@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:

壁の罅　    27  1.6%
壁のひび   532 31.3%
壁のヒビ 1,143 67.2%

罅だらけ　    73  1.9%
ひびだらけ 1,014 26.2%
ヒビだらけ 2,781 71.9%

罅が入った　    327  1.1%
ひびが入った 12,978 42.8%
ヒビが入った 17,013 56.1%

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒビ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2727020">ダウナー・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2727020">ダウナー・2</xref>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>upper (drug)</gloss>
@@ -28 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>upper</gloss>

daijs: 多く複合語の形で用い、上の、上方の、の意を表す。「―スイング」

I don't think the 上層 x-ref is needed. They're not normally interchangeable.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1353710">上層</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12 +11 @@
-<gloss>higher</gloss>
+<gloss>upward</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>shoe upper</gloss>
-<gloss>upper part of a shoe</gloss>
+<gloss>upper (of a shoe)</gloss>

KOD, Daijs, etc.

Seems it's fairly broad.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1353710">上層</xref>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>higher</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +25,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2727020">ダウナー</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>stimulant</gloss>
+<gloss>upper</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daijr, daijs, nikk

Not sure if the shoe sense is notable enough, but koj, daijs and nikk all have it.

@@ -11,0 +12,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>shoe upper</gloss>
+<gloss>upper part of a shoe</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1016590">アッパーカット</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>uppercut</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think エヌジ is right. My refs only have エヌジー.
Sense 1 is a noun in daijs.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>エヌジ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16,4 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
@@ -23,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・ジー</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌジー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌ・ジ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5, and kokugo (Daijr/s, Shinmeikai) to confirm

Seems to be able to refer to the performance itself or the footage.

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>blooper (deleted scene)</gloss>
+<gloss>outtake</gloss>
+<gloss>blooper</gloss>
+<gloss>retake</gloss>

サインはOKです
heard this twice in two days in a row from different delivery men.
You couldn't really translate this as "The sign is OK" in English - might it make sense to split? Or should we just add "all right" to sense 1, as in GG5?

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オッケ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -22,0 +27,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>fine (without)</gloss>
+<gloss>not needed</gloss>
+<gloss>unnecessary</gloss>
+<gloss>all right</gloss>

Just noting that GG5, etc. don't use nakaguro with this one.

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

オーピー is now [sk] and not technically associated with the ＯＰ form
We can't use オー・ピー since nakaguro symbols break the formatting in the XML version

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・1</xref>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・2</xref>

See discussion on 2833798.

@@ -13,0 +14,13 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・1</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>opening credits</gloss>
+<gloss>title sequence</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833798">ＯＰ・オーピー・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>theme song (played during the opening credits of a TV show, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

Style update.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ペーハー</reb>
+<reb>ペー・ハー</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ペー・ハー</reb>
+<reb>ペーハー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I don't think the xref is a lot of use. Japanese people tend to use "pH", and I think it's more often read ペーハー than ピー・エイチ, although the latter is what the JEs like. GG5 points pH/ペーハー to pH/ピー・エイチ.

@@ -15,3 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2830086">水素イオン指数</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2830086">水素イオン指数</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2830086">水素イオン指数</xref>

水素イオン指数	1018

Some kind of xref to 水素イオン指数 might make sense once we have more xref types, but as things are now I think it can be misunderstood.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/水素イオン指数

I did wonder about that, but the kokugos redirect from "pH" to 水素イオン指数, and 水素イオン指数 is the title of the Japanese Wikipedia article on pH.

Does this xref make sense? pH is not an abbrv of 水性イオン指数 and 水性イオン指数 is certainly.the more obscure word of the two. I suggest removing it.

OK

ユーフォー is the most common reading. I think it should lead.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ユー・エフ・オー</reb>
+<reb>ユーフォー</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ユーフォー</reb>
+<reb>ユー・エフ・オー</reb>

Style change.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ユー・エフ・オー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11 +14,2 @@
-<reb>ユーエフオー</reb>
+<reb>ユーフオー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,5 +18,2 @@
-<reb>ユーフオー</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ユー・エフ・オー</reb>
+<reb>ユーエフオー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

OK

Tatoeba

16 ＵＦＯ and 5 ユーフォー

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Odd that the ichiman source had that form. I'll move the tag.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 趣が　　　 │ 252,178 │ 82.2% │
│ 趣きが　　 │  47,631 │ 15.5% │
│ おもむきが │   7,021 │  2.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Drop the priority tag from the irregular form?

No, it should be the one sense.

@@ -38,4 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>taste</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -44,0 +41 @@
+<gloss>taste</gloss>

中辞典 https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/趣

Are senses 4 and 5 different?

@@ -44,0 +45 @@
+<gloss>elegance</gloss>

https://www.who.int/

As it's a name, we only need the official spelling.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>World Health Organization (Organisation)</gloss>
+<gloss>World Health Organization</gloss>

I think that gloss should lead.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>great success</gloss>

GG5

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/大成功/#clj-1221002
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=大成功

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>

G n-grams 797654

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 中座　　 │ 60,172 │ 99.6% │
│ 中坐　　 │    134 │  0.2% │ - rK
│ ちゅうざ │    108 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>leaving one's seat (before event is over)</gloss>
+<gloss>leaving one's seat (before an event is over)</gloss>

