merged in from rejected 2841599

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懿徳</keb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>great virtue</gloss>

only nikkoku and my kanwa have this. i think that warrants [obsc] or [arch]

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

i agree. i think daijirin makes that rather clear.  OP was perhaps confused with 偉徳?

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス

I don't think I agree with this (anonymous, unreferenced) amendment. I think the point is it means *both* virtue and power/influence, etc.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>virtuousness, respectability, dignity, majesty</gloss>
+<gloss>virtue and influence</gloss>
+<gloss>virtue and authority</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>virtue and influence</gloss>
+<gloss>virtuousness, respectability, dignity, majesty</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

i think so

Daijr, GG5

Better?

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>the rest omitted (in quotes)</gloss>
+<gloss>remaining text omitted (in quotation)</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

questionable gloss

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かりゃく</reb>
+</r_ele>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18,1 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>a bulkhead</gloss>
+<gloss>bulkhead</gloss>
+<gloss>partition</gloss>
+<gloss>septum</gloss>
+<gloss>diaphragm</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/隔壁

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>a bulkhead</gloss>

copied from 前略  (this is a more formal version).  also refers to the act of omitting preliminaries, should that be indicated in another gloss/sense

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>letter salutation</gloss>
+<s_inf>formal salutation for a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>

koj, meikyo:
「かんせい」は誤読。

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かんせい</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

gg5, E-DIC

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>orderly</gloss>

definitely [io]

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>規則正い</keb>
+<keb>規則正しい</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,2 @@
-<keb>規則正しい</keb>
+<keb>規則正い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5

note that is perhaps useful or perhaps not but some of our entries already appear to have notes like this.
some reduction of sexist language.
questionable int?

@@ -13,1 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>Dear Sirs (opening for a letter)</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>letters that open with this usu. end with 敬白, 謹言, or 敬具</s_inf>
+<gloss>Dear Sir or Madam</gloss>
+<gloss>Dear Sirs</gloss>

koj, daij

questionable int?

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>when giving a gift, esp. if self-made</s_inf>
+<s_inf>when giving a gift, esp. if one's own work</s_inf>

shinmeikai
【謹呈】
－する （他サ）
〔自分の作った（関係した）物を〕
どうか お納めくださいと、差し上げること。


gg5 example
謹呈.　〔書籍に署名して〕 With the compliments of the author [publisher].

probably unneeded and could be replaced with a note like shinmeikai's

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>when giving a gift, esp. if self-made</s_inf>
@@ -16,5 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>when giving a book, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>with the author's compliments</gloss>
-</sense>

daij nikk only have one sense. do we really need sense 2?

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

顕在	362629	  
顕在化	293749	  
顕在化する	123721	  
顕在化して	46313	  
顕在化した	30403	  
顕在意識	33060

This is almost always part of 顕在化, which GG5 and 中辞典 use for examples.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1617900">顕在化</xref>

daij

This is a noun. It shouldn't have adjective glosses.

@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>actual (as opposed to hidden or obscured)</gloss>
-<gloss>obvious</gloss>
-<gloss>clear</gloss>
-<gloss>manifest</gloss>
-<gloss>explicit</gloss>
-<gloss>overt</gloss>
-<gloss>apparent</gloss>
-<gloss>evident</gloss>
-<gloss>actualized</gloss>
-<gloss>actualised</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1391310">潜在</xref>
+<gloss>being actual (as opposed to hidden or latent)</gloss>
+<gloss>being apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>being obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>being tangible</gloss>
+<gloss>being revealed</gloss>

daijr daijs
http://eow.alc.co.jp/顕在/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>clear</gloss>
+<gloss>manifest</gloss>
+<gloss>explicit</gloss>
+<gloss>overt</gloss>
+<gloss>apparent</gloss>
+<gloss>evident</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijr daijs

There are probably better ways to say this in some JEs.

@@ -17,3 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>manifesting</gloss>
-<gloss>displaying</gloss>
-<gloss>honouring</gloss>
+<gloss>honouring (publicly)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>making someone's good deeds or achievements well-known</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Better to get the point over with more glosses.

