Hmm, on reflection, I think I'm back agreeing with Marcus.

@@ -59,0 +60,9 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>コロコロ</stagr>
+<stagr>ころころ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>roller</gloss>
+<gloss>lint roller</gloss>
+<gloss>paint roller</gloss>

コロコロ	895768	62.2%
ころころ	512867	35.6%
ころんころん	16554	1.1% rk?
コロンコロン	14357	1.0%

Again, I don't think that sense should be split out. If "Apple" were normally written lower case and had become genericized then yes, I think including it in the fruit entry would have made sense.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Splitting off that sense.

@@ -59,9 +58,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>コロコロ</stagr>
-<stagr>ころころ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
-<gloss>roller</gloss>
-<gloss>lint roller</gloss>
-<gloss>paint roller</gloss>

removing [vs] and changing sense 4 as i said in my previous comment

i still don't think it makes sense to have sense 7 here just because of shared etymology, esp. as it's a trademark
it's a bit like having "Apple (company)" in a "apple (fruit)" entry and it's even more awkward since it's under many senses and has restrictions

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -27 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -34 +31,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -46 +43,2 @@
-<gloss>roly-poly</gloss>
+<gloss>chubby</gloss>
+<gloss>rounded</gloss>

I'd leave it the way it is. Works OK.

gg5, sankoku: 〘医〙

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

kokugos; NHK accent; forvo

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アルコールいそんしょう</reb>
+</r_ele>

Metaphor not used in English.

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>balance of power (held by a minority party)</gloss>

wiki & daijs have two senses
https://imidas.jp/idiom/detail/X-05-X-07-8-0002.html

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャスチング・ボート</reb>
+</r_ele>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャスティング・ボート</reb>
+</r_ele>

ワークショップ	2152810	99.9%
ワクショップ	0	0.0% removing
ワークショプ	2977	0.1% adding as sk

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<reb>ワクショップ</reb>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+<reb>ワークショプ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Daijs's ト・タル sense is "にわかなさま". The "とても、断然" meaning is only mentioned in a note.
Sankoku has it as a second sense and tags it as 俗. I don't think it should lead.

@@ -17,3 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>by far</gloss>

All the JEs just have the suddenly sense. I think Daijisen's other sense, tagged "［文］", should go later.

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>very</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +15,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>very</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>

Another test.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>攪はん</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>攪はん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

That was a test. Reversing the edit.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>攪はん</keb>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>攪はん</keb>

gendai reikai: 「こうはん」が本来の読みで、「かくはん」は慣用読み。

I get the impression that こうはん is probably still used by pedants.

daij, koj

@@ -29,0 +30,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>grasping</gloss>
+<gloss>surmising</gloss>
+</sense>

汲み取り	76231	61.1%
汲取り	10762	8.6%
汲取	4896	3.9%
くみ取り	30277	24.3%
酌み取り	2570	2.1% <- Daijisen
酌取り	102	0.1%

Tidying up after mazegaki addition.

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<keb>くみ取り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>酌み取り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +19,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>くみ取り</keb>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くみ取り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

Sankoku 8: 〔古風〕

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 口忠実　 │   0 │
│ 口まめ　 │ 244 │ - move up
│ くちまめ │ 179 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>口忠実</keb>
+<keb>口まめ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>口まめ</keb>
+<keb>口忠実</keb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

Harmless and possibly useful. I'd leave it.

今思うと	304257	39.0%
今思えば	475997	61.0%

I don't think this is needed as an entry. The literal translation "when I think now" is very similar to the idiomatic "thinking about it now". The meaning is obvious.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>looking back</gloss>

今思うと 	304257	95.7%
いま思うと	12049	3.8%
今おもうと	1517	0.5%

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いま思うと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>今おもうと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

最高	27482676	97.4%
サイコー	734651	2.6%

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サイコー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I've adjusted a couple,

The ~100 sentences are mostly the"best" sense. I'll approve and reopen as I need to index some.

I'm not sure it is the most common sense. As a predicate adjective, definitely, but 最高 is used in all sorts of contexts. Most of the JE examples are for the "highest"/"maximum" sense. To me, it feels more natural to lead with that sense. All the JEs do.

最低	6369772	98.6%
サイテー	92404	1.4%

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サイテー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1293850">最高・1</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1293850">最高・2</xref>
@@ -28 +28 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1293850">最高・2</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1293850">最高・1</xref>

I don't think that gloss adds anything. No references provided.

@@ -38 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>worst imaginable</gloss>

???