"affair" sounds a little strange.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>leaving one's seat (before an affair is over)</gloss>
+<gloss>leaving one's seat (before event is over)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Added sense and glosses.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1472860">背負う・1</xref>
+<gloss>to carry on one's back</gloss>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>to carry on one's back</gloss>
+<gloss>to shoulder</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +26,7 @@
-<gloss>to take responsibility for</gloss>
-<gloss>to accept a duty</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (responsibility)</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume</gloss>
+<gloss>to accept</gloss>
+<gloss>to bear (the blame, costs, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have (a duty, obligation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to become responsible for</gloss>
+<gloss>to be burdened with (work, debt, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -32,3 +37,4 @@
-<gloss>to receive (wound)</gloss>
-<gloss>to incur (damage)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be injured</gloss>
+<gloss>to suffer (an injury)</gloss>
+<gloss>to sustain (a wound)</gloss>
+<gloss>to receive</gloss>
+<gloss>to incur (a loss, damage, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -39 +45,9 @@
-<gloss>to owe</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...に負う</s_inf>
+<gloss>to owe (a debt of gratitude to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be indebted to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to have (something) behind one</gloss>
+<gloss>to be backed by</gloss>

中辞典: 重傷を負う be [get] severely [seriously] wounded [injured]
GG5: 〔傷を〕 get [be] hurt [injured, wounded]; suffer 《an injury》;

That's not intransitive.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>to be injured</gloss>

大辞林

ダメージを負う
すり傷を負う

Intransitive is not good.

@@ -32 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>to be injured</gloss>
+<gloss>to receive (wound)</gloss>
+<gloss>to incur (damage)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">在る・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>

Reverting.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to be (of animate objects)</gloss>

An edit like this needs to include detailed reasons.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to be (of animate objects)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be</gloss>

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>to have been ...-ing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have been ...-ing</gloss>

〈類（い）／比（い）／たぐい〉〈稀／希／まれ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 類まれ　　 │ 48,625 │ 31.6% │
│ 類稀　　　 │ 39,675 │ 25.8% │
│ 類い稀　　 │ 17,257 │ 11.2% │ - (daijs)
│ 類い希　　 │ 17,512 │ 11.4% │
│ 類いまれ　 │  6,413 │  4.2% │ - sK
│ たぐい稀　 │  4,522 │  2.9% │ - add sK
│ 類希　　　 │  3,064 │  2.0% │ - sK
│ たぐい希　 │    442 │  0.3% │ - add sK
│ 比希　　　 │     23 │  0.0% │
│ たぐいまれ │ 16,489 │ 10.7% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>類稀</keb>
+<keb>類まれ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>類まれ</keb>
+<keb>類稀</keb>
@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たぐい稀</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +26,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たぐい希</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, ルミナス
類稀	39675
類まれ	48625
類い稀	17257
類い希	17512
類いまれ	6413
類希	3064
たぐいまれ	16489

Not uk.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>類まれ</keb>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<keb>類希</keb>
+<keb>類いまれ</keb>
@@ -17,4 +20 @@
-<keb>類まれ</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>類いまれ</keb>
+<keb>類希</keb>
@@ -27,2 +26,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>unique</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +29,3 @@
+<gloss>extraordinary</gloss>
+<gloss>unique</gloss>
+<gloss>incomparable</gloss>
@@ -32 +33 @@
-<gloss>incomparable</gloss>
+<gloss>matchless</gloss>

WWW hits are not that great on these. I see GG5, etc. use kana, Eijiro has only kana.
I think best to leave the "uk" and we can revisit it when the n-gram counts are back (fingers crossed.)

@@ -47 +47,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1352170">上・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2080200">下・2</xref>

Done.

OK.

gg5, prog, wisdom, luminous, daij

I felt that the suffix senses should be higher up.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -14,4 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>medium</gloss>
-<gloss>average</gloss>
+<gloss>medium (size)</gloss>
+<gloss>average (grade, level, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,22 @@
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>in</gloss>
+<gloss>within</gloss>
+<gloss>out of (e.g. ten people)</gloss>
+<gloss>among</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>during</gloss>
+<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>in (the course of)</gloss>
+<gloss>within (a period)</gloss>
+<gloss>throughout</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>currently (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>in the process of</gloss>
+<gloss>in the middle of</gloss>
+<gloss>under (e.g. construction, investigation)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -21,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>middle way</gloss>
@@ -26 +47,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2128530">中一</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
+<gloss>second volume (of three)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +54 @@
+<gloss>junior high school</gloss>
@@ -36,20 +61,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>volume two (of three)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1600920">話し中・1</xref>
-<gloss>during (a certain time when one did or is doing something)</gloss>
-<gloss>under (construction, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>while</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2083570">中・じゅう・2</xref>
-<gloss>in</gloss>
-<gloss>out of</gloss>
-<gloss>of the</gloss>

i think this is basically the same as the sense we already have but that the example distracts from it.

@@ -54,6 +54,2 @@
-<gloss>out of (e.g. three out of ten people)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>(as N+中の+N) most N of the N</gloss>
-<gloss>N among N's</gloss>
+<gloss>out of</gloss>
+<gloss>of the</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>from 行ける</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -28,0 +30 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

See いけない

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>行ける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

Can close it now.

Reopen.

GG5 & ルミナス (have the kanji). Other JEs just have kana.

