Aligning.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>mechanical pencil</gloss>
+<gloss>automatic pencil</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>mechanical pencil</gloss>

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>propelling or mechanical pencil</gloss>
+<gloss>propelling pencil</gloss>
+<gloss>mechanical pencil</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シャープ・ペンシル</reb>

I see あわれむ as a reading for 閔 in a kanwa but nowhere else. Probably okay to drop.

Our second sense is in meikyo and sankoku with a (雅) tag. I think we use the [poet] tag for that?

meikyo: 「憫れむ」「愍れむ」とも。 (our first sense only)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 憐れむ　 │ 27,209 │ 46.7% │
│ 哀れむ　 │ 25,430 │ 43.6% │
│ 憫れむ　 │     40 │  0.1% │ - add, sK
│ 愍れむ　 │     20 │  0.0% │ - add, sK
│ 閔れむ　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - drop
│ あわれむ │  5,601 │  9.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -12,2 +12,6 @@
-<keb>閔れむ</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>憫れむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>愍れむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -33 +37 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

gg5, prog

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to commiserate</gloss>
@@ -24 +23 @@
-<gloss>to have mercy on</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel sympathy for</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>to commiserate with</gloss>
+<gloss>to have mercy on</gloss>
@@ -34 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>to appreciate (e.g. the moon, flowers)</gloss>
+<gloss>to appreciate</gloss>
+<gloss>to admire</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to weep one's eyes out</gloss>
+<gloss>to cry one's eyes out</gloss>
+<gloss>to make one's eyes swollen from crying</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 泣きはらした │ 8,494 │ 63.5% │
│ 泣き腫らした │ 4,843 │ 36.2% │
│ 泣腫らした　 │     0 │  0.0% │ - sK (daijs)
│ なきはらした │    33 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think it's needed.

That note one sense 1 isn't great. If we want to mention the divination thing, it shoule be a separate hist or arch sense.

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<gloss>tug of war (orig. a form of divination to predict whether the year will be favourable or unfavourable)</gloss>
+<gloss>tug of war</gloss>

〈綱／つな／ツナ〉〈引（き）／曳（き）／ひき／ヒキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 綱引き　 │ 191,692 │ 86.8% │
│ 綱引　　 │  13,885 │  6.3% │ - add, sK (shinmeikai)
│ つな引き │   1,897 │  0.9% │ - add, sK
│ 綱曳き　 │     877 │  0.4% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ 綱曳　　 │     593 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ 綱ひき　 │     412 │  0.2% │ - add, sK
│ ツナ引き │      52 │  0.0% │
│ つな引　 │      26 │  0.0% │
│ つなひき │  10,805 │  4.9% │
│ ツナヒキ │     523 │  0.2% │
│ ツナひき │      39 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,17 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>綱引</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>綱曳</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つな引き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>綱ひき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19,2 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>tug of war</gloss>
-<gloss>tug of war used as a form of divination to predict whether the year will be favourable or unfavourable</gloss>
+<gloss>tug of war (orig. a form of divination to predict whether the year will be favourable or unfavourable)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 采配　　 │ 336,611 │ 98.9% │
│ 采幣　　 │      49 │  0.0% │ - rK
│ さいはい │   3,528 │  1.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

采幣 from daijisen

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>采幣</keb>
@@ -17,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>direction</gloss>

Seems to be a fork.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/higgledy-piggledy
ひどく乱雑な、めちゃくちゃな

雑然	98589	  
雑然とし	75205

"aligning" with suggested changes to 雑然とした (apologies, all the refs went over there). 

Recommend the current 雑然とした entry be deleted.  Instead, copied a "とした" note from another entry.   Not sure how I feel about this. (Well, in fact I think it would be useful if these notes were used *more* often, but I think most する [adv-to] entries that could have such a note do not, so...).

I moved "messy" further back because it is ambiguous in English (can imply filth, a messy plate, or a room with food containers everywhere).  Pushing it back down the list surrounds it with terms indicating that this is primarily about disorder. 

I'd never heard the term "higgledy-piggledy", but that's on me. I'm surprised at how common it looks googling around.  Even so, I don't think it matches the tenor of this term.  Perhaps it would be a better gloss on something like めちゃくちゃな? (suggestion found on weblio). I'd be cautious though, as I think 雑然 and めちゃくちゃ are universally comprehensible (as are all of the glosses above), while higgledy-piggledy is maybe idiomatic, and a Japanese person maybe shouldn't be encouraged to use it as a J->E gloss without warning.

If you are all confident I'm the only one who doesn't know this term, then I understand if you put it back :)

@@ -13 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>messy</gloss>
+<s_inf>often 雑然とした, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>cluttered (e.g. desk)</gloss>
+<gloss>jumbled (e.g. thoughts)</gloss>
+<gloss>messy (e.g. room)</gloss>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>higgledy-piggledy</gloss>
+<gloss>chaotic (e.g. lifestyle, atmosphere)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog, ウィズダム

Not a noun.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,4 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>disorderliness</gloss>
-<gloss>confusion</gloss>
-<gloss>jumble</gloss>
-<gloss>mess</gloss>
+<gloss>messy</gloss>
+<gloss>untidy</gloss>
+<gloss>disorderly</gloss>
+<gloss>higgledy-piggledy</gloss>

gg5, prog
雑然	        98,589	
雑然とした	46,739

The JEs lead with untidy/messy. I think we should too.
雑然とした is very common but we wouldn't usually have a note unless the word appeared overwhelmingly in that form.

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<s_inf>often 雑然とした, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>cluttered (e.g. desk)</gloss>
+<gloss>untidy (room, pile, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>messy</gloss>
+<gloss>cluttered</gloss>
+<gloss>disorderly</gloss>
@@ -16,4 +18 @@
-<gloss>messy (e.g. room)</gloss>
-<gloss>untidy</gloss>
-<gloss>disorderly</gloss>
-<gloss>chaotic (e.g. lifestyle, atmosphere)</gloss>
+<gloss>chaotic (lifestyle, atmosphere, etc.)</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/higgledy-piggledy
ひどく乱雑な、めちゃくちゃな

雑然	98589	  
雑然とし	75205

"aligning" with suggested changes to 雑然とした (apologies, all the refs went over there). 

Recommend the current 雑然とした entry be deleted.  Instead, copied a "とした" note from another entry.   Not sure how I feel about this. (Well, in fact I think it would be useful if these notes were used *more* often, but I think most する [adv-to] entries that could have such a note do not, so...).

I moved "messy" further back because it is ambiguous in English (can imply filth, a messy plate, or a room with food containers everywhere).  Pushing it back down the list surrounds it with terms indicating that this is primarily about disorder. 