@@ -35 +34,0 @@
-<gloss>worst imaginable</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>worst imaginable</gloss>

@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>worst imaginable</gloss>

じき needs to be split out as it's not an adjective.
GG5 has "やけの　desperate; self-abandoned" but I can't find any evidence of adj-no usage.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -17,4 +16,0 @@
-<reb>じき</reb>
-<re_restr>自棄</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -26 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -28 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2426820">自棄になる</xref>

Yes, 自棄/じき is not uk, but it's hardly worth splitting out. AFAICT it's not that common.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 自棄になって │  9,770 │ 18.9% │
│ 焼けになって │    794 │  1.5% │ add rK (daijr/s, meikyo, kanken, koj) 
│ やけになって │ 21,934 │ 42.5% │
│ ヤケになって │ 19,109 │ 37.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

自棄/自棄 is not adjectival, not sure it's [uk] and seems [vs] (daijr, obunsha), maybe should be split out

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Can help reverse lookups.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to bike</gloss>

Isn't it convenient to have them somewhere for reverse look-ups, if nothing else? "to bike" might be informal but it's very common.

"bike" is very informal.

@@ -16,4 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to pedal a bike</gloss>
-<gloss>to ride a bike</gloss>
-<gloss>to bike</gloss>
-<gloss>to bicycle</gloss>
+<gloss>to pedal a bicycle</gloss>
+<gloss>to ride a bicycle</gloss>

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bicycle

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>to bicycle</gloss>
+<gloss>to cycle</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to ride a bike</gloss>

じてんしゃ屋	2586	1.2%
自転車屋	213429	98.8%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>じてんしゃ屋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think it was better as it was before.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<s_inf>title or form of address for a teacher, master, doctor, lawyer, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">title or form of address for a teacher, master, doctor, lawyer, etc.</gloss>

Better as note?

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<s_inf>title or form of address for a teacher, master, doctor, lawyer, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -27 +27,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">title or form of address for a teacher, master, doctor, lawyer, etc.</gloss>

Additionally, in my copy of Geisha in 
Rivalry by Kafū Nagai the "sensei" is 
not capitalized when used as a form of 
address.

I would not be putting a capital letter on it in English. When I was a professor (no capital) people called me "Professor Breen", which is correct. However, we don't put "Professor" (with a capital) in a dictionary entry just because it's (also) used as a title.

used as a title or form of address (as per the gloss), it should be capitalized, no?

sense 3 (well 2 as well)
立ちこぎ	16605	58.2%
立ち漕ぎ	11935	41.8%

sense 5
雪をこいで	477	56.8%
雪を漕いで	363	43.2%
 gonna assume sense 4 is uk too. (it's not a separate sense in the kokugos)

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -34,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -39,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

see 自転車をこぐ

prob safe to tag the remaining senses as uk too?

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Closing.

Maybe this? I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>child in first-year class (at a kindergarten or nursery school)</gloss>
+<gloss>child in the first year of kindergarten</gloss>

(didn't mean to edit the gloss)

When it is used at 保育園, it doesn't refer to a child in a first-year class but a 3-year-old (and I'm not even sure "class" would be the right terminology as 保育園 are not considered educational institutions, unlike 幼稚園). If we want to mention nursery schools I think we nees to gloss it differently, e.g. like daijs' does: 最年少の3歳児。「

mw suggests "kindergarten pupil"

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>child in the first-year class (at a kindergarten or nursery school)</gloss>
+<gloss>child in first-year class (at a kindergarten or nursery school)</gloss>

without a mention in the 幼稚園 entry that it's a 3 year system in Japan, the xref is pointless.

@@ -48 +47,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>

I think it's better to define sense 4 as a student then as a class. daijs does this: 幼稚園・保育園で、4歳児。
Interesting we had this sense for 年中 but not 年少 or 年長...

The x-ref might help Americans confused by the fact that in the US, kindergarten is just 1 year.

@@ -48 +48,3 @@
-<gloss>middle class (of a nursery school, etc.)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>
+<gloss>second-year kindergarten student</gloss>

Ok, I don't have a problem with keeping it.
Meikyo wasn't one of the refs you listed. I assumed the reading was added in error.

my IME also automatically converts ねんぢゅう --> 年中

without a mention in the 幼稚園 entry that it's a 3 year system in Japan, the xref is pointless.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>

The x-ref maybe helps? In the US, kindergarten is just 1-year

@@ -22,0 +23,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1545260">幼稚園</xref>
+<gloss>third-year kindergarten student</gloss>
+</sense>

prog
http://yourei.jp/年長
KM n-grams:
年長な	237
年長の	5074

Adjective glosses make more sense.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>seniority</gloss>
+<gloss>senior</gloss>
+<gloss>older</gloss>

I think this is cleaner. Dropping ハクチョウ wouldn't be consistent with our usual style for animal entries.
Daijr and smk have the "white bird" sense for はくちょう.

