gg5, prog, luminous

The JEs only have 〜する glosses.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -21,4 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>trembling</gloss>
-<gloss>getting nervous</gloss>
-<gloss>excited</gloss>
-<gloss>thrilled</gloss>
+<gloss>to be excited</gloss>
+<gloss>to be nervous</gloss>
+<gloss>to be thrilled</gloss>

ワックワク	3879

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワックワク</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

gg5, daij, meikyo

Not an abbreviation.

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>bar</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">bar</lsource>
+<gloss>crowbar</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +15 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>crowbar</gloss>
+<gloss>bar (unit of pressure)</gloss>

為すすべ	        6,381	
成すすべ	        5,103		
害を為す	        1,570		
害を成す	        1,573		
為すがまま	3,163		
成すがまま	3,746

I agree with the split but 成す is also used for the "do" sense.

@@ -43,0 +44,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>also written as 為す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to commit</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring about</gloss>

Reopen.

Split as suggested. I'll approve initially to lock it down and reopen.  If approved I'll fix the sentence indices.

@@ -10,8 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>為す</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>爲す</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20 +11,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -26 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -36,11 +25,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>esp. 為す</s_inf>
-<gloss>to do</gloss>
-<gloss>to commit</gloss>
-<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
-<gloss>to bring about</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -52 +30,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -61 +38,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -69 +45,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>

I agree. It's also the visible form in sankoku and daijirin.

"why" is redundant.
If we're keeping one kanji form visible, I think it should be 何故かと言うと.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
+<keb>何故かと言うと</keb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<keb>何故かと言うと</keb>
+<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>the reason is that ...</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>the reason why is</gloss>

なぜかと言うと	55815	14.8%
何故かと言うと	38043	10.1%
なぜかというと	220108	58.3%
何故かというと	63769	16.9%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

google ngrams
なぜかというと	220108
なぜかと言うと	55815
何故かと言うと	38043

〈花／華／はな／ハナ〉より〈団／だん／ダン〉〈子／ご／ゴ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 花より団子　　 │ 107,911 │ 74.7% │
│ 花よりだんご　 │  22,476 │ 15.6% │ - add, sK
│ 花よりダンゴ　 │   6,661 │  4.6% │
│ 華より団子　　 │   2,745 │  1.9% │ - add, sK
│ はなより団子　 │     130 │  0.1% │
│ 花より団ご　　 │      99 │  0.1% │
│ 華よりだんご　 │      46 │  0.0% │
│ ハナより団子　 │      30 │  0.0% │
│ 花よりだん子　 │      25 │  0.0% │
│ はなよりだんご │   3,899 │  2.7% │
│ ハナよりだんご │     412 │  0.3% │
│ ハナよりダンゴ │      92 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>花よりだんご</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>華より団子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Better.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">dumplings rather than flowers</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">dumplings over flowers</gloss>

Fine as a [lit] gloss.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">dumplings rather than flowers</gloss>

daij

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>dumplings rather than flowers</gloss>
-<gloss>people are more interested in the practical over the aesthetic</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>function over aesthetics</gloss>

prog, luminous, daij

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>to help out of (trouble)</gloss>
-<gloss>to extricate</gloss>
+<gloss>to help (someone) out of trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>to rescue</gloss>
+<gloss>to save</gloss>

[vt]: koj

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 助け出す　 │ 33,046 │ 94.7% │
│ 助けだす　 │  1,424 │  4.1% │ - add, sK
│ 助だす　　 │    103 │  0.3% │
│ たすけ出す │     21 │  0.1% │
│ 助出す　　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ たすけだす │    297 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>助けだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -36,2 +36,4 @@
-<gloss>to finish</gloss>
-<gloss>to fulfill</gloss>
+<gloss>to achieve</gloss>
+<gloss>to complete</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry through</gloss>

