アボートし	1,799		
アポートし	0

Looks like アポート is a very rare typo. Much more commonly means "apport". I think it should be dropped.

@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アポート</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +11,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ クインテット │ 106,198 │ 97.5% │
│ クィンテット │   2,755 │  2.5% │ - sk
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

The "documentation" sense is in the kokugos and GG5. Daijr/s and meikyo combine it with the "computer document" sense.

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>reportage</gloss>
-<gloss>documentary</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>document</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -21,0 +23,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>documentary</gloss>
+<gloss>reportage</gloss>

https://talking-english.net/document-documentation-documentary/
document（ドキュメント）は通常は「書類」などを指して使われる言葉ですが、英語には似た単語でdocumentation（ドキュメンテイション）や
documentary（ドキュメンタリー）があります。

カタカナではこれらの混同が少なからず見られ「ドキュメント番組」といった言い方がされますが、英語としては誤りだといえます。

documentとdocumentationの違いについてはかなり近い意味になるので間違えやすい要素になっています。ここでは英単語としての意味を確認しま
す。

Possibly col. I think it should come after "reportage", which is attested in several sources. Actually a glance at twitter 
suggests it's actually the most common usage, by far.

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<gloss>reportage</gloss>
+<gloss>documentary</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>reportage</gloss>
-<gloss>documentary</gloss>
-</sense>

英和コンピューター用語辞典: documentation -> ドキュメント as well as ドキュメンテーション
Borkand Manual: UML のセマンティクスと表記法の詳細については、UML ドキュメントを参照してください. Refer to UML documentation for the detailed
information about UML semantics and notation.

Could be seen as part of sense 1, but I think it deserves splitting out.

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1088110">ドキュメンテーション</xref>
+<gloss>documentation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

バケーションを	        11,948		
ヴァケイションを	        53	
バケーションレンタル	6,777			
ヴァケイションレンタル	0

I think most of the ヴァケイション n-grams come from a song title.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

JLD, JWN, G n-grams:
ヴァケイション	136073
バケーション	197006
ヴァケーション	4590
バケイション	1440

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァケイション</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァケーション</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バケイション</reb>

Ancient history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BITNET
>> BITNET was a co-operative U.S. university computer network founded in 1981 by Ira Fuchs at the City University of New York (CUNY) and Greydon Freeman at Yale University.

Not in the kokugos or GG5. I don't think this is needed.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＢＩＴＮＥＴ</keb>
+</k_ele>

jawiki, daijr/s, obunsha

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みやづかさ</reb>

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>(Shinto) chief priest</gloss>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<gloss>chief priest</gloss>

gg5, luminous, daij

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>competition for better work</gloss>
+<gloss>competing (with each other) in creating (composing, drawing, writing, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>competition to produce an (artistic, literary, etc.) work</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5

I think this reads more naturally.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>musical composition title</gloss>
+<gloss>title of a musical composition</gloss>
+<gloss>name of a piece of music</gloss>

GG5

Not just songs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>musical composition title</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>song titles</gloss>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5

More glosses
(“the aforementioned” seems most natural close translation)

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>the above-mentioned</gloss>
+<gloss>the aforementioned</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>the above-mentioned</gloss>
+<gloss>the aforesaid</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 見栄を張る │ 15,526 │ 78.5% │
│ 見栄をはる │  3,846 │ 19.5% │ - sK
│ 見えを張る │    237 │  1.2% │ - sK
│ 見えをはる │     40 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ みえをはる │    122 │  0.6% │
├─ーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ 見栄を張っ │ 26,319 │ 76.7% │
│ 見栄をはっ │  7,498 │ 21.9% │
│ 見えを張っ │    262 │  0.8% │
│ 見えをはっ │     58 │  0.2% │
│ みえをはっ │    175 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5 G-ngrams

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>見えをはる</keb>
+<keb>見えを張る</keb>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>見えを張る</keb>
+<keb>見えをはる</keb>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to show off</gloss>

1909980 is  duplicate

@@ -5,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>見栄を張る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見えをはる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見えを張る</keb>
@@ -12,0 +21,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

GG5

I think it's clear from all the glosses, but I'll lower that one to make it clearer.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>interference</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>interference</gloss>

isn't this specifically "spoken" interference? not just any kind of interference

gg5, luminous

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>meddling</gloss>
+<gloss>meddling (in)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>poking one's nose into</gloss>

口出し　 182,280  95.0% 
口だし　   8,463   4.4% -sK
くちだし   1,193   0.6%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

