prog, luminous
gg5: いかに生きるべきかをじっくり(と)説いて聞かせる　explain at length [slowly and carefully, deliberately] the right rules for living

I think this works.
I don't think "deliberately" should lead.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<gloss>(slowly and) carefully</gloss>
+<gloss>without haste</gloss>
+<gloss>thoroughly</gloss>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>carefully</gloss>
+<gloss>closely</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>thoroughly</gloss>
-<gloss>without rushing</gloss>

However most references have "carefully" without "slowly and". It doesn't have to be slow.

"X and Y" is actually a really helpful way of glossing many adverbs and adjectives. An initial gloss like that puts the reader to the right frame of mind right at the start.

GG5, 中辞典, etc.

Removing repetition. My refs don't support the last 3.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>slowly and carefully</gloss>
+<gloss>carefully</gloss>
@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>perfectly</gloss>
-<gloss>properly</gloss>
-<gloss>well</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/すっぱり/#jn-118826

added definitions

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<gloss>resolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>decisively</gloss>
+<gloss>flatly</gloss>
+<gloss>firmly</gloss>

koj, daij

merge of 2742800

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すぱり</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>completely</gloss>
+<gloss>completely (quitting, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>without hesitation</gloss>

I guess the uk is the key tag here.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/丁髷
prog: 丁髷を結う  do up [tie] one's hair in a topknot
丁髷	        5089	2.1%
ちょんまげ	236085	97.9%

I think 丁髷 is a form that learners should be aware of. I wouldn't tag it as rare. All the JEs have it.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>

Merge

@@ -14,0 +15,9 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1430230">ちょうだい・3</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb; punning form of ちょうだい</s_inf>
+<gloss>please do (for me)</gloss>

ちょんまげ	236085
丁髷    	5089

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I probably forgot the final "submit". I do that occasionally.

See comments on deleted 2857154.
Jim, you said you'd added this already. I'm doing it myself in case you forgot.

@@ -16,0 +17,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1019420">アルバイト・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>part-time worker</gloss>
+<gloss>part-timer</gloss>

Meikyo

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Needs to be split on source. Can find no evidence for バイト = bite.

@@ -17,16 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<field>&math;</field>
-<gloss>byte</gloss>
-<gloss>octet</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>bite</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>cutting tool</gloss>
-<gloss>bit</gloss>
-</sense>

Aligning.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger">Arbeit</lsource>
-<gloss>work (esp. part time or casual)</gloss>
+<gloss>part-time job</gloss>
+<gloss>side job</gloss>

kokugos have "holding under arm" (小脇にかかえだくこと etc.) as a secondary gloss but google images only show people cradling babies.

横抱き	18313	99.2%
よこ抱き	75	0.4%
横だき	70	0.4%
よこだき	0	0.0%

Adding vs because I added it to 縦抱き (because every time I've heard it used, it was as a vs) but kokugos don't actually have it as スル

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>carrying (child) under arm</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>carrying (an infant, etc.) horizontally in one's arms</gloss>
+<gloss>cradling</gloss>
+<gloss>holding under one's arm</gloss>

I've gone through the 何x entries, so this can close.

reopening as reminder to align pos on other similar 何x entries

n looks good to me (without having thought too deeply on the topic)

Question marks should only be used for sentences.
I think the kokugos classify 何[counter] terms as nouns, but the definitions often end in "...のときに用いる語", "...を表す", etc. so it feels like a separate category to me. Is the "何人" in "何人いる？" considered adverbial? The "what ..." (as opposed to "how many ...") terms seem to function only as nouns.
GG5 and meikyo and have the third sense. I think it should stay.
I think the "what article" sense should lead.

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>何じょう</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15 +11,7 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>what article (of a legal document, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>what clause</gloss>
+<gloss>what section</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>what article (in a law)</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>how can (one possibly do ...)</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot possibly ...</gloss>
+<gloss>there is no way ...</gloss>

何番,何個,何ヶ月,何人,何分,何回,何年 are n
なんぼ is adv
何万年,何度 are both
何割,何年間,何年生,何座,何日 are exp

we need to standardize PoS for these.


aslo very few (or maybe none, max 1-2) of these have question marks in the glosses.

I suggest removing sense 3, should be a separate entry relaly (but it's arch, so)

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>what street? (esp. in Kyoto and Sapporo)</gloss>
+<s_inf>of streets ending in 条</s_inf>
+<gloss>which street</gloss>
@@ -20,9 +21 @@
-<gloss>what article? (in a law)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>the 条 in 何条 is an ateji</s_inf>
-<gloss>how can?</gloss>
-<gloss>cannot possibly</gloss>
-<gloss>there is no way</gloss>
+<gloss>what article (in a law)</gloss>

何番目	84517	99.4%
何番め	538	0.6%

Not sure this is needed. We have an entry for 番目.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>what number</gloss>
+<gloss>what number (in a sequence)</gloss>

Need to be consistent.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>rank?</gloss>
+<gloss>what rank</gloss>

confusing glosses

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何番め</keb>

gg5, daij

I think this should be two senses.

@@ -22 +22,5 @@
-<gloss>frame (e.g. picture frame, decorative door frame, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(picture) frame</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>architrave (of a door, window, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 額縁　　 │ 451,006 │ 98.9% │
│ 額ぶち　 │   2,031 │  0.4% │ - sK
│ がくぶち │   3,089 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

[vi]: sankoku

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

vs in nikk.

感涙し	16332

That's quite a lot of hits. More than I expected. I think vs is appropriate here.

感涙	253163
感涙する	3575
感涙して	5755

I'm not seeing it.

gg5, prog

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>(very) unusual</gloss>
+<gloss>unconventional</gloss>
+<gloss>eccentric</gloss>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>unconventional</gloss>
@@ -21,4 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>strange</gloss>
-<gloss>unusual</gloss>
-<gloss>eccentric</gloss>
-<gloss>fantastic</gloss>
+<gloss>bizarre</gloss>
+<gloss>wild</gloss>

GG5, etc.