@@ -16,1 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>now (esp. in contrast to the past, e.g. "she is now a great star")</gloss>
+<gloss>now (esp. in contrast to the past)</gloss>
+<gloss>now at last</gloss>
+<gloss>at present</gloss>
+<gloss>right now</gloss>

Add nuance of “contrast to past”.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>now</gloss>
+<gloss>now (esp. in contrast to the past, e.g. "she is now a great star")</gloss>

"yours truly" is quite informal.
See comments on 1250740 regarding PoS.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary closing formula</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used at the end of a letter</s_inf>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>yours truly</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>Yours sincerely</gloss>
-<gloss>Yours truly</gloss>
-<gloss>Sincerely yours</gloss>
+<gloss>yours sincerely</gloss>
+<gloss>yours truly</gloss>
+<gloss>sincerely yours</gloss>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

I find "vs" a stretch.

gg5, prog, daij
獅子奮迅	        25513
獅子奮迅の	16022	
獅子奮迅し	269
獅子奮迅する	209

Only daijr has this as vs. Doesn't look right.
I think this is better glossed as an adjective. All the examples in the JEs and kokugos are 獅子奮迅の〜.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,4 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,3 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>being furiously vigorous</gloss>
-<gloss>being intensely forceful</gloss>
-<gloss>being unstoppable</gloss>
+<gloss>furious (energy, battle, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>frenzied (work, activity, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>ferocious</gloss>

[vi]: obunsha, sanseido kokugos

I think "irresistible" is somewhat ambiguous

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>being irresistible</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>being unstoppable</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I think the "mainly" is valid, and it gives some context.

Also used often in business Japanese. Is the note still necessary in light of this?

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>used mainly in letters</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used mainly in letters or email</s_inf>

Hardly in a reference.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 潤す　　 │ 127,139 │ 68.0% │
│ 霑す　　 │      52 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding (mentioned in a note in meikyo)
│ うるおす │  59,734 │ 32.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>霑す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr daijs

@@ -21,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I think this is just another way of expressing sense 1. For (virtually) all "adj-no", the の is often dropped, so the "n-pref" POS is not really needed.

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>superior (rank not class)</gloss>
+<gloss>superior (in rank)</gloss>
+<gloss>top</gloss>
@@ -19,4 +20,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<gloss>top (members of a ranking, e.g. top 3 companies)</gloss>

GG5 example

Add sense “top N (companies etc.)” – saw used as this in class, and “top N companies” specifically is a common pattern (in textbook, GG5, and our current example sentence).

@@ -21,0 +21,4 @@
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<gloss>top (members of a ranking, e.g. top 3 companies)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

Mainichi article use of 上位独占, 上位の独占 gets 300k hits.

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>ranking</gloss>

This edit had no case or reference. Without  a reason, I don't consider I should approve a change. Resubmit giving reasons and references.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>opening part of a letter</gloss>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog, wisdom

Added sense.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>preamble</gloss>
+<gloss>the above sentence</gloss>
+<gloss>the foregoing remark</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>the above statement</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>

I'm not sure how important that contextual information is but it's included in all the kokugos. It is quite a long gloss but I don't think it's overly wordy.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>opening part of a letter (used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.)</gloss>

My issue is that the edit removed the contextual information about the sense that I'm sure Robin intended to include. I didn't think it was overly wordy. If you disagree with that information, that's fine, but I think we need a case to be made that it's not correct or appropriate, and not just an excision.

In regards to the rejected suggestion,
"-<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>opening part of a letter</gloss>"
to which Jim responded:
"This edit had no case or reference. Without  a reason, I don't consider I should approve a change. Resubmit giving reasons and 
references."
Apologies, but doesn't many edits  really speak for themselves? I tried to simplify an overly wordy gloss. If you think the 
original gloss was better, by all means reject the suggestion.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statute, constitution, etc.)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog, wisdom

Added sense.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>preamble</gloss>
+<gloss>the above sentence</gloss>
+<gloss>the foregoing remark</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>the above statement</gloss>
+<gloss>preamble (to a statue, constitution, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>first part of a letter used for season's greetings, asking after someone's health, etc.</gloss>

been about three weeks.  i think no refs are forthcoming

That looks like another version of sense 1. Any references? If none are available, I'll drop this addition.

