G n-grams:

家族連れ　 716,218 97.7%
家族づれ　  16,684  2.3%
かぞく連れ      51  0.0%
かぞくづれ      44  0.0%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>家族づれ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Fork

Bizarre x-ref to 著名. I assume it was supposed to indicate a contrast with 署名 (written signature; note the difference b/w 著 and 署), which is mentioned by a few kokugos.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1427150">著名</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1343640">署名</xref>

mk

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, meikyo, luminous, wisdom

I think there's only one sense here.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>signature</gloss>
-<gloss>register</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -23,8 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>to put one's name on</gloss>
-<gloss>to sign</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="ant" seq="1427150">著名</xref>
-<gloss>stamped name</gloss>
-<gloss>typed name</gloss>
+<gloss>signature</gloss>
+<gloss>signing one's name</gloss>
+<gloss>writing one's name (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>registration (of a bond)</gloss>

mk

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij, meikyo
医者に見せ	4,407		
医者に診せ	2,716

Not limited to medical contexts when it's written as 見せる. The refs don't split like this but I think it's clearer as two senses.
Replaced the 診せる x-ref with a note.

@@ -41 +41,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2861871">診せる</xref>
+<gloss>to have (something) looked at (by a specialist)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have (an antique, etc.) appraised</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>also written as 診せる</s_inf>

See 2861871.

@@ -36,0 +37,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2861871">診せる</xref>
+<gloss>to have (an injury, person, etc.) looked at (by a doctor)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) to a doctor</gloss>

見せる	3839491	82.9%
観せる	8803	0.2%
みせる	783051

Certainly not seeing it in kokugo entries for 見せる.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

観せる and 見せる have slightly different nuances but then again 見る and 観る are also combined into a same entry.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>観せる</keb>

I suspect it's a 変換ミス. Search only.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

断やす variant: なんとしても一族の血統を断やすわけにはいかないわー！　「from 旧約聖書 1 創世　published by  日本聖書協会 ISBN 9784820242680]

Added variant spelling 断やす

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断やす</keb>

gg5, prog

More glosses.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>to wipe out</gloss>
+<gloss>to put an end to</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>to let die (e.g. flowers)</gloss>
+<gloss>to run out of</gloss>

gg5, luminous, wisdom

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>well-known</gloss>
+<gloss>famous</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21,3 @@
+<gloss>eminent</gloss>
+<gloss>prominent</gloss>
+<gloss>distinguished</gloss>

gg5, prog
有名	18,631,316		
有名な	8,698,595		
有名を	1,546		
有名が	1,140

I don't think we need a separate noun sense. Meikyo has this as an adjective only.

@@ -19,4 +19 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fame</gloss>
+<gloss>well-known</gloss>

I think せうゆ can be dropped. It's archaic and the kokugos don't have it.
しょうゆう is a "dialectal kana" candidate.

@@ -33,4 +32,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せうゆ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -39,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>soya sauce</gloss>

Yes, 醬 is another of the 表外漢字字体表 brigade, having made the JIS X 0212 -> Unicode journey. 醬油 is getting about 3% of the Googits that 醤油 is getting, so still rK.

Looks fine for the readings. But 「醬油」 is the headword in newer editions of meikyo, smk, and other kokugos. These also have 「正油」 in their notes.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>しょう油</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -15 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +16,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>しょう油</keb>

醤油	5813601	68.2%
しょう油	244996	2.9%
醬油	901	0.0%
正油	53674	0.6%
しょうゆ	2395408	28.1%
しょうゆう	12404	0.1%
せうゆ	1433	0.0%
しょゆ	473	0.0%
しょゆう	1761	0.0%

Proposing a significant cleanup of this messy entry. しょう油 could be [sK] too. 醬油/せうゆ could go in its own entry, although I don't think either needs to be visible.
If we want to have しょゆ and しょゆう visible as dialect terms, they could go into their own entry/entries.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +29 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -32,12 +33 @@
-<re_restr>醤油</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょゆ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょゆう</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -47 +36,0 @@
-<s_inf>しょゆ, しょゆう are dial.</s_inf>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10100305410

At first I thought せうゆ might have been 旧仮名遣い for 醤油 but I see that's シヤウ in all the kokugos. せうゆ in fact is not in any kokugos, but the Q/A quoted seems to indicate that it is an old reading - it's an interesting discussion.
We don't usually include 旧仮名遣い but I think せうゆ can probably stay as "old kana".