〈成（し）／為（し）／なし／ナシ〉〈遂／と〉げ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 成し遂げ │ 453,561 │ 91.5% │
│ なし遂げ │   9,170 │  1.8% │ - add, sK
│ 成しとげ │   4,389 │  0.9% │
│ 為し遂げ │   2,073 │  0.4% │
│ 成遂げ　 │     472 │  0.1% │ - add, sK (daijr, smk)
│ 為しとげ │     134 │  0.0% │
│ 為遂げ　 │      81 │  0.0% │
│ なしとげ │  26,046 │  5.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<keb>なし遂げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +20,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成遂げる</keb>

成し遂げる	144471	94.4%
成しとげる	1365	0.9%
為し遂げる	768	0.5% <- Daijs -  rK
なしとげる	6467	4.2%

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

N-grams:
成し遂げる	144471
為し遂げる	768
成しとげる	1365

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<keb>成しとげる</keb>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<keb>為し遂げる</keb>

OK, closing.

https://www.bunka.go.jp/kokugo_nihongo/sisaku/joho/joho/kakuki/22/pdf/jitaihyo.pdf

As I understand it, the bureaucrats in the education ministry decided in 2000 that 搔 is the proper ("印刷標準") form of the kanji and 掻 is an acceptable simplified variant ("簡易慣用").

Practically every recently published kokugo from a variety of different publishers (daijirin, meikyo, iwakoku, etc.) uses these 印刷標準 kanji rather than the simplified forms.

Many entries will be much messier if we display both types of forms, so I think it's probably best to stick with one. Lately we've been hiding the "proper" forms and keeping the simplified forms visible. I think that's probably fine. If we want to switch to the 印刷標準 forms someday, it would be simple enough to write a script to swap them.

I agree [rK] probably isn't a good tag for these kanji forms, since they're quite a bit more common now than when the 2007 n-gram corpus was compiled. People are bound to encounter them frequently and wonder what they are. Maybe that information is better explained via a dedicated kanji dictionary rather than a vocabulary dictionary like JMdict.

掻く	89328
搔く	123

I don't think 搔く rates as [rK]. Kanjipedia is a form of kanwa; not the sort of reference we'd use to justify word level [rK] tags. 搔 entered the JIS standards in JIS X 0212 as an 異体字 of 掻. Even after 20+ years of Unicode it's still rather rare. Wiktionary says it's a 旧字体, but I don't take that as authorative.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kanji/0004265300
Not 旧字体, so [rK] rather than [oK]

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

No need to explain the gloss. That is not the purpose of the note field.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb; indicates possibility of an action</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>

Is this... an ARGUMENT?! IMPOSSIBLE!!!!
Anyhow, a little redundancy to make sure something sticks has never hurt a dam, but I can see your point.

"indicates possibility of an action" adds nothing but fluff considering the glosses relay the same semantic information.

daijs, daijr, meikyo

Adding notes with the intent of further clarifying function.

Changing both senses to v2a-s.
Addressing the points in 2020-09-01 20:16:58, This is considered by every Japanese source I have looked at as the only remaining 二段 verb in modern Japanese and it does conjugate, even if the only provable instances of conjugation are the identical 連体形 and 終止形, both forms are still formally distinguished by 国語 grammars by their use much like english tells apart past 'read' from non-past 'read' by pronunciation. Non-provable instances of conjugation would be 未然形 and 連用形 as they would be completely indiscernible from える. Finally, there is the provable case of the 仮定形, but it is almost never used: ありうれば returns measly 33 results from the N-gram and a google search only 407 - though you will see that it is indeed the 仮定形 if you stop to read some of phrases found by google.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&v-unspec;</pos>
+<pos>&v2a-s;</pos>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb; indicates possibility of an action</s_inf>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<pos>&v-unspec;</pos>
+<pos>&v2a-s;</pos>

It's our only "v-unspec". We can look at it again if needed.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>difficult to recover from illness</gloss>
+<gloss>difficult-to-recover-from illness</gloss>