スーパー大辞林
デジタル大辞泉

added definitions

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>unconventional</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>unusual</gloss>

I don't see the 拡 form in any refs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 繰り広げる　 │ 628,798 │ 96.9% │
│ 繰広げる　　 │   1,486 │  0.2% │ - (in daijr/s, shinmeikai)
│ 繰り拡げる　 │     239 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 繰拡げる　　 │       0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ くりひろげる │  18,532 │  2.9% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
 繰り広げる	628798
 繰広げる 	  1486
 繰り拡げる	   239
 繰拡げる 	No matches
 くりひろげる	 18532
------------------
 繰り広げ	1692493
 繰広げ	   6645
 繰り拡げ	    922
 繰拡げ	No matches
 くりひろげ	  37108

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

completing suggested merge

@@ -12,0 +12,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>繰り拡げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>繰拡げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -21,0 +27,1 @@
+<gloss>to unroll</gloss>

gg5

Dropping adjective gloss.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>three dimensional</gloss>

@@ -33 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>IRL (in real life)</gloss>
+<gloss>IRL</gloss>
+<gloss>in real life</gloss>

@@ -33,1 +33,1 @@
-<gloss>IRL</gloss>
+<gloss>IRL (in real life)</gloss>

心みる	357
心見る	272

May as well add 心見る back while we're at it.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>心見る</keb>

meikyo: 「心みる」と書くのは誤り。

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>心みる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>to have a go (at something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a go (at)</gloss>

Too rare

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>心見る</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

It doesn't meet the rK threshold either.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

iK implies there is a correct kanji, whereas this is really a version of 小さい.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I only see the kanji form explicitly in one ref (sankoku), and ち isn't a standard reading for 小. Some sort of tag (rK, iK, sK) is probably appropriate.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 小っちゃい │    31,393 │  3.0% │
│ ちっちゃい │ 1,029,128 │ 97.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Probably.

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/1823283

No official source, but I'm pretty sure this is informal/colloquial.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

GG5, etc.

I'd split that one.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>freely (and unrestrained)</gloss>
+<gloss>freely</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>unrestrained</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/伸び伸び/#je-59148

added definition

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>freely (and unrestrained)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>relaxed</gloss>
+<gloss>carefree</gloss>

Self.approving

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, etc. Tanaka

I think this sense is more common.

@@ -21 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>(growing) quickly</gloss>
+<gloss>comfortably</gloss>
+<gloss>peacefully</gloss>
+<gloss>with one's mind at ease</gloss>
+<gloss>calmly</gloss>
+<gloss>without worries</gloss>
@@ -28,5 +32 @@
-<gloss>comfortably</gloss>
-<gloss>peacefully</gloss>
-<gloss>with one's mind at ease</gloss>
-<gloss>calmly</gloss>
-<gloss>without worries</gloss>
+<gloss>(growing) quickly</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 吹雪　 │ 691,017 │ 87.3% │
│ 乱吹　 │      30 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijs, koj)
│ ふぶき │ 100,480 │ 12.7% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijs

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乱吹</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 旋風　　　 │ 385,785 │ 88.3% │
│ つむじ風　 │  37,961 │  8.7% │
│ 辻風　　　 │   2,989 │  0.7% │
│ つじ風　　 │      24 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ せんぷう　 │   3,910 │  0.9% │
│ つむじかぜ │   6,169 │  1.4% │
│ つじかぜ　 │     174 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -33 +33,0 @@
-<re_restr>つじ風</re_restr>

G n-grams:
旋風	385785
辻風	2989
つむじ風	37961
つじ風	24

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>辻風</keb>
+<keb>つむじ風</keb>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<keb>つむじ風</keb>
+<keb>辻風</keb>
@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>sensation</gloss>
@@ -43 +43,0 @@
-<gloss>sensation</gloss>

I think we have to regard it as a case of the writers of those works playing with words. Perhaps they found せんぷう or つむじかぜ too long. Maybe they meant かぜ to be an abbreviation. I don't think we can add かぜ as a reading here.

It could be that this kanji also has a reading of "かぜ". See for example the titles of these works:

* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/旋風の用心棒
* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハリスの旋風

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 息吹　 │ 349,832 │ 89.1% │
│ 息吹き │  40,675 │ 10.4% │
│ 気吹　 │   1,937 │  0.5% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ いぶき │ 186,908 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, gg5

I don't think [oK] is applicable here.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>breath (metaphor)</gloss>
+<gloss>breath (of spring, fresh air, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>vitality</gloss>

Trimming.

@@ -28,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>sign (of something new and fresh about to begin or just begun, e.g. a new age)</gloss>
-<gloss>breath (metaphorical, e.g. breath of spring, breath of fresh air)</gloss>
+<gloss>sign (of something new and fresh)</gloss>
+<gloss>breath (metaphor)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 値打ち │ 1,352,300 │ 92.4% │
│ 値打　 │    43,403 │  3.0% │
│ 値うち │    15,214 │  1.0% │ - sK
│ ねうち │    52,582 │  3.6% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daij, prog, gg5
G n-grams:
値打ちする	20
値打ちし	        53

Daijr does have this as vs but that usage appears to be archaic.
Adding sense.

@@ -26,2 +26,7 @@
-<gloss>price</gloss>
-<gloss>dignity</gloss>
+<gloss>merit</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>estimation</gloss>
+<gloss>evaluation</gloss>
+<gloss>appraisal</gloss>

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Meikyo also has 閑か here, but most other refs have 閑か as しずか

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 長閑な　 │  43,368 │  9.0% │
│ 長閑かな │     265 │  0.1% │ - add, sK (meikyo)
│ 閑かな　 │   2,623 │  0.5% │
│ のどかな │ 434,583 │ 90.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>長閑か</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>serene</gloss>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<gloss>gentle</gloss>
+<gloss>balmy</gloss>

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<s_inf>of weather</s_inf>
-<gloss>mild</gloss>
+<gloss>mild (weather)</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>daimyō</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyo</gloss>

OK as is.

or arch?

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1415080">大名</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

OK. I'm happy to leave this how it is now.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>daimyo</gloss>
+<gloss>daimyō</gloss>

daij nikk

I'm going to reopen this. There's a big difference between being a 1) nobleman - a person part of the nobility who in most cases held 
little power, and 2) being a "powerful Japanese feudal lord" who "ruled most of Japan from their vast, hereditary land holdings" (enwiki). 
The meaning is different enough to qualify splitting in both Japanese and English. If the two meanings in English look too similar, that 
can be handled by making them more different

This isn't some obscure little historical issue but the word is used with both meanings today. If somebody looked up the use of "tonosama" 
in hyakunin isshu decks (for one example of contemporary use of the word in the Heian sense meaning) and walked away with the 
understanding that the "tonosama" cards of those decks depict "powerful feudal lords", then we've done them a disservice.

