense mentioned by daijs is the [adj-na] な、not the ”ね" な。 てなこと =　と言うようなこと。So, probably what I've added as [2] here needs be a separate entry (but there was previous discussion on this daijs entry, so I'm starting here). The 〜ね readings obviously have nothing to do with [2]. 

Just encountered between an ellipsis and resumption of speech (though resume with てな).　"you think/say he's too conspicuous [to be a spy]..."] ...てなことになりかねないってのに... (well, even if that sort of thing is likely)

It seems to function as sankoku and daijs both suggest, a drop-in spoken replacement for  "と言うような".

The gloss here is far less important than expanding the abbreviation, which is important.  Because てなことになりかねない is really hard to parse if you don't know what てな means.

With our collection of と言う entries, it's a little surprising that we don't have a と言うよう(な) entry to reference. Though that does get into grammar.
と言うよう	312348

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>spoken abbreviation of と言うような</s_inf>
+<gloss>that sort of (thing mentioned immediately prior)</gloss>

て‐な
［連語］
１ 《接続助詞あるいは格助詞「て」＋間投助詞「な」。文末に用いる》…ということだな。…てね。「合格したんだってな」

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ってな</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>てね</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ってね</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,2 +18,2 @@
-<s_inf>used after a phrase to modify the following noun</s_inf>
-<gloss>a sort of thing like</gloss>
+<s_inf>used at end of sentence</s_inf>
+<gloss>(apparently) that's what it's like, isn't it</gloss>

daij

フォリナー	6940	72.9%
フォーリナー	2585	27.1%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フォーリナー</reb>

Entry created

Daijr, gg5, prog

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 整理ダンス　 │ 6,941 │ 78.9% │
│ 整理箪笥　　 │ 1,476 │ 16.8% │
│ 整理だんす　 │   383 │  4.4% │ add sK
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>せいりダンス</reb>
-<re_restr>整理ダンス</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>整理箪笥</re_restr>
-<re_restr>整理だんす</re_restr>

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>整理だんす</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>整理だんす</re_restr>

Entry created

Not in my refs.

Merge

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アコンパニ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

google & km
アカムパニ	0	0.0%
アカンパニ	0	0.0%
アコムパニ	0	0.0%
アコンパニ	0	0.0%	2156470

Entry created

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アクリリック・レジン・セメント</reb>

Entry created

Merged

Entry created

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>鳥カツ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>とりかつ</reb>
-<re_restr>鳥かつ</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +16 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_katsu

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>chicken katsu</gloss>

Entry created

こましゃくれる	176	73.3%
こまっしゃくれる	43	17.9%
こまちゃくれる	0	0.0%
こまっちゃくれる	21	8.8%

Better than split up.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>こまちゃくれる</reb>
+<reb>こまっちゃくれる</reb>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<reb>こまっちゃくれる</reb>
+<reb>こまちゃくれる</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

add [vi] (sankoku, smk, etc.)

feels a bit weird to have all the readings in just one entry

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Entry created

OK

I think this can go. I don't see any cockroaches when googling "Ｇ様". If it's not in any refs...

I agree.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&euph;</misc>

I think just [joc] is fine for this one?

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&euph;</misc>

エスタブリッシュメント	15290	91.1%
エスタブリシュメント	282	1.7%
イスタブリッシュメント	1207	7.2%
イスタブリシュメント	0	0.0%

merge

Entry created

ヒストリの置換	0	0.0%
ヒストリーの置換	0	0.0%

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>there is always a bigger fish</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&v5r-i;</pos>

There are currently 19 entries with the "proverb" tag, of which about half end with a verb. None have verb PoS tags. As I said earlier, I don't mind having them, but it's not a big issue, and prefer to be consistent.

Reverso

I think it gets over the line. Reverso quotes quite a few sentences using it as a regular noun.

Not in my refs. I don't think it's used outside of names/transcriptions. We could add it to the glossing file.