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>opening formula of a letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dearest</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

koj, daij, gg5, prog

combination of glosses from gg5 and prog.  nc helpfully offers ~no~ translation and says only that 英文手紙ではすぐ用件に入るのが普通なので, 「前略」にあたる正確な英語はない

@@ -14,2 +14,7 @@
-<gloss>first part omitted</gloss>
-<gloss>salutation of brief letter</gloss>
+<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>

Fork

I don't think this id an improvement

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

gg5, daijr

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>
+<s_inf>when quoting something</s_inf>
+<gloss>omitting the previous part</gloss>

Fork - sorry, I edited an earlier version.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>
+<s_inf>brief letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

gg5, daijr

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>skipping the pleasantries...</gloss>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>omitting the beginning</gloss>
+<s_inf>when quoting something</s_inf>
+<gloss>omitting the previous part</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Noted, but I don't think it added materially to this entry, whereas the notes in the 拝啓 and 敬具 entries did.

I was trying to bring this pair (戦略、早々) in line with the other correspondence pair (拝啓、敬具) which are currently and I think beneficially linked.
So if it’s not an improvement for the brief letter, why is it an improvement that adds value for the formal letter?
As in the case of 拝啓 & 敬具, 前略 & 早々 are always paired in an appropriately but quickly written letter.

I prefered it as it was before, which I think was more appropriate as a dictionary entry.

@@ -14,3 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
-<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>

Learn Japanese New College Text Volume II ©1984 John Young and Kimiko Nakajima-Okano, Chapter 14, Note 14.4.1, page 286.

Bringing the correspondence pairs in line with each other.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1596410">草々・2</xref>
+<s_inf>letters beginning with this typically end with 草々</s_inf>

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>admiring someone greatly</gloss>
-<gloss>taking off one's hat to someone</gloss>
+<gloss>admiring (someone) greatly</gloss>
+<gloss>taking one's hat off to</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23 +25 @@
-<gloss>"taking off one's hat" to someone</gloss>
+<gloss>taking off one's hat to someone</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス, etc.

@@ -19,0 +19,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>admiring someone greatly</gloss>
+<gloss>"taking off one's hat" to someone</gloss>
+</sense>

I think a clearer meaning or two would be helpful here.  i understand how it could be translated as "removing one's hat" -- although I've certainly seen that conveyed much more frequently as "taking one's hat off to (someone/something)".  "removing one's hat" sounds too literal to me, and could be confusing to someone who doesn't know the phrase.

But in the spirit of the example sentence, a helpful additional meaning (particularly for those not familiar with the phrase "to take one's hat off to") might be something like "expressing admiration/respect for".

I think that's worth doing.

@@ -27,3 +27,3 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>dressing oneself</gloss>
-<gloss>putting on clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>embezzlement</gloss>
+<gloss>misappropriation</gloss>
+<gloss>pocketing</gloss>
@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>embezzlement</gloss>
-<gloss>misappropriation</gloss>
-<gloss>pocketing</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>dressing oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>putting on clothes</gloss>

Except gg5, all the JEs only have the second "embezzlement" sense. The one example sentence is also for that sense, as are a majority of the reverso sentences. Perhaps the sense order should be switched?

@@ -35,0 +36,2 @@
+<gloss>misappropriation</gloss>
+<gloss>pocketing</gloss>

meikyo 2e

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -31,0 +34 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 追伸　　 │ 593,924 │ 99.5% │
│ 追申　　 │   2,881 │  0.5% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, meikyo)
│ ついしん │   2,857 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>post scriptum P.S.</gloss>
+<gloss>post scriptum</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>P.S.</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>P.S.</gloss>
+<gloss>post scriptum P.S.</gloss>

@@ -44,0 +44,1 @@
+<gloss>doing as one pleases</gloss>
@@ -46,3 +47,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>being peerless</gloss>
-<gloss>having no equal</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>peerless</gloss>
+<gloss>incomparable</gloss>
+<gloss>superlative</gloss>
@@ -53,0 +55,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

daijr daijs
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=天下&dtype=3&dname=2na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=02943400

Not sure on daijr 4 and daijr/daijs 8, so I left them out.
Sense 6 is apparently always used in the construction "天下の"; I'm not sure if that should be adj-no, or just have a note, or what.