I'd never heard the term "higgledy-piggledy", but that's on me. I'm surprised at how common it looks googling around.  Even so, I don't think it matches the tenor of this term.  Perhaps it would be a better gloss on something like めちゃくちゃな? (suggestion found on weblio). I'd be cautious though, as I think 雑然 and めちゃくちゃ are universally comprehensible (as are all of the glosses above), while higgledy-piggledy is maybe idiomatic, and a Japanese person maybe shouldn't be encouraged to use it as a J->E gloss without warning.

If you are all confident I'm the only one who doesn't know this term, then I understand if you put it back :)

@@ -13 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>messy</gloss>
+<s_inf>often 雑然とした, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>cluttered (e.g. desk)</gloss>
+<gloss>jumbled (e.g. thoughts)</gloss>
+<gloss>messy (e.g. room)</gloss>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>higgledy-piggledy</gloss>
+<gloss>chaotic (e.g. lifestyle, atmosphere)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog, ウィズダム

Not a noun.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,4 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>disorderliness</gloss>
-<gloss>confusion</gloss>
-<gloss>jumble</gloss>
-<gloss>mess</gloss>
+<gloss>messy</gloss>
+<gloss>untidy</gloss>
+<gloss>disorderly</gloss>
+<gloss>higgledy-piggledy</gloss>

Several of the dictionaries have a 「―の秋」 example but I don't think that's adjectival.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 実り　 │ 567,016 │ 98.0% │
│ 稔り　 │  11,698 │  2.0% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ みのり │ 527,563 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Adjectives

@@ -29,2 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>double edge (e.g. sword blade)</gloss>
-<gloss>double bevel (e.g. kitchen knife)</gloss>
+<gloss>double-edged (e.g. sword blade)</gloss>
+<gloss>double-beveled (e.g. kitchen knife)</gloss>

Aligned glosses with 片刃

There's an issue with treating 片刃 as a single sense, which is:
"what do you do with this entry"?

I'm pretty confident that: 
 double bevel (e.g. kitchen knife)
has a kanji/reading restriction here. 両刃

I know I've seen reading restrictions, but I'm not sure how to find one off the top of my head as an example.  I'd appreciate it if someone would take a look, and I'll use this as a model in the future.

@@ -29 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>double-edged</gloss>
+<gloss>double edge (e.g. sword blade)</gloss>
+<gloss>double bevel (e.g. kitchen knife)</gloss>

daijr (諸刃): 刃物で両面または両側に刃が付いていること。また，そのもの。両刃（りようば）。
daijs, koj

According to the kokugos, the restriction on sense 2 isn't needed.

@@ -32 +31,0 @@
-<stagk>両刃</stagk>

meikyo (entry for 両刃の剣)
  近年「もろはのけん」「りょうばのつるぎ」ともいうが、本来は「もろはのつるぎ」。

〈両刃／もろ刃／諸刃／もろは／りょうば〉の〈剣／つるぎ／けん〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 諸刃の剣　　　　 │ 95,288 │ 76.2% │
│ 両刃の剣　　　　 │ 20,673 │ 16.5% │
│ もろ刃の剣　　　 │  6,862 │  5.5% │
│ もろはの剣　　　 │    287 │  0.2% │
│ 諸刃のつるぎ　　 │     61 │  0.0% │
│ もろ刃のつるぎ　 │     48 │  0.0% │
│ 両刃のつるぎ　　 │     32 │  0.0% │
│ もろはのつるぎ　 │  1,697 │  1.4% │
│ もろはのけん　　 │     97 │  0.1% │
│ りょうばのけん　 │     20 │  0.0% │
│ りょうばのつるぎ │      0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Proposing a merger with 1628210.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>両刃の剣</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もろはの剣</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +19,11 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>もろはのけん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>りょうばのけん</reb>
+<re_restr>両刃の剣</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>りょうばのつるぎ</reb>
+<re_restr>両刃の剣</re_restr>

諸刃の剣	95288	93.3%
もろ刃の剣	6862	6.7%

Saw a source mount out that 諸 has so many readings, もろ may be preferred to avoid ambiguity.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もろ刃の剣</keb>

gg5

News organisations use this word when reporting on a stabbing or someone brandishing a knife. I think "knife" should be a gloss.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>cutting instrument (knife, dagger, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>cutting instrument</gloss>
+<gloss>knife</gloss>

Probably best just to drop cutlery.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2140880">カトラリー</xref>
@@ -19 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>cutlery(only in ref. to knives)</gloss>

Between jisho.org's last snapshot(quite dated) and now, "Japanese Cutlery" was renamed to "Japanese Kitchen Knife".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_kitchen_knife

This is not about the meaning of the Japanese word. This is about the E->J direction, and the English word "cutlery", which 50 years ago in the U.S. broadly meant "kitchen knives", and no longer does. (and perhaps never did in Britain).

If you search "cutlery", you get two results:
1.  This term 刃物, and "cutlery" with a big green sign (on jisho.org anyway) that says "common, use me, you can't go wrong here".
2. Then, among a bunch of rare katakana terms, you see カトラリー, not distinguished in any way.

Which to pick?  I gave reverso examples of people doing this wrong.  I did this wrong. 

In English, the etymology of "cutlery" has "cut" and likely referred to knives. So, shouldn't it be reasonable to think that 刃物 could have also undergone such a transformation and now apply to other metal implements (or even plastic tableware by extension)?

I think this is an unnecessary source of errors when a few words could be added to sort this out.  I don't know what those words would be, or the best way to insert them, but it seems like something could be done.

As long as "cutlery" is in the gloss ( which is fine ), I think the [xref] is critical, because 刃物 is the *wrong* word (E->J) for cutlery in many modern use cases.

If you're Japanese, incidentally, "cutlery" is probably a poor choice today for 刃物 for all the reasons above.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2140880">カトラリー</xref>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<gloss>cutlery</gloss>
+<gloss>cutlery(only in ref. to knives)</gloss>

Daijr: 物を切断したり削ったりする，刃のついている道具。包丁・刀など。
GG5: 	a 「cutting [sharp] instrument [tool]; a knife; a dagger; a cutter; 〈集合的に〉 cutlery.

The references all have one sense (samples given). I think that's sufficient.