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エクサイトメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イクサイトメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

イクサイトメント	0	0.0%
イキサイトメント	0	0.0%
エクサイトメント	77	4.8%
エキサイトメント	1512	95.2%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>イクサイトメント</reb>
+<reb>エキサイトメント</reb>

Entry created

インバイアロンメント	No matches

see エンバイロメント

Entry created

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インバイアロンメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

〈イ／エ〉ン〈バ／ヴァ〉イ（ア）ロ（ン）メント

インバイロメント	0	0.0%	daijs
エンバイロメント	752	49.1%	daijr/s
エンヴァイロメント	495	32.3%
エンバイロンメント	213	13.9%	daijr
エンバイアロンメント	73	4.8%

@@ -5,0 +6,14 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンヴァイロメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンバイロンメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンバイアロンメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インバイロメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

daij, meikyo

@@ -10,2 +10,11 @@
-<gloss>to be nappy</gloss>
-<gloss>to get fluffy</gloss>
+<gloss>to become fluffy</gloss>
+<gloss>to become nappy</gloss>
+<gloss>to become fuzzy</gloss>
+<gloss>to fray</gloss>
+<gloss>to pill</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to become dishevelled (e.g. of hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>to become untidy</gloss>

add [vi] (sankoku, etc.)

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Entry created

高品位な	104760
高品位の	27808

Don't need both.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

[adj-na]
高品位な印刷	14819	  
高品位な映像	5699	  
高品位なサウンド	5055	  
高品位な音質	3626	  
高品位なデザイン	2883	  
高品位なデジタル	2274

vs.
[adj-f]
高品位印刷	1118	11.0%
高品位映像	1926	19.0%
高品位サウンド	3338	32.9%
高品位音質	236	2.3%
高品位デザイン	1825	18.0%
高品位デジタル	1712	16.9%

vs:
[adj-no]
高品位の印刷	220	20.5%
高品位の映像	404	37.7%
高品位のサウンド	173	16.1%
高品位の音質	90	8.4%
高品位のデザイン	69	6.4%
高品位のデジタル	116	10.8%

"高品位な" site:mainichi.jp　（10 pages of dynamic usage)
　vs
"高品位の" site:mainichi.jp (4 pages, half to high-grade stainless steel in repetitive PR as 高品位のステンレス（SUS316L）)

高品位のステンレス	0	0.0%
高品位なステンレス	192	100.0%

Google books comparison "高品位のサウンド"
adj-no 7 books, 3 of which are modern
https://www.google.com/search?q="高品位のサウンド"&sca_esv=5ca5dd3556662dcb&udm=36&biw=1745&bih=887&sxsrf=ADLYWIIYdqX2rWt39zXMdWZZWZU3jMjh9Q:1732796659782&ei=82BIZ9m1L8OTvr0Pk_vO6Ao&ved=0ahUKEwiZ-_7Kgv-JAxXDia8BHZO9E60Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq="高品位のサウンド"&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIhoi6auY5ZOB5L2N44Gu44K144Km44Oz44OJIjILEAAYgAQYsAMYogQyCxAAGIAEGLADGKIEMgsQABiABBiwAxiiBDILEAAYgAQYsAMYogRI2wNQAFgAcAF4AJABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBA8gBAJgCAaACA5gDAIgGAZAGBJIHATGgBwA&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless

adj-na, at least 6 pages of books
https://www.google.com/search?q="高品位なサウンド"&sca_esv=5ca5dd3556662dcb&udm=36&ei=2GFIZ9aCJIun2roP8Oan-QU&start=0&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjWzoy4g_-JAxWLk1YBHXDzKV84MhDy0wN6BAgBEAQ&biw=1745&bih=887&dpr=1.1

sankoku has this, but just says [noun].