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>white bird</gloss>

GG5, etc. Daijisen

I'll go along with the split. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -17,7 +16,0 @@
-<reb>しらとり</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しろとり</reb>
-<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -30,4 +22,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>white-feathered bird</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ハクチョウの雛　 │   453 │ 11.6% │
│ 白鳥の雛　　　　 │ 3,455 │ 88.4% │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ ハクチョウが飛来 │   645 │  7.8% │
│ 白鳥が飛来　　　 │ 7,618 │ 92.2% │
├─ーーーーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ ハクチョウの飛来 │   615 │  8.1% │
│ 白鳥の飛来　　　 │ 6,948 │ 91.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

In that case, my vote would be to just hide ハクチョウ.

For aesthetic reasons, I'd support splitting out しらとり/しろとり. I'm not fond of this sort of merge when there are [nokanji] readings.
I don't think "cygnet" is needed as a gloss. We don't have "puppy" for 犬.

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>cygnet</gloss>

The count for 平素が hardly supports it being a noun.

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
gg5: 平素から注意深い　always be [have always been] careful
     平素のとおり　as usual

It is a noun.
We usually have [adv] as a separate sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,8 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>usual</gloss>
+<gloss>ordinary</gloss>
+<gloss>normal</gloss>
+<gloss>regular</gloss>
+<gloss>everyday</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -17,4 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>ordinary</gloss>
-<gloss>in the past</gloss>
-<gloss>usual</gloss>
-<gloss>regular</gloss>
+<gloss>ordinarily</gloss>
+<gloss>normally</gloss>
+<gloss>usually</gloss>

平素	244820
平素は	125575
平素が	101
平素な	556
平素の	19022

Glosses much the same as in the JEs. Certainly not a noun.

mk 「━の努力が実を結ぶ」
daijr 「━の行い」
daijs 「平素の努力」

glosses need some clean up? Not sure adj-no should lead but most of the glosses are currently adjectives

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

sankoku: やや改まった言い方

daijs, oukoku

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みょうあさ</reb>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update: Removal of n-t POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

I can live with this.

https://www.wokingham.gov.uk/children-families-and-young-people/children-and-families/childcare-pre-schools-and-nurseries/starting-nursery-or-preschool
"Day nurseries can care for children normally from around 3 months up until compulsory school age. "
"Preschools are often run by a voluntary committee. Normally they care for children from 3 years old, up until compulsory school age although some now care for children from 2 years old. "

https://directories.merton.gov.uk/kb5/merton/directory/advice.page;jsessionid=693DA256A03E72D7586A764F23E04D56?id=Rl5dFEqueTw
Day nurseries offer full-time or part-time childcare for children, often from 6 weeks old. Day nurseries are usually open from 8am to 6pm.
Preschools offer childcare in sessions which range from 2 ½ to 4 hours, either mornings or afternoons, and cater for children from the age of 2. They are usually only open during school term time and not for the whole day. Preschools are sometimes called playgroups or kindergartens and also include Montessori schools.

https://familyserviceshub.havering.gov.uk/kb5/havering/directory/advice.page?id=Ghwqqw8JUYI
Up to 2 years old: If you need childcare before your child is 2 years then either a registered childminder or day nursery would suit your needs.  ...
2 years old: When your child reaches 2 you may want to consider an early years childcare place available at preschools, Day Nurseries, Childminders and at some schools with nurseries.


The Oxford Learner's dictionary is vague and unclear about this distinction, but it becomes very apparent when looking through the google results. Seems like kindergarten is not commonly used in the UK and while actual usage seems to align with how it's used in the US, the OEL suggests that in British use, it's a synonym to nursery school. Which it actually defines as "school for children between the ages of about two and five" which. again, doesn't mesh at all with what I'm actually seeing on site:gov.uk /site:uk sites.