@@ -16,11 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>knife</gloss>
-<gloss>(object with a short) blade</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>edged tool (esp. knives, also chisels, scissors, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2140880">カトラリー</xref>
-<s_inf>caution: 刃物 refers exclusively to knives, while "cutlery" may also refer to spoons, forks, and even plastic tableware</s_inf>
+<gloss>cutting instrument (knife, dagger, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>edged tool</gloss>

gg5

〔文〕in meikyo.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>appearance of the laity (as opposed to appearance of a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>appearance of a layperson (as opposed to a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>

１ 僧でない一般の人の姿。⇔僧体。
２ 詩歌などのありふれた様式。
３ 漢字の俗字。また、その字体。



https://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/z/zokutaizou.htm
俗体像
A portrait of a lay person in formal secular dress. This contrasts with the more numerous portraits of Buddhist priests called *hottaizou 法体像, which depict a man who has entered the priesthood, and renounced his secular status

“Unrefined” personality, > 20,000 n-grams(several over 200,000):
野暮ったい  ぎこちない  野暮  無骨 無粋  殺風景 品がない もっさい  もさっと  芸がない ごつい

無風流  785     0.1%
蕪雑    527     0.0%
This entry --> 俗体    490     0.0%
不意気  123     0.0%
没風流  20      0.0%

Only marked [2] as rare, because if you want to say "appearance of the laity", I guess this is how you'd do it. (It's no more rare than what you want to express)

But I'm sure [1] is not exactly common either.

I only have the daijs sentry, which says 僧でない.  Absent evidence to the contrary, I suspect any gloss of "vulgar" is misplaced in modern English.  Likely this was intended with the dated meaning: "characteristic of or belonging to ordinary people."  This will not be a common interpretation of vulgar today.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>appearance of the laity</gloss>
+<gloss>appearance of the laity (as opposed to appearance of a Buddhist priest)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,2 +12,8 @@
-<field>&Buddh;</field>
-<gloss>condition of the laity</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1398170">僧体</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1398170">僧体</xref>
+<gloss>appearance of the laity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unrefined appearance</gloss>
+<gloss>vulgar style</gloss>

OK

I think this 3-sense split works quite well but I'd stick with vi on all the senses.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Daijr: （１）学校の全教科または学科の課程を修了すること。 （２）ある状態・段階を通過すること。「もうマンガ本は卒業した」 （３）一つの事業を完了すること。

Stephen is correct; there were two senses until Brian proposed a third earlier this month.
The Kokugos have three senses but they are a bit different. I've quoted Daijrin's - Daijisen has the first two of these.
I prefer the original two senses, which is how the JEs have it.

(forked entry)
I'm looking at the entry for 卒業 from the JMdict file dated March 4 2023 and it only has two senses.

The 3rd sense was there before Brian's edits and I think it should stay as a separate sense.

Regarding transitivity, Meiko etc. treat it as vi. I notice also that mk has 「会社(学校・テニス部］を━)辞める as intransitive but (酒［販売］を━)止める as transitive. So... maybe our sense 3 should be?

@@ -28,0 +29,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, meikyo

Not just books.
I don't think the sense 3 gloss is an expl gloss. "Nichiren chant" refers specifically to 南無妙法蓮華経.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>book title</gloss>
+<gloss>title</gloss>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32 +30 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Nichiren Buddhist chant</gloss>
+<gloss>Nichiren chant</gloss>

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>title of a book</gloss>
+<gloss>book title</gloss>

not an actual definition

@@ -32,1 +32,1 @@
-<gloss>Nichiren chant</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Nichiren Buddhist chant</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts

恥ずかしい	4028362	97.4%
恥かしい	97888	2.4%
恥しい	7973	0.2%
羞ずかしい	281	0.0%
羞しい	405	0.0%
羞かしい	192	0.0%

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,2 +28 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I'm not sure that really fits. Resubmit with references/examples.

@@ -44 +43,0 @@
-<gloss>flustered</gloss>

@@ -43,0 +44 @@
+<gloss>flustered</gloss>

恥ずかしい	4028362
恥かしい	97888
恥しい	7973
羞ずかしい	281
羞しい	405
羞かしい	192

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +30 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 二番煎じ　　 │ 90,909 │ 98.7% │
│ 二番せんじ　 │    840 │  0.9% │ - add, sK
│ にばんせんじ │    347 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二番せんじ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>(boring) rerun</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>second brew of tea</gloss>

I agree.

With that n-grams count and being in all the major JEs I wouldn't label it rare.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

“Unrefined” personality, > 20,000 n-grams(several over 200,000):
野暮ったい  ぎこちない  野暮  無骨 無粋  殺風景 品がない もっさい  もさっと  芸がない ごつい

This entry --> 無風流  785     0.1%
蕪雑    527     0.0%
俗体    490     0.0%
不意気  123     0.0%
没風流  20      0.0%

Google: several pages of dictionary entries.
Also, very limited image search results(mostly dictionaries too).

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

gg5
G n-grams:
不風流	250
無風流	785
無風流な	289
無風流が	No matches
無風流を	23

-> adj glosses
I don't think the x-ref is necessary.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>不風流</keb>
+<keb>無風流</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>無風流</keb>
+<keb>不風流</keb>
@@ -16,5 +16,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2114610">没風流</xref>
-<gloss>lack of refinement</gloss>
-<gloss>inelegance</gloss>
-<gloss>want of artistic taste</gloss>
-<gloss>lack of poetic sense</gloss>
+<gloss>unrefined</gloss>
+<gloss>tasteless</gloss>
+<gloss>inelegant</gloss>
+<gloss>prosaic</gloss>
+<gloss>unpoetic</gloss>
+<gloss>unromantic</gloss>
+<gloss>boorish</gloss>

JEs

Simpler

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>confusingly similar</gloss>
+<gloss>confusing</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>confusing</gloss>

新和英中辞典, wisdom

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>confusing</gloss>

大辞林
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=紛らわしい

@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>confusing</gloss>
+<gloss>easily mixed up (e.g. similar words)</gloss>
+<gloss>easily mistaken</gloss>
+<gloss>confusingly similar</gloss>
@@ -22 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>easily mixed up (e.g. similar words)</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>sharp sighted</gloss>
+<gloss>sharp-eyed</gloss>
+<gloss>keen-eyed</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 目ざとい │ 15,138 │ 63.5% │
│ 目敏い　 │  3,176 │ 13.3% │
│ 目聡い　 │    697 │  2.9% │ - add rK (daijs, koj, meikyo)
│ めざとい │  4,846 │ 20.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目聡い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令兄-660935

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令姉-660980

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令室-661006

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令孫-661094

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令弟-661116

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令夫人-661187

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令妹-661214

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令婿-661062

令婿	0

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

meikyo, smk, koj

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>used mainly in letters</s_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>Mrs</gloss>
+<gloss>Mrs.</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令閨-660936

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

Yes, that split works.

gg5, sankoku, smk
妻夫	348,704		
妻夫木	325,390

I think sense 2 is always めおと/みょうと. GG5 points to ふうふ because めおと also has the "husband and wife" meaning.
The ok tag is usually used for archaic readings. Sankoku tags both めおと and みょうと as 古風. I think they should be a separate entry.
The vast majority of the 妻夫 counts come from 妻夫木.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<re_restr>夫婦</re_restr>
@@ -23,7 +22,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>めおと</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みょうと</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -36,7 +28,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1841840">夫婦茶碗</xref>
-<s_inf>usu. めおと</s_inf>
-<gloss>his and hers</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">pair of objects, one larger (for man), one smaller (for woman)</gloss>

The JEs have this is a separate sense, but point to ふうふ.