I think 摺り替える can be hidden.
Moving up 掏り替える as it's in most of the kokugos.
It's not necessary to add every form with a non-zero n-gram count. I'm dropping the ones that are <0.1%.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<keb>擦り替える</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -19 +15 @@
-<keb>摺り替える</keb>
+<keb>擦り替える</keb>
@@ -31,5 +27 @@
-<keb>摺りかえる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>掏りかえる</keb>
+<keb>摺り替える</keb>
@@ -45,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>to replace</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ すり替え │ 148,334 │ 67.0% │
│ 摩り替え │  15,956 │  7.2% │
│ 摺り替え │   1,239 │  0.6% │ add rK (not in any of my refs)
│ 擦り替え │     367 │  0.2% │ add rK (jitenon, iwakoku)
│ 掏り替え │     273 │  0.1% │ add (daijr/s, nikk, gg5 as 掏り替え)
│ 擦りかえ │     183 │  0.1% │ add
│ 掏替え　 │      78 │  0.0% │ add sK
│ 摺りかえ │      70 │  0.0% │ add
│ 掏りかえ │      24 │  0.0% │ add
│ 摩替え　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ 擦替え　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ 摺替え　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ すりかえ │  54,790 │ 24.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摺り替える</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +27,10 @@
-<keb>摺り替える</keb>
+<keb>擦りかえる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>摺りかえる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掏りかえる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

They were split out because their roles differ. The sentence indexing needs to be pinned to the さけ entry, which will take some work as the global edit system in Tatoeba is a bit limited.

I wonder why these are listed as different entries, and not as alternative readings.
Minimally, the example sentences should be removed from the items with readings that don't match the sentences.

 酒 【さか】 (pref) alcohol; sake [Links] (Name entry: 酒 )
     僕は酒も煙草もやらないんだ。 I neither drink nor smoke.[Amend]

酒 【さけ】 (n) alcohol; sake; [P] [Links] (Name entry: 酒 )
     僕は酒も煙草もやらないんだ。 I neither drink nor smoke.[Amend]
 酒 【ささ】 (n) (dated) alcohol; sake [Links]
     僕は酒も煙草もやらないんだ。 I neither drink nor smoke.[Amend]
 酒 【しゅ】 (suf) alcohol; (alcoholic) drink; liqueur [Links]
     僕は酒も煙草もやらないんだ。 I neither drink nor smoke.[Amend]

I think a separate entry would work. I;ll set one up and close this.

レモン酒 	7244
ミカン酒 	303 an entry
オレンジ酒	437
リンゴ酒 	5067 an entry
柚子酒   	5859 an entry
桃酒    	2644
メロン酒　	404
スイカ酒　	107

Not sure how many [noun]酒 drinks there are.
We could split out しゅ into a separate [suf] entry.

smk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

We usually don't hide forms that are in daijisen unless they would cause significant clutter.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

smk

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 団栗　　 │  14,542 │  1.3% │
│ 橡　　　 │  17,183 │  1.6% │ false positives + only in daijs, nikk, gendai
│ どんぐり │ 882,691 │ 80.4% │
│ ドングリ │ 183,448 │ 16.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

団栗	14542
橡	17183
どんぐり	882691
ドングリ	183448

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<reb>ドングリ(nokanji)</reb>
+<reb>ドングリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

I can live with it being a sense, but I think it's technically incorrect. Taiwan is the island. There are die-hards who still think that the ROC rules the whole place and Mao and his successors are temporary occupiers (that was the US's official position until the 1970s.)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/中華民国_(1912年-1949年)

I see that Jim objected to adding "Taiwan" as a gloss I think it's OK. "Republic of China" is just the official name of Taiwan.
I think we need a separate sense for the pre-1949 中華民国, which was obviously not referred to as Taiwan.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Republic of China (Taiwan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Republic of China</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+<gloss>Taiwan</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Republic of China (country controlling mainland China from 1912 to 1949)</gloss>

jawiki:
"中華民国（ちゅうかみんこく、繁: 中華民國、注音: ㄓㄨㄥ ㄏㄨㄚˊ ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄍㄨㄛˊ、ウェード式: Chung-hua Min-kuo、英: Republic of China）は、東アジアに位置する共和制国家。実効支配している領土の大半が台湾島であることと、中華人民共和国が「一つの中国」原則を唱えている政治情勢により、台湾（たいわん、繁: 臺灣／台灣、注音: ㄊㄞˊㄨㄢ、英: Taiwan）が通称として国際的にしばしば使用されている。現在（1949年以降）の首都は台北市。"
enwiki:
"Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)"

i think it makes sense to add Taiwan as a separate gloss

OK.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Republic of China</gloss>
+<gloss>Republic of China (Taiwan)</gloss>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Taiwan</gloss>

Sorry, but I don't think "Taiwan" is a correct translation of 中華民国. None of my JE 
references do that. Fine to add ROC, but I liked the previous version.

斃れ	17,977		
仆れ	2,685		
殪れ	90

仆れる is in meikyo and smk.