GG5: 	a serious [an intractable] disease; a 「serious [bad] case.
中辞典: 〈不治の〉 an incurable disease; 〈難治の〉 an intractable disease; ┏a serious [an obstinate] case 《of malaria》.
ルミナス: (不治の病気) incurable disease; (命にかかわる) serious disease; (悪性の病気) malignant disease

I think there's just one sense. It's a fairly broad term.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>serious disease</gloss>
+<gloss>intractable disease</gloss>
@@ -18,10 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>an illness in which the cause and treatment is unknown</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>an illness in which the appropriate treatment requires long-term care</gloss>

1. 出典：デジタル大辞泉（小学館）
2. The entry above has a 補説 that also includes 3 bullet points from this source: https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/a0705/nanbyo/nanbyogaiyo.html

「難病」とは、2015年1月施行の「難病の患者に対する医療等に関する法律（難病法）」により1から3のとおり定義されています。ただし、がんや精神疾患、感染症、アレルギー疾患等、個別の施策体系があるものは含まれていません。

    発病の機構が明らかでない
    治療方法が確立していない希少な疾病である
    当該疾病にかかることにより長期にわたり療養を必要とすることとなるもの

The entry for "incurable" disease lead me to look it up in other monolingual dictionaries as "incurable" as a description or definition feels insufficient. It makes me believe it is a known disease that has no treatment or cure for it. 

I also included the tags [med] to denote it is related to medical terminology, I am not sure if this is appropriate.

@@ -16 +16,12 @@
-<gloss>incurable disease</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>difficult to recover from illness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>an illness in which the cause and treatment is unknown</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>an illness in which the appropriate treatment requires long-term care</gloss>

daijr: また，その人。
gg5: 〔人〕 a Sunday [an amateur] carpenter; a DIY buff.
luminous: (人) do-it-yourselfer, Sunday [weekend] carpenter.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>home carpentry</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>weekend carpenter</gloss>
+<gloss>do-it-yourselfer</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>weekend carpenting</gloss>
+<gloss>weekend carpentry</gloss>
+<gloss>home carpentry</gloss>

daijs

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>weekend carpenter</gloss>
-<gloss>do-it-yourselfer</gloss>
+<gloss>weekend carpenting</gloss>
+<gloss>do-it-yourself</gloss>
+<gloss>DIY</gloss>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>winning by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>winning by decision (in combat sports)</gloss>

More idiomatic.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>winning by points</gloss>
+<gloss>winning on points</gloss>

gg5 says "winning on points."
sankoku:
〘ボクシングなど〙決定的な勝敗がつかないとき、審判が優勢と認めたほうを勝ちとすること。（↔判定負け）

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decisions_in_combat_sports
>> In combat sports, a decision is a result of the fight or bout that does not end in a knockout, submission or other finish, in which the (usually) three judges' scorecards are consulted to determine the winner; a majority of judges must agree on a result.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>winning a decision</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>winning by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>winning by points</gloss>

goo

This gloss is wrong but I don't have a better one.

I'll close this now, and keep the new 哺育 entry open for comment for a while.

保育
GG5: upbringing; day care; 《文》 nurture.  ～する bring up; take care of 《a child》; rear; 《文》 nurture 《a child》.
中辞典: upbringing; 《文》 nurture; 〈託児所などでの〉 day care   ¶保育する bring up; take care of 《a child》; rear; 《文》 nurture; 〈職業として〉 nurse; 〈里親として〉 foster
哺育
GG5: (xref to 哺乳/ほにゅう).   ～する suckle; nurse.
中辞典: 哺育する bring up 《a child》; nurse [suckle, breast-feed] 《one's baby》.

