Refocus xref.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2544630">アズファーエンジェル</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2614200">アズファーエンジェル</xref>

Tidying

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>アズファーエンジェル</reb>
+<reb>アラビアン・エンジェルフィッシュ</reb>
@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2544630">アズファーエンジェル</xref>

More info than we usually include/what the 
policy prescribes

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>tasselled wobbegong (Eucrossorhinus dasypogon, sole species of the carpet shark genus Eucrossorhinus)</gloss>
+<gloss>tasselled wobbegong (Eucrossorhinus dasypogon)</gloss>

Let's go.

doesn't matter to me.  i kind of like having the kanji, but either way

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2614190">タッセルドウォビゴン</xref>

Tidying. Actually sticking my neck out, as アラフラ大瀬 is probably never written. Perhaps it should be dropped and there just be an xref to 大瀬?

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アラフラ大瀬</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アラフラおおせ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,3 +12,1 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タッセルドウォビゴン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -12,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

0 n-grams

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>western wobbegon (Orectolobus hutchinsi, species of carpet shark from Western Australia)</gloss>
+<gloss>western wobbegon (Orectolobus hutchinsi)</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウェスタン・ウォビゴン</reb>

of questionable use

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Indian swellshark (Cephaloscyllium silasi, species of catshark from the western Indian Ocean)</gloss>
+<gloss>Indian swellshark (Cephaloscyllium silasi)</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インディアン・スウェル・シャーク</reb>

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2614210">スープフィンシャーク</xref>

Refocus xref.

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2553090">スープフィンシャーク</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2614210">スープフィンシャーク</xref>

http://diving.tank.jp/sports/fish/3chondrichthyes/2elasmobranchii/3mejirozame/3dotizame/3dotizame.htm

Tidying

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スープフィンシャーク</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2553090">スープフィンシャーク</xref>
@@ -13,0 +11,1 @@
+<gloss>soupfin shark</gloss>

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>くろへりめじろざめ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くろへりめじろざめ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2614240">くろへりめじろ</xref>
@@ -18 +17 @@
-<gloss>copper shark (Carcharhinus brachyurus, only member of Carcharhinus found mostly at temperate latitudes)</gloss>
+<gloss>copper shark (Carcharhinus brachyurus)</gloss>

kanji here (minus the obvious サメ)
http://www.web-aquarium.net/zukan/se/zukan_se_s_kuroheri.html

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>黒縁目白鮫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くろへりめじろざめ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10,0 +17,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Splitting

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>クロヘリメジロ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2614240">クロヘリメジロ</xref>

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ブロードノーズ・セブンギル・シャーク</reb>
+<reb>ブロードノーズセブンギルシャーク</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ブロードノーズセブンギルシャーク</reb>
+<reb>ブロードノーズ・セブンギル・シャーク</reb>

Splitting.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エビスザメ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2614230">エビスザメ</xref>

wiki

Correct. No example either.

afaict there's no audio clip for this, so i think it can be converted directly.

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>一切気にしない</keb>
+<keb>気にしない</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>いっさいきにしない</reb>
+<reb>きにしない</reb>
@@ -14,3 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>not give a damn</gloss>
-<gloss>not care a bit</gloss>
-<gloss>could care a less</gloss>
+<gloss>not caring</gloss>
+<gloss>not giving a damn</gloss>

I think just having an entry for 気にしない is sufficient. All those versions with amplifiers such as 少しも, ちっとも, 一切 and 全然 could probably be dropped.
気にしない has a subentry in 新和英中辞典 and is the gloss for a heap of entries in リーダーズ+プラス.
I guess it could argued that it's obvious as a negative of 気にする, and I presume that's why most JEs don't have it. I think it would certainly help text-glossing if it was be included.

if the 378 google hit entry was/is accurate, i don't think this should be an entry.  even if it gets far more hits, these are just standard meanings for 一切+気にしない.  you could say いっさい~ない for any verb, e.g. 一切食べない gets just as many hits as 一切気にしない
-
if anything, it should be converted to 気にしない, although i'm not certain that is needed as an entry either.
i also think the entries for 少しも-, 全然-, and ちっとも気にしない should be reconsidered
-
note: for whatever reason, i am incapable of recommending this entry for deletion.  the system craps out when that box is checked.  i think it's a rejected/deleted x-ref thing again

See below.

I am not making a submission about the above as such.
I searched for "気にしない" and I got the above entry. Then I clicked the link to "気にする". Then I could see that my search was the negative of the positive.

I know how that progression happened.

My point is this: Should there be an entry for "気にしない"?

Based upon what I believe you have stated before, there is no reason why there should be an entry for either the positive or negative. So, in my way of thinking, either there should be neither entry or there should be both entries [that would seem to be logic to me because if it were not for the nature of such an entry, normality would say that only "気" plus the [n,vs]classification would be normal].