GG5 has the senses of this entry following "to be able to go", etc. I think it's important that users, particularly beginners, don't get confused. I think the best approach is to drop 行ける as a headword, and add "from 行ける" as a note. The vast majority of uses of 行ける will be from 行く, and not this entry.
I'll approve this approach, since Robin has suggested it, and reopen if anyone wants to continue the dialogue.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>行ける</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12 +8,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -17 +13 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>from 行ける</s_inf>
@@ -24 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -30 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Style alignment.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2102390">縁起を担ぐ</xref>
@@ -26 +25 @@
-<gloss>blackmarket peddler (after WW2)</gloss>
+<gloss>blackmarket peddler (after WWII)</gloss>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>blackmarket peddler (during WW2)</gloss>
+<gloss>blackmarket peddler (after WW2)</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

担ぎ屋	170
かつぎ屋	63

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かつぎ屋</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2102390">縁起を担ぐ</xref>
@@ -12,0 +17,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +21,6 @@
-<gloss>blackmarket peddler</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>peddler</gloss>
+<gloss>itinerant salesman</gloss>
+<gloss>blackmarket peddler (during WW2)</gloss>

gg5, meikyo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiten

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>torpedo modified as a suicide weapon (used in WWII)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kaiten</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">manned suicide torpedo used by the Japanese navy in WWII</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

I don't know why most of the JEs have "murder by contract". It's clearly wrong.

@@ -12,4 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2846767">承諾殺人・しょうだくさつじん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2846770">同意殺人・どういさつじん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2846770">同意殺人・どういさつじん</xref>
-<gloss>homicide at the victim's request</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846767">承諾殺人</xref>
+<gloss>murder at the victim's request</gloss>
+<gloss>consensual homicide</gloss>

Changing to "homicide" to align with related entries and Japanese government verbiage(see 同意殺人 refs).

With regard to the unusual 3-way total xref, I really think these are explanatory in all directions.  They are all prefixed differently, so you probably won't see them in any single dictionary search, and each elucidates the nuances with the other (I think).

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>murder at the victim's request</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846770">同意殺人・どういさつじん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846770">同意殺人・どういさつじん</xref>
+<gloss>homicide at the victim's request</gloss>

嘱託殺人	3042
嘱託殺人罪

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/嘱託殺人
homicide caused at request

研究社 新和英中辞典
murder at the victim's request.

sankoku: 嘱託殺人：本人から自分を殺してくれると頼まれて殺すこと

https://fukuyama.vbest.jp/columns/criminal/g_other/7105/#:~:text=説明します。-,（1）嘱託殺人とは,が必要になります。
嘱託殺人とは、被害者が加害者に対して自身の殺害を依頼して、その依頼に基づいて加害者が被害者を殺害することをいいます（刑法202条）。

② 承諾殺人罪とは
承諾殺人罪とは、被害者の承諾を得て、被害者を殺すことをいいます（刑法202条）。
嘱託殺人も承諾殺人も被害者の同意に基づいて殺害を行うものであることから、両者をまとめて「同意殺人」と呼ぶこともあります。
しかし、嘱託殺人は、被害者からの働きかけによって殺害するという犯罪であるのに対して、承諾殺人は加害者からの殺害の申し込みに同意をして殺害されるという点で異なっています。

承諾殺人の法定刑は嘱託殺人の法定刑と同様であり、6月以上7年以下の懲役または禁錮と規定されています。


Search on 嘱託殺人 does *not* redirect to the article on contract killing, but instead to here:(concensual murder. there is a different page entirely for assisted suicide)
自殺関与・同意殺人罪
出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
（嘱託殺人から転送）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/自殺関与・同意殺人罪

Really helps with the nuance of 嘱託 (internal business).

This is when you pay someone to kill *yourself*.

After much reading, I stumbled on the new gloss in the middle of weblio. I can't "unsee" it now, or think of any alternative that isn't objectively worse.  There is a lot of misunderstanding floating around the internet right now, with English news sources thinking that "self-requested murder" is a "special case" of 嘱託殺人 due to the "contract murder" gloss (here and elsewhere).

承諾殺人　Someone offers to murder you and you accept
嘱託殺人 You seek out someone of your own volition to murder you
These two are grouped under 同意殺人罪, consensual murder.

Distinguished from assisted suicide. 自殺幇助. (all illegal in Japan)

Quite a taxonomy.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>contract killing</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846767">承諾殺人・しょうだくさつじん</xref>
+<gloss>murder at the victim's request</gloss>

more common term

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>contract murder</gloss>
+<gloss>contract killing</gloss>

gg5, daij
研ぎ物	149		
研物	140		
研ぎもの	92

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>研物</keb>
@@ -12 +15,8 @@
-<gloss>sharpening</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>sharpening (of knives, swords, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>grinding</gloss>
+<gloss>honing</gloss>
+<gloss>whetting</gloss>
+<gloss>polishing</gloss>
+<gloss>buffing</gloss>
+<gloss>things to be sharpened or polished</gloss>

daijr/s
研ぎ物師	0		
研物師	110		
研ぎ師	9,414		
研師	3,297

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>研物師</keb>
@@ -12 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>sharpener (of swords) and polisher (of mirrors)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1716350">研ぎ師</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>knife grinder (person)</gloss>
+<gloss>sword sharpener</gloss>
+<gloss>polisher (of mirrors, swords, etc.)</gloss>

I added adj-no to sense 1 in 2016 but there's little evidence for it in the n-grams (looking at the top 〜の terms).
I don't think adj-f is needed. Those examples are really just compound nouns.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24,2 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1605510">痩せる・1</xref>

GG5, 中辞典, etc.
痩身	476624	99.5%
そう身	2263	0.5%

I don't mind having a couple of synonyms, especially when they are in the JEs.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>slender body</gloss>

痩身	476624
痩躯	5057	
長身痩躯	2833


Reverso, endless examples, almost always glossed as "slim" or "slimming"
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/痩身

痩身や、肥満を軽減するため  to lose weight and reduce fat,
貴重な痩身援助です。 ... aids slimming.
痩身剤 slimming agent
痩身エステ slimming esthetics!
健康的な痩身 "healthy slimming"
RFレーザー技術で痩身サービ SLIMMING WITH RF LASER TECHNOLOGY
あなたのウエストラインを痩身. slimming your waistline.

etc.