@@ -15,0 +16,7 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>nobleman</gloss>
+<gloss>dignitary</gloss>
+<gloss>lord</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,5 +25 @@
-<gloss>lord</gloss>
-<gloss>nobleman</gloss>
-<gloss>dignitary</gloss>
-<gloss>master</gloss>
-<gloss>feudal lord</gloss>
+<gloss>feudal lord (of the Edo period)</gloss>

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -28,0 +28,1 @@
+<s_inf>subordinate of 与力</s_inf>
@@ -29,1 +30,1 @@
-<gloss>constable in the Edo period (underlings of yoryoku)</gloss>
+<gloss>constable in the Edo period</gloss>

gg5

@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1544890">与力</xref>
@@ -28,1 +29,1 @@
-<gloss>constable in the Edo period</gloss>
+<gloss>constable in the Edo period (underlings of yoryoku)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +24,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +28,1 @@
+<gloss>constable in the Edo period</gloss>

番目	4538719	99.2%
番め	37993	0.8%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think this is clearer.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1604890">目・め・7</xref>
-<gloss>indicates position in a sequence</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1604890">目・17</xref>
+<s_inf>indicates position in a sequence</s_inf>
+<gloss>the nth ...</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<field>&kabuki;</field>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>番め</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
ふて寝	66800	54.0%
不貞寝	30938	25.0%
フテ寝	23160	18.7%
ふてね	2807	2.3%

saw it in a light novel

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>フテ寝</keb>

shinmeikai: 「｛不貞｝」は、借字。

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 不貞寝　 │ 30,938 │ 30.8% │
│ ふて寝　 │ 66,800 │ 66.4% │ 🡠 moving up
│ ふてね　 │  2,807 │  2.8% │
├─ーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ 不貞寝し │ 12,472 │ 33.2% │
│ ふて寝し │ 24,168 │ 64.4% │
│ ふてねし │    912 │  2.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>不貞寝</keb>
+<keb>ふて寝</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ふて寝</keb>
+<keb>不貞寝</keb>

gg5

"hope for" also works for sense 1.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to hope for</gloss>

@@ -26,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to expect</gloss>
-<gloss>to hope</gloss>
+<gloss>to expect (of someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hope for</gloss>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典
小学館 プログレッシブ和英中辞典

added definitions

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to want</gloss>
+<gloss>to wish for</gloss>
@@ -24 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to wish for</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +27,2 @@
+<gloss>to hope</gloss>
+<gloss>to look forward to</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>to overlook</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>low-ranking samurai who assisted daimyō or prominent military commanders (Muromachi period)</gloss>
+<gloss>low-ranking samurai who assisted daimyo or prominent military commanders (Muromachi period)</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寄騎</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +17,7 @@
-<gloss>feudal era police rank</gloss>
+<gloss>police sergeant (Edo period)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<s_inf>also written as 寄騎</s_inf>
+<gloss>low-ranking samurai who assisted daimyō or prominent military commanders (Muromachi period)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/立ち会う/#je-46133

added definition

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>to attend</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to be present</gloss>
+<gloss>to be present (esp. during a birth)</gloss>

daij

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>立会う</keb>

GG5, etc.

Trimming. We don't need that many glosses.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 凛とした</s_inf>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<gloss>(of appearance, attitude, etc) dignified</gloss>
+<gloss>dignified</gloss>
@@ -31,6 +31,0 @@
-<gloss>graceful</gloss>
-<gloss>reliable</gloss>
-<gloss>dependable</gloss>
-<gloss>brave</gloss>
-<gloss>courageous</gloss>
-<gloss>cool</gloss>

スーパー大辞林
https://dime.jp/genre/1278815/#:~:text=りりしく引き締まった様子&text=力強くきりっとしている,で用いられています。
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20181221135544.html
https://smartlog.jp/234522#S59134607
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11106929281
https://meaning-dictionary.com/「凛とした姿」とは？意味や使い方を解説/#toc2

added definitions

@@ -27 +27,22 @@
-<gloss>dignified</gloss>
+<gloss>(of appearance, attitude, etc) dignified</gloss>
+<gloss>distinguished</gloss>
+<gloss>refined</gloss>
+<gloss>elegant</gloss>
+<gloss>graceful</gloss>
+<gloss>reliable</gloss>
+<gloss>dependable</gloss>
+<gloss>brave</gloss>
+<gloss>courageous</gloss>
+<gloss>cool</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>(of an atmosphere) tense</gloss>
+<gloss>nerve-racking</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>(of voice, sound, etc) clear</gloss>
+<gloss>ringing</gloss>

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2540640">呼び樋</xref>

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>fool</gloss>
+<gloss>curved gutter</gloss>
@@ -29 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>curved gutter</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>fool</gloss>

jwiki wiki

simplifying a bit

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>goosefish (any anglerfish of family Lophiidae)</gloss>
+<gloss>goosefish (any fish of family Lophiidae)</gloss>

Yes, messy.

gave あんこ its own entry.  it could be merged here, but restrictions would be required on every sense but 1

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あんこ</reb>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

added definition

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>splitting the bill</gloss>

meikyo, sankoku, luminous

Meikyo and sankoku have a separate "reflect" sense.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 映し...</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 映し出す</s_inf>
@@ -34 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>to show</gloss>
+<gloss>to show (on a screen)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reflect (of a mirror, lake, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -39 +40 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 写し...</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 写し出す</s_inf>
@@ -43 +44,6 @@
-<gloss>to reflect</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. 映し出す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to reflect (the times, mood, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 映し出す　 │ 203,574 │ 83.6% │
│ 写し出す　 │  19,878 │  8.2% │
│ 映しだす　 │  11,711 │  4.8% │ - sK
│ 写しだす　 │   2,831 │  1.2% │ - sK
│ うつし出す │     843 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ うつしだす │   4,545 │  1.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うつし出す</keb>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1547390">欲張り</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 欲深　　 │ 15,669 │ 97.3% │
│ 慾深　　 │     93 │  0.6% │ - adding (shinmeikai)
│ よくふか │    272 │  1.7% │
│ よくぶか │     63 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>慾深</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1547390">欲張り</xref>

daij, koj, prog, gg5

Daijs is the only ref to mention よくぶか ("「よくぶか」とも") so I assume よくふか is the more common reading.
Don't know if the [ichi1] should be moved.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<reb>よくふか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,3 +13,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>よくふか</reb>
@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>avarice</gloss>
-<gloss>covetousness</gloss>
-<gloss>greed</gloss>
+<gloss>greedy</gloss>
+<gloss>avaricious</gloss>
+<gloss>covetous</gloss>

GG5 (splits)

スーパー大辞林
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/善くも/#jn-227179
https://hinative.com/questions/16580726

added definition

@@ -16,0 +17,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>
+<gloss>unexpectedly</gloss>

善くもそんな	No matches
よくもそんな	5360

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>How dare ...</gloss>
-<gloss>How could ...</gloss>
+<gloss>how dare ...</gloss>
+<gloss>how could ...</gloss>

eij

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>hereditary daimyo (whose ancestors supported Tokugawa Ieyasu prior to the battle of Sekigahara)</gloss>
+<gloss>hereditary daimyo whose ancestors supported Tokugawa Ieyasu prior to the battle of Sekigahara</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

splitting

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>譜第</keb>
@@ -13,1 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>hereditary (Tokugawa) daimyo</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1691030">譜代大名</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>hereditary daimyo (whose ancestors supported Tokugawa Ieyasu prior to the battle of Sekigahara)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 着付け　 │ 894,513 │ 97.0% │
│ 着つけ　 │  27,834 │  3.0% │ - sK
│ きつけ　 │  16,250 │  N/A  │
├─ーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 着付けの │  85,901 │ 97.3% │
│ 着つけの │   1,803 │  2.0% │
│ きつけの │     559 │  0.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijs
ex:
"２月１６日（土曜）１４時半～
着付け教室をすることになりました☆
先生はまちゃママです♪
簡単な着方を教えてもらえますので
興味のある方は、お店までお問い合わせください！！
少人数制なので、あと３名までです！！
お早めに～(^∀^)"