@@ -30,0 +31,5 @@
+<reb>せうゆ</reb>
+<re_restr>醤油</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -37,5 +41,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せうゆ</reb>

daij, koj

We don't typically use [rK] for archaic terms.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -37 +35 @@
-<s_inf>orig. from the Sanskrit 'Cinasthana'</s_inf>
+<s_inf>orig. from the Sanskrit "Cīnasthāna"</s_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 震旦 │ 2.706 │ 94.6% │
│ 真丹 │    95 │  3.3% │gendai only ; [sK]
│ 真旦 │    37 │  1.3% │daijs, nikk, gendai ; [rK]
│ 振旦 │    23 │  0.8% │daijs, nikk, gendai ; [rK]
│ 振丹 │     0 │  0.0% │gendai ; add ; [sK]
│ 旃丹 │     0 │  0.0% │gendai ; add ; [sK]
╰─ーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>振旦</keb>
+<keb>真旦</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12,2 @@
-<keb>真旦</keb>
+<keb>振旦</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>振丹</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>旃丹</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think the [arch] tag is clear enough.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>old name for China</gloss>
+<gloss>China</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/震旦-82210
https://www.weblio.jp/content/震旦

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>(ancient) China</gloss>
+<gloss>old name for China</gloss>

I did not think any references would be needed, It is formally classified as a 接続助詞 just about everywhere: daijs, daijr, smk, meikyo, koj...

ば's primordial function is to connect two clauses, clause A to clause B, where A is in some manner precedent to B, this should be in line with the citation you have just provided of a conjunction. 

Additionally, I do not see how these definitions would - or even could - be mutually exclusive: every single conjunction has a grammatical aspect to it, it must always form a syntactically subordinating or coordinating relation in between the two linked items; dismissing [3] as an omission of clause B, and with the potential exclusion of [2], ば falls into the former type.
I must also bring to attention that the definition of a conjunction provided is vague and potentially problematic, for example: how does it deal with a coordinating conjunction between two nouns? ”僕と君と...”or anything following the same structure will be constituted of two words that are not particularly large units of meaning, certainly not clauses, and I do not think most would consider each a phrase. Would と cease to be a conjunction? would also または or および? This is not limited to Japanese either, you can just as easily take "Me and you..." and the same problem arises.

Lastly, not classifying ば as a conjunction makes the corpus inconsistent: other terms formally classified as 接続助詞 such as と, けれども and its variants have both [conj] and [prt] on their entries; notably, なら and たら both directly derive from ば and are classed as [conj] (though the former's entry is itself a tad inconsistent).
Now, as the meaning does not change even in their original forms of ならば and たらば, if ば is not a conjunction, what is it? or rather, if it is not, how are they?

None were provided.

I regard particles and conjunctions as different things. To quote one reference: "Particles indicate grammatical relationships between words, while conjunctions connect larger units of meaning such as clauses or sentences."

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -22 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -28 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -34 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>

It is a conjunction, marking it as such.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>

gg5
daijr: 〔金属製品は溶かして別の製品にすることができることから〕それまでの職業をやめても、他の職業や他の分野の仕事で十分やっていく能力がある。

〈潰（し）／つぶし／ツブシ〉が〈利／効／き〉く

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ つぶしが利く │ 2,364 │ 22.4% │
│ 潰しが利く　 │ 1,395 │ 13.2% │
│ 潰しが効く　 │ 1,063 │ 10.1% │
│ 潰しがきく　 │   969 │  9.2% │ - add, sK
│ つぶしが効く │   746 │  7.1% │ - add, sK
│ ツブシが利く │   306 │  2.9% │
│ ツブシが効く │   296 │  2.8% │
│ つぶしがきく │ 2,949 │ 28.0% │
│ ツブシがきく │   457 │  4.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -12,0 +13,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>潰しがきく</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つぶしが効く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19 +27 @@
-<gloss>to be valuable as scrap</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -21 +29,3 @@
-<gloss>to have marketable skills</gloss>
+<gloss>to have transferable skills</gloss>
+<gloss>to be adaptable</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to be valuable as scrap</gloss>

つぶしが利く	2364	49.0%
潰しが利く	1395	28.9%
潰しが効く	1063	22.0%

N-gram, Daijisen

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for 86-エイティシックス-.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>潰しが効く</keb>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijs, wisdom

Not a conjunction.
"should" isn't right for sense 3.