Other adj-f justifications:
痩身エステ	28147	  
痩身法	26032	  
痩身効果	16681	  
痩身術	14748	  
痩身用	13361	  
痩身方法	11040	  
痩身メニュー	9748	  
痩身用食品	8836	  
痩身カプセル	6841	  
痩身コース	6784	  
痩身ダイエット	6258	  
痩身カプセル試し	4879	  
痩身機	4705	  
痩身医学	4437	  
... etc....

The xref is quite uncommon, and probably unhelpful to point at without significant nuance explanation. (comments at the xref, also edited)

I feel like pushback will come on removing "lean figure".  My argument is that "slim" is almost always the right J-E gloss. (or "weight loss" if the text is more elaborately massaged).

Sure, you won't get this entry if you search "lean", but you won't get it if you search "thin" either.  

The sankoku definition are:
1.  やせたからだ
2. 「ふとったからだを」やせたからだにすること

Either way, you have to have weight and then lose it.  For "lean" a person can always be lean.  For "slim" I grant that it's ambiguous, (I think someone can always be slim if they've been healthy all their lives), but there is a strong exercise/weight loss/health connotation to "slim" which seems to match this term. Having "lean" on a gloss here, to me, makes it appear less-specific than it actually is.

Google image search for "痩身" kind of says everything, I think.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1835410">痩躯・そうく</xref>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>lean figure</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>slimming</gloss>

G n-grams 476624

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1835350">痩身・そうしん・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2031990">長身痩躯・ちょうしんそうく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2031990">長身痩躯</xref>

http://www.gunjieigo.com/四字熟語/「た」行の四字熟語/「ち」ではじまる四字熟語/長身痩躯/

Tall and slender person.
【山本賢の英訳解説】
“長身” means “Tall person.” “痩躯” means “Slender person.”

「痩躯」と「痩身」の違いとは？分かりやすく解釈
https://meaning-difference.com/?p=27517
「痩躯」は単独で用いることは少なく「長身痩躯」と四字熟語に変えて使用していきます。
(among other extensive explanation)


痩身	476624
痩躯	5057	
長身痩躯	2833

Disconnecting the sense of this term from the xref.  "slim" has a strong "healthy" connotation, which this term seems to lack, and "slim" is also by far the most common gloss for the xref.

We could put 100 synonyms for "thin" on this gloss, but it doesn't seem like "slim" has any special association with this term.

This isn't quite [rare], perhaps, but it is quite uncommon.  It is not in sankoku.  More than half of its uses are in the 4-character compound 長身痩躯 (a reference explicitly pointed this out, saying it's almost exclusively used in the 4-character-compound, but this seems like a little bit of an overstatement).
「痩躯」は単独で用いることは少なく「長身痩躯」と四字熟語に変えて使用していきます。

jmdict doesn't usually link 4-character-compound components back to the compound (燕雀 and 鴻鵠 do not point at 燕雀鴻鵠, even though that might be their primary use), but in this case the connotation of the person indicated by 痩躯 is often tied to that indicated by 長身痩躯, and 長身痩躯 might frequently be more useful to the person examining this entry.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2031990">長身痩躯・ちょうしんそうく</xref>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>slim figure</gloss>
+<gloss>slender figure</gloss>

Daijr, Daijs, プログレッシブ和英中辞典
KM n-grams:
痩躯	381
痩躯の	150
痩身	3489

It's a noun so it makes sense to remove the parentheses.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>lean (figure)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1835350">痩身・そうしん・1</xref>
+<gloss>lean figure</gloss>
+<gloss>slim figure</gloss>

I think 替え心/替心 can be dropped.

@@ -10,8 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>替え心</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>替心</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -23 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1595120">芯・しん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1595120">芯・1</xref>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>spare pencil lead</gloss>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>spare lead</gloss>

替え芯	31616	57.7%
替芯	23068	42.1%
替え心	88	0.2%
替心	65	0.1%

https://www.amazon.co.jp/ウィック-オイルランプ用替え芯-ランタンパーツ-ブロンズランタン用・替芯-450cm/dp/B07S4H2555?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&psc=1&smid=A3GXOQG137R79I

Corrected kanji.

Seems like anything that can be a 芯 can be a 替え芯. Not sure how you'd like to handle that.  Unqualified image search result is for pens, not pencils, but it's used for everything.

Ballpoint, jetstream, other kinds of cartridge refill pens. (I was tempted to put "ballpoint" in the gloss, but this seems overly narrow)

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>替え心</keb>
+<keb>替え芯</keb>
@@ -8 +8,9 @@
-<keb>替え芯</keb>
+<keb>替芯</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>替え心</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>替心</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +23,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1595120">芯・しん・1</xref>
+<gloss>pen refill (cartridge)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>replacement wick (e.g. of a lantern)</gloss>

Several JEs' glosses of "deify":
神として祭る	851
神格化する	4991 <- we have 神格化/deification
神とする	8044
神に祭る	81

Perhaps we could have an entry for 神とする. 
I'm no longer trying to use JMdict as a reverse search source, although it can be useful at times.