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>dressing</gloss>
+<gloss>dressing (esp. in kimono)</gloss>

daij, meikyo, gg5

I don't have "having a go" is right.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>having a go at something</gloss>
+<gloss>trusting to Providence</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 運否天賦　　 │ 2,031 │
│ うんぷてんぷ │ 1,091 │
│ うんぴてんぷ │     0 │ - adding (shinmeikai yoji, gakken yoji, jitenon)
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うんぴてんぷ</reb>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Aligning

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>hereditary daimyo (whose ancestors supported Tokugawa Ieyasu prior to the battle of Sekigahara)</gloss>
+<gloss>hereditary daimyo whose ancestors supported Tokugawa Ieyasu prior to the battle of Sekigahara</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典
スーパー大辞林

added sense

@@ -47,0 +48,2 @@
+<gloss>coincidence</gloss>
+<gloss>(stroke of) luck</gloss>

daijr and nikkoku have 回り合(わ)せ, but I'm skeptical. Probably meant to be 廻 instead of 回?

｛巡り、廻り、巡、廻、めぐり｝ｘ｛合わせ、会わせ、合せ、会せ、あわせ｝ = 25 forms.
These are the only forms with >20 google n-gram counts.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 巡り合わせ　 │ 57,516 │ 43.3% │
│ めぐり合わせ │ 41,223 │ 31.1% │
│ 巡り会わせ　 │  8,032 │  6.1% │
│ 巡りあわせ　 │  6,772 │  5.1% │ 🡠 adding
│ 巡り合せ　　 │  2,414 │  1.8% │ 🡠 (in daijr/s, koj)
│ めぐり会わせ │    953 │  0.7% │ 🡠 sK
│ 廻り合わせ　 │    921 │  0.7% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo)
│ めぐり合せ　 │    470 │  0.4% │ 🡠 adding
│ 廻り合せ　　 │    256 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding
│ 廻りあわせ　 │    120 │  0.1% │ 🡠 adding
│ 廻合せ　　　 │     30 │  0.0% │ 🡠 not adding
│ めぐりあわせ │  9,904 │  7.5% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>めぐり会わせ</keb>
+<keb>巡り合せ</keb>
@@ -17 +17,22 @@
-<keb>巡り合せ</keb>
+<keb>巡りあわせ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>めぐり会わせ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>廻り合わせ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>めぐり合せ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>廻り合せ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>廻りあわせ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

中辞典, etc.

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

added definitions

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>as ... as</gloss>
+<gloss>no less ... than ...</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>evenly balanced or talented</gloss>
+<gloss>equally (talented, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>evenly</gloss>
+<gloss>neck and neck</gloss>
@@ -15,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>equally</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/負けず劣らず

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>equally</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 嚥下　 │ 167,003 │
│ 咽下　 │     124 │ - rK (daijr, koj)
│ えんげ │  18,641 │
│ えんか │  42,923 │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&physiol;</field>

Reverso

I agree.

日本大百科:『萬川集海』では、忍には陽忍と陰忍とがあり、「陽忍」とは謀計の知慮（詭計(きけい)）をもって、その姿を顕(あらわ)しながら敵中に入る法、「陰忍」とは、人目を忍び姿を隠し、敵の虚隙(きょげき)を計り、「隠形(おんぎょう)」の術をなし、特別の道具や仕掛け（忍器・忍具）を使って忍び入る法をいう。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/忍者#概要
『萬川集海』によると「忍芸はほぼ盗賊の術に近し」とあり、忍術には「陰忍」と「陽忍」があるとされる。陰忍とは、姿を隠して敵地に忍び込み内情を探ったり破壊工作をする方法であり、一般的に想像される忍者とはこの時の姿である。対して陽忍とは、姿を公にさらしつつ計略によって目的を遂げる方法である。

The gloss was wrong but the entry might be worth keeping.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>camouflaged ninja</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2026470">陽忍</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>carrying out covert operations without being seen (of a ninja)</gloss>

陰忍	346
http://wiki.ffo.jp/html/17570.html

Entry created

Harmless, but we have 隠れ身 as an entry.

Not more than the sum of its parts.

I think this can stay, but with a slightly broader meaning. If the proposed 隠れ身 entry is approved, there's less need for this entry, but I think it can stay.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>ninja art of camouflage</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2842170">隠れ身</xref>
+<gloss>art of disappearing (esp. ninja)</gloss>

oops.  right you are

8/41 entries. Easier to change individually.

Most entries don't capitalize ninja, can the ones that do be fixed w a script maybe? @Jim

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ninja sword</gloss>
+<gloss>ninja sword</gloss>

忍び刀	602

could be deleted

Entry created

忍び文字	78

Entry created

It surprises me that "fukibari" is mentioned in that Wikipedia article given that there's barely any mention of the word on the Japanese web.
Possibly hist.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1713500">吹き矢・ふきや・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1713500">吹き矢・2</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>darts used with fukiya</gloss>
+<gloss>(blowgun) dart</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukiya - "The darts used in the fukiya are called fukibari. Traditionally, fukibari were 5 cm in length."
Reverso

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Ninja spitting needles</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1713500">吹き矢・ふきや</xref>
+<gloss>darts used with fukiya</gloss>

吹き針	151	100.0%
吹針	0	0.0%
ふきばり	0	0.0%

not in kokugos

Entry created

All kokugos have te kabuki.sense first, and that's the only way Ive heard it used (though outside of kabuki - the entry could have one more sense)

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<field>&kabuki;</field>
+<gloss>dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,4 +28,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>kabuki dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>

daij
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アジサイ

@@ -22,0 +22,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1311730">アジサイ</xref>
+<gloss>hydrangea (Hydrangea macrophylla)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>Kabuki dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+<gloss>kabuki dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>

Entry created

OK, reinstating. I'm very skeptical to this word actually being used seriously outside of manga and the like (my understanding is that the Iga museum is mostly for entertainment). Not sure whether [hist] would be appropriate or not.