@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>てんが</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>てんげ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,4 +24,9 @@
-<gloss>the world</gloss>
-<gloss>whole country</gloss>
-<gloss>descent from heaven</gloss>
-<gloss>having one's own way</gloss>
+<gloss>the whole world</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the whole country</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>society</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +34,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>supremacy over a nation</gloss>
+<gloss>government of a country</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +41,14 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>having one's own way</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>being peerless</gloss>
+<gloss>having no equal</gloss>
+<gloss>world-famous</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>shogun (Edo period)</gloss>
+</sense>

Not sure about that. Both 中辞典 and ルミナス have stupid/foolish for that sense.

@@ -53,0 +54 @@
+<gloss>to be foolish</gloss>

Wording was a bit strong here. Not necessarily used as an insult.

@@ -51 +50,0 @@
-<gloss>to be stupid</gloss>

I've looked at this a few times. I think it's really part of sense 1 - I don't think it should go in one of its own.

I understand that アルコールが抜ける or 酒が抜ける means "alcohol leaves the body," i.e. to sober up, no longer have an effect. Just leaving a comment here if you want to fit that in somewhere.

Daijr, GG5

@@ -11,2 +11,8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Very sincerely yours</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1493570">不宣・ふせん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1493570">不宣・ふせん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1493570">不宣・ふせん</xref>
+<gloss>I'll write again soon (closure for a letter, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>more anon</gloss>
+<gloss>sincerely yours</gloss>
+<gloss>yours truly</gloss>

in gg5 and meikyo, so probably not arch

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

"house arrest" is too specific. I think it comes from an example sentence.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>house arrest</gloss>

No sign of a source. I'll remove it.

@@ -23,1 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>depressed feeling</gloss>

Is there a source for the "depressed feeling" gloss? Daijr/daijs and ALC don't seem to have anything like that.

GG5, 新和英中辞典

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>liaison committee</gloss>
+<gloss>liaison council</gloss>

gg5, prog, ルミナス
こう着状態	15968
膠着状態	        79638

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>こう着状態</keb>
+<keb>膠着状態</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>膠着状態</keb>
+<keb>こう着状態</keb>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>standstill</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>impasse</gloss>
+<gloss>standoff</gloss>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Not sure why かって is restricted to 曾て only.
daijr: 近世以降「かって」と発音されることもある
daijs: 近世以降「かって」ともいう。
smk: 口頭語では「かって」と言う向きもあるが 本来は誤り


曽て	1,597  -- adding (daijr/s, koj, smk, etc.)

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>曽て</keb>
@@ -22 +25,0 @@
-<re_restr>曾て</re_restr>

嘗て	79638
かつて	5837059
かつてあった	29810
嘗てあった	473
曾てあった	No matches

I've seen 嘗て in old texts, but never anything 
modern i don't thonm

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

djr;djs;prog3e

Added "used with neg. verb" note to sense 2 because previously 
with the parentheses it only seemed to apply to "never yet" but 
not "never before" etc.

@@ -37 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>never yet (with negative verb)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>never yet</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

koj, daij, etc.

proposed split.  そうそう is adv-ni ~only~.  only はやばや is adv-to.

@@ -6,1 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -18,4 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はやばや</reb>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -23,3 +18,5 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>early</gloss>
-<gloss>all in good time</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<gloss>as soon as...</gloss>
+<gloss>just after...</gloss>
+<gloss>immediately after...</gloss>
@@ -28,1 +25,4 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. as 早々に</s_inf>
+<gloss>hurriedly</gloss>
+<gloss>in haste</gloss>
@@ -31,5 +31,1 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>そうそう</stagr>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>just- (opened, started, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>early</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

koj, daij

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2041710">一筆啓上</xref>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
+<s_inf>often used in letters, e.g. as an opening phrase</s_inf>

gg5

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>small quantity</gloss>

koj, daij, etc.

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16,6 @@
+<gloss>cut end</gloss>
+<gloss>edge (of a page, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1643480">大口・おおぐち・3</xref>
@@ -18,2 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>(cut) end</gloss>
-<gloss>edge</gloss>
+<gloss>small sum</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22,1 +29,7 @@
-<gloss>section</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1267680">虎口</xref>
+<gloss>tiger's den</gloss>
+<gloss>jaws of death</gloss>
+<gloss>dangerous place</gloss>

gg5, prog

I believe only sense 3 is adj-no.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>mouth opened wide</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +26,2 @@
+<gloss>bragging</gloss>
+<gloss>boasting</gloss>
@@ -33 +34 @@
-<gloss>large sum</gloss>
+<gloss>large quantity</gloss>

@@ -31,0 +31,1 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1639840">小口・こぐち・2</xref>
@@ -32,0 +33,1 @@
+<gloss>large sum</gloss>

this sense ordering is closer to that in all of my refs

@@ -20,5 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>large amount</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -33,0 +28,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>large amount</gloss>
+</sense>

gloss to note and fake note to gloss
questionable int?