Maybe a note is best.

@@ -38 +37,0 @@
-<stagr>めおと</stagr>
@@ -40,0 +40 @@
+<s_inf>usu. めおと</s_inf>

shinmeikai says みょうと is a 古風な表現

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 夫婦　　 │ 8,818,680 │ 95.4% │
│ 妻夫　　 │   348,704 │  3.8% │ - add (daijr/s, koj, meikyo)
│ 女夫　　 │     9,836 │  0.1% │ - add rK (daijr/s, koj, meikyo)
│ ふうふ　 │    18,719 │  0.2% │
│ めおと　 │    45,716 │  0.5% │
│ みょうと │     4,449 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

The kokogos don't seem to mention anything about the second sense or a restriction to めおと.

@@ -9,0 +10,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>妻夫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>女夫</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<re_restr>夫婦</re_restr>

Just one is OK, I think.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>

Sankoku and meikyo both say these terms are 古い言い方 and redirect to 鉱員.
I think a [dated] tag might be less confusing than a [sens] tag. I guess we could have both.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2094690">鉱員</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

Although it's recorded at the sense level, the [rare] tag applies to the term itself, and is usually intended to signal a lesser used alternative.. Perhaps we need a standard way of noting uncommon senses.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

I take your point on [2] not being rare in the context of "walking barefoot on the edge of a sword blade". 

The issue is that stats attach to the entire term, and [1], surprisingly, appears as "common" (due, it seems,  to news stats on crime reporting). This inadvertently gives the impression that maybe sword-walking is a commonly-recognized cultural activity in Japan.  This couldn't be further from the truth.  [2] is an arcane religious ceremonial activity(or an extremely arcane form of entertainment).  Yes, it is sometimes enacted, yes, this is the word for the activity. No, it is not something an average Japanese person would have any familiarity with. (vs., say, 綱渡り tightrope walking, or maybe even fire walking). 

To answer your question directly, "is there a better word", no, there isn't.  But that doesn't make this a good word.  The couple of Japanese news sources that mentioned this included a definition, presumably because the specific details of "刃渡り" are not comprehensible on their own(unlike 綱渡り, which brought me back here). So, if an E->J translator wanted to describe "sword walking" to a Japanese audience, they shouldn't expect to have success using this term to do it(without supplementary information).  Perhaps that does justify [rare].

My actual motivation was that a learner can safely discard [2] as "not worth learning"(due to cultural rarity, not just low ngrams).  It was also as to counter the stats on [1].  Lots of online Japanese learning resources just scoop up "common" terms from jmdict and present them as-is.  In this specific context, I think [rare] is the lesser of two evils, but I understand if this is rejected.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I don't think "(sword, knife, etc.)" is needed on sense 1.
I can't see why [rare] has been added to sense 2. Is there a more common name for this stunt?

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>length of a blade (sword, knife, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>length of a blade</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

刃渡り	38120	91.3%
刃渡	2061	4.9%
はわたり	1561	3.7%

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK

meikyo (entry for 両刃の剣):
  近年「もろはのけん」「りょうばのつるぎ」ともいうが、本来は「もろはのつるぎ」。

両刃 can be read もろは or りょうば, and 剣 can be read つるぎ or けん in this expression.
We can probably merge the entries together

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1344300">諸刃の剣・もろはのつるぎ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344300">諸刃の剣</xref>

諸刃の剣	95288	82.2%
両刃の剣	20673	17.8%

諸刃の剣と両刃の剣の違いとは？意味や読み方・例文を解説
https://kokugoryokuup.com/moroha-ryouba/
ゆえに、「両刃の剣」の方の使用を排除したり否定したりすることはできないのです。
しかし、どちらを使うか？と問われればやはり「諸刃の剣」を使うのが無難ということになります。

【両刃の剣】と【諸刃の剣】の意味の違いと使い方の例文
https://reibuncnt.jp/27083

daijs:
諸刃もろはの剣つるぎ」に同じ。

Recent news article: コロナ自粛は両刃の剣
https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/228190

kokugos, online articles, and n-grams all seem to concur that these are synonymous,　up-to-and-including metaphoric usage, but the other form is preferable.

This was not previously marked as [exp], but the xref is.  Even though the metaphors align perfectly with English (or especially because they do), would it be appropriate to give an explanatory gloss?

As entered currently, it is not possible to know if these terms are safe to use in the English metaphorical way without looking it up somewhere else.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344300">諸刃の剣・もろはのつるぎ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1344300">諸刃の剣・もろはのつるぎ</xref>

daij, gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>longstanding desire or goal</gloss>
+<gloss>long-standing ambition</gloss>
+<gloss>one's heart's desire</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Doesn't appear to be adverbial.

@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf38</ke_pri>
@@ -9,2 +10,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf38</ke_pri>
@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>in passing another (esp. colliding with oncoming traffic, bumping into a person)</gloss>
-<gloss>the moment two persons or objects meet</gloss>
+<gloss>the moment of meeting (of two people, vehicles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>the moment of running into each other</gloss>
+<gloss>the moment of crossing paths</gloss>

GG5 has both, in this order.

Meikyo and smk lead with the 会 version, which also gets the most counts below

〈出／で〉〈会（い）／合（い）／あい〉〈頭／がしら／ガシラ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 出会い頭　　 │ 42,253 │ 73.9% │
│ 出合い頭　　 │  6,129 │ 10.7% │
│ 出会いがしら │  5,593 │  9.8% │ - add, sK
│ 出合頭　　　 │  1,579 │  2.8% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 出会頭　　　 │    340 │  0.6% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 出合いがしら │    300 │  0.5% │ - add, sK
│ で会頭　　　 │    269 │  0.5% │
│ 出会いガシラ │     93 │  0.2% │
│ 出あいがしら │     80 │  0.1% │
│ 出あい頭　　 │     38 │  0.1% │
│ 出合がしら　 │     31 │  0.1% │
│ であいがしら │    498 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>出会い頭</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10 +13,2 @@
-<keb>出会い頭</keb>
+<keb>出会いがしら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +18 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +22,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>出合いがしら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -26 +26,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

prog, luminous

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>transport by sea</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 回漕　　 │  3,861 │ 85.1% │
│ 廻漕　　 │    676 │ 14.9% │ - add (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ かいそう │ 36,676 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>廻漕</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>rough</gloss>

GG5: ～な confused; disordered; ill-balanced. [⇒ざつぜん]

I don't think the note is needed.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>unpolished (e.g. of a text, of a drawing )</gloss>
+<gloss>confused</gloss>
+<gloss>unpolished</gloss>

蕪雑    527     0.0%

daijs
［名・形動］雑然としていること。また、そのさま。「―な言辞を弄する」


蕪雑の英語
ピン留め
 単語を追加
英訳・英語
inept、awkward、cumbersome、ill-chosen、clumsy、inapt、confused、broken、disordered、upset

A good self-effacing use: "This sketch is 蕪雑, but I would be happy if you all would take a look"
https://twitter.com/tapipipipi1234/status/1373942201542045705

self-effacing:
中学で初めて書いた蕪雑な恋愛小説は、私の宝だ。
https://twitter.com/ichika01mojiai/status/1448785002813014017

Rare but used. Not not worth knowing...

sankoku says 入り混じって整わないこと　「ーな文章」。

Doesn't seem to apply to people(why I was looking at it).