I think precisely because there is a lot of confusion and different terms in use in the Anglosphere (and beyond), we really ought to explain exactly what this refers to in Japanese.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>kindergarten</gloss>
+<gloss>kindergarten (in Japan, non-compulsory education from age 3 until primary school)</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>nursery school</gloss>

https://www.emmasdiary.co.uk/baby/childcare/preschool-guide
There are a number of differences between pre-school and nursery, and it is down to personal preference as to where you choose to send your child. Your choice will depend on your child’s age, what you are looking for from a setting and how you child is developmentally. Difference include:

Nurseries will take children from ages one – three where as pre-schools generally take children from three – five.
Pre-schools have a formal curriculum and trained teachers. Conversely, nursery schools have a more relaxed environment and have a wider variety of programs.
Nurseries tend to cost more than pre-schools do but this is not a hard and fast rule.
Pre-schools emphasis preparing the children for future education, while nurseries give a lighter learning experience and act more like a childcare provider.

https://www.daynurseries.co.uk/advice/what-is-a-pre-school
Difference between nursery and pre-school

Are you really sure about that, Robin? Because that's not at all what I'm seeing (at a glance).

If we're going to throw in "nursery school" in here, which again, I really don't think we should, I think we do need to explain the difference between a 幼稚園 and 保育園, because there are several specific differences that are very relevant to foreigners with young kids in Japan. (I'm not being argumentative just for the sake of it)

Let's put "nursery school" back and leave it. The terminology varies a lot - what Americans call kindergarten we call "prep", etc., etc. In general "nursery school" seems to fit 保育園/保育所. After all, the 保育 indicates rather young kids. (My 5yo granddaughter is in prep, and my 3yo grandson is in kindergarten.)

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>nursery school</gloss>

幼稚園 corresponds to what we call "nursery (school)" in the UK. It's synonymous with "preschool". I think "nursery school" is a better fit for 幼稚園 than 保育園/保育所.

I don't think "expert" is right.

@@ -36,2 +36,2 @@
-<s_inf>as Xの卵</s_inf>
-<gloss>(an expert) in the making</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...の卵</s_inf>
+<gloss>a ... in the making</gloss>
@@ -39 +39 @@
-<gloss>budding</gloss>
+<gloss>budding ...</gloss>

GG5

Can't think of an alternative to adjective glosses.

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>budding</gloss>

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<s_inf>as Xの卵</s_inf>
@@ -36,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>future (lawyer, doctor, etc.)</gloss>

玉子	1,636,998

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

See my comment on 2178850 regarding adj-no.
I went with [anat] because Wiktionary and RP tag "umbilical cord" as an anatomy term.

gg5: 臍帯の　【医】 umbilical.
wouldn't [adj-no] be appropriate here?
also this seems more [biol] than [anat] to me

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&anat;</field>

臍帯	56400	60.5%
さい帯	36826	39.5%
せい帯	0	0.0%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>さい帯</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>臍帯</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 不意打ち │ 188,223 │ 96.4% │
│ 不意討ち │   6,319 │  3.2% │ add rK (sankoku, meikyo, daijs, etc.)
│ 不意撃ち │     653 │  0.3% │ add (smk)
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>不意撃ち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>catching a person off guard</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>surprise visit</gloss>

恩着せがまし	15956	  
恩に着せ	2068	 
恩にかける 20

See notes at removed xref 恩に掛ける.  Exceedingly rare, not helpful to link in that direction.

恩着せがましい by comparison is 8 times more popular than this formulation. For someone who encounters this term, I think it's worth seeing the other, but it isn't strictly needed.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2603490">恩に掛ける</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2603490">恩に掛ける</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2056100">恩着せがましい</xref>

koj daij

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2603490">恩に掛ける</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+<gloss>to make a favour of something</gloss>
+<gloss>to remind of a favour done to someone</gloss>
+<gloss>to emphasize the favour one has done</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

先生に就いた	1699
先生に就いて	615

Not obvious.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1331530">就く・4</xref>

since 先生に is an explicit part of the word

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to study under (a teacher)</gloss>
+<gloss>to study under a teacher</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

Indeed.

先生の述	No matches

I don't even understand what the gloss means.

大火傷	19730	49.5%
大やけど	20043	50.3%
大焼けど	80	0.2%

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>large burn or scald</gloss>
+<gloss>large burn</gloss>
+<gloss>large scald</gloss>

See 2012710.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日ぐらし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

日暮らし	225740
日暮らしの	23162

Reasonably high count.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

i'm not sure this is [adj-no]
sankoku and smk have it tagged as 雅, daijr uses an archaic example - maybe [form] would be appropriate?

gg5 daijs
G n-grams:
 日暮らし	225740
 日暮し	 47383

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>twilight</gloss>
-<gloss>evening hours</gloss>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>from morning to evening</gloss>
+<gloss>all day long</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ひぐらし

i doubt the meaning. quite different to その日暮らし.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>day-to-day existence</gloss>
-<gloss>living hand-to-mouth</gloss>
+<gloss>twilight</gloss>
+<gloss>evening hours</gloss>