The reason for at least one xref is not explanatory, it is this is not the best term for "deify". 神格化 seams to be objectively preferable in terms of nuance and n-gram counts.

If you search jmdict for "deify" today, this is the only term that comes up. This is misleading as an E->J entry.  

There are a number of xrefs of in jmdict of the form:
[rare term] -> [probably what you actually want]

For deify, "神と崇める" isn't rare, but "神格化" is "probably what you actually want" if you got here by searching "deify".

I'm not sure if there is any practical remedy to this when all of the "deify" terms are under "deification".  It's certainly not a problem limited to this entry though, I don't know if there is a practical solution.

神と崇める	4362
神とあがめる	1083
GG5: 神と崇める treat sb as a god; deify sb.
中辞典 too.

I'd keep it, I think the と usage needs to be shown.
I don't think those xrefs help.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神とあがめる</keb>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1765230">神格化・しんかくか</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1295250">祭る・まつる・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2180460">神聖視・しんせいし</xref>

I don't think this should be an entry. We would reject any と/として[verb] construction if it were submitted today.

Reverso matches for "deify"
https://context.reverso.net/translation/english-japanese/deify
神格化して
神を祀る 13042
神格化を図った
自身を神聖視する　　（神聖視	18047)
天皇を東京で祭りたい
天皇に神格を与え
神として祀り
神格化されて

long-story-short, 神と崇める never appears
By searching the Japanese I got one match:
神と崇められた天皇 "revered as a deity"

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/神とあがめられる
神とあがめられるの英語 (uses passive form)
be worshipped as a god

神と崇める	4362
神として崇める	1316

vs.

神格化	62535
神格化され	19701	  
神格化し	18322

I guess one can revere without worshipping, but "worship as a god" is more common in English.

I was going to discuss deletion, and suggest the removal of "to deify" as a gloss, because I think the xref terms are better.

Instead, I am going to advocate for keeping all of the higher-n-gram xrefs to "cheat".  The xrefs are often [vs] forms, and are listed under "deification", making them pretty much undiscoverable. (search for "deify", you'll never find them).

By adding these xrefs from a simple, understandable, common-enough-but less-common form, we expose all of the other "deify" entries to anyone doing such a search.

@@ -12,0 +13,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1765230">神格化・しんかくか</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1295250">祭る・まつる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2180460">神聖視・しんせいし</xref>
+<gloss>to revere as a god</gloss>
+<gloss>to worship as a god</gloss>

As pointed out below, "sexual assault" is too broad. I don't think we need a second gloss.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

I added "criminal assault" 7 years ago largely because it is in the JEs. As I said at the time it's a euphemistic term. Since Brian rightly points out it can be somewhat misleading, I suggest adding the more literal equivalent.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1595494370459160577
Seven Michigan State players have been charged with criminal assault in connection with a tunnel brawl with Michigan players on October 29.

Or, search the news for "charged with criminal assault"

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/prince-georges-county/13-prince-georges-officers-charged-in-alleged-double-dipping-scheme/3142102/
Investigators were led to Finn shortly after an investigation into former county police corporal Darryl Wormuth. Wormuth was charged with criminal assault after allegedly grabbing a handcuffed 17-year-old boy by the throat. 

Obviously the term is also used for sexual assaults.

THE THIRD REPORT OF JAPAN
UNDER ARTICLE 44, PARAGRAPH 1
OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHT OF THE CHILD 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/child/report_a44.pdf
vs. 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/jido/pdfs/0804_kj03.pdf
"rape" is the translation throughout, ex:
１４１． なお、確かに、刑法１７７条（強姦罪）
141. While it is true that the offenses under Article 177 (rape)

I wonder if there is an issue here that we didn't used to charge men with criminal assault over brawling as much as we do today, and that "criminal assault" has lost an older implied connotation.

...

Came here to "correct" what I thought was an oversight, and saw that this was discussed and decided on deliberately.  If you see this term on jisho.org, it looks like:
(crime of) rape; criminal assault​ Law ("Law" in gray).

While the goal of "people will infer sexual connotations from the first term" is understandable, [law] appears affixed to the second term.  It's possible to read this as "colloquially used for [rape], but as a legal matter this is the general term for any criminal assault".

If you search "criminal assault" in jmdict, this is currently the *only* matching entry, which also increases the chance of misunderstanding. 

I don't agree that "criminal assault" is limited to an understood euphemistic reference for rape. If you'd asked me out of the blue, "what is criminal assault", I would have said "someone attacks/injures another in a fight and got arrested/charged."  "rape" would not have entered my mind.  If you say "the woman was criminally assaulted by the male perpetrator", inferences would obviously be made.  But "charged with criminal assault" is also what you'll get if one man punches another in a bar fight.

I was going to just insert "sexual" in the middle of "criminal assault", but I think Tom's point from 2016 was well made.  From a legal perspective "rape" in English (as far as I can see) requires penetration, as does the legal term 強姦罪.  "Sexual assault" does not.  I don't see the value of downgrading the term as a gloss. (people can do that on their own if they want)

And given that 強姦罪 *requires* penetration, "criminal assault" seems like a massive understatement.  I don't know what the other J-E dictionary motivations was here.  If eijiro and ルミナス exclusively glossed this as "criminal assault", that seems way off, and it's hard to imagine a reason other than not wanting to include sensitive English vocabulary in their dictionary. 