I think the best approach is to split this into two entries, as in the JEs.  I'll add one for 哺育 and remove it from here.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>哺育</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<stagk>保育</stagk>
@@ -26,8 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>nursing (esp. an animal)</gloss>
-<gloss>suckling</gloss>
-<gloss>(feeding and) raising</gloss>

luminous, daij, meikyo
人工哺育	8,821		
人工保育	4,556

The 哺 in 哺育 means "feeding"/"nursing". 哺育 isn't used for childcare. 
哺育 isn't rK.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -32 +31 @@
-<gloss>nursing</gloss>
+<gloss>nursing (esp. an animal)</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>(feeding and) raising</gloss>

中辞典: 哺育する bring up 《a child》
ルミナス (哺育 entry):  (動物などを育てる) raise

Syed added the sense 1 restriction a couple of years back giving the JEs as a reference. Is it really appropriate?

rK should work.

A couple of JEs use it in examples for that sense of 済ます. May as well staty.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1295030">済ます・3</xref>

なしで済ます	398	46.2%
無しで済ます	213	24.7%
無しですます	0	0.0%
なしですます	250	29.0%

Does this nees to b an entry?

Tanaka: 3 examples of 無しですます
G n-grams;
 なしで済ませ	656
 無しで済ませ	463
 無しですませ	　79

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無しですます</keb>

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なしで済ます</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5, luminous
基準のサイズ	260		
基準サイズ	31,267		
基準の価格	422		
基準価格	        79,926

I don't think it's adj-no. The top 〜の n-gram terms aren't adjectival.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>basis</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>reference</gloss>
-<gloss>datum</gloss>
+<gloss>benchmark</gloss>
+<gloss>measure</gloss>
+<gloss>gauge</gloss>
+<gloss>basis</gloss>

OK. Closing.

The "adj-no" tag is defined as: "nouns which may take the genitive case particle `no'". In other words it's saying in this case that 基準の can behave as an adjective. This is supported by various references, e.g. the Kenkyusha 新和英中辞典 has, after the noun glosses: "¶基準の standard", and the リーダーズ+プラス 英和 translates the English adjective
"standard" as (among other things) 基準の .
I think your proposed removal of the "adj-no" POS tag from this and other entries is based on a misunderstanding of the tag.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I do not think this makes sesne.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij

Not a noun.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -34 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 確かな　 │ 2,087,868 │ 94.2% │
│ 確な　　 │    30,977 │  1.4% │
│ 慥かな　 │       148 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr, meikyo, etc.)
│ たしかな │    96,426 │  4.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Rearranged the Tatoeba indices.

daij - 確 is io
gg5, prog, eij, etc. for gloss changes

not sure sense 1 and 2 really need to be split.  all waeis do so, some have more splitting

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>sure</gloss>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<gloss>sure</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +32,12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>reliable</gloss>
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss>
+<gloss>safe</gloss>
+<gloss>sound</gloss>
+<gloss>firm</gloss>
+<gloss>accurate</gloss>
+<gloss>correct</gloss>
+<gloss>exact</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -32,2 +45,3 @@
-<gloss>if I'm not mistaken</gloss>
-<gloss>if I remember correctly</gloss>
+<gloss>If I'm not mistaken</gloss>
+<gloss>If I remember correctly</gloss>
+<gloss>If I remember rightly</gloss>

gg5, prog
ひとかどの人物	2,125	76.4%	
一角の人物	524	18.8%	
一廉の人物	132	4.7%	
一かどの人物	0	0.0%

The JEs, sankoku and smk only have one sense.
The "one matter/field" sense appears to be obsolete.
Chujiten uses 一かど in its examples.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一かど</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,3 +24,5 @@
-<gloss>a cut above the rest</gloss>
-<gloss>superior</gloss>
-<gloss>something uncommon</gloss>
+<gloss>considerable</gloss>
+<gloss>decent</gloss>
+<gloss>respectable</gloss>
+<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+<gloss>fully fledged</gloss>
@@ -25 +31 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -27,2 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>respectable</gloss>
-<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+<gloss>suitably</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonably</gloss>
@@ -32 +38,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>one matter</gloss>
@@ -34,6 +40,0 @@
-<gloss>one matter</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>suitably</gloss>
-<gloss>reasonably</gloss>

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

daijirin

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>respectable</gloss>
-<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,7 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>respectable</gloss>
+<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>last train</gloss>
+<gloss>last train (of the day)</gloss>

I don't see a need for it.