@@ -14 +14,5 @@
-<gloss>dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+<gloss>dance in which the performer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the seven disguises of ninja</gloss>

I agree that I can't cleanly identify the historical source for this (maybe ninja's don't take careful notes?) but the Iga-ryu Ninja Museum went so far as to print 七化 on a sign (photo included with hand-transcription of photo, including furigana):

https://iganinja.jp/2007/12/post-51.html
https://iganinja.jp/2008/02/15/sichihoude.JPG

忍者は敵地に潜入する時、正体と目的を隠すために変装した。変装は「虚無僧」「出家」「山伏」「商人」「放下し」（曲芸人）「猿楽師」「常の形」（農民や武士）の７つとされ、忍術伝書では「七方出で立ちの事」または「七化」（ななばけ）と呼ばれた。
A ninja could disguise himself in seven different ways: as a straw-hat-clad Buddhist priest, traveling priest, a novice priest, merchant, acrobat, street musician, or in everyday attire (farmer or warrior).
Image posted in museum December 2007.

Apparently the sign is still up, as is. Photo of same display, 2021:
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/2014kurumatabi/e/ad46f2fc24ca833161929096d8875912

Another photo from 2012 (I think this poster might be the origin...)
https://ameblo.jp/peace-study/entry-11379537800.html

Well, now that I hand-typed it, this text is currently echoed (copy/paste) on https://www.ninja-museum.com/ninja-database/?p=732
I'm not actually sure of the affiliation of this website, so the previous reference to a standing museum seems more concrete. 
七方出（しちほうで）
忍者は敵地に潜入する時、正体と目的を隠すために変装した。
　忍者は敵地に潜入する時、正体と目的を隠すために変装した。変装は、「虚無僧」「出家」「山伏」「商人」「放下師」（曲芸人）「猿楽師」「常の形」（農民や武士）の7つとされ、忍術伝書では「七方出で立ちの事」または「七化」と呼ばれた。

This appears to be a modern work of fiction, so maybe all ninja-afficionados are just passing the same anecdote around:
七方出
https://ncode.syosetu.com/n2851cy/7/
これを忍術伝書では、「七方出(しちほういで)立ち事」または「七化」といい、俗に「七方出(しちほうで)」と呼ばれた。
https://pdfnovels.net/n2851cy/main.pdf


忍術（忍者）の「七方出しちほうでの術（七化ななばけ）」は、虚無僧・出家・山伏・商人・放下師・猿楽・常の形（つねのなり、武士や農民）の7つを指す。
https://meitou.info/index.php/放下通し

A hand-drawn cartoon image with a ninja in 7 different outfits, titled 七化. The text is in Chinese. Posted by the Embassy of Japan in China?! (日本国驻华大使馆)
https://weibo.com/ttarticle/p/show?id=2309404005136853813468&infeed=1

Here it is on Wikipedia, marked "source needed"
特に虚無僧・出家・山伏・商人・放下師（ほうかし、大道芸人、奇術師）・猿楽・常の形（つねのなり、武士や農民）の七つは「七方出の術（七化）」と呼ばれる。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/忍者#.E5.A4.89.E8.A3.85

Here is the exact moment it snuck into wikipedia.  August/2009, so the source may have been someone visiting the ninja museum?
https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=忍者&diff=27715863&oldid=27711298

Seems like someone needs to pay the museum a visit and get a better source...

A chinese blog reference from 2006
https://blog.xuite.net/h0937397696/twblog/151787021-忍者相關知識

忍者的基本「七 化」（nanabake）是： 出家、虛無僧、山伏、放下師、常之形、商人、猿樂師。 「出家」（syukke），是一般光頭和尚。 「虛無僧」（komusou），頭上戴著圓筒形竹笠，蓋住整張臉孔 ；身上披著袈裟；頸上掛著托缽；邊吹蕭邊化緣乞討。 「山伏」（yamabusi），在山野中修行的僧侶。 「放下師」（houkasi），相當於現代的街頭藝人，表演魔術、 特技、耍猴等。 「常之形」（tunenokata），化身為在地農人或武士，條件是 ，必須會講一口流利的當地方言。 「商人」，就是賣藥、賣糖的行商。 「猿樂師」（sarugakusi），江湖藝人。 

Chinese blog, 2005
http://cg.17173.com/content/2005-1-29/n94_10658.html
首先，当然是得临机应变化身为各种身份。忍者的基本「七化」（是：出家、虚无僧、山伏、放下师、常之形、商人、猿乐师。「出家」，是一般光头和尚。「虚无僧」，头上戴着圆筒形竹笠，盖住整张脸孔；身上披着袈裟；颈上挂着托钵；边吹萧边化缘乞讨。「山伏」，在山野中修行的僧侣。「放下师」，相当于现代的街头艺人，表演魔术、特技、耍猴等。「常之形」，化身为在地农人或武士，条件是，必须会讲一口流利的当地方言。「商人」，就是卖药、卖糖的行商。「猿乐师」，江湖艺人。其它还有「变相术」、「变体术」、「变声术」等。

Typo [performer].  (Was just browsing around and happened to see it)

That said, I imagine the gloss should match the referenced entry for 七変化? (That's what I changed it to)

Stylistically I'd drop [his] and use 
  "dance in which the performer quickly changes clothes seven times"
for both entries, but I'm not going to mess with the other entry over style preferences.

Anyway, only here to warn about the typo, no personal stake in this.

I also changed the sense from [3] to [1], as the entry for 七変化 was re-ordered 2023-01-08.
~~ 
I got curious about the ninja reference and started researching the sources.  Best guess:
Some museum curator at the Iga-ryu Ninja Museum misheard/misread something somewhere, and put 七化 on a public-facing sign in a popular exhibit, which sat in place for the next 2 decades.  It gained little traction until someone thought to copy/paste the museum reference into wikipedia (August 2009, definitely more recent than the museum).  It then became a part of a bunch of students' wikipedia copy/paste homework assignments "give a presentation about ninjas".  And here we are.

Still not overly common, and I can't find 七化 in the 忍者 context, except as 七方出... 七化とも呼ばれ。 (The apparent Chinese Embassy of Japan hand-drawn 七化 entry being an odd exception...)

So, I'll leave my reference digging just in case this ever comes up again.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2106490">七変化・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2106490">七変化・1</xref>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>dance in which the perfotmer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+<gloss>dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>

not seeing any evidence for sense 2 in kokugos

@@ -12,6 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2106490">七変化・しちへんげ・3</xref>
-<gloss>kabuki dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>the seven common disguises of ninja</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2106490">七変化・3</xref>
+<field>&kabuki;</field>
+<gloss>dance in which the perfotmer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>

'nanabake' gives supporting hits in english for the ninja thing as well

Daijr, Koj, GG5

None of them mention ninja (the original submission quoted 忍者の大常識.)

@@ -12,0 +12,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2106490">七変化・しちへんげ・3</xref>
+<gloss>kabuki dance in which the dancer quickly changes his clothes seven times</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Ben Bullock put this in quoting a book of ninja terms. I guess it's too rare to bother about.
忍び六具	22

忍び六具	22

Entry created

Ben Bullock put this in quoting a book of ninja terms. I guess it's too rare to bother about.