For comparison, the jmdictdb entries for レイプ and 強姦 are already glossed:
レイプ  rape; sexual assault​
強姦 rape; sexual assault​

In this case, as a matter of [law], this would appear to need to be

*** criminal sexual assault (including penetration)

I'm not advocating for or against such a gloss. That's a matter of everyone's sensibilities.

The value of including "criminal assault" (especially when we don't even have entry in jmdictdb for the actual legal equivalent), seems to me to be outweighed by the more serious issues attached to this term.  Translating 強姦罪 as "criminal assault" loses a whole lot of information, and blindly translating "criminal assault" as 強姦罪 could represent a massive error in modern use.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

ルミナス: criminal assault
中辞典: rape; criminal assault
GG5: rape; criminal [sexual] assault
Eijiro: criminal assault

AFAIK "criminal assault" is a rather euphemistic English term for rape. Obviously compilers of JE dictionaries rather like it. It probably should be added, at least for reverse searches. Having it preceded by "rape" should make the context clear.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?
re=02&vm=04&id=1960#ja_pt2ch23at4

According to the Japanese penal code, "sexual intercourse" has to 
occur for the crime of 強姦罪 to apply, so I think the broader "sexual 
assault" gloss is unneeded/incorrect.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>sexual assault</gloss>

Not sure this is needed.

Tall and slender person.
【山本賢の英訳解説】
“長身” means “Tall person.” “痩躯” means “Slender person.”


http://kimamalove.blog94.fc2.com/blog-entry-3663.html
Krause had imagined the owner of that lackadaisical voice to be tall and lean; apparently he was nothing of the sort.
クラウスはあのつっけんどんな声の持ち主は長身痩躯だろうと想像していたが、どうやらちがうらしい。

金髪、長身痩躯、妖艶な容貌、ハスキーな声
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/リリアン・タッシュマン
vs.
Tall, blonde, and slender with fox-like features and a throaty voice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilyan_Tashman

Aligning with update to 痩躯.
Gloss with a slightly more positive connotation.

Wasn't easy to verify with a real x-ref.  Searched 長身痩躯 on wikipedia, and looked for "tall" in English-xrefed articles.  Often applied to tall baseball players, but fairly non-specific.  Usually omitted entirely in English.  After that, usually glossed simply as "tall", as the slender bit is kind of implied and not-so-critical I guess.  Perhaps 長身痩躯 is just more efficient to throw around in Japanese. Interesting term.

And even though I dropped it from 長身, I also found "slim" as a gloss when describing a particular vampire's physique.  But really, I think the author has a wide berth to do what they want with this.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>tall and slender figure</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

daij, koj

I don't know where the ビー reading comes from.

@@ -8,7 +7,0 @@
-<reb>シー・エー・ティー・ビー</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>シーエーティービー</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +8,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -23,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1986530">ケーブルテレビ</xref>
@@ -25,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>cable television</gloss>

Style update

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>シー・エー・ティー・ビー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シー・エー・ティー・ブイ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

Style update

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<reb>ディー・エイチ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ディー・エッチ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daij, gg5

probably the weirdest formatted entry i've seen

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＤＨ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ディーエイチ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>(designated hitter - baseball)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1936440">指名打者</xref>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>designated hitter</gloss>
+<gloss>DH</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>however</gloss>
-<gloss>having said that</gloss>
+<gloss>(and) yet</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>for all that</gloss>
+<gloss>nevertheless</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 然りとて │    351 │  0.5% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 去迚　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - mentioned in smk
│ さりとて │ 70,220 │ 99.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

GG5 (has both)
カーゲーベー	308
ケージービー	134

Style update

@@ -7,0 +8,6 @@
+<reb>カー・ゲー・ベー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケー・ジー・ビー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="rus">Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti</lsource>
-<gloss>KGB (former Soviet Union intelligence agency)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>KGB (Soviet Union intelligence agency)</gloss>

BGN/PCGN romanization of Комитет государственной безопасности

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="rus">Komitet Gosudarstvennoi Bezopasnosti</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="rus">Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti</lsource>

i would expect this in a dictionary, i think

Style update.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブイ・エー・エヌ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>ブイエイエヌ</reb>
+<reb>ブイエーエヌ</reb>

I agree, I'll do it.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/付加価値通信網 
"一般的には英文名称の「Value-Added Network」の頭文字を取ってVAN（バン、ブイエイエヌ）の略称で呼ばれる"

I suggest we drop the VAN sense from the バン entry (1100090).

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＶＡＮ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブイエイエヌ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>value added network</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>value-added network</gloss>

GG5

New style

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>ジーユーアイ</reb>
+<reb>ジー・ユー・アイ</reb>
@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジーユーアイ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

グイ seems to be more common.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<reb>グイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

GG5, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>グーイ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

New style

@@ -8 +8,5 @@
-<reb>ピーエッチエス</reb>
+<reb>ピー・エイチ・エス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピー・エッチ・エス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピーエッチエス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Handy-phone_System

I think we need to explain what this is.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>personal handyphone system</gloss>
+<gloss>personal handy-phone system</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">low-powered mobile network system developed in Japan and once popular in parts of Asia</gloss>

Entry created

Style update

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<reb>ディー・エー・ティー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

Style update

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>シーアイエス</reb>
+<reb>シー・アイ・エス</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シーアイエス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

シス is in daijs for the Commonwealth of Independent States (redirects to シーアイエス)

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シス</reb>

Entry created

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>オーエルイー</reb>
+<reb>オー・エル・イー</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オーエルイー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

oops

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＯＬＥ</keb>
+</k_ele>

daijs

merge

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オーレ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>object linking and embedding</gloss>