I'm comfortable with this entry, but we may as well have 日ぐらし[sK] in the other one too.

my problem with duplicating the kanji forms is that it makes search slightly less immediate
"日ぐらし" search-only form is here and not in the other entry, but results on google are mostly related to the 一日中 sense
we obviously could have "日ぐらし" in both the entries, but only having it in the 一日中 sense entry seems less confusing to me

btw not related to my previous comment but i think 日暮 is [io], in none of my refs

Daijs and nikk combine the two meanings into entry.
With two entries like this, I think it's better to duplicate the kanji form(s) rather than the sense.

wouldn't it make more sense if we added the 日- forms to the 日暮らし entry as an additional sense and x-ref it here?
this is how daijs, saito and nikk do it

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ヒグラシの声 │ 9,192 │ 57.4% │ - moving up
│ ひぐらしの声 │ 4,612 │ 28.8% │
│ 蜩の声　　　 │ 1,978 │ 12.4% │
│ 日暮の声　　 │   118 │  0.7% │
│ 日暮らしの声 │    48 │  0.3% │
│ 日ぐらしの声 │    47 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ 日暮しの声　 │    20 │  0.1% │ - add, sK
│ 茅蜩の声　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -19,3 +19,8 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ひぐらし</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日ぐらし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日暮し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -24,0 +30,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひぐらし</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 自棄っぱち │  1,267 │  3.5% │ add rK
│ 焼けっぱち │    203 │  0.6% │ add
│ やけっぱち │ 33,416 │ 92.3% │
│ ヤケっぱち │  1,331 │  3.7% │ add
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

sankoku and shinkoku have 俗
smk: 「やけ」の口頭語的な強調表現。

@@ -5,0 +6,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼けっぱち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +14,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヤケっぱち</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

自棄っぱち	1267
焼けっぱっち	No matches
やけっぱっち	No matches
ヤケっぱっち	No matches
ヤケッパッチ	No matches
ヤケっパッチ	No matches
自棄ぱち	No matches
焼けぱっち	No matches
やけぱっち	No matches
ヤケぱっち	No matches
ヤケパッチ	No matches

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,5 +18,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>completely desperate</gloss>
-</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 自棄のやんぱち │   122 │  4.8% │ add (sankoku, daijr, etc.)
│ 焼けのやんぱち │    75 │  3.0% │ add sK (only in koj)
│ 自棄のやん八　 │    58 │  2.3% │ add rK (daijs, shinkoku, etc.)
│ やけのやん八　 │    43 │  1.7% │
│ やけのやんぱち │ 2,032 │ 80.6% │
│ ヤケのやんぱち │   192 │  7.6% │ add sk
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

sankoku and shinkoku have 俗

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>自棄のやんぱち</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +20 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

自棄のやん八	58
やけのやんぱち	2032
やけのやん八	43
ヤケのやん八	No matches
ヤケのやんぱち	192
焼けのやんぱち	75
焼けのやん八	No matches

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼けのやんぱち</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヤケのやんぱち</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>professional attitude</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>professionalism; professional awareness</gloss>
+<gloss>professionalism</gloss>
+<gloss>professional awareness</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Bartlett Act (1964)</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>Bartlett Act (US)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>Bartlett method</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">technique for estimating power spectra</gloss>
+<gloss>Bartlett method (technique for estimating power spectra)</gloss>

情報・知識imidas (sense 1)
Igaku (sense 2)

Rene quoted Kojien when entering this in 2009, but I can't find it there.

@@ -14,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Bartlett method</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">technique for estimating power spectra</gloss>
+</sense>

47 hits (b)

googled in English but unsure which act this even is

Entry created

[rK] is fine - it's in Koj (「恩に着せる」に同じ。)

恩に掛け* 0
恩にかけ  0
恩にかける	20	(only match for 恩にかけ*)
vs.
恩に着せ	2068	  
恩に着せる	1129	  
恩に着せて	487	  
恩に着せない	347

Some book results sprinkled across the 1900s.  No news, twitter, etc.

Got here via 恩着せがましい found in the wild, xref'd to 恩に着せる (useful), xref'd here. While defined as synonymous, this entry looks rare/obsolete.  I will edit 恩に着せる to break the xref here as well.

恩に掛け with both kanji is exceedingly rare.  Matches ~15 google book hits.  Would [sK], but it's worth showing which of the かける kanji applies.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>恩にかける</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

koj daij

If もらいげろ is hidden, then 貰いゲロ wouldn't have any associated readings.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Probably just best hidden.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

もらいゲロ	2108	73.7%
貰いゲロ	625	21.9%
もらいげろ	126	4.4%
貰いげろ	0	0.0%

Is it worth keeping もらいげろ?