0 ngrams, not in kokugos

Entry created

お粥を	47764	49.1%
おかゆを	49611	50.9%
お粥が	20017	50.6%
おかゆが	19547	49.4%

It's about 50/50.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ お粥　 │ 393,549 │ 44.0% │
│ 御粥　 │   3,529 │  0.4% │ - sK (not explicitly in refs)
│ おかゆ │ 497,463 │ 55.6% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

The expression isn't really common enough to warrant using rK tags I think

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>尻を捲る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -13,4 +15,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>尻を捲る</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Probably should make it visible.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

The 「尻を捲る」 headword appears in many refs (daijr/s, meikyo, shinmeikai, obunsha). Do we really want to hide it?

I was unsure about the しり reading for 穴, but I see daijr/s has it listed as a (俗) reading in their entries for けつ【穴／尻】. This reading isn't in jmdict, though.

I suggest this.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>穴を捲る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +16 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>穴を捲る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,2 +23 @@
-<reb>ケツをまくる</reb>
-<re_restr>ケツを捲る</re_restr>
+<reb>けつをまくる</reb>
@@ -25,2 +26,0 @@
-<re_restr>尻をまくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>尻を捲る</re_restr>
@@ -29,5 +29,2 @@
-<reb>けつをまくる</reb>
-<re_restr>尻をまくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>尻を捲る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>穴を捲る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>けつを捲る</re_restr>
+<reb>ケツをまくる</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

尻をまくる　 174 14.6%
ケツを捲る　 109  9.2%
尻を捲る　　  48  4.0%
穴を捲る　　   0  0.0% <- daijs; koj
穴をまくる　   0  0.0%
けつを捲る　   0  0.0% <- prog; meikyo redirect
しりを捲る　   0  0.0%
けつをまくる 136 11.4%
しりをまくる  38  3.2%
ケツをまくる 685 57.6%

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>穴を捲る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>けつを捲る</keb>
@@ -25,0 +32,2 @@
+<re_restr>穴を捲る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>けつを捲る</re_restr>

I think we can assume that the kanji form is rare. N-grams aren't much use here due to false positives.
We don't have a katakana form on とと.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,4 +9,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>オトト</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>

nikk

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御魚</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おとと</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11,1 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>fish (kid's talk)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
+<gloss>fish</gloss>

Entry created

I'm quite comfortable with having good coverage of 複合動詞. They may be obvious to native speakers but not necessarily to learners, and they are good for reverse lookups.
I see [rare] as more a signal to non-native speakers to use it with caution.
We have a couple of example sentences using this one.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
悼み悲しむ	114
憂い悲しむ	174

twitter for 憂い悲しむ
https://twitter.com/search?q=憂い悲しむ&src=typed_query

Examples of 憂い悲しむ used to define other terms:
憂愁
意味	憂い悲しむこと。心配して悲しむこと。
https://kokugo.jitenon.jp/word/p51782

憂戚（ゆうせき）
うれい悲しむこと。
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/憂戚/

ゆう‐しゅう〔イウシウ〕【憂愁】 の解説
うれえ悲しむこと。気分が晴れず沈むこと。「―に閉ざされる」
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/憂愁/#jn-224231


For Comparison on rarity(I happen to have just started studying 縋る): these *縋る entries are all in jmdict and in my J-J dictionary, likely because their meaning not so plainly obvious or directly derivable, but they appear no less rare than 悼み悲しむ and are not marked [rare] in jmdict:
泣き縋る	184
取り縋る	291
寄り縋る	77

When looking at dictionary definitions for another entry on grief (憂戚), I randomly encountered another *悲しむ example, 憂い悲しむ. Looking at the n-grams, it is even more common than this entry, is *also* frequently used to define other terms (its meaning is readily understood), and also does not appear in 国語辞典 as a standalone entry。 It's also common enough (but not super common) in a twitter search.

And, 憂い悲しむ is another term I can't imagine being added to this dictionary.　

For reference, my little 国語辞典 has zero entries ending in 悲しむ, which is to say that I don't think absence from 国語辞典 is an inherent statement on rarity for such terms.

Since this entry appears to be still open, and given some indication that I may not be the only one who feels [rare] is a bit incongruous, I'd lean towards deleting this entry over leaving it here as [rare].  

There seems to be some consensus that this entry might not be re-created today based on current criteria for entry. That said, I feel like there might be some preference to keep terms once they are already in here - I guess I am still feeling that out.  I won't be bothered one way or the other about how this turns out, but I will find it instructive to see what the final decision is here.

Brian makes a good point.
There are so many 複合動詞 out there, mostly with meanings that are obvious from their parts, that we tend not to add them unless they're common (or listed in a major dictionary).
Given that 悼み悲しむ is comparatively uncommon and easy to translate, it's not a particularly useful entry. I wouldn't object to dropping it. Brian rightly assumes that we would reject 悲しみ悼む.
I do think [rare] looks a little odd here. To me, the tag implies that if a native speaker were to come across the word in writing, they might raise an eyebrow or suggest replacing it with another. That probably wouldn't happen with 悼み悲しむ.

Thank you Jim and Marcus, I appreciate the feedback.  I will keep that github link in mind for the future, and re-evaluate my understanding of [rare] in this database.

As a final note on this (not advocating for a change) I asked a handful of Japanese students the difference between 死を悼む,　死を悲しむ, and 死を悼み悲しむ, and the immediate response (besides some laughter because they are all very similar and difficult to tease apart) is that 悼み悲しむ is "more serious".  It's just duplication, basically a grammatical combination of mourning + mourning = really mourning.  Japanese speakers don't need a dictionary entry for this.  You can also build it in reverse 悲しみ悼む, a structure that is marginally less common: 

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
悲しみ悼む	75
悲しみ悼んで	26

As a learner I wouldn't vote to remove this entry, as I've clearly found it instructive. But I also kind of wonder if it would be added today if it weren't already here. Usually when I encounter [rare] it is to downplay an eccentric entry from some 国語辞典.  In this case, jmdict seems to have bucked the j-j dictionaries by including 悼み悲しむ, only to end up tagging it [rare].  If I suggested adding 悲しみ悼む (I have no intentions of doing this, don't worry), for example, I assume it would be rejected outright for rarity, obviousness, and absence in existing 辞典.

Apologies for the final cluttering-up of this entry's history.  It included some stats on the reversed 悲し悼む and some reports of Japanese feedback that might have some small relevance. But this does not require a response, and I am not advocating any further edits to this entry.  Thanks again.

Just want to add, Brian, that suggestions/questions relating to policy (e.g. "what is [rare] supposed to convey?") are better suited for the github: https://github.com/JMdictProject

The edits have been approved.

I've finally had a chance to look at this in detail. I basically agree to doing a すく/とく split for 梳く, and to delting this entry. I've set up the edits for 梳.