@@ -55 +55 @@
-<s_inf>occ. 斃れる</s_inf>
+<s_inf>occ. written as 斃れる, 仆れる</s_inf>

倒れる	716589	99.2%
斃れる	5806	0.8%
仆れる	210	0.0%
殪れる	22	0.0%

(Re)merging as suggested in 2834855.

@@ -8,0 +9,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>斃れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仆れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>殪れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42,0 +55 @@
+<s_inf>occ. 斃れる</s_inf>

I was about to suggest the same thing. I'll do it.

@@ -10,9 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>斃れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>仆れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>殪れる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -26 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -35 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -45 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -59 +46,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -68 +54,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>
@@ -75 +60,0 @@
-<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

I think the usual thing to do in this situation is to create a new 斃れる/仆れる/殪れる entry and have an x-ref pointing to this entry's "die" sense.

daij

斃れる, 仆れる and 殪れる all only apply to the "to die" 
sense, one out of seven senses. If they would still 
appear in searches, it'd make sense to just include them 
in a note...
_
Also a reminder that the example sentences will have to 
be adjusted if my split of sense 1 goes through.

@@ -44,0 +45 @@
+<stagk>倒れる</stagk>

洞くつ	35,734

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洞くつ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think "cave system" is needed.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>cave</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>cave</gloss>
-<gloss>cave system</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to sell off</gloss>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>to sell off</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 売り飛ばす │ 20,517 │ 95.6% │
│ 売りとばす │    868 │  4.0% │ - sK
│ うりとばす │     79 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>売りとばす</keb>

@@ -19,4 +18,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stuffed animal</gloss>
-</sense>

Not [vs] in the kokugos

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 剥製　　 │ 101,967 │
│ 剥製し　 │      25 │
│ 剥製する │       0 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

See comments on entry 1905160

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 剥製 │ 101.967 │100.0% │
│ 剝製 │       0 │  0.0% │sankoku, shinsen, smk, meikyo, etc. ; ngram error?
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
剝 is 繁体字 and 通用字体 to 剥, and when scanned with e.g. yomitan does not direct to 剥 here

I see this form used in some ndl results, although the larger part of it is for 剥製
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?pageNum=0&pageSize=20&sortKey=SCORE&fullText=true&includeVolumeNum=true&keyword=剝製&displayMode=list&accessRestrictions=internet&accessRestrictions=ooc&accessRestrictions=inlibrary

jawiki also lists 剥製（はくせい、剝製）

from deleted submission 2865947

didn't tag in any way since I assumed that this is an ngram problem and not an extremely rare form

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>剝製</keb>

I'm comfortable either way.

It's true that a majority of the kokugos define this word as a もの without mentioning the こと.

剥製の〜 phrases seem less common than 〜の剥製.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 鳥の剥製　 │ 1,504 │
│ 剥製の鳥　 │   207 │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┤
│ 動物の剥製 │ 5,209 │
│ 剥製の動物 │   239 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

Maybe we should reorder the senses.

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<gloss>stuffed specimen</gloss>
+<gloss>taxidermy mount</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,5 +23,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stuffed specimen</gloss>
-<gloss>taxidermy mount</gloss>

[not the same commenter]
I'm not sure sense 1 belongs here at all
daijisen does say ...外形を保つように作ること。また、そのもの。 but it seems the そのもの part vastly dominates - daijirin for example does not mention the ...作ること part at all

剥製にする as does not really mean "to stuff" but "to make into a taxidermied animal" and
剥製の熊 does not really mean "stuffed" bear but a "bear that is a taxidermied animal" (note that you can reverse it into 熊の剥製 which is a much more natural way of phrasing it)

basically I think the JEs are just trying to phrase it in a way that suits the english translations they give but is not really the way the word is used in japanese

smk, daijs, gendai

無手法	39

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無手法</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

GG5

Well, well.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>headlong</gloss>
+<gloss>foolhardy</gloss>

daijs
《「むてんぽう（無点法）」、または「むてほう（無手法）」の音変化という。「無鉄砲」は当て字》

無鉄砲	70814	99.9%
無点法	42	0.1%
無手法	39	0.1%

Longer pondering on etymology
https://gogen-yurai.jp/muteppou/

Finally wondering how "no gun" = "reckless".  Ateji.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

daijs: 仕事の途中でむだ話などをして怠ける。

I don't think "particularly" is needed.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to loaf (particularly on the job)</gloss>
+<gloss>to loaf around (on the job)</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

〈油／脂／あぶら／アブラ〉を〈売／う〉る

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 油を売る　　 │ 4,341 │ 52.9% │
│ あぶらを売る │ 3,190 │ 38.9% │ - (skewed/inflated counts)
│ アブラを売る │   295 │  3.6% │
│ 油をうる　　 │   247 │  3.0% │
│ 脂を売る　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ あぶらをうる │   129 │  1.6% │
│ アブラをうる │     0 │  0.0% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 油を売っ　　 │ 8,931 │ 94.4% │
│ 油をうっ　　 │   196 │  2.1% │ - add, sK
│ アブラを売っ │   142 │  1.5% │ - add, sK
│ あぶらを売っ │    83 │  0.9% │ - add, sK
│ 脂を売っ　　 │    21 │  0.2% │
│ あぶらをうっ │    59 │  0.6% │
│ アブラをうっ │    24 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>油をうる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アブラを売る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あぶらを売る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Style alignment with おんどり.
I don't think "chanticleer" is needed.