7k in the ngrams

Not really needed, I don't think

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>established (certain) fact</gloss>
+<gloss>established fact</gloss>
+<gloss>certain fact</gloss>

saito has it as an example:
  法に適う | to conform to the law

法に適う	94

No idea where this came from.

Needed? Is the gloss correct, even?

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

Hard to justify....

I don't think either is needed. This is overly compositional. 一体何 is A+B.

I've suggested an entry for 一体何/いったい何. I that is accepted, this can prbably be dropped.

Looks like an example sentence to me.

Entry created

reverso
数種を	6,854		
数種が	4,571

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>poly-</gloss>
+<gloss>several kinds</gloss>
+<gloss>several species</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudotorynorrhina_japonica
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カナブン
"近縁の種が数種ある上、一般にはコガネムシ科全般、特に金属光沢のあるものを指す通称として「カナブン」と呼ぶ場合もあるため、アオドウガネやドウガネブイブイなどと混同されることもある。"

@@ -22 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>drone beetle (scarabaeid beetle) (Rhomborrhina japonica)</gloss>
+<gloss>drone beetle (Pseudotorynorrhina japonica)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>scarab beetle</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<reb>かなぶん</reb>
+<reb>カナブン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -16,2 +17 @@
-<reb>カナブン</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>かなぶん</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 金蚉　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ <- daijr/s, koj, oukoku
│ 金蚊　　 │    145 │  0.1% │ <- jp wikipedia has this
│ かなぶん │ 33,338 │ 31.6% │
│ カナブン │ 71,953 │ 68.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<keb>金蚉</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daij

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>metallic tasting</gloss>
+<gloss>having a metallic smell</gloss>
+<gloss>having a metallic taste</gloss>

金臭い	384	88.1%
金くさい	52	11.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金くさい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

gg5, prog

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>there being no backing out</gloss>
-<gloss>gone too far to retreat</gloss>
+<gloss>being in too deep to back out</gloss>
+<gloss>having gone too far to retreat</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 引っ込みがつかなく │ 7,310 │
│ 引っ込みが付かなく │ 1,317 │
│ ひっこみがつかなく │ 1,442 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

More commonly inflected than not

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

引っ込みが付かない	469	13.1%
引っ込みがつかない	3118	86.9%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>引っ込みが付かない</keb>
+<keb>引っ込みがつかない</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>引っ込みがつかない</keb>
+<keb>引っ込みが付かない</keb>

Entry created

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijs, wisdom

Not a conjunction.
"should" isn't right for sense 3.

@@ -8,2 +8,7 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>even if</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>no matter (what, who, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...であれ...であれ</s_inf>
+<gloss>whether ... or ...</gloss>
@@ -13,5 +18 @@
-<gloss>(it doesn't matter) whether (A or B or ...)</gloss>
-<gloss>whatever</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008340">である</xref>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>should</gloss>
+<gloss>be</gloss>

であれ and であろうと are commonly grouped together into a grammar point in JLPT study guides.
https://jlptsensei.com/learn-japanese-grammar/であれ-であろうと-de-are-de-arou-meaning/

であろうと isn't compatible with the third sense here.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>であろうと</reb>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>であろうと</reb>

Fixing x-ref

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ・2</xref>

Entry created

Fixing x-ref

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ・2</xref>

Entry created

Fixing x-ref

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ・2</xref>

Entry created

Fixing x-ref

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2136650">であれ・2</xref>

sp

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>whereever</gloss>
+<gloss>wherever</gloss>

Entry created

OK. I just reinstated the previous gloss.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>
+<gloss>malarial fever</gloss>

I think we've agreed not to include notes like that one, that are notes on the English gloss rather than the Japanese word.