@@ -8,2 +8,7 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>even if</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>no matter (what, who, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...であれ...であれ</s_inf>
+<gloss>whether ... or ...</gloss>
@@ -13,5 +18 @@
-<gloss>(it doesn't matter) whether (A or B or ...)</gloss>
-<gloss>whatever</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008340">である</xref>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>should</gloss>
+<gloss>be</gloss>

であれ and であろうと are commonly grouped together into a grammar point in JLPT study guides.
https://jlptsensei.com/learn-japanese-grammar/であれ-であろうと-de-are-de-arou-meaning/

であろうと isn't compatible with the third sense here.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>であろうと</reb>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>であろうと</reb>

* https://kotobank.jp/word/狢藻-641491
* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ムジナモ

Typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>まじなも</reb>
+<reb>むじなも</reb>

Entry created

日外３５万語科学技術用語大辞典

Typo. Compare 「鵞口瘡」.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ガッコウソウキン</reb>
+<reb>ガコウソウキン</reb>

http://iroha.scitech.lib.keio.ac.jp:8080/sigma/bitstream/handle/10721/3151/document.pdf?sequence=2
Wikip

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ガッコウソウキン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>thrush fungus</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>thrush fungus (Candida albicans)</gloss>

cross, 日英・英日専門用語辞書
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/鵞口瘡�%8
F%8C

* https://kotobank.jp/word/ウォンバット-172420: キタケバナウォンバット
* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ウォンバット科#分類

Typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きたみけはなウォンバット</reb>
+<reb>きたけばなウォンバット</reb>

Rather threatened these days.

wiki, 世界大百科事典
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ウォン�
%90%E3%83%83%E3%83%88
http://kotobank.jp/word/ケバナウ%E
3%82%A9%E3%83%B3%E3%83%90%E3%83%83%E3%83%88

* 動植物名よみかた辞典: https://kotobank.jp/word/幌向苺-1758782
* jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ホロムイイチゴ
* https://kotobank.jp/word/幌向草-631865

Typo.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ほろまいいちご</reb>
+<reb>ほろむいいちご</reb>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2833456">クラウドベリー</xref>

jwiki wiki
ランダムハウス英和大辞典

I've discussed this with Rob. I think it's ok as search-only.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

小さな和室で、古い造りなので風呂とトイレは別になっている。換気があまりよくないので、白羽さんの入った後の風呂場のドアから、湿気と湯気がむわりと部屋にたちこめていた。「From the novel コンビニ人間　by　村田 沙耶香」

Added the alternate spelling むわりと

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>むわりと</reb>

No reference provided.

@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>むわりと</reb>

Google N-grams:
むわりと	   75

References?

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>むわりと</reb>

Closing

I think separation is best in this case. I'll confirm it, then reopen for a while.

Normally we'd just do a note, "esp. 哺育", no?

Meikyo does too. Maybe it's worth having separate entries just to show that 哺育 is the more common form for this meaning.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>保育</keb>

ビビり散らかす	0	0.0%
ビビりちらかす	0	0.0%
びびり散らかす	0	0.0%
びびりちらかす	0	0.0%

Many references don't include a lot of 複合動詞 as they are rather obvious to Japanese people. I don't mind covering them as they can be useful for beginners et al. There are limits - the verbs need to be on the radar. This one seems very rare.

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/21325092

「むやみにビビる」というのが文字通りの意味ですが、そこから転じて「盛大にビビり続ける」、「何をやっても・ほんの些細なことでもビビる」

daijs: https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ピークタイム/

ピークタイム　 8,290
アイドルタイム 7,309 <- already an entry

Merged to 5746769.

Merged to 5746769.

* daijr/s
* https://kotobank.jp/word/内田百閒-19325
* https://kotobank.jp/word/内田_百閒-1639761
* http://digioka.libnet.pref.okayama.jp/mmhp/kyodo/person/uchidahyakken/hyakkenn-short.htm: 百間の「間」は正しくはもんがまえの中が日でなく月であらわされる。また、やむをえず内田百聞、内田百門と表記する場合もある。

内田百閒　  9,628 27.2%
内田百間　  6,773 19.1%
内田百聞　  1,392  3.9%
内田百門　     34  0.1%
内田百けん 17,629 49.7%

We have two existing entries for him, with the 閒 of his name written with other kanji. This entry has the correct form, but merging the others here, as they are too common to ignore. [sK] candidates.

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内田百けん</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内田百間</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内田百聞</keb>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/内田百閒