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<stagk>雄鳥</stagk>
@@ -37 +37,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雄鳥 when in kanji</s_inf>
@@ -44 +44 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雄鶏 when in kanji</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 雄鶏</s_inf>
@@ -47 +46,0 @@
-<gloss>chanticleer</gloss>

meikyo, gendai reikai, sankoku

雄鶏　　 25,363  39.5% 
雄鳥　　  5,351   8.3% 
牡鶏　　    128   0.2% -sK, smk has it as ほけい, maybe split it off too like we did with 牝鶏 ?
おん鳥　    100   0.2% -sK
おん鶏　     49   0.1% -sK
牡鳥　　      0   0.0% -sK
おんどり 25,868  40.3% 
オンドリ  7,312  11.4%

align with 雌鳥.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -30,0 +35 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1608640">雌鳥・1</xref>
@@ -31,0 +37,8 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 雄鳥 when in kanji</s_inf>
+<gloss>male bird</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1608640">雌鶏・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. 雄鶏 when in kanji</s_inf>

G n-grams:
おんどり	25868
雄鶏	25363
オンドリ	 7312
雄鳥	 5351
牡鶏	  128
おん鳥	  100
おん鶏	   49
牡鳥	No matches

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>雄鶏</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,7 @@
-<keb>雄鶏</keb>
+<keb>牡鶏</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おん鳥</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おん鶏</keb>
@@ -13,3 +21,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>牡鶏</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +25,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オンドリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +31 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I see that 膝まづく gets used a dozen or so times per day on twitter.

We all saw that it was in sankoku last year. Anonymous "I think" statements don't carry any weight.
Please try to add something new if you're going to reopen recently edited entries to nitpick.

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<keb>膝まずく</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>膝まづく</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<keb>膝まづく</keb>
+<keb>膝まずく</keb>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_restr>跪く</re_restr>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<re_restr>跪く</re_restr>

膝まずく is mentioned in sankoku, i think we can keep at least one 膝 form visible

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<keb>膝まづく</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>膝まずく</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<keb>膝まずく</keb>
+<keb>膝まづく</keb>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<re_restr>跪く</re_restr>

GG5, etc.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>to genuflect</gloss>

I think the irregular 膝 forms are rare enough to hide.

〈跪／膝／ひざ／ヒザ〉（（ま）〈ず／づ〉）いて

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 跪いて　　　 │ 55,201 │ 63.9% │
│ 膝まづいて　 │  1,865 │  2.2% │
│ 膝まずいて　 │    623 │  0.7% │
│ 跪づいて　　 │     85 │  0.1% │
│ 膝いて　　　 │     79 │  0.1% │
│ 跪ずいて　　 │     48 │  0.1% │
│ 膝づいて　　 │     22 │  0.0% │
│ ひざまずいて │ 21,612 │ 25.0% │
│ ひざまづいて │  6,902 │  8.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

I'd prefer わるくち to lead, but it's no big deal.

it's hard to tell what reading is more common from n-grams alone, especially when it's much more common in kanji

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 悪口　　 │ 1,115,036 │ 99.4% │
│ 惡口　　 │       991 │  0.1% │
│ わるくち │     3,428 │  0.3% │
│ わるぐち │     2,129 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

the refs pretty much all have わるくち, but i believe わるぐち is the more common reading and what i hear all the time
immersionkit clips all have わるぐち and youglish clips overall prefer わるぐち

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<reb>わるぐち</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -20,4 +23,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>わるぐち</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

わるぐち	2129	38.3%
わるくち	3428	61.7%

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<reb>わるぐち</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -23,0 +20,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>わるぐち</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Done.

Putting ニセモノ first will cause it to appear before 偽物【にせもの】 on e.g. jisho.org and also my own jmdict distro, even though ニセモノ is far less common.
See how the word "イカリソウ" is displayed on jisho.org for example.
I can't think of any instances where we've placed a [nokanji] form first in a situation like this.

It's not really what we discussed in the github thread, but doesn't it make sense to put ニセモノ first among the kana considering it's the most common when written in kana? There's no uk tag, so there's no indication that it's more common than the kanji.

Putting the priority tags back.

@@ -26,0 +27,3 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf24</re_pri>

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/113

This isn't a situation where we'd want to lead with the [nokanji] form.
Not sure that にせもん needs to be visible.