Saw a comment that a translation took some time to read because it was 蕪雑. 

Lot's of use as self-effacing "my work is 蕪雑, but".  This makes "unpolished" feel a bit weak.  Unrefined especially so(I dropped this gloss).

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>unpolished</gloss>
-<gloss>unrefined</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>disordered</gloss>
+<gloss>unpolished (e.g. of a text, of a drawing )</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>separate arrangements (e.g. payments)</gloss>
+<gloss>separate arrangement (e.g. of payments)</gloss>

Oops

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<stagk>別立て</stagk>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>{別立て] beating whites and yolks of eggs separately</gloss>
+<gloss>beating (egg whites and yolks) separately</gloss>

GG5 (also has 別建て). Koj, Daijs

I think its meaning really depends on the context.

@@ -19,3 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>separate payments</gloss>
-<gloss>separate charges</gloss>
-<gloss>separate dealings</gloss>
+<gloss>separate arrangements (e.g. payments)</gloss>
+<gloss>handling separately</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>{別立て] beating whites and yolks of eggs separately</gloss>

Jitsuyou:
主に金銭のやり取りに用いられる場合が多い。

On second thought, this doesn't always refer exclusively to exchanges of money, so I can see where "dealings" came from.
To me it seems a little difficult to interpret, but I'm struggling to think of something better.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>separate dealings</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>an odd piece</gloss>
+<gloss>odd set</gloss>
+<gloss>incomplete set</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

daij, koj
刃物三昧し	No matches		
刃物三昧する	No matches

Only vs in daijr.
The gloss wasn't great.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -14 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(engaging in a) knife fight</gloss>
+<gloss>swinging a knife around</gloss>
+<gloss>brandishing a knife</gloss>

Koj, daijr, etc.

刃物三昧	112

One news hit in 2010.

Japanese person discovers dictionary entry under 三昧, shocked:
https://twitter.com/gogo_no_hi/status/1192052689636454401

Used as "joy working with knives"
https://twitter.com/07wacko/status/1402202609591619595
https://twitter.com/mosmos90054560/status/1594317492163211264
https://twitter.com/allex_japan/status/1165221382013116416

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2831453">ユーエイチティー</xref>
-<gloss>pasteurization (at a low temperature)</gloss>
-<gloss>pasteurisation</gloss>
+<gloss>low-temperature pasteurization</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>pasteurization</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831453">ユーエイチティー</xref>
+<gloss>pasteurization (at a low temperature)</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>low-temperature pasteurization (as opposed to ultra high-temperature pasteurization (UHT) or high-temperature pasteurization)</gloss>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1012811000

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>low-temperature pasteurization (as opposed to ultra high-temperature pasteurization (UHT) or high-temperature pasteurization)</gloss>

gg5, luminous, daij

Added sense.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>foliage plants</gloss>
+<gloss>foliage plant</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>green vegetables</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>(Edo-period) head of a prisoners' group</gloss>
+<gloss>head of a prisoners' group (Edo period)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Yes, I think it's not necessary.

There are only 16 entries in all of jmdictdb that end with とした(and half of those are coincidental, and not とする forms at all).  A number of others should probably also be dropped in deference to an [adv-to] parent entry. I don't think there is anything particularly special about this entry statistically.

Otherwise there are a mountain of とした forms that could be added.

とした search:
http://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/srchres.py?s1=1&y1=4&t1=とした&src=1&search=Search&svc=jmdict

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=雑然とした
chaotic, cluttered, some others...

https://www.waeijisho.net/i/word.html?id=41956
jumbled-up

https://study-z.net/100160243/3

｢His desk is always messy.｣
（彼のデスクはいつも雑然としている。）
｢This downtown area has a cluttered atmosphere. ｣
（この繁華街の一角は雑然とした雰囲気がある。）

Does not apply to people (it would seem).  If you search 雑然とした男, you find 雑然とした男の部屋.

Figured out "chaotic" from context, but later found that dictionaries back it up. 雑然とした雰囲気 is a common collocation.

Note: 雑然 is marked [adv-to], that means it literally subsumes this entire entry. This can ban be deleted.

Is this how "promiscuous" became a gloss? 

Wiktionary英語版での「promiscuous」の意味
promiscuous
From Latin prōmiscuus (“mixed, not separated”), from prō (“forth”) + misceō (“mix”).

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1299450">雑然・ざつぜん</xref>
+<gloss>cluttered (e.g. desk)</gloss>
+<gloss>jumbled (e.g. thoughts)</gloss>
+<gloss>messy (e.g. room)</gloss>
+<gloss>untidy</gloss>
@@ -13 +18 @@
-<gloss>promiscuous</gloss>
+<gloss>chaotic (e.g. lifestyle, atmosphere)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>your (his) heir</gloss>
+<gloss>your heir</gloss>
+<gloss>his heir</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/令嗣-660981

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1916490">例の件</xref>
-<gloss>topic at hand</gloss>
-<gloss>current topic</gloss>
+<gloss>matter in the heading (of a document)</gloss>
+<gloss>matter mentioned in the subject line (of an email)</gloss>

jitsuyou:
https://www.weblio.jp/content/掲題の件
 題目として掲げた案件。文書のタイトルや電子メールの件名に記した事柄に言及する際などに用いる。

I think the "(formal)" note was to indicate that this refers to a main topic (as opposed to a digression), not necessarily that the expression itself is a formal or literary term

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&form;</misc>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(formal) topic at hand</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>topic at hand</gloss>

シャーペン	154957	69.6%
シャープペン	67827	30.4%
some of these ngrams seem to be from シャープペンシル but not all:

シャープペンの	9253
シャープペンを	6017

jpwiki: 略称で「シャープ」、「シャーペン」とも呼ばれ、「シャープペン」の表記も一般に見られる

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シャープペン</reb>

gg5, prog, luminous

lsrc tag not needed on the abbreviated form.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">sharp pencil</lsource>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>propelling pencil</gloss>

シャーペン	154957	99.5%
シャアペン	826	0.5%

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Only gets a minute fraction of the hits.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Saw this for the first time today and I had no idea where the じ came from. Maybe it would be helpful to have a x-ref.