Entry created

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>オーディーピー</reb>
+<reb>オー・ディー・ピー</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>オー・ディー・ピー</reb>
+<reb>オーディーピー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＯＤＰ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オー・ディー・ピー</reb>
@@ -9,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>overdrive processor</gloss>
+<gloss>ODP</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>ozone depletion potential</gloss>

Entry created

Style update.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ティー・エー・ピー・アイ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/TAPI-5901

merge

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ティーエーピーアイ</reb>
+</r_ele>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/TAPI_(タピ)/

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＴＡＰＩ</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>Telephony Application Programming Interface</gloss>

GG5

New style.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<reb>ディー・ブイ・ディー・ラム</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-RAM

Regularizing hyphen usage. Historical interest now.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ＤＶＤ−ＲＡＭ</keb>
+<keb>ＤＶＤ-ＲＡＭ</keb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>DVD Random Access Memory</gloss>

Entry created

GG5

Style update.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ピー・オー・エス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daij, gg5
see also rejected 2670390.

not sure the "comp" is appropriate.  it's certainly used outside that context

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＰＯＳ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピーオーエス</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,1 +15,1 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>point of sale</gloss>

Entry created

See comment on 1032960

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2679770">ＳＩ・エスアイ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2679770">ＳＩ</xref>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2679770">ＳＩ・エスアイ</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>SI</gloss>

pretty broad.  i'm not sure it qualifies as [comp] or [phys]

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<field>&physics;</field>

It was misspelt in French (a "m" was missing in "Système International d'Unités"), but I guess we should as well use the English name : "International System of Units".

Moreover the field is probably more closely related to physics than computer, but could somehow also be relevant for chemistry.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>Systee Internationale d'Unites</gloss>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>International System of Units</gloss>

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌエーディー</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・エー・ディー</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌエーディー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +20 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Intelligence_Service_(United_States)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>
@@ -24,2 +25,2 @@
-<field>&mil;</field>
-<gloss>Military Intelligence Service (US)</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>minimally invasive surgery</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +30,3 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>minimally invasive surgery</gloss>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Military Intelligence Service (WWII US military unit)</gloss>

KOD

Style update, extra glosses.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>エム・アイ・エス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15 +19,12 @@
-<gloss>management information system (MIS)</gloss>
+<gloss>management information system</gloss>
+<gloss>MIS</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<gloss>Military Intelligence Service (US)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>minimally invasive surgery</gloss>

Entry created

真芯	8382	87.3%
真っ芯	1183	12.3%
まっ芯	35	0.4%

sankoku 真っ芯：真芯を強めた言い方

Reversing xrefs.

Twitter is also heavily weighted to 真芯.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2524180">真っ芯</xref>

Entry created

The dictionaries don't say it's col.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2524170">真芯・ましん</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2524170">真芯</xref>

I don't think it's needed.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<s_inf>emphatic form of 真芯</s_inf>

Copied [note] and [col] from すっごく　すごく.  I think this is a helpful style for a learner

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>emphatic form of 真芯</s_inf>

Reversed xrefs from 真芯, comments there.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2524170">真芯・ましん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2524170">真芯・ましん</xref>

Style update.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>テ・ジェ・ヴェ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">train a grande vitesse</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">train à grande vitesse</lsource>

Entry created

Daijs and koj only have ノックス. Daijr redirects from エヌオーエックス to ノックス.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌ・オー・エックス</reb>
+<reb>ノックス</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ノックス</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・オー・エックス</reb>

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エヌオーエックス</reb>
+<reb>エヌ・オー・エックス</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エヌオーエックス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>NOx</gloss>

Daijirin, 新英和大辞典, etc.

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エスオーエックス</reb>
+<reb>エス・オー・エックス</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エスオーエックス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Daijirin, リーダーズ+プラス, 理化学英和辞典, etc.

I don't think it's needed.

See statistics at 芯のケース.
Given that this is not the dominant form, it probably doesn't need to be here.

If we want to keep it anyway, it should get an xref back in the other direction to 芯ケース.

(I grant that in a vacuum, if you saw 芯のケース in a novel, even with the glosses for 芯 this would be difficult to guess if you didn't already know).

WWW

An amazing 600k hits.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>pencil lead case (for mechanical pencil)</gloss>
+<gloss>pencil lead case (for a mechanical pencil)</gloss>

I don't think that xref is relevant.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2405790">シャー芯・シャーしん</xref>

芯ケース	1289	67.1%
芯のケース	262	13.6%

シャーペン芯ケース	107	5.6%
シャーペンの芯ケース	102	5.3%
シャーペンの芯のケース	71	3.7%
シャーペン芯のケース	0	0.0%

シャー芯ケース	52	2.7%
シャー芯のケース	37	1.9%
シャーの芯のケース	0	0.0%


Without の (common) 92 hits since march 1
https://twitter.com/search?q="芯ケース"&src=typed_query&f=live
With の , still present, 12 hits since march 1
https://twitter.com/search?q="芯のケース"&src=typed_query&f=live

It appears that something reporting numbers back in 2011 was off, because comments are tied together with this and the xref'ed entry.

This seems to be the dominant form(confirming the n-grams, search Amazon and the の form won't appear hardly anywhere on a product listing).