@@ -26,2 +26 @@
-<reb>ニセモノ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>にせもの</reb>
@@ -30 +29,2 @@
-<reb>にせもの</reb>
+<reb>ぎぶつ</reb>
+<re_restr>偽物</re_restr>
@@ -37,2 +37 @@
-<reb>ぎぶつ</reb>
-<re_restr>偽物</re_restr>
+<reb>にせもん</reb>
@@ -41 +40,2 @@
-<reb>にせもん</reb>
+<reb>ニセモノ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

Used in sankoku's entry for さか【酒】

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 上側　　 │ 178,619 │
│ 上がわ　 │     215 │
│ うわかわ │      44 │
│ うわがわ │     163 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上がわ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

already accounted for in entry for うわっかわ

@@ -13,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うわっかわ</reb>
-</r_ele>

daijr: 床の間や机の上などに，装飾のため据え置く物。

I don't think we need to mention tokonama. It's just an example of where you'd place an ornament.

@@ -28,5 +27,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1349400">床の間</xref>
-<gloss>object placed in a tokonoma</gloss>

OK

better as a separate sense?

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1349400">床の間</xref>
@@ -28,0 +28,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1349400">床の間</xref>

置物	726402	88.9%
置き物	67089	8.2%
おきもの	20989	2.6%
置もの	100	0.0%
置きもの	2400	0.3%

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>置きもの</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1349400">床の間</xref>

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>attraction</gloss>

乗り物	2,588,229	96.0%	
乗物	108,942	        4.0%

Probably best to drop [ichi1] from 乗物.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

I don't think a playground has "rides".

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>transport</gloss>
+<gloss>(means of) transport</gloss>
@@ -32,2 +32 @@
-<gloss>ride (playground, fair, carnival)</gloss>
-<gloss>playground facility</gloss>
+<gloss>ride (at a fair, amusement park, etc.)</gloss>

Indeed

Well, at least the beta version is close enough...

I'm not sure that any tweaking there would work. The buggy "beta" version, which runs the text first through MeCab/Unidic. is about the best I can do there.

Can you tweak Text Glossing so that it recognises ハマれる as being the potential form of ハマる?

Input: 洋楽を色々聴いてみて有名でもあまりハマれるものがなかったのですがこのアルバムはめちゃくちゃ好きです

1. this is what regular glossing gives us:
    ハマ : 浜 【はま(P); ハマ】 (n) (1) beach; seashore; (n) (2) (abbr) (uk) {go} (See 揚げ浜・2) captured pieces; captured stones; (n) (3) (abbr) (See 横浜) Yokohama; (n) (4) (arch) (osb:) riverbank; riverside; (P); ED; Name(s): ; (g,p) Hama
    れる (aux-v,v1) (1) indicates passive voice (incl. the "suffering passive"); (aux-v,v1) (2) indicates the potential form; (aux-v,v1) (3) indicates spontaneous occurrence; (aux-v,v1) (4) (hon) used as an honorific for others' actions; KD 

2. this is what the new beta glossing gives us:
    ハマれ from: 嵌まる : 嵌まる; 填まる; 塡まる; 嵌る 【はまる; ハマる(P)】 (v5r,vi) (1) (uk) to fit; to get into; to go into; to be fitted with (e.g. door with a window); (v5r,vi) (2) (uk) to be fit for (a job, etc.); to be suited for; to satisfy (conditions); (v5r,vi) (3) (uk) to fall into; to plunge into; to get stuck; to get caught; (v5r,vi) (4) (uk) to be deceived; to be taken in; to fall into a trap; (v5r,vi) (5) (uk) to get addicted to; to get deep into; to become crazy about; to become stuck on; (P); ED
    る (suf) (col) verb-forming suffix; KD

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1542550">雄鳥・1</xref>
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1542550">雄鶏・2</xref>

smk: ニワトリの場合は、「雌鶏」とも書く
meikyo: ❶ めすの鳥。
          表記「雌鳥」と書く。
        ❷ めすのにわとり。
          表記②は、多く「雌鶏」と書く。

雌鶏 isn't used for sense 1.
"hen" doesn't necessarily refer to a chicken.
Although this is [uk], I think a simple "esp." note is fine.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<stagk>雌鳥</stagk>
@@ -28 +28,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雌鳥 when in kanji</s_inf>
@@ -34,2 +34,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雌鶏 when in kanji</s_inf>
-<gloss>hen</gloss>
+<s_inf>esp. 雌鶏</s_inf>
+<gloss>hen (female chicken)</gloss>

OK, splitting. Trimming.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<keb>牝鶏</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -20,4 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>牝鳥</keb>
@@ -36 +28 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雌鳥 when written with kanji</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. 雌鳥 when in kanji</s_inf>
@@ -42 +34 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 雌鶏 when written with kanji</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. 雌鶏 when in kanji</s_inf>

明鏡国語辞典, 現代国語例解辞典

雌鳥　　  9,649  17.8% 
雌鶏　　  6,898  12.7% 
牝鶏　　  2,890   5.3% -sK, refs have it as ひんけい. I think we should split it off.
めん鶏　    765   1.4% -sK
めん鳥　    573   1.1% -sK
牝鳥　　    101   0.2% -sK, not in refs
めんどり 24,008  44.3% 
メンドリ  9,368  17.3%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -31,0 +36 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 雌鳥 when written with kanji</s_inf>
@@ -32,0 +38,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. 雌鶏 when written with kanji</s_inf>

gg5, prog, luminous

I think these should be separate glosses.