This seems to be an old term that has been popularized by tech, with the modern usage preferring adj-na.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

eij, gg5

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>カツ飯</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かつめし</reb>
-<re_restr>かつ飯</re_restr>

nikk

katsu is not english

@@ -4,0 +4,10 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カツ飯</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かつ飯</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カツめし</reb>
+<re_restr>カツ飯</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +16,1 @@
+<re_restr>かつ飯</re_restr>
@@ -9,1 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>katsu rice meal (e.g. beef katsu, chicken katsu, pork katsu)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>cutlet and rice combo meal</gloss>

wiki

カツサンド	78844	75.7%
かつサンド	25261	24.3%

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">豚カツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">豚カツ</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>tonkatsu sandwich</gloss>

nikk, wiki, gg5

I think Brian meant to write "glosses" there instead of "entries". But I otherwise agree with Jim's comment.
To clarify, I'm not arguing for the inclusion of "queer act". I'd have dropped the gloss myself. I was just a little confused by his initial comment. Thanks for elaborating.

> I think we're better off without dialect/region/generation-specific entries, even if some users may see them as acceptable.

The decision to include an entry is based on the *Japanese*; not on the variety of English in the gloss(es). We don't usually have any glosses using dialectal terms (Scots, Singlish, etc.). AmE and BrE are not dialects. We try to make sure glosses cover regional terminologies, e.g. our policy states: `where different forms of English use different terms, include all major variants (e.g. both "snow pea" and "mange tout" or "tap" and "faucet"'.

The point about terms such as "queer" in glosses is that it has a common meaning in 2024 that it didn't have in 1994. Nothing wrong with using it with its historic meaning but the meaning, in the context of other glosses, must be clear.  I felt "queer act" had problems in that area.

Because I think it's a more broadly-important question, I'll re-open just to answer Robin's question (not trying to start a debate or anything)

1. I was at least a little open to entertaining "queer act" if it was idiomatic.  I looked for it, I could find no evidence that this gloss had ever in history been used.  Probably has been used somewhere, but I couldn't find it. 
 "dumbfounding performance" is idiomatic, and seems like an excellent gloss.  In contrast, in modern AmE I'm at a loss for any circumstance where "queer act" would be an advisable translation today.  It seems to me most likely to lead to embarrassment or misunderstanding if anyone were to try and use it.  Perhaps I should have been more explicit on this point - I should not have presumed that other editors' intuitions would match my own.

2. As suggested, I do think that "queer" in this sense is [dated].  Especially for non-idiomatic use, I see no reason to offer a [dated] gloss on any entry today(so long as the Japanese term is not also [dated], at least).  Since policy disallows marking English terms themselves as [dated], I really think "queer" should be stripped off of almost all of the terms where we currently still have it.  But that is a separate issue.

To my eye, "queer act" in particular didn't look merely [dated] here, it looked absurd, and I suspect it would look absurd to a large audience of jmdictdb.  In cases like these, with a universally understood, perfectly serviceable gloss already available, I think we're better off without dialect/region/generation-specific entries, even if some users may see them as acceptable.  There's no way for each of use to know what another dialect will find objectionable/misleading/confusing, so I think we just have to point these things out as we encounter them and discuss.

I do get the sense that historic jmdictdb policy has leaned towards "so long as it's valid in some English dialect, it's ok as a gloss".  I'm usually okay with this, but in cases of likely confusion/embarrassment (like this one), I think we should perhaps be a bit more selective.

Given its modern usage, it's probably best avoided.

daijs: 客があっけにとられるような奇妙な演技・演奏。

Brian, I'm not sure I understand your objection to "queer act". It's a somewhat dated use of "queer" but it seems to fit the definition.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>bizarre performance</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>performance so bad it is spellbinding</gloss>

一口カツ	12848	70.8%
一口かつ	5292	29.2%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一口かつ</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

nikk prog 新和英中辞典

カツ重 is arguably the correct option

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>かつじゅう</reb>
-<re_restr>かつ重</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>カツ重</re_restr>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1336650">重箱</xref>

http://www.ocada.jp/yummy/donburi.php (down the bottom)
Squillions of WWW images, Ngrams.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6521117
'中島みゆきが独占告白「本当に星になっちゃった。でも星は消えないですから」