Giant illustration with scissors reads 日常英語、（髪を）すく。Note the （髪を）is explicitly parenthetical. This is a resource for Japanese speakers learning English, and gives glosses [thin out], [could you thin out my hair] [Could you thin out a bit?] and lastly notes [reduce the volume (of my hair)]
「髪をすく】は英語で何て言う？「すきバサミ・髪をすいて」などの英語をご紹介
https://eigojin.com/2021/04/26/kamiwosuku/
髪のボリュームを減らす為に、刃の間隔が空いている梳き鋏（すきばさみ）を使って髪を切る事を日本語では「（髪の毛を）すく」を言いますが、英語では[thin out]などと表現します。


髪梳ける女 (すける I believe, which may be the potential form here - able-to-clean-her-hair-woman/prostitute). The "cleaning" meaning of すく。1920 painting of geisha/woman
http://hanga-museum.jp/collectionimage/list008

There may be something to the historic nature of すく.  Very few hits for 髪を梳く イラスト, but among them one is a kabuki dancer
イラスト素材：髪を梳く舞妓さん
https://www.ac-illust.com/main/detail.php?id=242125&word=髪を梳く舞妓さん

Just another random reference for すく = thinning/volume reducing.  Full title, uses kanji and kana forms, equates with definition... 
【髪の量を減らしたい！】髪が多い！すきたいけど髪は梳きすぎると逆に広がるの？
https://brace-ichi.com/?p=1225

Summary: I propose that this entry be deleted, and that 梳く（とく・すく） be split into two entries with updated glosses.  I think とかす should be singled out (perhaps with see=[] references) as the "common" verb for "to comb one's hair". 

=======

He's just one source, but for reference my barber is a mid-40s professional who runs his own neighborhood two-chair salon in Tokyo.

Just got back from the barber, presented him with: 梳る 梳かす 梳く。 To 梳る = くしけずる I got an "ああ、知らなかった"(he could not read it).  This was not only a case of kanji, but くしけずる is also uncommon.  That's already a separate entry though, so I won't dwell on it, but I suspect it could be reasonable marked [rare], as a different word for "combing hair" should almost certainly be used(とかす). (minimally, [see=とかす] should probably be added)

He read すく right off the bat.  It has to do with thinning/reducing volume, and is precisely tied to the meaning in スキバサミ。　If you ask 髪をすいてほしい, you should anticipate that thinning shears are involved.  For that reason, I've trimmed my "lighter hairstyle" suggested gloss, and returned to a more literal agreement with my J-J dictionary about "reduction in volume".

とく, he indicated, has the same/similar meaning as とかす(combing). It is used, but isn't so common(I said "this is rare?" and he corrected me "I wouldn't say rare, but...").  とかす seems to be the overwhelmingly common verb for simply combing one's hair. For reference, my J-J dictionary defines every other term here with a reference to とかす。

すく, with the meaning "to cut one's hair", is not a meaning he was at all familiar with, bordering on disbelief.

For the 3rd meaning of すく, "歯のこまかなくしで、髪の毛のふけやごみを取る", my barber wouldn't have given me this definition off the top of his head, but when I showed him the J-J dictionary entry, this is what he said(paraphrased Japanese): "Ah yes, during the Edo period they didn't have shampoo, you know, so the way they cleaned their hair of debris was to use a comb".  He appeared to be familiar with the meaning after-the-fact, but it would seem comparatively rare, and/or historical.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
くしけずる　　　487
髪をとかす　　　7045
髪をとく	　　　1794
髪をすく	　　　1713
髪をくしけずる　143
髪を解く	　　　669
髪をほどく　　　839

Note: をとく seems boosted by the overlapping を解く sense of "untangle", complicated by the reading of 解く as ほどく。

Previous conversations on this entry have discussed the relative statistical prevalence of とく and すく and how to order them.  I think the issue is that they have totally independent meanings, and so their popularity is not really comparable.  とく is a less-common way to say a popular activity (とかす, combing), and すく is the *best* way to say a somewhat less common activity (having your hair thinned at a salon).  Their n-gram counts coincidentally end up somewhat close together, but not because they are interchangeable variants. 

All that said, this is what I actually think makes sense.

First, I think *this* entry should be deleted for a few reasons:

1. When I look at the editorial policy, 髪をとかす・髪をとく pretty much fails every test for "is it worth including".  In particular, it is exactly what a learner would guess if they knew 髪 and とかす, and these aren't an exclusive pair (髪の毛をとかす is also quite common, but has no dictionary entry, for example).
http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Is_it_worth_including?

2. If we want to keep at least one entry for the "best" "to cut one's hair" with hair as a direct object, there is also an entry for 髪をとかす, and I think this the most common/useful form. 

3. I think whatever changes need to be made to split とく and すく would need to be applied almost identically to both this entry, and the 梳く（とく・すく）　standalone verb entry, and that the glosses will basically be carbon-copies of each other.  Forms like すいてほしい seem perfectly usable in a proper context without 髪を or 髪の毛を prepended. (and so a reader may see すいてほしい in a context disjoint from 髪, and look up　すく in the dictionary for an explanation.  In other words, I think the verb forms strongly include the sense of "hair" even in isolation).

Second, I would split 梳く（すく・とく）into independent entries 梳く（すく） and 梳く（とく）. They seem to each have a popular meaning （とく=とかす=combing), （すく=梳バサミ=cutting）. Their "rare" meanings may overlap with each other somewhat, but I think trying to keep them together with several [restr] provisos (as I have done in this entry) just adds confusion and makes them difficult to manage.

For 梳く(すく), I would do something like
[1] "(haircut) to thin, to reduce in volume"
see=すきばさみ
[2] carding, to remove debris from hair with a fine-toothed comb  (maybe [rare], maybe [hist], maybe not, possibly merits additional research)
[3] to comb (one's hair)[rare] [see=とかす]

For 梳く(とく), I imagine something like:
[1] To comb (one's hair); to untangle (one's hair) with a comb [see = とかす] [see =解く]

I'm not sure any other current gloss for 梳く applies to the とく reading.  My modest J-J dictionary has only one definition, which is とかす, but I imagine any other gloss, if included, would be [rare].

I've been somewhat sloppy writing out the glosses here, but if you want me to make an earnest attempt at splitting 梳く with an eye toward deleting this entry, I am happy to try.  But I don't want to go stepping on toes if there are objections. I also have no qualms if anyone else has changes they would be more comfortable making on their own.

