https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/スナップ写真
"スナップ写真は、下準備その他特にせず、日常のできごとあるいは出会った光景を一瞬の下に撮影する写真。"

I don't think "esp. of people" is needed.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>snapshot (esp. of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>snapshot</gloss>

OK. I think we should keep it simple.

@@ -26,3 +26 @@
-<gloss>snap</gloss>
-<gloss>sudden movement</gloss>
-<gloss>sharp sound</gloss>
+<gloss>snap (movement, action)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/スコットランドのフィドル奏法

It's obviously very marginal. It's found in compounds like スナップ作用 and スコッチスナップ (see Wiki page).

GG5, etc.

ホック & フック were discussed on the Honyaku list. I felt it needed a little qualification here.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>hook</gloss>
+<gloss>hook (esp. for clothing)</gloss>

meikyo and daijs combine too.  'snap' certainly seems to win on images

GG5, etc.

If Google images is a true guide, this should be the first sense.
The Kenkyushas combine the first two senses,

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1071660">スナップ・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1071660">スナップ・3</xref>

submitted an entry for ともにする, so removing vs

@@ -25,1 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -32,1 +31,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Daijirin, GG5, 新和英中辞典

Splitting as per the refs. A bit subtle.
I really doubt 供に belongs here, however I see a few refs such as the 実用日本語表現辞典 say "「共に」と同じ。「供に」は当て字。" In expressions such as "供に従える" it's really got its follower/attendant sense.

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>倶に</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,2 +26,18 @@
-<gloss>sharing with</gloss>
-<gloss>participate in</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>together</gloss>
+<gloss>jointly</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>often as ...とともに</s_inf>
+<gloss>at the same time</gloss>
+<gloss>with</gloss>
+<gloss>as ...</gloss>
+<gloss>including</gloss>
+<gloss>along with</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,5 +45,0 @@
-<gloss>alike</gloss>
-<gloss>together</gloss>
-<gloss>along with</gloss>
-<gloss>with</gloss>
-<gloss>including</gloss>

Also written 供に, with slight nuance difference (“as an attendant/servant” esp.)

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>供に</keb>

I don't think "(of a man and woman)" adds anything.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>(of a man and woman) having sexual relations</gloss>
+<gloss>having sexual relations</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&euph;</misc>

Kodansha 大辞典.

Kod has "(3)夫婦の交わりを結ぶこと。share bed and board." I think it's just a euphemism for sense 2.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>(of a man and woman) to have sexual relations</gloss>
-<gloss>to have sexual intercourse</gloss>
+<gloss>(of a man and woman) having sexual relations</gloss>
+<gloss>having sexual intercourse</gloss>
@@ -27,4 +27,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>share bed and board</gloss>
-</sense>

I don't think any of these senses are adjectival

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -40 +38,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -47 +44,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -41,1 +41,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1584870">爺</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1584870">爺・1</xref>

@@ -25,2 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>background</gloss>
-<gloss>circumstance</gloss>
+<gloss>background (of an incident, situation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>circumstances</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>background</gloss>

GG5 splits sense 1, 新和英中辞典 combines.

大辞泉 大辞林
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=背景&dtype=3&dname=2na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=03393700

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>backdrop</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<gloss>context</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>backing</gloss>
+<gloss>support (from behind the scenes)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 背負う │ 494,835 │
│ 脊負う │      37 │ - [iK] to [sK]
╰─ーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -43,0 +44 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2831946">しょってる</xref>

daijr/s, koj

Added sense. Split 1st sense.

@@ -25,0 +26,5 @@
+<gloss>to carry on one's back</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -28 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>to carry on back or shoulder</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +40,8 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>しょう</stagr>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>in the form しょってる</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be conceited</gloss>
+<gloss>to think highly of oneself</gloss>
+</sense>

I think we can ignore them for now.

prog kana
eij has kana, says 被る is こうむる
n-grams
帽子をかぶる	945
帽子を被る	278
水をかぶる	467
水を被る	90
罪をかぶった	41
罪を被った	24

tanaka 3/82 sentences kanji, plus 6 false hits (こうむる)

haven't a clue about senses 4-8

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -41,0 +44 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, nc, meikyo

@@ -25,2 +25,4 @@
-<gloss>to wear (on head, usu. one's own)</gloss>
-<gloss>to put on (over head, usu. one's own)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on (one's head)</gloss>
+<gloss>to wear</gloss>
+<gloss>to have on</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull over (one's head)</gloss>
@@ -28,1 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>to completely cover (e.g. with snow or a blanket)</gloss>
@@ -33,1 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>to pour or dash water, dust, etc. (on oneself)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be covered with (dust, snow, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pour (water, etc.) on oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>to dash on oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>to ship water</gloss>
@@ -39,0 +43,3 @@
+<gloss>to take (blame)</gloss>
+<gloss>to assume (responsibility)</gloss>
+<gloss>to shoulder (burden)</gloss>
@@ -47,1 +54,1 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -54,1 +61,2 @@
-<gloss>(of film) to be cloudy and blurred from overexposure</gloss>
+<s_inf>of film</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be fogged (due to overexposure, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -59,0 +67,1 @@
+<s_inf>of a play, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -60,1 +69,1 @@
-<gloss>to come to an end (e.g. a play or concert)</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to an end</gloss>
@@ -65,1 +74,2 @@
-<gloss>(of a play, concert, etc.) to get a full house</gloss>
+<s_inf>of a play, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to get a full house</gloss>
@@ -71,0 +81,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2649000">毛氈を被る・1</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>of a play, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -72,1 +85,2 @@
-<gloss>to make a mistake</gloss>
+<gloss>to bungle</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail</gloss>
@@ -77,0 +91,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