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>貰いげろ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12 +9 @@
-<re_restr>貰いゲロ</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16 +12,0 @@
-<re_restr>貰いげろ</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

http://mentalfloss.com/article/67710/why-do-i-gag-when-someone-else-barfs
The phenomenon is called “sympathy vomiting,” 
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sympathy Vomiting

nvm

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>sympathy vomiting</gloss>

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/丿乀

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>へつふつ</reb>

https://kotobank.jp/word/丿乀-379301#:~:text=へつ‐ほつ【丿&JISF047;】&text=② ( 形動タリ ) 左右,ゆれ動くさまにいう。

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>へつほつ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Actually the example sentence was from a book from 1911 and 
I found "へつぼつと" in a book from 1929 as well.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijr
arch based on example sentence: 「 －として、波に漂ふ一隻の帆
船／此一戦 広徳」

Interesting kanji (daijr: 〔漢字の筆画の名で、左に払うものを
「へつ」、右に払うものを「ほつ」といったことから〕)

daijr splits into two senses

vs in daijr
vs,vi in 三省堂国語辞典　第八版

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +18,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

立ち漕ぎ	11935
立ちこぎ	16605
たちこぎ	1420

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>立ち漕ぎ</keb>
+<keb>立ちこぎ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>立ちこぎ</keb>
+<keb>立ち漕ぎ</keb>

images for ブランコ 立ち漕ぎ

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>standing on a swing</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=立ちこぎ
http://bicycle.omakase-hp.com/word/140/post_95.html

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稚児がに</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

That was a test to see if the bulk updater mangles the [nokanji\. It does. Needs fixing.

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>稚児がに</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13 +9 @@
-<re_restr>稚児がに</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稚児がに</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +13 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_restr>稚児がに</re_restr>

* https://kotobank.jp/word/チゴガニ-96067#w-1365307
* KOD
* https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=444895

稚児蟹　    52  3.5% <- nipp
チゴガニ 1,448 96.5%
ちごがに     0  0.0%

No common name found.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>Ilyoplax pusilla</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>Ilyoplax pusilla (crab species)</gloss>

wiki

The JEs gloss sense 1 as "white bird".
I don't think we can assume that しろとり is rare based simply on which refs it appears in.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -16 +15 @@
-<gloss>white-feathered bird</gloss>
+<gloss>white bird</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>swan (Cygnus spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>cygnet</gloss>
+<gloss>swan</gloss>

daijs is the only ref i see mentioning gulls
most refs either have two senses or say something like "特に、ハクチョウ"

@@ -16 +16,8 @@
-<gloss>white-feathered bird (swan, gull, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>white-feathered bird</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475330">白鳥・はくちょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1475330">白鳥・はくちょう</xref>
+<gloss>swan (Cygnus spp.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cygnet</gloss>

GG5 and other JEs. Daijisen: カモメやハクチョウなど羽毛が白い鳥。しろとり。 (limits はくちょう to swan)

Proposed split. Possibly could have a second "swan (Cygnus spp.)" xreffed to 1475330.

Also, hiragana readings for non-loanwords

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>ギザじゅう</reb>
+<reb>ぎざじゅう</reb>

Daijr/s have ぎざ十 and say that this term is colloquial.
ぎざ十	79

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぎざ十</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21,2 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Simplify gloss

@@ -16,3 +16 @@
-<gloss>reeded edge 10 yen coin</gloss>
-<gloss>milled edge 10 yen coin</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">10 yen coin minted from 1951 through 1958</gloss>
+<gloss>reeded-edge 10 yen coin (minted 1951-1958)</gloss>

GG5 examples

daijs, 三省堂国語辞典　第八版

恩を返す 	6354	97.9%
おんをかえす	24	0.4%
恩をかえす	109	1.7%
おんを返す	0	0.0%

GG5, etc.