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&euph;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to pass away</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to become a star</gloss>

I don't think there's enough evidence to say it's "hon".

segment on yomiuri tv show:
"追悼   忘れられない名シーン・・・　星になった有名人"
_
http://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/831216.html
"人間が死んだら星になるという話は和洋限らず、物語や映画でよくあります
が、この起源はなにでしょうか？"
_
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/僕が星%
E3��なるまえに
"僕が星になるまえに"
_
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/星にな%
E3��た少年
"星になった少年"
_
http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~comefx99/star.htm
"追悼…星になった声優達"

[hon]?

フィッシュカツ	4202	96.7%
フィッシュかつ	145	3.3%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/フィッシュカツ

I'm not sure a flat ball works....
Could go on to say they often have curry, spices, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フィッシュかつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<gloss>flat breaded fish balls</gloss>
+<gloss>flat breaded fish cakes</gloss>

ngrams
フィッシュカツ	4202

saw on TV. a couple of companies selling this under this 
name (all apparently based in Tokushima)

Aligning.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Bopomofo (Chinese transliteration system used mainly in Taiwan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Bopomofo (Chinese transliteration system now used mainly in Taiwan)</gloss>

Shouldn't have an expl gloss as it's not a Japanese concept.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Bopomofo</gloss>
+<gloss>Bopomofo (Chinese transliteration system used mainly in Taiwan)</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese transliteration system now used mainly in Taiwan</gloss>

I think this is better.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Bopomofo (Chinese transliteration system used in Taiwan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Bopomofo</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">Chinese transliteration system now used mainly in Taiwan</gloss>

daij, koj
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bopomofo

カツカレー	174470	90.4%
かつカレー	18574	9.6%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Not wasei.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1037720">カツ</xref>

Doesn't need a comma.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>it is better to try and fail, than never try at all</gloss>
+<gloss>it is better to try and fail than never to try at all</gloss>

やらずに後悔	10109	  
やらずに後悔する	8779	  
やらずに後悔するより	6533

I guess I don't mind it returning.

for the record
やらずに後悔するより gets 59 hits on NDL, the first from 1974.
first one where "やって後悔した方が..." is added is from 1979 (and from then on it and other variants on it come to dominate the results)

Can we revisit this?
Robin: "I'm just generally opposed to adding long, non-idiomatic expressions that aren't in the refs, regardless of how common they are."

This a (clichéd) adage so accusing it of not being an idiom seems to miss the mark. Again, I think it's more worthwhile to include these rather than the hundreds of obscure ones in the kokugos (... though of course I'm responsible for adding many of those as well). I think we should include the kind of hackneyed phrases people actually use in contemporary Japanese.

(if we introduce a [cliché] tag I think it would fit better than  [proverb].

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>it's better to try and fail, than never try at all</gloss>
+<gloss>it is better to try and fail, than never try at all</gloss>

OK, I've made this an example sentence: https://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/7316608
I could go either way, but I suppose this is best off there.

not really joc I don't think.

Possibly ephemeral.

今度は「＃インスタ萎え」が10代に流行る理由
https://m.japan.cnet.com/amp/story/3511296
3/
heard in conversation (of a photo not on 
instagram)

致し方ない	159255	74.4%
致し方無い	5335	2.5%
いたしかたない	38354	17.9%
致しかたない	2175	1.0%
いたし方ない	8892	4.2%

@@ -8,0 +9,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いたし方ない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>致しかたない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -34 +34,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 〜ても致し方ない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as 〜ても致し方ない</s_inf>
+<gloss>it's no use (doing)</gloss>

