gg5, prog, daij, koj

なにとも is a separate entry in the kokugos with different (archaic) meanings.
I think "quite" could be misleading.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なにとも</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -21 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>quite</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
+<gloss>awfully</gloss>
@@ -29,3 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>nothing</gloss>
-<gloss>not a bit</gloss>
-<gloss>not at all</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) anything</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) at all</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) a bit</gloss>

Looks better.

prog, nc, gg5

i'm rather sure 共 is the wrong とも

@@ -10,3 +10,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>何共</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なにとも</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -21,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>nothing (with neg. verb)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +22,8 @@
+<gloss>really</gloss>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>with neg. verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>nothing</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +31,1 @@
+<gloss>not at all</gloss>

Hi, the layout of this entry seems to imply that the "not a bit" meaning occurs with an affirmative verb. Is that right, or should "not a bit" fall within the scope of "with neg. verb"?

n-grams
私共	15993
私ども	95668
馬鹿ども	1727
馬鹿共	588

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5 daijr koj

Add [derog] to second person sense (as in 野郎共) – it’s not extremely strong, but it is rather insulting.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>

that works for me

submitted an entry for ともにする, so removing vs

@@ -25,1 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -32,1 +31,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Daijirin, GG5, 新和英中辞典

Splitting as per the refs. A bit subtle.
I really doubt 供に belongs here, however I see a few refs such as the 実用日本語表現辞典 say "「共に」と同じ。「供に」は当て字。" In expressions such as "供に従える" it's really got its follower/attendant sense.

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>倶に</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,2 +26,18 @@
-<gloss>sharing with</gloss>
-<gloss>participate in</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>together</gloss>
+<gloss>jointly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>often as ...とともに</s_inf>
+<gloss>at the same time</gloss>
+<gloss>with</gloss>
+<gloss>as ...</gloss>
+<gloss>including</gloss>
+<gloss>along with</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,5 +45,0 @@
-<gloss>alike</gloss>
-<gloss>together</gloss>
-<gloss>along with</gloss>
-<gloss>with</gloss>
-<gloss>including</gloss>

Also written 供に, with slight nuance difference (“as an attendant/servant” esp.)

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>供に</keb>

大辞泉 大辞林

@@ -18,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>original document</gloss>
+<gloss>original document (not a copy or adaptation)</gloss>
+<gloss>book in its original language (esp. a European language)</gloss>

gg5

That sort of information doesn't normally go in a note.

@@ -38,2 +38 @@
-<s_inf>of public transport</s_inf>
-<gloss>to run (between)</gloss>
+<gloss>to run (between; of a rail service, bus route, etc.)</gloss>

Many are for sense 8 - perhaps it should be earlier.

I'll approve, but reopen to remind me to work on example sentences. There are 209 but only 
one sense linked.

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Word change to clarify meaning – this is specifically for moving for a *new* job, not for a new posting within an existing company (which is 転任 instead).

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>moving to a different location to start a new job</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+<gloss>ersatz (object)</gloss>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>companion</gloss>
+<gloss>companion (e.g. book)</gloss>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>accesso ry</gloss>
+<gloss>accessory</gloss>

prog

@@ -25,0 +26,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>accompaniment</gloss>
+<gloss>companion</gloss>
+<gloss>complement</gloss>
+<gloss>accesso ry</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>comrade</gloss>

See comment on 1234250.

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,0 +10,1 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -29,0 +30,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

meikyo, prog, etc.

i think きょう is kanwa (only kojien has it).

@@ -10,3 +10,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>きょう</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,6 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>both</gloss>
-<gloss>all</gloss>
-<gloss>and</gloss>
-<gloss>as well as</gloss>
-<gloss>including</gloss>
-<gloss>with</gloss>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
@@ -24,1 +16,0 @@
-<stagr>きょう</stagr>
@@ -26,2 +17,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>communism</gloss>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<gloss>same</gloss>
@@ -30,3 +21,9 @@
-<stagr>とも</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>neither (with negative verb)</gloss>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>both</gloss>
+<gloss>all</gloss>
+<gloss>neither</gloss>
+<gloss>none</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>including ...</gloss>

Possibly arch.