大辞泉 大辞林

There may be a better way of saying sense 5 to get across the definition, as shown in the examples from 大辞泉.
I'm guessing some of the later definitions are probably archaic, but not sure.
I think I got transitive/intransitive right on all of them, but please check.

@@ -28,0 +28,1 @@
+<gloss>to completely cover (e.g. with snow or a blanket)</gloss>
@@ -42,1 +43,35 @@
-<gloss>to overlap</gloss>
+<gloss>to overlap (e.g. sound or color)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be similar</gloss>
+<gloss>to be redundant</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>(of film) to be cloudy and blurred from overexposure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to close</gloss>
+<gloss>to come to an end (e.g. a play or concert)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>(of a play, concert, etc.) to get a full house</gloss>
+<gloss>to sell out</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to blunder</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a mistake</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be deceived</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -10,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おじ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2578330">老媼</xref>

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<s_inf>usu. ジジイ</s_inf>

comment here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKP3pj6JAO0&feature=youtu.be
逆走するジジ、ババよりは安全運転かもしれない。

@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジジ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -31,2 +34,0 @@
-<stagr>じじい</stagr>
-<stagr>ジジイ</stagr>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<reb>ジジイ</reb>
+<reb>じい</reb>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<reb>じい</reb>
+<reb>ジジイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<stagr>ジジイ</stagr>
@@ -33 +34 @@
-<gloss>geezer</gloss>
+<gloss>old geezer</gloss>

Google n-gram counts
じじい	242902
ジジイ	206054
http://bokete.jp/odai/365548

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジジイ</reb>

gg5, prog, meikyo
子細	28,879		
子細に	10,255

GG5 and prog have three senses, like the kokugos.
I think we should have an entry for 子細に.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -21 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>details</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>significance</gloss>
-<gloss>particulars</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +24,9 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>details</gloss>
+<gloss>particulars</gloss>
+<gloss>significance</gloss>
+<gloss>meaning</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>with neg. sentence</s_inf>
@@ -29,2 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>obstruction</gloss>
-<gloss>interference</gloss>
+<gloss>inconvenience</gloss>
+<gloss>objection</gloss>

GG5:
1 〈事情〉 circumstances; 〈詳細〉 details; 《文》 particulars
¶子細に in detail; 《文》 minutely
･子細に語る give a detailed [full] account 《of》
･子細に点検する make a close inspection 《of》.

The JEs combine those senses, and think it works well.
They also only have 子細, and the kokugos lead with it so I'd leave it as it is.

@@ -20,6 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>detailed</gloss>
-<gloss>minute</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>details</gloss>

デジタル大辞泉, 旺文社国語辞典

most of my dictionaries have it as the first definition. 

Also as for 子 vs 仔, I think 仔 is the correct kanji for this word since it has the detailed/minute meaning and is used in the examples:

し【仔】
① こまかに。くわしく。「仔細」
② こ。動物の子。「仔牛（こうし）」

し【×仔】
㊀〈シ〉小さい。細かい。「仔細」
㊁〈こ〉動物の子。「仔羊」

@@ -16,0 +17,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>detailed</gloss>
+<gloss>minute</gloss>
+</sense>

Certainly both are sanctioned, although 大辞林 tags 仔細 as deprecated.
I'll go the the 常用漢字 one first, I think.

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog

I think this is clearer. "Year" makes more sense than "class" for the first gloss.

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>repeating the same class (school)</gloss>
-<gloss>staying in the same class for two or more years</gloss>
+<gloss>repeating a year (at school)</gloss>
+<gloss>staying in the same class for another year</gloss>

大辞泉 大辞林

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>staying more than two years in the same class</gloss>
+<gloss>staying in the same class for two or more years</gloss>

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>miniscule</gloss>
+<gloss>minuscule</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

ok

http://www.jalan.net/uw/uwp3500/uww3512.do?yadNo=324384&aid=0000958987   "『てっぱい』とは晩秋から冬にかけての香川県の郷土料理です。"
https://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/takagi7153/diary/20101109/  "「てっぱい」とは、故郷讃岐の郷土料理で、「鉄砲和え」のなまったものらしい。大根、人参に、酢じめしたフナ、我が家では専らコイだったと思うが、を加え、白味噌の酢味噌であえたもの。"

I'm inclined to go with my suggestion, but adapting it as per that last ref.