有毒植物	13066
daij nikk

bot I guess_

GG5
就園	100476	  
就園児	54632	  <- in GG5
就園奨励	17293

Usually in compounds.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>kindergarten enrollment</gloss>

daij nikk 三省堂国語辞典　第八版 etc.
就園	100476	48.1%
就園児	54632	26.2%
未就園児	53598	25.7%

就園	100476	48.1%
就園児	54632	26.2%　but a google for this just brings up 未就園児
未就園児	53598	25.7%

https://www.cfa.go.jp/councils/mishuuenji_iinkai/vPmcR9yE
末尾の「※」に記載の通り、未就園児であること自体が批判につながる表現や記載にならないよう留意いただきたい。未就園の背景は様々であり、保育所に入りたくても、言葉の壁などによって就園できない事例もある。「無園児」といった言葉が一人歩きすることや、未就園児＝虐待家庭等のイメージが広がることで、更なる孤立を生まないか懸念する。
https://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/kodomo/page/0000597389.html
この資料の中身とは関係ないんですけれども、この前ニュースで、無園児という言葉が出てきました。どこの園にも属していないこどもたちを無園児と表現していたんですけれども、我々、幼稚園の側からすれば、それは未就園児ではないかという話ですが。

https://www.city.kariya.lg.jp/faq/q_kosodate/q_kyouiku/1002582/1002585.html
幼児園は、令和2年4月から刈谷市立幼稚園が幼保連携型認定こども園に移行したもので、教育・保育を一体的に行う施設であり、幼稚園（幼児教育）と保育園（保育）の両方のよさを併せ持つ施設です。3歳以上児が入園対象で、従来の幼稚園利用の子ども（1号認定）と保育園利用の子ども（2号認定）双方が在園できるため、保育園と異なり、保護者が就労などをやめても継続して入園することができます。

https://www.town.godo.gifu.jp/life/koso/koso17.html
幼児園では、保育園と幼稚園という既存の枠組みを超え、施設の共有化を図り、町内に住所がある５歳児までの異年齢児を一体的に保育・教育を実施することにより、子どもたちの活動内容をより豊かにし、それぞれ子どもの個性を生かしながら、就学前にふさわしい社会性、創造性を育むことを目指しています。


幼児園	24687

Not identical to 認定こども園 it seems

I actually saved a note when I saw this word in a book in January 2021.

>> 親の赤１なので愚形残りでも即リーチで良い。
"It's okay to instantly riichi with a poor wait because you're the dealer with one red dora in hand"

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────╮
│ 愚形 │ 3,278 │
╰─ーー─┴───────╯

Usually "wait" corresponds to the word 待ち and "shape" is used to translate 形 in mahjong terminology.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>A wait with few winning tiles</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>shape which accepts few winning tiles</gloss>
+<gloss>inefficient tile pattern</gloss>

https://mj-station.net/word/gukei/

Mahjong term, can be found in recent books and on the net

星室庁	265

Abolished in 1641, before the UK existed.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>court of Star Chamber (UK)</gloss>
+<gloss>Court of the Star Chamber (England)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Court of Star Chamber</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>court of Star Chamber (UK)</gloss>

daij, koj, wiki

Yes. As I commented in another entry, we don't have to mimic Wilipedia.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shinzo Abe (1954.9.21-2022.7.8; prime minister of Japan from 2006 to 2007 and from 2012 to 2020)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shinzo Abe (1954.9.21-2022.7.8; prime minister of Japan 2006-2007 and 2012-2020)</gloss>

Isn't the terser wording better?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinzo_Abe

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shinzō Abe (1954.9.21-2022.7.8; Prime Minister of Japan 2006-2007 and 2012-2020)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shinzo Abe (1954.9.21-2022.7.8; prime minister of Japan from 2006 to 2007 and from 2012 to 2020)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shinzō Abe (1954.9-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shinzō Abe (1954.9.21-2022.7.8; Prime Minister of Japan 2006-2007 and 2012-2020)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-; prime minister of Japan from 2021 to 2024)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-; prime minister of Japan 2021-2024)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fumio_Kishida

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-; 100th Prime Minister of Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-; prime minister of Japan from 2021 to 2024)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-; 100th Prime Minister of Japan)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kishida Fumio (1957.7.29-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fumio Kishida (1957.7.29-)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ryutaro Hashimoto (1937.7.29-2006.7.1; prime minister of Japan from 1996 to 1998)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ryutaro Hashimoto (1937.7.29-2006.7.1; prime minister of Japan 1996-1998)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryutaro_Hashimoto

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Hashimoto Ryūtarō (1937.7-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ryutaro Hashimoto (1937.7.29-2006.7.1; prime minister of Japan from 1996 to 1998)</gloss>

 Ryuu to Ryū conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Hashimoto Ryuutarō (1937.7-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Hashimoto Ryūtarō (1937.7-)</gloss>

tarou conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Hashimoto Ryuutarou (1937.7-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Hashimoto Ryuutarō (1937.7-)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-; prime minister of Japan from 2001 to 2006)</gloss>
+<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-; prime minister of Japan 2001-2006)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junichiro_Koizumi