Koj and nikk say "凶器に同じ。"

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───╮
│ 凶具 │ 0 │
│ 兇具 │ 0 │
╰─ーー─┴───╯

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1591540">凶器</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

koj, google hits

gg5, daijr

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>strong belief</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>strong belief (of the judge)</gloss>

gg5, daij, meikyo ..

all my dicts keep 心証 and 心象 separate.
心象 already has its entry (2647240)

@@ -7,5 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>心象</keb>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf28</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,2 +9,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf28</re_pri>
@@ -21,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>strong belief</gloss>
+<gloss>conviction</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>usu. with vol. verb or adj. stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. with volitional verb or adj. stem</s_inf>

I think "also as" is a good translation for certain cases e.g.
daijs:
"エステティック
《「エステティク」「エステティーク」とも》"

Could this note be clarified? "usu. with vol. verb or adj. stem" 
I think "vol. verb" is a little cryptic. Volume verb? Voluminous verb? Verb describing volume?

And the note [note="sometimes esp. an emphatic form of the particle と"] as well - isn't "sometimes esp." a little clumsy?

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<gloss>also as</gloss>

If there has to be a (real) gloss...

@@ -42 +42 @@
-<gloss>emphatic particle</gloss>
+<gloss>well</gloss>

No longer working.

@@ -41,4 +40,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008490">と・4</xref>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>origin(al)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>origin</gloss>
@@ -18,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>first</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>starting point</gloss>

I liked the second version. It was getting encyclopedic.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">the second of three official classes in Japan in 1868-1947, consisting of former samurai; ranked above commoners but not afforded any special priveleges</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">the second of three official classes in Japan in 1869-1947, consisting of former samurai</gloss>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">the second of three classes in Japan in 1868-1947, consisting of former samurai</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">the second of three official classes in Japan in 1868-1947, consisting of former samurai; ranked above commoners but not afforded any special priveleges</gloss>

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>shizoku (the second of three classes in Japan in 1868-1947)</gloss>
+<gloss>shizoku</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">the second of three classes in Japan in 1868-1947, consisting of former samurai</gloss>

Kojien
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shizoku

@@ -12,3 +12,9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1195580">華族・かぞく</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1195580">華族・かぞく</xref>
-<gloss>family or person with samurai ancestors</gloss>
+<gloss>family of samurai lineage</gloss>
+<gloss>person with samurai ancestors</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1709200">族称</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1709200">族称</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>shizoku (the second of three classes in Japan in 1868-1947)</gloss>

-gg5 gives the second sense, but no examples of its usage.  i think they may be confused.
-vs unnecessary, as せんする entries have been added

@@ -8,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>撰</keb>
@@ -20,1 +17,1 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2244150">撰・せん</xref>
@@ -23,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>choosing</gloss>
+<gloss>picking</gloss>
@@ -25,7 +24,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>compilation</gloss>
-<gloss>editing</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5, 研究社中辞典

* Add [n-suf] – used as suffix (as in GG5)
* Add [vs] – seems to be used, given in 中辞典 （as 選をする）
* Add 撰 – frequently used, and AFAICT used pretty interchangeably with 選 (I see 撰 on food a lot, as in 和菓撰 (“select wagashi”) at FamilyMart, and on some nattō).
* I don’t know that there’s any difference in usage of 撰, so no notes/glosses to that effect – maybe a bit more used for poetry (per dicts), but it seems to get plenty of use in food, say.

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>撰</keb>
@@ -16,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +27,2 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Daijr, GG5

I think the note is better in the gloss.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>Fortune telling result at shrine omikuji (fortune slips)</s_inf>
-<gloss>good luck to come</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270440">御神籤・おみくじ</xref>
+<gloss>good luck to come (omikuji fortune-telling result)</gloss>
+<gloss>future good luck</gloss>

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

Replace definitions with simple “good luck to come”, which is the literal definition and what is given in all the dictionaries I looked at.
Other definitions (“uncertain, will become apparent”) don’t seem supported.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>uncertain luck (as a fortune telling result)</gloss>
-<gloss>luck which will become apparent as time passes</gloss>
+<s_inf>Fortune telling result at shrine omikuji (fortune slips)</s_inf>
+<gloss>good luck to come</gloss>

for better or worse, none of the other potential みくじ fortunes link to that entry

@@ -12,2 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270440">おみ籤</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1270440">御神籤</xref>

update xref if edit goes through

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1578040">共・とも・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1578040">共・とも・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578040">共・とも・3</xref>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1578040">共・とも</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578040">共・とも・1</xref>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>an unspecified day of the month, used on diplomas, proclamations, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>unspecified day of the month (used to obscure the date a letter, invitation, etc. was written)</gloss>

https://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/comments/9yxm9e/what_does_it_mean_when_吉_is_used_in_a_date_like/