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>salutation of a formal letter of response (in reply to your letter, Dear Sir, Dear Madam, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>salutation of a formal letter of response</s_inf>
+<gloss>Dear Sir or Madam, in reply to your letter ...</gloss>

松脂	31,006	53.5%	
松ヤニ	13,954	24.1%	
松やに	10,799	18.6%	-sK
まつやに	2,184	3.8%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>松脂</re_restr>
-<re_restr>松やに</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まつヤニ</reb>
-<re_restr>松ヤニ</re_restr>

医学英和辞典

Nothing wrong with "turpentine".

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>turpentine</gloss>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>turpentine</gloss>
+<gloss>(pine) resin</gloss>

gg5

current gloss to a note (if needed at all). another questionable "int"?

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>term used in closing a formal letter</gloss>
+<s_inf>term used in closing a letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>respectfully yours</gloss>

Aligning with 敬具.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1242070">謹啓</xref>
@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>Yours Sincerely</gloss>
+<gloss>yours sincerely</gloss>
+<gloss>sincerely yours</gloss>
+<gloss>yours truly</gloss>

koj, daij, nikk for readings

another questionable int according to the kokugos

@@ -10,0 +10,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けいびゃく</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けいひゃく</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

I agree with Rene; this isn't really needed now.

with the rewriting of 通り, to account for things like flow, i think this entry is no longer necessary.  通り applies to so many senses it would be a mess to account for them all.  i suggest deletion of this, 通りのいい, 通りが悪い, 通りの悪い, etc, etc.  eijiro doesn't even both with them

Adding cross-references to expanded とおり

@@ -26,0 +26,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1432920">通り・とおり・3</xref>
@@ -31,0 +32,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1432920">通り・とおり・5</xref>

新和英中辞典

Tidying

@@ -26,1 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>pass (run) well (wind through a building, water through a pipe, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>pass well (wind through a building, water through a pipe, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>run well</gloss>

〈絞（り）／搾（り）／しぼり／シボリ〉〈込／こ〉ん

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 絞り込ん　 │ 2,539,465 │ 99.2% │
│ 絞りこん　 │    11,369 │  0.4% │ - sK
│ 絞込ん　　 │     2,513 │  0.1% │ - sK
│ しぼり込ん │       845 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 搾り込ん　 │       386 │  0.0% │ - rK (koj, gg5)
│ 搾りこん　 │       114 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 搾込ん　　 │         0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ しぼりこん │     4,057 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<keb>搾り込む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,3 +22 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>搾り込む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +30 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

ok

not [oK]
搾 is 常用 and 搾る is not uncommon

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +21,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27 +24,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Here goes.

@@ -5,1 +5,4 @@
-<reb>メアリ</reb>
+<reb>ミアリー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミアリ</reb>
@@ -8,1 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>sometimes メアリ</s_inf>
@@ -11,4 +15,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Mary</gloss>
-</sense>

it might be worth having as that.  i'm not fussy about this one way or the other.

http://tangoro.com/merely has メアリ. So does http://zero.blush.jp/J/l.html
http://uminosoto.exblog.jp/1312412

A few hits, but most WWW examples of メアリ = merely come from EDICT.
Either we delete it, or we add "ミアリー/ミアリ", because that occurs too.
ミアリー gets 9k hits. We could do an entry for it, with a note "sometimes メアリ".

Mary should be in ENAMDICT. Any evidence for merely?

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

ルミナス, 中辞典

The JEs all explain it a little.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<s_inf>used to start a brief letter or note</s_inf>
-<gloss>Just a short note to tell you ...</gloss>
-<gloss>This will just be a short note</gloss>
+<s_inf>beginning a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>this will just be a short note</gloss>
+<gloss>I'm writing to tell you</gloss>

daijs

I don't think the note needs to be so long.
Should the glosses be all lower case?

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
-<s_inf>set formula of greeting used by a man at the beginning of a brief note</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used to start a brief letter or note</s_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>This will just be a short note.</gloss>
+<gloss>This will just be a short note</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Focussing xref.