Aligning with 1305420.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,4 +16,43 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1305440">仕方ない</xref>
-<gloss>it can't be helped</gloss>
-<gloss>it's inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>it's no use</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1305420">仕方がない・1</xref>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>there's no (other) way</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>cannot be helped</gloss>
+<gloss>unavoidable</gloss>
+<gloss>inevitable</gloss>
+<gloss>(there's) nothing one can do</gloss>
+<gloss>having no choice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜ても致し方ない</s_inf>
+<gloss>pointless</gloss>
+<gloss>useless</gloss>
+<gloss>no good</gloss>
+<gloss>insufficient</gloss>
+<gloss>not enough</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<gloss>hopeless (person)</gloss>
+<gloss>annoying</gloss>
+<gloss>troublesome</gloss>
+<gloss>awful</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<s_inf>as 〜て致し方ない or 〜で致し方ない</s_inf>
+<gloss>cannot stand it</gloss>
+<gloss>unbearable</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot help (doing, feeling)</gloss>
+<gloss>dying (to do)</gloss>

致し方がない	15625
致し方のない	7551
致し方ない	159255
致し方無い	5335
致し方なく	11399
いたしかたがない	1791
いたしかたのない	1896
いたしかたない	38354

Pretty clearly another of the が/の+ない cases with the particle dropped.

I don't think this needs a rare tag. There's not a more common name for it.
"Cangjie" is much more common than "Tsang-chieh". I think one gloss is enough.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>Tsang-chieh input method</gloss>

倉頡輸入法	290

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/倉頡輸入法
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cangjie_input_method

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457410">トンカツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>

Meant to add these.

@@ -5,0 +6,10 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひれかつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒレかつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひれカツ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I guess we don't treat things containing abbr as wasei

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">fillet katsu</lsource>

ソースカツ	96900	78.7%
ソースかつ	26166	21.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ソースかつ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Sounds revolting.

ソースカツ丼	85498 ← daij, nagoya meibutsu. though I did see ソースカツ in the supermarket this morning, and it was just the katsu with sauce. I didn't stop and look too closely but it might have been fish-katsu.

found this online: https://www.topvalu.net/items/detail/4902121286928/ (魚肉)

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>...</gloss>
+<gloss>breaded cutlet (e.g. tonkatsu) covered in Worcester sauce</gloss>

ソースカツ	96900

will revisit (unless sb else gets to it before me, feel free)

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

あ奴が	28
あやつが	157
彼奴が	162

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あ奴</keb>

daijr: やや古めかしい言い方
sankoku:〔古風〕

Split from 1483160.

準備は	935905	  
準備はでき	83949	  	  
準備は出来	39668

Compositional and not that common. Not sure it's worth having.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/準備はいいか

準備はいいか	8348

This just means "two syllables", not "two-syllable word". A+B.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>two syllables</gloss>

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>二音節2273</keb>
+<keb>二音節</keb>

eijiro
reverso context
weblio

二音節	2273

not entirely sure about pronounciation.

GG5, etc.
べた書き	2240

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>solid writing</gloss>
+<gloss>close writing</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=べた書き

Not sure, but this might be the same as ベタ打ち. I saw this used at work, possibly with the [comp] sense of hardcoding.

Surprised it's so common, but we can't assume it's used for all senses of 消える.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1350040">消える・1</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 消ゆ │ 26.743 │ 38.2% │Daij's, Koj ; High Ngram count
│ きゆ │ 43.292 │ 61.8% │duplicates possible
╰─ーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Worth having I think. Have seen it used multiple times now. Mostly in songs.
So would I add all of the senses of the modern 消える here, or is the way I did it here fine? 
What is the policy on such cases?

Must have been thinking of 〜ある

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&v5r-i;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>there is always a bigger fish</gloss>

上には上がいる	36662	83.6%
上には上がある	7185	16.4% in lots of kokugos and jmdict

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>fixture (on a property , e.g. house, tree)</gloss>
+<gloss>fixture (on a property; e.g. house, tree)</gloss>

JEs

Maybe this.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>fixture (esp. a house)</gloss>
+<gloss>fixture (on a property , e.g. house, tree)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, shinkoku, gg5, gendai, etc.

not really sure how to gloss

中辞典: 心の闇 the dark of the heart; 《文》 the unfathomable depths of the human mind.