Not sure if actually common

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577870">吉日・2</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>an unspecified day of the month, used on diplomas, proclamations, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Daijr

Again, better to have the omikuji mention in the gloss, plus xref.
I wondered about きつ, but I see Koj has it for this meaning.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<s_inf>particularly at shrines in omikuji (fortune strips)</s_inf>
-<gloss>good fortune</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270440">御神籤・おみくじ</xref>
+<gloss>good fortune (esp. omikuji fortune-telling result)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>auspiciousness</gloss>

Perhaps a note?

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<s_inf>sometimes confused with 選</s_inf>

all kokugo dics (gg5 may be confused in their entry for 選?)

no, they aren't the same.  the difference is: 撰 is anthology of poetry; 選 is the selecting of anything

@@ -12,0 +12,4 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1956560">選・せん・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1956560">選・せん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1956560">選・せん・1</xref>
@@ -13,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>compilation</gloss>
+<gloss>collection</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>compilation</gloss>

* These seems identical to 選 basically an older variant, and used pretty interchangeably in compounds AFAICT.
* If 撰／選 really are different, could the distinction be clarified?
* (They should probably be linked to each other regardless.)

My version of shinmeikai doesn't give a PoS for this. But I see that 遅くとも is 〘副〙 in daijr and koj so I'll put it back. Can probably drop exp as well.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

shinmeikai
はやくとも【早くとも】
（副）

are we sure it's not an adverb?

gg5

Not an adverb.
I don't think we need an x-ref to とも.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1632180">とも・3</xref>
@@ -15,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>at the soonest</gloss>

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1632180">とも</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1632180">とも・3</xref>

Entry created

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>with ...</gloss>

koj

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぐち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

gg5

also, i think gg5's glosses are more accurate.  e.g.
魚を骨ごと食う means "eat a fish, bones and all", not "eat the whole bones", etc.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>with the rest</gloss>
-<gloss>all of</gloss>
-<gloss>the whole</gloss>
+<gloss>including...</gloss>
+<gloss>inclusive of</gloss>
+<gloss>...and all</gloss>

koj, gg5

almost certain the wrong uk was applied here

@@ -9,1 +9,0 @@
-<re_inf>&uK;</re_inf>
@@ -13,0 +12,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>mental picture</gloss>

thanks.  i didn't catch the duplication because 心証 (not 心象) shows up in the list of "did you mean ..." entries

moving priority data from entry 1595150

@@ -6,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf28</ke_pri>
@@ -9,0 +11,2 @@
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf28</re_pri>

koj, daij, gg5

provide refs, please

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>mental image, image</gloss>
+<gloss>mental image</gloss>
+<gloss>image</gloss>

Trimming comment.

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<s_inf>Generally used in various wording for 'to use, to spend, to waste', esp. money, as in 'spend money like water'.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as in 'spend money like water'</s_inf>
+<gloss>like water</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +20,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">like water</gloss>

common enough, but standard use of ごとく, especially now that sense 2 of 湯水 is spelled out in detail.  i can take it or leave it

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2653950">湯水のように使う</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1774260">湯水・2</xref>

英辞郎

Alt. form (more literary – 如く for ように)

koj, daij, gg5

koj, daij

GG5

gg5, daijr

http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=整備計画
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/整備計画

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>maintenance plan</gloss>
+<gloss>maintenance schedule</gloss>
+<gloss>maintenance program</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, Eijiro

GG5, 新和英中辞典, Eijiro

Eijiro, 1.3M hits

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>question asked in the negative (e.g. "Can't you read Japanese?")</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">question asked in the negative (e.g. "Can't you read Japanese?")</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/疑問文

* Promote
* Add pos [n]
* Add [ling] tag
* Add eg sentence
We studied these in class today, and I asked sentence what they were called; after a moment’s thought, he replied with this (confirmed by WP and fact that there’s an WI4 entry for it).

Tsk, tsk. No reading.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいぎょうそう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2654350">行草・ぎょうそう</xref>

GG5, 新解さん, 400k+ Google hits

A little rewording.
The kokugos all put the plant first. GG5 only has the plant.