Confirmed by twitter.
People who use の tend no not abbreviate other parts as well, such as...
シャーペンの芯のケース

Interesting

Is this [abbr] if it is the dominant form?    シャー芯ケース , or something even longer, would seem to be the etymological root.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2648570">芯のケース・しんのケース</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2405790">シャー芯・シャーしん</xref>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2648570">芯のケース・しんのケース</xref>

Significantly less common than 芯のケース (with の), but this form is also found.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2356910">国際単位系・こくさいたんいけい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2356910">国際単位系</xref>

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エスアイ</reb>
+<reb>エス・アイ</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>エス・アイ</reb>
+<reb>エスアイ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5, etc.

いける口	9101	94.7%
行ける口	505	5.3%

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631370">いける・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631370">いける・3</xref>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5

I think the "can hold ..." is more implied.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<gloss>drinker</gloss>

nikk
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13821
8433
"いける口" 25k (b)

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>HR</gloss>

Style update

@@ -8 +8,5 @@
-<reb>エッチアール</reb>
+<reb>エイチ・アール</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エッチ・アール</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エッチアール</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I thought this was pronounced エイチアール
but my google search is being a bit inconclusive with that.
probably won't hurt to have both

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エイチアール</reb>

I'd argue it's a common/obvious sense of 負う but I won't fight it.
I think the x-ref is unnecessary.
I don't think 深傷を負う should be sK. 深傷 isn't sK.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,2 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1497930">負う・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1497930">負う・3</xref>

GG5, 中辞典 (both have this as examples in the 深手 entry)

I'd be happy to drop it if the receive/incur/etc. sense of 負う was the main one. It's not; we have it as #3 and some JEs have it as #5. It's obviously a standard phrase and while rhe meaning might be obvious, it's not something I'd construct from scratch. I think it's useful to show that it's used this way.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 深手　　　 │ 18,009 │
│ 深手を負う │  1,512 │
│ 深手を負っ │  6,760 │
│ 深手を負わ │  1,581 │
│ 深手を負い │  2,398 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────╯

For what it's worth, 12,251 / 18,009 = roughly 70% of the usages of 深手 seem to be in this expression.
Many of the remaining usages are slight variations (e.g. 深手の傷を負う)

I still think should be deleted (see my comment from 2019). I don't think it should be kept just because it's harmless.

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ピーピー</reb>
+<reb>ピー・ピー</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ピー・ピー</reb>
+<reb>ピーピー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Daijr, GG5

載量	115

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daijr koj

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to purr (cat)</gloss>
+<gloss>to purr (of a cat)</gloss>

See deleted 2829468.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喉鳴らす</keb>

〈咽喉／喉／のど〉を〈鳴ら／なら〉し

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 喉を鳴らし　 │ 21,891 │ 68.7% │
│ のどを鳴らし │  4,755 │ 14.9% │
│ 喉をならし　 │  3,478 │ 10.9% │
│ 咽喉を鳴らし │    606 │  1.9% │ - add sK (jitsuyou)
│ 咽喉をならし │     26 │  0.1% │
│ のどをならし │  1,095 │  3.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>咽喉を鳴らす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

See 2857565.

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&vidg;</field>
+<gloss>buff (positive status effect)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, Readers+, recent Translators' FB discussion

[nokanji] isn't needed. We consider ワン, ツー, etc. to be valid readings of Arabic numerals.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -24 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>Unicode 8-bit UCS Transformation Format</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>8-bit Unicode Transformation Format</gloss>

Daijisen has ユーティーエフエイト. Both are in Wikip.

Mesyy style update. Maybe this works.

@@ -11 +11,5 @@
-<reb>ユーティーエフはち</reb>
+<reb>ユー・ティー・エフ・はち</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ユー・ティー・エフ・エイト</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

the merging of readings seems odd since there's generally some effort to split by language source (though different lang sources also generallt result in slightly different kana)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8
http://www.weblio.jp/content/ユーティーエフエイト

Style alignment.

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>Panjandrum</gloss>
-<gloss>The Great Panjandrum (rocket-propelled, explosive-laden cart designed by the British military during WW2)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Panjandrum (rocket-propelled, explosive-laden cart designed by the British military during WWII)</gloss>
+<gloss>The Great Panjandrum</gloss>

N-grams: 1104

wiki

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2198530">ＶＸガス・ブイエックスガス</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2198530">ＶＸガス</xref>

Style update.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ブイエックス</reb>
+<reb>ブイ・エックス</reb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ブイ・エックス</reb>
+<reb>ブイエックス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>VX (nerve gas)</gloss>
+<gloss>VX (nerve agent)</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブイ・エックス</reb>
+</r_ele>

we have four "... (nerve gas)" entries
should we change these to "... (nerve agent)"?

Style alignment.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>generation comprising those who were children during WW2 (in Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>generation comprising those who were children during WWII (in Japan)</gloss>

Google hits: 6.7k

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>generation comprising those who were children during WW2</gloss>
+<gloss>generation comprising those who were children during WW2 (in Japan)</gloss>

wiki (https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/焼け跡世代)

chujiten: 街は強風にあおられて火の海と化した.　 A strong wind was blowing and the neighborhood turned into a sea of flames.
luminous: 1 階は火の海だった The 「first [《英》 ground] floor was 「a sea of flames [in flames].
prog: 部屋の中は火の海だった The room was 「in flames [a sea of flame/ablaze].
      繁華街は火の海と化した  The shopping district turned into a blazing inferno.

I think it's clear enough that "sea of fire" isn't literal, especially with the id tag.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>area engulfed in flames</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>sea of flames</gloss>
+<gloss>blazing inferno</gloss>