Koj, Daijr

No case or references provided.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>

基準にかなう	279		
基準に適う	263

I don't think so. Uncommon and obvious.

Needed?

Entry created

Sankoku has a 古風 tag on this word, but not on 意地を張る.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

isn't 意地はる simply 意地をはる with the を dropped?
if read as いじばる, I think this is simply an obsolete word

Dropping [exp] tag.
[vi]: sankoku, shinsen

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 意地張っ │ 19,255 │ 89.7% │
│ 意地ばっ │      0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 意地はっ │  1,997 │  9.3% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ いじばっ │      0 │  0.0% │
│ いじはっ │    215 │  1.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

A bit simpler.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,2 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>意地張る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>意地ばる</re_restr>
@@ -21,2 +19,0 @@
-<re_restr>意地張る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>意地はる</re_restr>
@@ -26 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Entry created

I agree.

I don't personally think this is needed either. I wouldn't mind seeing several of the othrt そうなんです etc. entries go either.

そうなんですけどねぇ	4217
そうなんですけどね	42058
そうなんですけど	178899
そうなんです	3609041  <- currently an entry
そうなんですか	715872  <- currently an entry
Reverso

The original was from EIjiro. Maybe the shorter and more common version is worth having.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>そうなんですけどねぇ</reb>
+<reb>そうなんですけど</reb>
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>that's right, but ...</gloss>

Smells like an example sentence

Entry created

gg5, luminous

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to drive someone out</gloss>
-<gloss>to force someone to leave</gloss>
+<gloss>to drive (someone) out by bullying them</gloss>
+<gloss>to bully (someone) into leaving</gloss>
+<gloss>to treat (someone) so badly that they leave</gloss>

[vt]: iwakoku, meikyo, smk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Entry created

I couldn't argue for it.

飛び出した目	407

I don't think this is needed.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1485350">飛び出す・とびだす・3</xref>

n-grams
飛び出した目	28

sense 3 of 飛び出す

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Entry created

Indeed.

I agree. It's just なんで + よ.

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for なんでよっ (Frequency Order)
なんでよっ	1172	  
なんでよっぽど	248	  
なんでよっ	182	  
なんでよっ	133	  
なんでよって	116	  
なんでよって	104	  
なんでよっす	73	  
なんでよっぽどの	72	  
なんでよっすぃ	63	  
なんでよっちゃ	61	  
なんでよっちゃん	61	 

includinf it an sK can lead to misparsing

Not convinced this needs to be an entry.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何でよ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なんでよっ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>Why?</gloss>
-<gloss>Why not?</gloss>
-<gloss>What for?</gloss>
-<gloss>What's wrong?</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>why?</gloss>
+<gloss>why not?</gloss>
+<gloss>what for?</gloss>
+<gloss>what's wrong?</gloss>

- zero n-grams for the version with the large つ
- this seems very A+B to me.
(I can't find a context where it could mean 'what's wrong' though)

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>なんでよつ</reb>
+<reb>なんでよ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

It's a conjunction in all the kokugos.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1188710">なぜかというと</xref>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<gloss>the reason is that ...</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>the reason why is</gloss>

Let's say [exp].

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

何となれば	9929	51.6%
なんとなれば	9320	48.4%

is conj right? 何故かというと is exp

スーパー大辞林

daijs daijr

Align with 2154380.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>
+<gloss>malarial fever</gloss>

Koj, Daijr

Provide a reason & references.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>malarial fever (old name)</gloss>

Good way to do it.

koj, daijr

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 疫病み</s_inf>
@@ -24,0 +25,1 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 瘧</s_inf>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2850980">アルゼンチン人</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────╮
│ 亜人　 │ 24,544 │
│ アじん │      0 │ - drop
│ あじん │  5,798 │
╰─ーーー─┴────────╯

I get that the アじん reading was added due to the ateji nature of 亜 for the second and third senses. By that logic I think we'd want to split those senses into a separate entry. I say we just drop it; we don't have アこく as a reading in our entry for 亜国.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>アじん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>あじん</stagr>

https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2016/161012-71colonia.html
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2016/160914-61colonia.html

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Argentinian (person)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1157130">成す・1</xref>

GG5: 一団をなして in a group; forming a group. (and many others)
Eijiro: 曲線をなして : in a curve

It mostly seen as in sense 1, so I think that should go first. or the totally wrong impression will be given.