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>headdress worn in kyogen to indicate a female character (being played by a man), a white sash tied around the head, with ends hanging down and tucked into belt</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654360">実葛・さねかずら</xref>
+<gloss>scarlet kadsura (Kadsura japonica)</gloss>
@@ -16,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>a type of flower (Kadsura japonica)</gloss>
+<gloss>white sash tied around the head, with ends hanging down and tucked into belt, worn in kyogen to indicate a female character being played by a man</gloss>

大辞林、広辞苑

This is a distinctive item in kyōgen (just used on NHK program tonight); 大辞林 has a good picture.

Hope definition is ok – it’s a bit intricate to describe, b/c it’s so unfamiliar (I’ve omitted minor details, like the knob/horn-like bits at the top).

I wonder if the 葛（かずら） is a corruption/respelling of 鬘 “headdress, wig”, which makes more sense etymologically.

I think one gloss is enough.
I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -12,4 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2011350">少子化</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2086740">高齢化</xref>
-<gloss>decreasing birthrate and aging population</gloss>
-<gloss>aging population combined with a diminishing number of children</gloss>
+<gloss>declining birth rate and aging population</gloss>

Yes

too many glosses

@@ -15,4 +15 @@
-<gloss>aging population combined with the diminishing number of children</gloss>
-<gloss>declining birthrate and a growing proportion of elderly people</gloss>
-<gloss>dwindling birthrate and an aging population</gloss>
-<gloss>low birthrate and longevity</gloss>
+<gloss>aging population combined with a diminishing number of children</gloss>

Corrected minor grammatical error on the note.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>だ after certain verb forms; indicate past or completed action</s_inf>
+<s_inf>だ after certain verb forms; indicates past or completed action</s_inf>

No comments. Closing. As it happens no sentence index changes are needed.

Implementing the suggestion made in entry 2089020 (だ). The note on sense #1 is probably not needed.
If this is approaved I'll probably have to reindex a lot of sentences.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2089020">だ・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2089020">だ・2</xref>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2089020">だ・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2089020">だ・3</xref>

I do too. At the worst they are harmless.

should be part of an entry for た. merge

http://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/た under 助動詞
xref た [aux-v]

Special conjugation: だろ,○,だ,だ,だら,○
Used after v5g, v5n, v5b, v5m
だらば form rarely used

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>

I wonder about the "aux". UniDic has "助詞,接続助詞" for this. I guess "aux" covers a multitude of sins.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
@@ -10,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate continuing action</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>

actually, come to think of it, れる and られる could be merged with a note.  they're already sufficiently well-documented.

they have to be merged because one is merely an alternate pronunciation of the other that occurs with certain verb forms. れる and られる are clearly more divergent than て and で.

in addition, there is already an existing entry for で, and we try to avoid having entries with identical headword/reading combos.

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>で</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,1 @@
+<s_inf>で after certain verb forms</s_inf>

If these 2 needs to be merged as RENE suggested, I have no 
idea why れる・られる　or せる・させる are not merged.

All these require to follow complicated conjugation rule but 
the same word for each.

Criteria for an entity is a bit unclear.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>で</reb>

daijr, daijs

Changed [aux] to [prt] as it is classed as a 接続助詞. Completely changing glossary as "Indicates continuing action" will likely lead anyone learning of this word through this entry to think of a continuous verb rather than a conjunction.
Senses are based on the references listed, mainly daijr, they are not absolutely exhaustive but these should be the main ones. I opted to make [1] what it is as most other senses can be imposed upon it by context.

If accepted, I would like to suggest deleting the 5th sense of the entry on ～で that leads here: it is same word and the changes to notes in this entry should make it unnecessary.

@@ -8,4 +8,39 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>
-<s_inf>で after certain verb forms</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms plain conjunction; 1-7 become ～で after godan verbs ending in ぐ, む, ぶ or ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>and...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in order of occurrence</s_inf>
+<gloss>and then...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in causal relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and because of that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in instrumental relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and through that... (preceding sentence is the means by which following sentence takes place)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms contrastive conjunction</s_inf>
+<gloss>but...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577980">いる・3</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to connect verbs to auxiliary verbs or to form compound verbs</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>used at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to make a request</gloss>

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>

I wonder about the "aux". UniDic has "助詞,接続助詞" for this. I guess "aux" covers a multitude of sins.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
@@ -10,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate continuing action</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>

actually, come to think of it, れる and られる could be merged with a note.  they're already sufficiently well-documented.

they have to be merged because one is merely an alternate pronunciation of the other that occurs with certain verb forms. れる and られる are clearly more divergent than て and で.

in addition, there is already an existing entry for で, and we try to avoid having entries with identical headword/reading combos.