@@ -9,1 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>salad of minced Welsh onions, seafood, and vinegared miso</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2648610">鉄砲和え</xref>
+<s_inf>from 鉄砲和え</s_inf>
+<gloss>regional Sanuki cuisine, usu. of minced vegetables, seafood, and vinegared miso</gloss>

i've no idea.  perhaps the answerer was only being lazy

I guess so.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>Mother (Mother Earth, Mother Nature)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mother (as in Mother Earth, Mother Nature, etc.)</gloss>

英辞郎

Used in a few set phrases, clearer to have a separate naru-adjective entry.

i think the pref sense should go first

@@ -11,8 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1164500">一駄</xref>
-<gloss>load</gloss>
-<gloss>pack</gloss>
-<gloss>horse load</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +20,8 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1164500">一駄</xref>
+<gloss>load</gloss>
+<gloss>pack</gloss>
+<gloss>horse load</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>

GG5

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>a load</gloss>
-<gloss>a pack</gloss>
+<gloss>load</gloss>
+<gloss>pack</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,9 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1409070">駄文・1</xref>
+<gloss>poor</gloss>
+<gloss>low-grade</gloss>
+<gloss>trivial</gloss>
+<gloss>insignificant</gloss>
+<gloss>worthless</gloss>

GG5、大辞林、広辞苑

Appears in 狂言「しびり」 in form 五駄や十駄

if it has to be one of the two, certainly.

Eijiro, http://www.if-j.co.jp/yogo/data50/yougo-u.html

I think I refer the noun.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>表見返しに</keb>
+<keb>表見返し</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>おもてみかえしに</reb>
+<reb>おもてみかえし</reb>
@@ -11,2 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>on the inside of the front cover</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1604410">見返し・みかえし・1</xref>
+<gloss>inside of the front cover (of book)</gloss>
+<gloss>front end-paper</gloss>

『脳みそが筋肉』の略。 indeed.

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/脳筋
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/Ǿ��
http://www.google.com/search?q="脳筋"

LSD, 医学英和辞典

OOps.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>裏見返しに</keb>
+<keb>裏見返し</keb>

should this be converted to the noun form to jive with 表見返し?

Eijiro, http://www.if-j.co.jp/yogo/data50/yougo-u.html

Merging.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>叔父御</keb>
@@ -16,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>uncle (older than one's parent)</gloss>
+<s_inf>伯父御 or 叔父御 can mean older or younger than one's parent</s_inf>
+<gloss>uncle</gloss>

see comment on 2648940

Kod & Daij don't make the distinction between 伯父御 and 叔父御. but do for 伯父 and 叔父. Are we justified in doing it here?

大辞林、広辞苑

Probably archaic; found in 狂言

OK, reject this leg if the merge goes OK.

i wouldn't mind seeing the two おじ entries combined with a note (surely there is frequent enough confusion between the two to justify it, and other sources like gg5 don't split).  then the same could be done for the おじご entries

Kod & Daij don't make the distinction between 伯父御 and 叔父御. but do for 伯父 and 叔父. Are we justified in doing it here?

大辞林、広辞苑

Analogous to 伯父御

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see">阿叔</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2648960">阿叔</xref>

koj, nikk

apparently different than おじ in that it refers only to one's father's brother

koj, nikk

appears to be different from おじ in that it is specifically an uncle on one's father's side

Yes, rather marginal.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>from タミフル (Tamiflu), from the flu panics of the late 2000s and early 2010s</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from タミフル (Tamiflu) and the flu panics of the late 2000s and early 2010s</s_inf>

Not sure this should be an entry

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<s_inf>from タミフル (Tamiflu)</s_inf>
-<gloss>to panic (from the flu panics of the late 2000s and early 2010s)</gloss>
+<s_inf>from タミフル (Tamiflu), from the flu panics of the late 2000s and early 2010s</s_inf>
+<gloss>to panic</gloss>

Removing JMnedict xref.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="5741066" corp="jmnedict">タミフル</xref>
@@ -12 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>to panic (from the flu panics of late 2000's and early 2010's)</gloss>
+<s_inf>from タミフル (Tamiflu)</s_inf>
+<gloss>to panic (from the flu panics of the late 2000s and early 2010s)</gloss>

http://ykun.exblog.jp/5770509
and many other blogs

タミフル (n) is already an entry. I think this is OK.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タミフル</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -13,2 +10,5 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>to panic or to act frantically or bizarrely (net slang, derived from flu panics of late 2000's and early 2010's)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2123810">タミフル</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>to panic (from the flu panics of late 2000's and early 2010's)</gloss>
+<gloss>to act frantically</gloss>
+<gloss>to act bizarrely</gloss>

http://www.nicovideo.jp/related_tag/タミフる

Regrettably, I can identify no more obvious references. The verb seems to have manifested on Japanese web forums (such as 2ch and Futaba) some time in the last three years, and its usage -- frequently unrelated to actual influenza outbreaks -- seems to imply the definition I've given here. The best evidence that I can give is that it now appears in tags on Nico Nico Douga, as seen in the Reference that I have linked.