Also: 負けじ魂

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2844468">じ・2</xref>

It break the link with the audio, but that's not a big deal.

G n-grams:
負けじ	211717	  
負けじと	205891

Don't see any reason not to include the と.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>負けじ</keb>
+<keb>負けじと</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>まけじ</reb>
+<reb>まけじと</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>unyielding</gloss>
-<gloss>forcefully</gloss>
+<gloss>resolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>determinedly</gloss>

I'm not sure those meaning fit that well.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>not wanting to lose</gloss>
-<gloss>not willing to be outdone</gloss>
+<gloss>unyielding</gloss>
+<gloss>forcefully</gloss>

中辞典: a single edge; a blade edge that is bevelled on one side only

I think it's just the one sense.

@@ -18,6 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2536100">和包丁・わぼうちょう</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2536100">和包丁・わぼうちょう</xref>

包丁には、片側だけ刃がついている「片刃」と、両側に刃がついている「両刃」があります。
このページでは片刃のシェフナイフと両刃のシェフナイフの切れ方の特徴、長所、短所などを解説します。
​動画は前半が片刃の切れ方、後半が両刃の切れ方です。
https://www.katabayui.com/doublesingle


Diagram
https://www.wahei.co.jp/reading/trivia/26154.html



和包丁	26596	95.3%
洋包丁	9952
片刃包丁	303	1.1%
両刃包丁	391	1.4%
片刃の包丁	402	1.4%
両刃の包丁	211	0.8%

https://www.kai-group.com/products/special/hocho/select/wa/#:~:text=洋包丁と和包丁,切断面になります。

。洋包丁と和包丁の大きな違いは、洋包丁が両刃であるのに対し、和包丁は片刃を基本にしているということ。

https://kamikoto.com/blogs/fundamentals/understanding-single-and-double-bevel-knives

What Is a Single Bevel Knife: The Ultimate Guide
https://blog.hdmdknives.com/single-bevel-knife.html

包丁
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/包丁
和包丁とは、...片刃のものが多く
洋包丁...多くが両刃である。

google 包丁　片刃　両刃, results are extensive

single-edged sword is sharp on only one side.  Knives are generally sharp on only one side, with 片刃 and 両刃 referring to the grinding of the blade (one side or both sides).

"double edged" and "single edged" are also apparently used this way in English, though "beveled" seems standard, unambiguous terminology.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1344290">諸刃・もろは・1</xref>
@@ -16,0 +18,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2536100">和包丁・わぼうちょう</xref>
+<gloss>single bevel (e.g. kitchen knife)</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog

x-ref not needed.

@@ -22,3 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2006640">間違いない・1</xref>
-<gloss>certain</gloss>
-<gloss>unmistaken</gloss>
+<gloss>unmistakable</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>certain</gloss>

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 紛れもない　 │ 98,274 │ 56.5% │
│ 紛れも無い　 │ 28,156 │ 16.2% │
│ まぎれも無い │  1,945 │  1.1% │ - add, sK
│ まぎれもない │ 45,626 │ 26.2% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まぎれも無い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

I don't think the x-ref is appropriate. This is a proverb and 藁にもすがる is an idiom. They don't even use the same verb.

@@ -33 +32,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる・わらにもすがる</xref>

藁をも掴む	8781	35.2%
藁をもつかむ	7388	29.6%
わらをもつかむ	4643	18.6%
ワラをもつかむ	2438	9.8%
ワラをも掴む	1702	6.8%

溺れる者は	6132	84.9%
おぼれる者は	1089	15.1%

also, vs more common
藁にもすがる	20495	  
藁にも縋る	2287	

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/a_drowning_man_will_clutch_at_a_straw#:~:text=A person in desperate need,even if it is insignificant.

https://www.plansponsor.com/tuesday-trivia-phrase-grasping-straws-come/?layout=print#:~:text=It comes from a proverb,the side of a river.
It comes from a proverb in Thomas More’s “Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation” (1534) which says, “A drowning man will clutch at straws.” It is said that the “straw” in this case refers to the sort of thin reeds that grow by the side of a river.

It was odd to see such a long-form idiom with kanji ranked at the bottom.  Full kanji form is prevalent on twitter, supported by n-grams. 

Seems like a bit of a fools errand to catalogue all combinations of 
溺れ・おぼれ　
もの・者　
藁・わら・ワラ　
掴む・つかむ
(24 combinations, all probably in use somewhere）. Likewise, I don't know about displaying any particular alternate surface form. *In particular*, for learners をも掴む would suffer by being written in kana, since をも is so unusual, and the "verb" would probably be guessed as もつかむ. (I had this problem myself, even with the kanji... I tried to figure out why もつかむ wasn't in the dictionary anywhere).  I added some [sK] forms that are more popular than the ones here, and I mostly just pulled them out of a hat. There are surely even more.

Japanese also has the old form(をも掴む) /modern-form (にも縋る) dichotomy, so I felt ok replacing the English gloss with what appears to be the most common structure. (clutch).

I didn't associate the English gloss with "grasping at straws", I had no idea this was an English idiom, or that it was the source of "grasping at straws".  
I thought this was a piece of ancient East-Asian wisdom.  Couldn't find a Japanese etymology, I think it's suspected to be a calque from English, but unknown.

In place of a [lit] gloss, I think the xref helps clears up a lot.

@@ -5 +5,5 @@
-<keb>おぼれる者はわらをもつかむ</keb>
+<keb>溺れる者は藁をも掴む</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者は藁をもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +16,10 @@
-<keb>溺れる者は藁をも掴む</keb>
+<keb>おぼれる者はわらをもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者はワラをも掴む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者はワラをもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +33 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる・わらにもすがる</xref>
@@ -20 +35 @@
-<gloss>a drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>
+<gloss>a drowning man will clutch at a straw</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>A drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>
+<gloss>a drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom

@@ -17,2 +17,4 @@
-<gloss>not revealing (thoughts, feelings)</gloss>
-<gloss>not breathing a word</gloss>
+<gloss>showing no sign of</gloss>
+<gloss>not giving the slightest indication of</gloss>
+<gloss>saying nothing at all about</gloss>
+<gloss>not breathing a word of</gloss>

OK. I'll add it.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

The -ず form also gets quite a few counts

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ おくびにも出さない　　 │ 4,089 │
│ おくびにも出さなかった │   828 │
│ おくびにも出さなく　　 │    30 │
│ おくびにも出さず　　　 │ 7,482 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

Quiet. Closing.

KOD

Tableware is too broad.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>tableware</gloss>
+<gloss>cutlery</gloss>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>cutlery</gloss>

刃物	664604	75.4%
カトラリー	217055	24.6%

Google search confirms that "plastic" cutlery is also fine.
プラスチックカトラリー

カトラリー
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カトラリー

This seems to be the main word in Japanese for set containing spoons, forks, and knives. 