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>で</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,1 @@
+<s_inf>で after certain verb forms</s_inf>

Proposing adding で to readings to go along with the proposal of deleting the sense of the cross-reference leading here.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>で</reb>

daijr, daijs

Changed [aux] to [prt] as it is classed as a 接続助詞. Completely changing glossary as "Indicates continuing action" will likely lead anyone learning of this word through this entry to think of a continuous verb rather than a conjunction.
Senses are based on the references listed, mainly daijr, they are not absolutely exhaustive but these should be the main ones. I opted to make [1] what it is as most other senses can be imposed upon it by context.

If accepted, I would like to suggest deleting the 5th sense of the entry on ～で that leads here: it is same word and the changes to notes in this entry should make it unnecessary.

@@ -8,4 +8,39 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>
-<s_inf>で after certain verb forms</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms plain conjunction; 1-7 become ～で after godan verbs ending in ぐ, む, ぶ or ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>and...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in order of occurrence</s_inf>
+<gloss>and then...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in causal relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and because of that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in instrumental relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and through that... (preceding sentence is the means by which following sentence takes place)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms contrastive conjunction</s_inf>
+<gloss>but...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577980">いる・3</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to connect verbs to auxiliary verbs or to form compound verbs</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>used at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to make a request</gloss>

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>

I wonder about the "aux". UniDic has "助詞,接続助詞" for this. I guess "aux" covers a multitude of sins.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
@@ -10,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate continuing action</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>

actually, come to think of it, れる and られる could be merged with a note.  they're already sufficiently well-documented.

I made somewhat of a revision of my proposal. As this has been drifting for months and nobody seems to want to touch it, I would like to highlight that I was not saying all these senses are needed, I made them in bulk so that an editor could pick them out if needed - the entry could be reduced to only [1], [6] and [7].

At any rate, I think the earlier versions of this unapproved entry should be closed, at least.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>forms plain conjunction; 1-7 become ～で after godan verbs ending in ぐ, む, ぶ or ぬ</s_inf>
-<gloss>and...</gloss>
+<s_inf>joins two sentences; becomes で after 五段 verbs ending in ぐ, む, ぶ or ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>and</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>and then...</gloss>
+<gloss>and (then)</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>and because of that...</gloss>
+<gloss>and (because of that)</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +31,2 @@
-<s_inf>connects sentences in instrumental relation</s_inf>
-<gloss>and through that... (preceding sentence is the means by which following sentence takes place)</gloss>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in instrumental relation; preceding sentence is means by which following sentence takes place</s_inf>
+<gloss>and (through that)...</gloss>
@@ -43 +43 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to connect verbs to auxiliary verbs or to form compound verbs</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to connect to auxiliary verbs or to form compound verbs</gloss>
@@ -48 +48 @@
-<s_inf>used at sentence end</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>

Proposing adding で to readings to go along with the proposal of deleting the sense of the cross-reference leading here.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>で</reb>

daijr, daijs

Changed [aux] to [prt] as it is classed as a 接続助詞. Completely changing glossary as "Indicates continuing action" will likely lead anyone learning of this word through this entry to think of a continuous verb rather than a conjunction.
Senses are based on the references listed, mainly daijr, they are not absolutely exhaustive but these should be the main ones. I opted to make [1] what it is as most other senses can be imposed upon it by context.

If accepted, I would like to suggest deleting the 5th sense of the entry on ～で that leads here: it is same word and the changes to notes in this entry should make it unnecessary.

@@ -8,4 +8,39 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>
-<s_inf>で after certain verb forms</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms plain conjunction; 1-7 become ～で after godan verbs ending in ぐ, む, ぶ or ぬ</s_inf>
+<gloss>and...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in order of occurrence</s_inf>
+<gloss>and then...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in causal relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and because of that...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>connects sentences in instrumental relation</s_inf>
+<gloss>and through that... (preceding sentence is the means by which following sentence takes place)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms contrastive conjunction</s_inf>
+<gloss>but...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577980">いる・3</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to connect verbs to auxiliary verbs or to form compound verbs</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>used at sentence end</s_inf>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to make a request</gloss>