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-; 56th Prime Minister of Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-; prime minister of Japan from 2001 to 2006)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-), the 56th Prime Minister of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-; 56th Prime Minister of Japan)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Koizumi Jun'ichirou (1942.1.8-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Junichiro Koizumi (1942.1.8-), the 56th Prime Minister of Japan</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Keizō Obuchi (1937.6.25-2000.5.14; prime minister of Japan from 1998 to 2000)</gloss>
+<gloss>Keizō Obuchi (1937.6.25-2000.5.14; prime minister of Japan 1998-2000)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keizō_Obuchi

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Obuchi Keizou (1937.6.25-2000.5.14)</gloss>
+<gloss>Keizō Obuchi (1937.6.25-2000.5.14; prime minister of Japan from 1998 to 2000)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yoshirō Mori (1937.7.14-; prime minister of Japan from 2000 to 2001)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshirō Mori (1937.7.14-; prime minister of Japan 2000-2001)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshirō_Mori

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mori Yoshirou (1937.7.14-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshirō Mori (1937.7.14-; prime minister of Japan from 2000 to 2001)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yoshihide Suga (1948.12.6-; prime minister of Japan from 2020 to 2021)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshihide Suga (1948.12.6-; prime minister of Japan 2020-2021)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshihide_Suga

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Suga Yoshihide</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshihide Suga (1948.12.6-; prime minister of Japan from 2020 to 2021)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Naoto Kan (1946.10.10-; prime minister of Japan from 2010 to 2011)</gloss>
+<gloss>Naoto Kan (1946.10.10-; prime minister of Japan 2010-2011)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naoto_Kan

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Naoto Kan (1946.10-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Naoto Kan (1946.10.10-; prime minister of Japan from 2010 to 2011)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kan Naoto (1946.10-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Naoto Kan (1946.10-)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; prime minister of Japan from 2024.9.30)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; prime minister of Japan from 2024.9.30-2025.10.21)</gloss>

Well, we don't have to mimic Wikipedia, and what I put was more accurate.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; prime minister of Japan since 2024)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; prime minister of Japan from 2024.9.30)</gloss>

this is more like the wikipedia entry

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; politician; prime minister of Japan from 2024.9.30)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; prime minister of Japan since 2024)</gloss>

OK

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; politician)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shigeru Ishiba (1957.2.4-; politician; prime minister of Japan from 2024.9.30)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Yukio Hatoyama (1947.2.11-; prime minister of Japan from 2009 to 2010)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yukio Hatoyama (1947.2.11-; prime minister of Japan 2009-2010)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukio_Hatoyama

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Yukio Hatoyama (1947.2.11-; Prime Minister of Japan, 2009-10)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yukio Hatoyama (1947.2.11-; prime minister of Japan from 2009 to 2010)</gloss>

I think this is more helpful than "93rd".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Hatoyama Yukio (1947.2.11-; 93rd Prime Minister of Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yukio Hatoyama (1947.2.11-; Prime Minister of Japan, 2009-10)</gloss>

Wikip: 2013年に名前を「友紀夫（読み同じ）」に改めた（本名は由紀夫のまま）。メディア出演時に「ペンネーム」として使用している。ただしニュース記事などでは「由紀夫」表記が使われることが依然として多い。2023年現在、本人の公式ウェブサイトのページタイトルは「鳩山由紀夫」の表記で、Twitterのプロフィールでも「由紀夫」の表記を併記している。

Better have both.

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yasuo Fukuda (1936.7.16-; prime minister of Japan from 2007 to 2008)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yasuo Fukuda (1936.7.16-; prime minister of Japan 2007-2008)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasuo_Fukuda

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Fukuda Yasuo (1936-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yasuo Fukuda (1936.7.16-; prime minister of Japan from 2007 to 2008)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Tarō Asō (1940.9.20-; prime minister of Japan from 2008 to 2009)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tarō Asō (1940.9.20-; prime minister of Japan 2008-2009)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarō_Asō

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Tarō Asō (1940.9.20-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tarō Asō (1940.9.20-; prime minister of Japan from 2008 to 2009)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Asou Tarō (1940.9.20-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tarō Asō (1940.9.20-)</gloss>

I favour a more concise form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yoshihiko Noda (1957.5.20-; prime minister of Japan from 2011 to 2012)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshihiko Noda (1957.5.20-; prime minister of Japan 2011-2012)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshihiko_Noda

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yoshihiko Noda (1957.5.20-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshihiko Noda (1957.5.20-; prime minister of Japan from 2011 to 2012)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Noda Yoshihiko (1957.5.20-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yoshihiko Noda (1957.5.20-)</gloss>