Added obvious English glosses to make it more discoverable. Ordered by what I think is probably "safest" for modern Japanese use as a gloss. Wouldn't mind if "cutlery" got a usage warning.
 
Amazon contains search categories like:
カトラリーアソートセット
アウトドア用カトラリー
カトラリーケース

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<gloss>tableware</gloss>
+<gloss>silverware</gloss>
+<gloss>flatware</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1409800">対・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1409800">対・1</xref>

daijr: 「…に対する」「対」の意。記号的に用いられる。「巨人―阪神」

It's not a conjunction in the kokugos. "versus" is a preposition in English.
unc?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ｖｓ</keb>
@@ -18,2 +21,2 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1409800">対・たい・2</xref>
+<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1409800">対・2</xref>

ブイエス	697
バーサス	12105
GG5 (ブイ・エス)

New style.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ブイエス</reb>
+<reb>ブイ・エス</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブイエス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

rm ブイ・エス; as far as i know we have never included the dot form for initialisms.  could be added back if there is extensive evidence of its usage in the wild.

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ブイ・エス</reb>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1625290">極超短波・ごくちょうたんぱ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1625290">極超短波</xref>

New style

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<reb>ユー・エイチ・エフ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ユー・エッチ・エフ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +20 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5, etc.

Slightly more common form.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ユーエイチエフ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1625290">極超短波・ごくちょうたんぱ</xref>

Entry created

I wouldn't object to it.

It would have to be a separate entry. But I'm not sure it's needed given that we have a "mechanical pencil" sense for シャープ.

シャー芯	6339	71.7%
シャープ芯	2117	23.9%
シャーペン芯	387	4.4%

worth including シャープ芯 here? note needs to be changed if we're not making it sk

https://www.weblio.jp/content/シャー芯

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>from シャーペン + 芯</s_inf>

シャー芯	6339

I feel there should be a note saying it's from "sharp lead".

KOD

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2651780">洋包丁・ようぼうちょう</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2651780">洋包丁・ようぼうちょう</xref>
-<gloss>Japanese kitchen knife(esp. in reference to a single-beveled blade)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2651780">洋包丁</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2651780">洋包丁</xref>
+<gloss>Japanese-style kitchen knife (esp. with single-beveled blade)</gloss>

片刃包丁（和包丁）の研ぎ方をご紹介します
https://www.wahei.co.jp/reading/trivia/26154.html


包丁
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/包丁
和包丁[編集]
「en:Japanese kitchen knife」も参照
和包丁とは、...片刃のものが多く
洋包丁...多くが両刃である。

https://oishya.com/journal/western-vs-japanese-kitchen-knife-types/
The fundamental difference between Western style knives and their Japanese counterparts, is the fact, that the Western knife is sharpened on both sides of the blade. They therefore have what is called a symmetrical bevel. This obviously has an impact on the way the Western knife is sharpened.

Saw this a lot when looking at 両刃 and 片刃 in terms of beveling on blades, especially when limited to kitchen knives. (There are double-beveled Japanese knives, but not so much in terms of kitchen knives).

和包丁 and 洋包丁 seem like a more common way of identifying the bevel than 片刃 and 両刃 (also recently edited).

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Japanese knife</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2651780">洋包丁・ようぼうちょう</xref>
+<gloss>Japanese kitchen knife(esp. in reference to a single-beveled blade)</gloss>

Entry created

See comments on 2419320.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

狐に小豆飯	46		
猫に鰹節	        2,475

@@ -15 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>risky thing to do (like feeding a fox)</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>trusting a cat with milk</gloss>
+<gloss>setting a wolf to mind the sheep</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">(giving) rice boiled with adzuki beans to a fox</gloss>

Not a great gloss

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

These xrefs aren't really helpful. Different conditions.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2632820">短頭</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2632820">短頭</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see">短頭</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2632820">短頭</xref>

koj, eij, gg5

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2632810">長頭</xref>

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/plagiocephaly-brachycephaly/

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>flat head syndrome</gloss>

koj, gg5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Western-style kitchen knife (esp. in reference to a double-beveled blade)</gloss>
+<gloss>Western-style kitchen knife (esp. with double-beveled blade)</gloss>

see also xref.

https://www.korin.com/about-western-knives#:~:text=Western-style knives have a,doubleground or double beveled blade.

Western-style knives have a blade edge that is sharpened on both sides of the blade. This edge style is commonly referred to as a double-edged, doubleground or double beveled blade. It is a stronger blade configuration than the single-edged blades of traditional Japanese knives, and Western-style knives are perfectly suited for any kitchen.

See comments at xref.
Changed [ant] to [see] based on my reading of the editorial policy for [ant].  

Should have a two-way ref (I already xrefed 和包丁 back to here as well).

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2536100">和包丁</xref>
-<xref type="ant" seq="2536100">和包丁</xref>
-<gloss>Western knife</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2536100">和包丁</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2536100">和包丁</xref>
+<gloss>Western-style kitchen knife (esp. in reference to a double-beveled blade)</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/226788/m0u/

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>洋包丁】</keb>
+<keb>洋包丁</keb>

Yes, very A+B.

Doesn't strike me as a very useful entry.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Beware of dog (on a sign)</gloss>
+<s_inf>on a sign</s_inf>
+<gloss>Beware of dog</gloss>

GG5 「猛犬」
199,000 猛犬注意
 65,800 猛犬に注意

Saw on neighbor’s house.
Form 「猛犬に注意」 (with に) also common.

OK, closing.

Reopen.

GG5: どすのきいた声で in a deep, threatening voice.   (other JEs have it too.)

As I commented earlier, I'm not keen to break with the references and have a 和語 like this lead with katakana. I'll close it off to shorten the queue, and reopen it for a while in case anyone else wants to comment.
Possibly sense 2 can be adj-no?