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・5</xref>

I wonder about the "aux". UniDic has "助詞,接続助詞" for this. I guess "aux" covers a multitude of sins.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
@@ -10,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate continuing action</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>

should be part of an entry for て.  merge

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/助詞
http://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/て

used with -masu stem for v5g, v5n, v5b, v5m

this entry already exists (2210140)

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/助動詞_(%E5
%9B%BD%E6%96%87%E6%B3%95)
http://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/まい

No conjugation of this word.  Just -nai form, 終止形, 連体形
The previous verb in v5 uses 終止形 but previous verb or adj-v 
in other conjugation uses 未然形(-nai form)

That works.

pretty sure 五段 verbs don't have a "ょ form", and i don't read that phrase as the translation given.  more like 
"connects to godan verbs, i-adjectives, na-adjectives, and auxiliary verbs whose imperfective form ends with ろ or ょ".

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<s_inf>used with ろ and ょ forms of 五段 verbs, e.g. 話そう</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the imperfective form of certain verbs and adjectives</s_inf>

Is Osamu's comment correct? The Wiki articles says: "五段活用の動詞と形容詞・形容動詞と未然形の最後が「ろ」「ょ」で終わる助動詞に接続する。"

@@ -9,1 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate speculation</gloss>
+<s_inf>used with ろ and ょ forms of 五段 verbs, e.g. 話そう</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates speculation</gloss>
@@ -13,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate will</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates will</gloss>
@@ -17,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate invitation</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates invitation</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/助動詞_(%E5
%9B%BD%E6%96%87%E6%B3%95)

connect to non-v5 verbs and v1 type aux-verb
non-conjugating aux-v

Did this a couple of days ago, but must have missed the final step.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>よー</reb>
@@ -29,14 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<misc>&fam;</misc>
-<gloss>hey</gloss>
-<gloss>yo</gloss>
-<gloss>hi</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2029090">よ</xref>
-<s_inf>empathetic version of よ</s_inf>
-<gloss>come on</gloss>
-<gloss>hey</gloss>

Saw as よお for sense  4. suggest splitting out 4 and 5 together with よー

No further comments. Closing.

Fine, but I suggest trimming back the notes as they rather swamp the entry. The "食べる→食べよう" spells out the context.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
@@ -23 +23 @@
-<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates speculation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>on non-五段 stem; indicates speculation</s_inf>

Thanks for the clarification. I was going to argue these senses shouldn't be included because it's a conjugation for only a limited set 
of verb classes (一段 and する/くる?) and we don't have similar entries for -そう, -とう, etc. which should be equally valid... but I 
realized these senses are actually included in daijs' and daijr's よう entries and we do actually have an entry for "た" ("indicates past 
tense") in JMDict as well. 
_
My preference would still be to follow GG5's example to not include these senses and also not have an entry for た, but I guess that'd be 
a topic for the mailing list instead of the comment section of this one entry.
_
In the meanwhile, I've tried improve the 3 senses because I don't think the definitions/notes were very clear. I've moved the previous 
glosses into usage notes and added actual glosses. To what extent the glosses are helpful, I'm not sure, but until the separate issue of 
glossless senses are resolved, maybe this will do. I also moved the previous sense 1 to sense 3 as I think it's the least common aux-v 
usage (if that's indeed the correct PoS).
_
"verb stem" - is this the right term? I forget

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べよう</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates speculation</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs, e.g. 食べる→食べよう; indicates intention</s_inf>
+<gloss>(I) will</gloss>
+<gloss>(I) shall</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>indicates will</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates suggestion or invitation</s_inf>
+<gloss>let's</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +23,6 @@
-<s_inf>indicates invitation</s_inf>
-<gloss>let's</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the verb stem of non-五段 verbs; indicates speculation</s_inf>
+<gloss>(I) wonder (if)</gloss>
+<gloss>might it be (that)</gloss>
+<gloss>maybe</gloss>
+<gloss>perhaps</gloss>
+<gloss>perchance</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>hey</gloss>

koj, daij

daijirin keeps apart, daijisen merges

koj, daij, meikyo

daijisen merges, daijirin keeps apart.  all others have 撰する only

Moved to enamdict. Was the entry truncated?

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/獣王記

Altered Beast was originally bundled with the SEGA Mega Drive video game console (known as the SEGA Genesis to consumers in the USA) until 1991, when it was replaced by Sonic The Hedgehog in the bundle.

Daijr

GG5, Daijr, Koj