@@ -33 +33,4 @@
-<gloss>things to be washed (esp. dishes and laundry)</gloss>
+<gloss>things to be washed</gloss>
+<gloss>(dirty) dishes</gloss>
+<gloss>laundry</gloss>
+<gloss>washing</gloss>

洗い物	225604	86.8%
洗物	15930	6.1%
あらいもの	1356	0.5%
あらいもん	144	0.1%
洗いもん	984	0.4%
洗いもの	15934	6.1%

@@ -12 +12,9 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洗いもの</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>洗いもん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +27,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あらいもん</reb>

wikt: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/あらいもの

"(the) washing" only refers to clothing.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>washing (esp. dishes and laundry)</gloss>
+<gloss>things to be washed (esp. dishes and laundry)</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom, daij

More senses.

@@ -13 +13,6 @@
-<s_inf>passive of 呼ぶ</s_inf>
+<s_inf>passive form of 呼ぶ</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be called out</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -15 +20,13 @@
-<gloss>to be referred to (as)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be referred to as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be invited (to)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be summoned</gloss>
+<gloss>to be called</gloss>
+<gloss>to be sent for</gloss>
@@ -21,6 +38 @@
-<gloss>to be treated to something (e.g. a meal)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to be invited to (e.g. someone's house)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be treated to (a meal, drink, etc.)</gloss>

sankoku, shinkoku

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
@@ -21 +22,5 @@
-<gloss>to be invited to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be invited to (e.g. someone's house)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

https://osakatimes.jugem.jp/?eid=870


木判	482

rare typo it seems

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>木判</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

立ちんぼう is tagged [sK] and shouldn't be used as a reading restriction.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<re_restr>立ちんぼう</re_restr>

立ちん坊	1279	7.9%
立ちんぼ	12176	75.3%
立ちんぼう	1004	6.2%
たちんぼ	1718	10.6%

it seems the streetwalker sense dominates today. Propose moving it up top.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>立ちんぼ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>立ちんぼ</keb>
+<keb>立ちんぼう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,3 +14,3 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>立ちんぼう</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たちんぼ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,5 +22,5 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たちんぼ</reb>
-<re_restr>立ちん坊</re_restr>
-<re_restr>立ちんぼ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>streetwalker</gloss>
+<gloss>street girl</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -32,5 +35,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>prostitute</gloss>
-<gloss>streetwalker</gloss>

@@ -48 +48 @@
-<gloss>day laborer standing and waiting for a job.</gloss>
+<gloss>day laborer standing and waiting for a job</gloss>

Hmmm. The JEs just have "Japan and China" which avoids the finer points.

daijr/s: 日本と中華民国

Unless this was used before 1912, I don't think it's two senses. The Republic of China started as a country on the mainland.

@@ -12,5 +12 @@
-<gloss>Japan and China</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Japan and Taiwan</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan and the Republic of China</gloss>

Daijisen (sense 2): 日本と中華民国。

would this really ever be used to refer to taiwan, excluding a tiny minority of fervent japanese-speaking ccp supporters?

GG5, ルミナス

Both just have Japan and China.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Japan and Taiwan</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan and China</gloss>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Japan and China</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan and Taiwan</gloss>

gg5, saito

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>burning with desire</gloss>
+<gloss>eagerly</gloss>
+<gloss>impatiently</gloss>

GG5

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>impetuously</gloss>
+<gloss>courageously</gloss>
+<gloss>ardently</gloss>

sankoku, smk
from kadokawa's kogo dict:
"こころは矢竹(やたけ)「矢竹」は「弥猛」の当て字。心があせりはやるさま。心が勇みはやるさま。"

矢竹に	103

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>矢竹に</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

様変わり　 192,536  97.7% 
様変り　　   2,867   1.5% -sK
さまがわり   1,655   0.8%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

mk

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>様変り</keb>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>transformation</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 生計を立て　　 │ 103,569 │ 86.5% │
│ 生計をたて　　 │  16,037 │ 13.4% │ - sK
│ せいけいをたて │      68 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>生計をたてる</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>the Gang of Four (Maoist political faction)</gloss>
+<gloss>Gang of Four (Maoist political faction)</gloss>