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>from 脅す・おどす</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from 脅す</s_inf>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2002480">どす黒い・どすぐろい</xref>

Carrying a knife　（image search for "ドスを持っいる" returns people with knives. So does "どすを持っいる", but the captions are all katakana ドス）:
短刀を持っ	818	61.9%
ドスを持っ	504	38.1% (this is not MS-DOS)
どすを持っ	0	0.0%

脅す sense:
ドスの効いた	10642	39.3%
ドスのきいた	7718	28.5%
ドスの利いた	6086	22.5%
どすの利いた	1372	5.1%
どすのきいた	808	3.0%
どすの効いた	482	1.8%

Wikipedia page on 短刀. ドス is used, どす is not.
また、昭和前期まで博徒やヤクザの伝統的な喧嘩道具に使用された粗製の短刀を隠語で「ドス」と称し、金に困った一部の包丁鍛冶などが作ったと言われている。ドスの中でも長い物（1尺8寸超）は特に“長ドス”と呼ばれる。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/短刀

Video: ドスと短刀って違うもの…？
Video title and *all* comments(a bunch) use katakana form
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIiedTCIgfM

Search どす 短刀, google asks:
Did you mean ドス 短刀?
Comp "どすと短刀" (2 hits) "ドスと短刀" (a couple pages)

Wikipedia disambiguation for DOS. ドス does not appear anywhere
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS

MS-DOS, ドス appears exactly once in the phonetic entry, and not even stand-alone: MS-DOS（エムエス-ディーオーエス、エムエスドス[2]）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

Same story for DOS alone. ディスクオペレーティングシステム（英語: Disk Operating System、DOS、ディーオーエス、ドス
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS_(OS)

Summary - from what I can find, at least, it appears that [1] and [2] are far and away predominantly katakana. For [3], hiragana wins out, but not by a huge margin, and [see=どす黒い] removes that ambiguity. [4] is very different from the other terms, and has a restriction already.  Counts don't appear to be influenced significantly by DOS/MS-DOS. [2] generally dominates the other counts, [1] is relatively rare in general. (should these be re-ordered?). Note, for example, 短刀 gets a whole wikipedia page, on which ドス get's a short paragraph.

yourei examples are all (or almost all) 脅す　sense.

==
I changed the ドス /どす ordering after editing ドスのきいた.  I won't post the long list, but if you do an n-gram search for the top 10/100 entries for 
ドスの 
and
どすの
You'll see that first, the list is absolutely overwhelmed by the 脅す meaning(using 効かす・利かせる and even the mistaken 聞かせる), and second,  ドス is the dominant form.
ドスを and　どすを are similarly overwhelmed by a grammatical variation of the same structure.

For the knife, while even sankoku lists primarily under どす, I suspect this is a reflection of it being a "native" and historical Japanese word. I don't know if they would ever handle such a case with ドス(「どす」とも書く).

It actually appears rare that ms-dos was written as　ドス. the wikipedia page for ドス doesn't even list DOS or MS-DOS as disambiguation options. Google "ドスソフト" or "ドス・ソフト" or "ドスのソフト" and you get almost nothing. Replace with "DOSソフト" or "DOSのソフト" or "MS-DOSソフト" and you'll get results. It seems the trendy thing for Japanese people to do might have been to use the English acronym, like DVD etc.

I'm not convinced ドス should lead. The JEs don't have it and most kokugos don't mention it. I think it's possibly noise from DOS.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ドス</reb>
+<reb>どす</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>どす</reb>
+<reb>ドス</reb>
@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1238070">脅す・おどす</xref>
-<s_inf>derivation of 脅す・おどす</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1238070">脅す</xref>
+<s_inf>from 脅す・おどす</s_inf>

gg5

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to dance down (leaves, petals, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to flutter down (of leaves, petals, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ が舞い散る │  17,528 │
│ は舞い散る │  11,527 │
│ に舞い散る │   7,866 │
│ と舞い散る │   3,162 │
│ を舞い散る │     237 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>to dance down (leaves, petals)</gloss>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to dance down (leaves, petals, etc.)</gloss>

Only nikk (the unabridged version) has そし. I think it can be dropped.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そし</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss>usual diet</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>vegetarian diet</gloss>

daijs, nikk
http://tokyovegelife.sblo.jp/article/34365997.html
"ここは素食（ベジタリアン）メニューと
普通のメニューの両方があるのですが
素食のメニューでもほぼ何でも揃うので
ベジタリアン以外の方をお誘いしやすく
皆で一緒に食事を楽しむことができます。"

Yes, better.

I think these glosses should lead.
I don't think "in all probability" is a great gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>no matter how you look at it</gloss>
+<gloss>no matter how you slice it</gloss>
+<gloss>clearly</gloss>
+<gloss>obviously</gloss>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>clearly</gloss>
@@ -15,3 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>in all probability</gloss>
-<gloss>no matter how you slice it</gloss>
-<gloss>no matter how you look at it</gloss>

less stilted, in line with the どう見ても entry.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>no matter how one slices it</gloss>
-<gloss>no matter how one looks at it</gloss>
+<gloss>no matter how you slice it</gloss>
+<gloss>no matter how you look at it</gloss>

We have around 50 〜ても entries and most are just "exp". Some, such as またしても, are just "adv", and some are "exp,adv". I doubt we can address these at a policy level as the usages seem to differ a lot. I think it will have to be a case-by-case assessment. (Daijisen tags またしても as 副.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-Alert

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2833338">全国瞬時警報システム・ぜんこくしゅんじけいほうシステム</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2833338">全国瞬時警報システム</xref>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">Japan's satellite-based disaster warning system</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">satellite-based early warning system used in Japan</gloss>

I think we can drop it.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>nationwide instantaneous alert system</gloss>

jawiki

Isn't the second gloss also expl? Jアラート doesn't refer 
to ANY nationwide instantaneous alert system

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジェイアラート</reb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>J-Alert system</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>J-ALERT system</gloss>
-<gloss>Japan's satellite-based disaster warning system</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">Japan's satellite-based disaster warning system</gloss>

See Marcus's comment.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<reb>ティー・ケー・ジー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ティーケージー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2451370">卵かけご飯・たまごかけごはん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2451370">卵かけご飯</xref>

jitsuyo: インターネットスラング
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamago_kake_gohan

@@ -13 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>meal consisting of a raw egg mixed with white rice, often seasoned with soy sauce</gloss>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>tamago kake gohan</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">raw egg mixed with white rice, often seasoned with soy sauce</gloss>

It's probably not well represented in writing as "SSS" is the dominant form.

I see that トリプルエス gets very few WWW hits, and none seem to be associated with this meaning.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エスエスエス</reb>
+<reb>エス・エス・エス</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エスエスエス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

エスエスエス	67
トリプルエス	241

Much the same as the "also read トリプルエス" put in a few months ago. On balance, I think it should be searchable. 
BTW, テレビ was already searchable which makes it a bit different.

I'm not sure トリプルエス can be considered a "reading" of "SSS". There was a similar discussion about adding "テレビ" as a reading to the "TV" entry and the decision was to leave it as a note.

the "also read" note is maybe unavoidable on SS, since it's the last sense in a multi-sense entry, but I'm not seeing the point of putting that reading in a note here?

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トリプルエス</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>also read トリプルエス</s_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 然すれば │    133 │  0.3% │ - rK (daijr/s, meikyo, sankoku)
│ 然為れば │     22 │  0.0% │ - rK (koj, smk)
│ さすれば │ 45,528 │ 99.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, koj
shimeikai: 古風な表現

It's a conjunction.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>if that is the case</gloss>
@@ -25 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>in that situation</gloss>