@@ -7,0 +7,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157130">為す・なす・2</xref>
+<gloss>forming</gloss>
+<gloss>comprising</gloss>
+<gloss>making up</gloss>
+</sense>

nikk
Listed under various dialects here: http://www.weblio.jp/content/なして

JA wiki has this recorded as ブーク.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K37
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buk_missile_system

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブーク</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="rus"/>

Yech.

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20140720-OYT1T50131.html
"「露からブク」証拠映像あるとウクライナ大統領"
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20140719-OYT1T50071.html
"旅客機撃墜はブク、親露派地域発射…米国防総省"
http://mainichi.jp/select/news/20140719k0000e030268000c.html
"マレーシア機撃墜:「ブク」か？　兵器搭載車の画像公開"

daijr, gg5, prog

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>impossible (dream, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>impossible (dream, wish, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>unrequited (love)</gloss>
+<gloss>hopeless</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>unfulfillable</gloss>

Daijr, N-grams:
叶わぬ	99481
適わぬ	3667
かなわぬ	43710

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>適わぬ</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>impossible (dream etc)</gloss>
+<gloss>impossible (dream, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

いかがお過ごしでしょうか	318615	89.0%
如何お過ごしでしょうか	39463	11.0%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>如何お過ごしでしょうか</keb>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>how are you getting along?</gloss>
+<gloss>how have you been?</gloss>
+<gloss>how are you?</gloss>

いかがお過ごしですか	202471  <- entry since 2010
いかがお過ごしでしょうか	318615
Several Tanaka sentences

V common. Better have it too. I'll index the sentences to it.

Closing

I think separation is best in this case. I'll confirm it, then reopen for a while.

Normally we'd just do a note, "esp. 哺育", no?

Meikyo does too. Maybe it's worth having separate entries just to show that 哺育 is the more common form for this meaning.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>保育</keb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:

仮決めし　 1,202 94.6%
仮決めをし    69  5.4%

Wadoku has -きめ, but the few Youglish samples I listened to were all -ぎめ.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

仮決め	2540
GT

Possibly read かりきめ.

コンパスローズ

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>affected, pretentious</gloss>
+<gloss>affected</gloss>
+<gloss>pretentious</gloss>

GG5
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/気取った

気取った	73603

not sure about adj-f?

諺解	1221	
Koj, Daijr, Unidic

Came up in an article about 漢文訓読.

仕事後	105863

As those sites say, it's more often 仕事後	.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>outside of hours</gloss>
+<gloss>outside of working hours</gloss>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10288885225
https://hinative.com/questions/9268545

業後	4618
Saw it in the wild.

Fork

I agree it doesn't really work as a standalone entry. I think it needs a か or や or sth similar at the end to take on this meaning.

GG5:
まあいいさ． Well, 「leave it as it is ［let it go at that］.
まあいいか．  Well, why not？
まあいい天気だこと． Isn't it lovely weather！ ｜ What a lovely day！
あっ, 塩を入れすぎたかな． まあいいか． Oh-oh, maybe that was too much salt． Oh well, I guess it's OK.
RP:
まあいいだろう. Fair enough!
まあいいや   Oh well!
KOD:
まあいいけどさ I don't know

The problem is that as まあ + いい it's very broad and the meaning usually/often depends on what comes after it.
I'm not sure it works as a standalone entry.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>oh well</gloss>

https://www.japanesewithanime.com/2019/03/maa-ii.html

meaningfully different from existing まあいいか, but both forms important:

まあいい	700866	  
まあいいか	219647	  
まあいいや	184158	  
まあいいん	37828	  
まあいいけど	29678	  
まあいいかと	20262	  
まあいいでしょ	17883	  
まあいいとして	17573	  
まあいいです	17522	  
まあいいでしょう	16195	  
まあいいかな	15417

https://hinative.com/questions/19286060  "What is the difference between まあいいや and まあいいか ?"
- I think they both have the same meaning.
- Almost same,...
- Both have the same meaning.