We usually leave out the "the" even in entries like these.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>four-person group</gloss>
+<gloss>foursome</gloss>
+<gloss>group of four people</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>four person group</gloss>
+<gloss>four-person group</gloss>

https://articlesofstyle.com/blogs/news/what-is-an-unstructured-suit
https://blog.knotstandard.com/unconstructed/
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unconstructed
G n-grams:
アンコン	                23,952	  - many false positives
アンコン仕立て	        693	
アンコンストラクティッド	0

Daijr and daijs don't say it's an abbreviation.
Some websites say it's abbreviation of アンコンストラクテッド・ジャケット.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -12 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>overcoat with very simple lines and no shoulder pads</gloss>
+<gloss>unstructured tailoring</gloss>
+<gloss>unstructured garment</gloss>
+<gloss>unconstructed jacket</gloss>

Daijirin redirects to アンコンストラクティッド.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&cloth;</field>
@@ -10 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>overcoat with very simple lines and no shoulder pads, etc. (from: unconstructed)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">uncon(structed)</lsource>
+<gloss>overcoat with very simple lines and no shoulder pads</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>group</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>group</gloss>

gg5, prog, saito
E.g. 誘拐団 (kidnapping gang), 盗賊団 (gang of thieves), 密輸団 (smuggling ring), 飛行団 (aviation corps)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>gang</gloss>
+<gloss>corps</gloss>
+<gloss>ring</gloss>

Merging would break the 2/3 rule.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2271470">これきり・1</xref>
@@ -32 +30,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2271470">これきり・2</xref>

see 2271470.

One note is probably enough. See 先ずは

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

デジタル大辞泉, 大辞林

is one note enough ? it applies for both senses.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2271470">これ切り</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2271470">これきり・1</xref>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<s_inf>more emphatic than これきり</s_inf>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2271470">これきり・2</xref>

これっ切り     50   0.1% -sK
此れっ切り      0   0.0% 
是っ切り　      0   0.0% 
これっきり 44,073  99.9%

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>これっ切り</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>これっ切り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

居ながらにして	90,099	55.4%	
居乍らにして	383	0.2%	
坐らにして	0	0.0%	
いながらにして	72,291	44.4%

Aligning.
Since 居乍ら is visible on the いながら entry, I think we can hide it here.

@@ -9,4 +9 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>坐らにして</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,2 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>from one's seat</gloss>
-<gloss>without stirring</gloss>
+<gloss>from one's home</gloss>
+<gloss>while sitting at home</gloss>
+<gloss>without leaving one's house</gloss>
+<gloss>without moving from one's chair</gloss>
+<gloss>without taking a step outside</gloss>

See comment in 1717830.

@@ -5,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>居乍らにして</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>坐らにして</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

Moving up クヌギ (n-grams posted previously)

@@ -27,0 +28,4 @@
+<reb>クヌギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -33,4 +36,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>クヌギ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

I think most are.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I only see くのぎ in daijr, and it only has it for 櫟

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<re_restr>櫟</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 櫟　　 │  26,880 │ 11.2% │
│ 椚　　 │  11,653 │  4.8% │
│ 橡　　 │  17,183 │  7.1% │
│ 櫪　　 │     489 │  0.2% │
│ 椢　　 │      71 │  0.0% │ <- nikk; adding
│ 槶　　 │       0 │  0.0% │ <- meikyo; adding
│ くぬぎ │  64,569 │ 26.8% │
│ くのぎ │     241 │  0.1% │
│ クヌギ │ 119,954 │ 49.8% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

I'd bet that most of the n-gram counts are from names and that they're probably all [rK].

JP Wikipedia lists the first three forms at least, so maybe this setup is okay.

@@ -14,0 +15,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>椢</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>槶</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

GG5 calls this "Japanese chestnut oak", but no other reference does.

ぱくり屋	223	7.0%
パクリ屋	2775	86.7%
パクり屋	203	6.3%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ぱくり屋</keb>
+<keb>パクリ屋</keb>
@@ -8 +8,6 @@
-<keb>パクリ屋</keb>
+<keb>ぱくり屋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>パクり屋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,5 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>ぱくり屋</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>パクリや</reb>
-<re_restr>パクリ屋</re_restr>

Entry created

Daijirin cites 日葡 for the "idiot; fool" sense. Daijisen quotes 醒睡笑 from the year 1623. The smaller kokugos and JEs don't mention this sense.

@@ -17,5 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>idiot</gloss>
-<gloss>fool</gloss>

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>noh mask for roles involving dead or ghost characters</gloss>
+<field>&noh;</field>
+<gloss>mask for roles involving dead or ghost characters</gloss>

jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アヤカシ_(妖怪)

あやかし	99863
アヤカシ	15450

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アヤカシ</reb>

It's in gg5 追加語彙

OK

山内溥の好きな言葉は"得意冷然、失意泰然" (1986 President profile of Hiroshi Yamauchi)

I think this is yojijukugo and not arch

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Thanks

They can't be merged as it breaks the 2/3 rule. これきり is 此れ切り, これっきり is 此れっ切り.

merging 1982160.

just like ごつい. see 2062930.