I think those briefer glosses work well.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,3 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>a heart unable to discern good from bad</gloss>
-<gloss>having lost one's sense of reason</gloss>
-<gloss>dreadful unknown depths of a heart</gloss>
+<gloss>dark of the heart</gloss>
+<gloss>depths of the human mind</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 心の闇　　　 │ 109.988 │ 99.7% │Sankoku, Smk, Daijs/t/r, Shinsen, Koj, Weblio古語
│ こころのやみ │     296 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
Sankoku for second sense: 〔古風〕

Some differences in the kokugo glosses, but the "inability do discern what's right and whats wrong" seems to be the most prominent one.

Gloss might need some work. Not entirely sure here.

GG5, 中辞典, ルミナス

The JEs all quote this expression as an example, but it's not that common. Not sure this entry is very useful.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>to imply</gloss>
+<gloss>to intimate</gloss>

Just a short followup thought.  Perhaps this is not "adverbial" at all, rather 言外に means something more like "inside what wasn't spoken", with に indicating location...

言外に	19696	 <-- look how much bigger this is
言外の	8154	 <-- than this
言外な	31       <-- but definitely not [adj-na]

[~ni]
言外に	19696	  
言外に含ま	674	  
言外に言っ	587	  
言外にある	394	  
言外に込め	368	  
言外に含まれ	355	  
言外に匂わせ	347	
言外にほのめかし	98	 
言外に仄めかし	24	 

vs [adj-no]
言外の	8154	  
言外の意味	3447	  
言外のメッセージ	272	  

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=言外
～を言外にほのめかす
hint at

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/jp/dictionary/japanese-english/言外にほのめかす
言外にほのめかす
hint
intransitive verb
If you hint at something, you suggest it in an indirect way.

This is not proposed for this term specifically, but for something lacking in the main 言外 entry. 

Encountered as 言外に...宣言した。（It seems any verb for transmitting information could be slotted in here. I've found 言う, 伝える, 示唆する, 主張する, 難詰される, in addition to the fixed collocation 言外に含まれる）

The main entry for 言外 is [adj-no,n].  This doesn't usually suggest an adverbial に usage in jmdict (I expect [adj-na] for that, usually), but ngrams suggests 言外に〜　is a dominant usage.  Might be simpler to offer an [exp] entry than try and fix the root entry. ほのめかす is not the *most* common collocation, but it's a simple gloss, and is contained in a number of JJ and J-E references as an example.

(sankoku contains both ~にほのめかす and ~に拒否する. collins has a dedicated entry for this, eijiro lists it as well).

Wouldn't usually have both adj tags.
I think the modern sense should lead.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16,0 +18,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
+<gloss>powerful</gloss>
+<gloss>outstanding</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -22,9 +30,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
-<gloss>strong</gloss>
-<gloss>powerful</gloss>
-<gloss>outstanding</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 強強　　 │ 2.900 │ 53.5% │daijs/r, koj
│ 強々　　 │   142 │  2.6% │add ; daijs/r ; [rK]
│ つよつよ │ 1.817 │ 33.5% │Pixiv for second sense
│ ツヨツヨ │   566 │ 10.4% │add
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
I would suggest [uk] for the second sense, especially since pixiv doesn't provide kanji for it.

Usage example is from 今昔物語集, I guess [arch] fits?

Daijr first sense: 非常に強いさま。きわめて丈夫なさま。(Emphasis)

I don't really know about the specific POS for the second sense. An archaic sense and a modern net slang sense go together quite weirdly. Maybe a note that the first sense was probably not spelled with katakana?

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>強々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ツヨツヨ</reb>
@@ -13,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>strong</gloss>
-<gloss>fit and healthy</gloss>
+<gloss>exceedingly strong</gloss>
+<gloss>perfectly fit</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>