In a fork Marcus wrote: "I agree it doesn't really work as a standalone entry. I think it needs a か or や or sth similar at the end to take on this meaning."
I'm making this into まあいいや. I really don't see a good case for まあいい standing alone.
Aligning with まあいいか.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>まあいい</reb>
+<reb>まあいいや</reb>
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>whatever</gloss>
-<gloss>oh well</gloss>
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
-<gloss>never mind</gloss>
-<gloss>okay</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>oh well, fine</gloss>
+<gloss>fine, I guess</gloss>
+<gloss>alright, I suppose</gloss>
+<gloss>OK, then</gloss>

I think it is useful separately. I'm encountering it end-of-sentence, with clearly the 'whatever' meaning. in the reference it is also described separately. note that this article also mentions the meanings 'fine' and 'never mind'. from reverso it also seems it is commonly used by itself. and translated in some cases with 'okay' (adding these).

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<gloss>fine</gloss>
+<gloss>never mind</gloss>
+<gloss>okay</gloss>

GG5:
まあいいさ． Well, 「leave it as it is ［let it go at that］.
まあいいか．  Well, why not？
まあいい天気だこと． Isn't it lovely weather！ ｜ What a lovely day！
あっ, 塩を入れすぎたかな． まあいいか． Oh-oh, maybe that was too much salt． Oh well, I guess it's OK.
RP:
まあいいだろう. Fair enough!
まあいいや   Oh well!
KOD:
まあいいけどさ I don't know

The problem is that as まあ + いい it's very broad and the meaning usually/often depends on what comes after it.
I'm not sure it works as a standalone entry.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>oh well</gloss>

https://www.japanesewithanime.com/2019/03/maa-ii.html

meaningfully different from existing まあいいか, but both forms important:

まあいい	700866	  
まあいいか	219647	  
まあいいや	184158	  
まあいいん	37828	  
まあいいけど	29678	  
まあいいかと	20262	  
まあいいでしょ	17883	  
まあいいとして	17573	  
まあいいです	17522	  
まあいいでしょう	16195	  
まあいいかな	15417

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にじゅうがらす</reb>
+<reb>にじゅうガラス</reb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>double-paned glass</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/二重ガラス

a lot more common than existing entry:

二重ガラス	6476
二重窓ガラス	174

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>observation room (hospital, prison, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>observation room (in a hospital, police station, etc.)</gloss>

RP, Eijiro, Igaku

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>observation room</gloss>
+<gloss>observation room (hospital, prison, etc.)</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/観察室

観察室	7777

I agree. 一体 is just an intensifier. cf. 一体どこ, 一体だれ, etc.

I don't think this really works as an entry.

一体何	1339977	  
一体何を	353562	  
一体何が	240095	  
一体何な	154895	  
一体何の	106478	
いったい何	1078734	  
いったい何を	212097	  
いったい何が	185418	  
いったい何な	157048	  
いったい何なん	87401	  
いったい何の	83109	
いったいなん	162333
いったいなに	53690
Reverso, 29 Tanaka sentences.

I see 一体何... often, It seems to be a stronger version of 一体/いったい. Worth spelling out as an entry?

Split from 1157130.

Non-past negative formal inflection of 有る【ある】
https://www.edrdg.org/jmwsgi/conj.py?e=1973252

daijr/s, jawiki

Resubmit with reasons why we need this as well as である.