@@ -12,0 +13,8 @@
+<keb>此れっ切り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>是っ切り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +22,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>これっ切り</keb>
@@ -17,0 +30,2 @@
+<re_restr>此れ切り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>是切り</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +35,7 @@
+<re_restr>此れ切り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>是切り</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>これっきり</reb>
+<re_restr>此れっ切り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>是っ切り</re_restr>
@@ -25,0 +47 @@
+<s_inf>これっきり is more emphatic</s_inf>

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

これ切り   387   4.9% -sK
此れ切り     0   0.0% 
是切り　     0   0.0% 
これきり 6,731  85.6% 
これぎり   742   9.4%

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>これ切り</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>これ切り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daijs
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/abend
アベンド	        1,421		
アベンドし	280

I don't think it's written as "ABEND".

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ＡＢＥＮＤ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -13,3 +12 @@
-<gloss>abnormal termination</gloss>
-<gloss>abnormal end</gloss>
-<gloss>ABEND</gloss>
+<gloss>abend</gloss>

supposedly

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＡＢＥＮＤ</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

インテグレーテッド	        1,461		
インテグレーテッドルーチング	0

インテグレーテッド is the usual spelling. I'll make an entry for it.

インテグレーティドルーチング	0
インテグレーティド・ルーチング	0

I thought may インテグレーティド could be an entry, but I can't see it being used.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インテグレーティド・ルーチング</reb>

Entry created

The main issue with "/" within glosses is that the old "edict" format used it as a separator between glosses. I think we can live with it being used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAD/CAM

Can we use slashes in glosses?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>CAD-CAM</gloss>
+<gloss>CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing)</gloss>

daijr
CAD/CAM

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＣＡＤ／ＣＡＭ</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_integrator

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>systems integrator</gloss>

Obvious misplaced dot

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>システムイン・テグレーター</reb>
+<reb>システム・インテグレーター</reb>

wiki, gakken katakana, WI

obvious variant

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>システムインテグレーター</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>システムイン・テグレーター</reb>
+</r_ele>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>システム・インテグレータ</reb>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Application_Programming_Interface
>> Business Application Programming Interface (BAPI) is used in mySAP to achieve business related functionalities. It is a remote-enabled function module which is provided by SAP.

Not in the usual refs. I think this can go.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＢＡＰＩ</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>BAPI (Business Application Programming Interface)</gloss>
+<gloss>Business Application Programming Interface</gloss>
+<gloss>BAPI</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_blit

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>bit blit (computer graphics operation)</gloss>

daijs

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＢｉｔＢＬＴ</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Magneto-Optical disk</gloss>
+<gloss>magneto-optical disk</gloss>

Entry created

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ワイアーム
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wyrm

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1148540">ワーム・1</xref>
-<gloss>wyrm (variety of wyvern)</gloss>
+<gloss>wyrm (limbless dragon)</gloss>

Entry created

The dictionaries only have アブラカダブラ. I think it should lead.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>アブラカタブラ</reb>
+<reb>アブラカダブラ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>アブラカダブラ</reb>
+<reb>アブラカタブラ</reb>

アブラカダブラ	3678	40.2%
アブラカタブラ	5469	59.8%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アブラカタブラ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

nikk
うら‐はり【裏張】
〘名〙 （「うらばり」とも）
I've actually heard it like this also

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うらはり</reb>

gakkoku


裏張り	11755	54.3%
裏貼り	8265	38.1%
裏張	764	3.5%
裏貼	881	4.1%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>裏貼り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>裏貼</keb>
@@ -15,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>back-pasting</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think we use [expl] glosses for proverbs and idioms.

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>monks make pure profit</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">monks need no capital and have no expenses, so their income is pure profit</gloss>
+<gloss>a monk's earnings are pure profit (due to needing no capital and having no expenses)</gloss>

坊主丸儲け	3302	95.8%
坊主丸もうけ	122	3.5% https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASS5F4HPMS5FPLZB00XM.html
ぼうず丸儲け	21	0.6%
ぼうず丸もうけ	0	0.0%

probably vi vt?

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>坊主丸もうけ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I'm comfortable with proverb.

I feel it's more a business term.

For what it's worth, Oxford tags this sense of "integrator" as a computing term.
I'm not sure "business" is better.

Daijirin, ja wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_integrator
>> A systems integrator (or system integrator) is a person or company that specializes in bringing together component subsystems into a whole and ensuring that those subsystems function together, a practice known as system integration.

Related to the IT industry, but not really a computing term.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&bus;</field>