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001330">おっかない</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1001330">おっかない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001330">おっかない・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001330">おっかない・1</xref>

Entry created

also, 粛白 is another opener, not a closer.  so there's no way the note is true

@@ -17,1 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1337770">粛白</xref>
@@ -19,1 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>used in starting letters finished with 粛白</s_inf>

reading from daij

probably not (arch)... on japan post list and in meikyo.
questionable int?  (also, i think i am beginning to recall having gone through this list from japan post before...)

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しゅっけい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -15,1 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1352590">上位</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1352590">上位・1</xref>

Entry created

The ネコ目 in that ref is indeed read ねこめ.

@@ -16,5 +16,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>cat eye (syndrome)</gloss>
-<gloss>leukocoria</gloss>
-</sense>

I don't have access to the dic referenced, but I had a hard 
time finding any references for the cat eye syndrome, except 
this 
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q102
5312560
but I'm wondering if it isn't read ねこめ? and written with 
the 猫 kanji, rather than ネコ?

医学英和辞典

@@ -16,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cat eye (syndrome)</gloss>
+<gloss>leukocoria</gloss>
+</sense>

this is redundant.  it is NOT redundant for 食肉類="carnivores (i.e. animals of the order Carnivora)", because "carnivore" can mean "member of order Carnivora (inc. things like pandas that don't eat meat)" or "things that only eat meat"

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>Carnivora (animals of the order Carnivora)</gloss>
+<gloss>Carnivora</gloss>

daijr, koj

Used at the end of a letter, not the start.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>Dear Sir or Madam</gloss>
-<gloss>Dear Sirs</gloss>
-<gloss>Gentlemen</gloss>
+<gloss>yours sincerely</gloss>
+<gloss>sincerely yours</gloss>
+<gloss>yours truly</gloss>

koj, daij, meikyo

glosses copied from 謹啓

gg5, japan post list, example sentences in kokugos for 謹んで or 謹む, 54200 hits

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Respectfully yours</gloss>
+<gloss>respectfully yours</gloss>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5

choosing to put original meaning last (contrary to gg5 and kokugos) because it is the only sense in meikyo and eijiro (therefore probably more common in modern japanese)

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<gloss>Respectfully yours</gloss>
+<gloss>respectfully yours</gloss>

Hanntaigo list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

koj, gg5 (entry for 頓首)

koj, japan post list

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5

copied from はいふく

nikk

perhaps arch/obsc

koj, daij

Aligning w Robin's edit to 前略

@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>opening formula of a brief letter</s_inf>
-<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>at the beginning of a brief letter</s_inf>
+<gloss>dispensing with the preliminaries ...</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>
+<gloss>forgive me for dispensing with the preliminaries, but I hasten to inform you that...</gloss>

daijr

copied from 前略

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>早々</keb>
+</k_ele>

koj, daijr, daijs

worth keeping separate from 1596420 based on it being archaic and used as an imperative

proposed split based on this being adv-to and そうそう being adv-ni.

新和英中辞典, リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro
Mainichi: 生産の自由が合法的なものになり、企業の活動、株式化、民有化が推進されています

Mainichi: 税制両院協で、飲食料品非課税が合意に至らなかったことは残念だ

GG5, Eijiro

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro

koj

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス, Eijiro

Eijiro
Mainichi: しかし、仮設住宅の室内暖房は、こたつと電気カーペットだけ

I think these glosses are fine.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>maintenance of safety</gloss>
-<gloss>safety guarantee</gloss>
+<gloss>guarantee of safety</gloss>

GG5 extract (安全 entry):
安全確保 maintenance [a guarantee] of safety.
- 安全確保のため for (extra) safety; to ensure safety
- 安全確保支援活動 support activities for ensuring security.

Constructive suggestions welcome.

I feel this entry could be improved

Eijiro, JLD
Mainichi: しかし、交渉決裂が今後の両国関係に少なからず影を落とす可能性も否定できない。

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Eijiro

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Eijiro

koj, daij, gg5, eij

daij, gg5, eij

gg5, eij

gg5, eij

gg5, eij

gg5, eij

koj, gg5, eij

koj, daij, gg5

daijr daijs

eij, gg5

might be adj-no

@@ -14,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>visuospatial</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, yahoo enc