Thank you in advance for your consideration and any feedback.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<stagk>髪をとく</stagk>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1598660">とかす</xref>
@@ -32,2 +34,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2535590">梳き鋏</xref>
-<gloss>(haircut) to thin, to reduce in volume, to give a lighter hair style</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535590">すきばさみ</xref>
+<gloss>(haircut) to thin, to reduce in volume</gloss>

三省堂国語辞典第七版
とく（梳く）
1. 髪のみだれを、くしでなおす。とかす。
＝＝＝
すく（梳く）
１。かみの毛をくしでとかす。
２。歯のこまかなくしで、髪の毛のふけやごみを取る
３。「ヘアカットで」かみの毛の量を減らす

15 minute video from a professional barber on being careful with the meaning of すく (if a customer asks for this, what do they really want...)
「髪をすく」の意味を動画でも解説してます
https://lecielb.com/2015/11/28/cut/
結果　すっきりさっぱりとボリュームも落ちることから
「すく」　＝　髪の量を減らす
のイメージが定着したんじゃないかなー　と。
僕の勝手な想像ですが
あ、あと　すきバサミは「梳き櫛」と形が似てますよね。
...
でも今や大半の人髪を少なく、軽くしたい時に「すいてください」　って言っちゃってるので定着しちゃってるわけですね。。
間違って。。(^_^;)
そう。　オーダーされてるお客様は
要するに「量を少なくしたい。そして軽くなりたい。」と思ってる。


髪を『梳く(すく)』ということは、毛量を減らしボリュームを抑えること。だけど、髪が少ない部位を梳くこともあります
https://shopblog.opus21.net/post-13623/

ためしてほしい！髪の毛のすき方【15のスタイル】からご紹介
https://www.biteki.com/hair/style/552428

Blog with illustrations. Girl goes for hair cut, asks "ちょっとすいて欲しい", loses more than she wanted...
【ヘアカット】髪がすかれすぎて悲しい…とならないように、『本当にすく？』髪を切る前は全身を鏡で見よう
https://nemutai-me.com/entry/2019/10/28/120141/2019-10-28-120141/
髪の根本が伸びてきてプリンになってたので、ヘアカラーとついでにカットもお願いしました。
…が、カットを頼むんじゃなかった…*****ちょっとすいて欲しい*****なんて言うんじゃなかった… [asterisks mine]
だってすかれすぎて変な頭になったから。

So many ways to comb one's hair.  Google image search for:
髪をとかす : Lots of women combing hair (seems to be the common verb)
髪をとく：Lots of women combing hair
髪をすく：Lots of images of the back sides of women's heads, *maybe* with a comb dangling in their hair, but generally with scissors at barber shops/salons

An even clearer image result might be:
髪のすき方 (lots of salons, lots of thinning shears)

I'm seeing consistent definitions from different references:
毛量を減らしボリュームを抑えること
かみの毛の量を減らす
髪の量を減らす

with the proviso that the professional barber says there is nuance involved here.  The web site with 15 techniques (髪の毛のすき方【15のスタイル】) shows that this isn't limited to "thinning" 
 the hair with thinning shears, and at a glance seems to agree with the barber that this is in general about having a "lighter", perhaps "more compact" hair style in general, however that is achieved. 

The thinning shears (梳き鋏 スキバサミ) kanji connection to reducing the volume of hair is relevant though (and the barber's blog/video notes it explicitly).

I see that my dictionary's definition (ごみを取る) is already present in the entry for 梳く。I briefly added a 3rd meaning here to encompass this, but I'm not sure if this has any actual utility in a 髪をすく entry.

It appears that the popular use of すく is for "lighter hair style".  My dictionary explicitly splits the とく and すく references in two.  While they have a theoretically shared meaning of "to brush ones hair", I suspect this is a common use for とく, but a rare use for すく。 In the standalone verb entries, it looks like すく（梳く） and とく（梳く）got split out in 2012, moving とく　to join 解く。　I don't know if it would be appropriate to split these two entries as well.

I'm getting a haircut with my regular Japanese barber this Friday, I'd be happy to ask for a professional opinion on this set of verbs if more clarity would be helpful.

@@ -27,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>髪を梳く</stagk>
+<stagk>髪をすく</stagk>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535590">梳き鋏</xref>
+<gloss>(haircut) to thin, to reduce in volume, to give a lighter hair style</gloss>
+</sense>

髪を梳く	3880
髪をすく	1713
髪をとく	1794
GG5 & Daijr only have すく.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>becoming soft (by melting)</gloss>
+<gloss>(melting and) becoming soft</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>creamily</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming soft (by melting)</gloss>

gg5, koj
とろっと	105353
トロッと	44599
トロっと	24337

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トロっと</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,3 +16,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1632190">とろとろ・1</xref>
-<gloss>to become syrupy</gloss>
-<gloss>to become thick (e.g. when cooking)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568350">とろり・1</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>thickly</gloss>
+<gloss>viscously</gloss>
+<gloss>stickily</gloss>
@@ -18 +24,6 @@
-<gloss>stickily</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568350">とろり・2</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>sleepily</gloss>
+<gloss>drowsily</gloss>
+<gloss>dozing off</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1632190">とろとろ・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1632190">とろとろ・1</xref>

I think this should have a spec tag.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12 +14 @@
-<gloss>minister of state</gloss>
+<gloss>minister (of a government department)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1940310">生息地</xref>

ハビタット	12695
ルミナス: 	(動植物の生息地) habitat

The old software system has long gone.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>Habitat</gloss>
+<gloss>habitat</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Managed object</gloss>
+<gloss>managed object</gloss>

Entry created

daijs

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>formula (milk)</gloss>
+<gloss>baby formula</gloss>
+<gloss>infant formula</gloss>
+<gloss>baby milk</gloss>

Entry created

お姫様抱っこ	35490	58.8%
お姫様だっこ	19984	33.1%
お姫さま抱っこ	2635	4.4%
お姫さまだっこ	1631	2.7%
御姫様抱っこ	137	0.2% not in kokugos
御姫様だっこ	60	0.1%
おひめさまだっこ	460	0.8%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,6 +16 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御姫様抱っこ</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御姫様だっこ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -28,4 +28,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1181050">横抱き</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1181050">横抱き</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>carrying a person in one's arms</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>carrying (someone) in one's arms</gloss>

@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>princess carry</gloss>
+<gloss>bridal carry</gloss>

I've gone along with the deletion of quite a few obscure ninja-terminology entries, but I can see non-manga WWW hits and images for this one. I think it may be worth keeping.

With ngrams as low as that, its likely from a specific manga or tv show. I don't think it should be an entry.

There's a modest amount of examples on twitter. Here are a few:
https://twitter.com/choco299/status/1278017602590175232
https://twitter.com/iga_raido/status/1284099358032453632
https://twitter.com/hisigurimero/status/1006888983782047744

A bit obscure, but it seems to be a real.
Hard to say if it was truly used by real ninjas, but the folklore definitely exists.

深草兎歩	No matches

There's a whole lot of absolute bullshit ninja entries (from the early days of the project I assume)

Entry created

feel that detail is kind of a given

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>forced relocation of a daimyo to a different domain by the Edo shogunate</gloss>
+<gloss>forced relocation of a daimyo to a different domain</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created