If you agreed, the link in the above would be to "気にしない".

The following entries would carry the same logic:-

少しも気にしない 【すこしもきにしない】 (exp,adj-i) not give a damn; not care a bit
全然気にしない 【ぜんぜんきにしない】 (exp,adj-i) (ant: 気にする) not mind in the slightest; not give a damn; not care a bit
ちっとも気にしない 【ちっともきにしない】 (exp,adj-i) (See 気にする) not give a damn; not care a bit; could care a less

If you preferred, for some measure of clarity, I guess that you could include the “ant” in front of the link to all of the entries to which I have referred. However, the aspect which I think can cause an odd way of thinking with the existing entry for “気にする” is the negative nuance, ie., as shown below:-

気にする 【きにする】 (exp,vs-i) to mind (negative nuance); to care about; to worry; to pay undue (amount of) attention to (something).
Whereas, it seems to me that “気にしない” also, in context, has a positive nuance [ie., [please] don't worry [everything is fine] when said in response to an enquiry from someone who really cares.
Sorry to ramble on a bit, but fewer words, in my mode, may have failed to deliver the message.

Splitting 2551540.

Splitting 2544630.

Splitting 2553090.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wobbegong

Changing the xref to the non-nakaguro version.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2555190">ブロードノーズ・セブンギル・シャーク</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2555190">ブロードノーズセブンギルシャーク</xref>

nikk

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>恵比須鮫</keb>
+</k_ele>

yahoo enc

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>恵美須鮫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>えびすざめ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10,0 +17,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Splitting 2555190.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

some hits for kanji, e.g.
http://h16nakaji.blogspot.com/2009/10/blog-post_2621.html

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>黒縁目白</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くろへりめじろ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11,1 +18,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2553890">くろへりめじろざめ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2553890">クロヘリメジロザメ</xref>

Splitting 2553890

I think you are right.

eol, nikk, wiki, yahoo enc

obsolete genus name, so far as i can tell

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>ferret badger (Helictis moschata)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>ferret badger (esp. the Chinese ferret-badger, Melogale moschata)</gloss>

GG5,新和英中辞典

Better

カビ止め	2147

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>かび止め</keb>
+<keb>カビ止め</keb>
@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かび止め</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

黴止め	0	0.0% <- GG5, etc.
かび止め	358	100.0%
かびどめ	0	0.0%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>黴止め</keb>
+<keb>かび止め</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>かび止め</keb>
+<keb>黴止め</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>fungicide</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>fungicide</gloss>
-<gloss>antmold agent</gloss>
+<gloss>antimold agent</gloss>

GG5, Daijirin, ルミナス和英辞典

"former name" -> [arch] or [obs]??

@@ -26,1 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>former name of the Rhododendron japonicum</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>Japanese azalea (Rhododendron japonicum)</gloss>
+<gloss>renge azalea</gloss>

Daijirin, GG5, Kojien

G n-grams:
伝え合う	49919
伝えあう	10089

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>伝えあう</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>to exchange (e.g. messages, thoughts, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to exchange (messages, thoughts, etc.)</gloss>

Eijiro, Tanaka example.

~35K Googits.

daijr

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>at first glance poor, but on closer examination not too bad</gloss>
-<gloss>crude but charming (of artwork, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>at first glance poor, but on closer examination skillful (of artwork, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>crude but charming</gloss>

GG5, Daijirin

I think the "first glance bad, closer examination not bad" nuance is important. Both Daijirin and GG5 mention it, e.g. GG5 has: "イラストなどが一見下手のようだが実は巧みであるさま".

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>at first glance poor, but on closer examination not too bad</gloss>

daijs

i think simpler is better

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>下手上手</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>へたうま</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -8,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -9,1 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>A piece of artwork that at first glance appears to lack talent on the creator's part, but upon further reflection shows the artist's personality and skill</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>crude but charming (of artwork, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>poorly made but captivating</gloss>

daij, nikk

daij, gg5

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>組み体操</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>Gymnastics which involves the use of many people to make shapes</gloss>
+<gloss>coordinated group gymnastics (in which teams form pyramids or other shapes)</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/63015/m0u/組体操/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEMdfqZFiR0

I think even just two participants can qualify as 組体操 but the majority of 
examples involve many

koj, wi1

koj

koj, daij, gg5

対数目盛	        1,261	65.2%	
対数目盛り	672	34.8%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>対数目盛り</keb>

nikk, gg5

koj, daij

@@ -15,2 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>farmer(s)</gloss>
-<gloss>see also 農民</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1470770">農民</xref>
+<gloss>farmer</gloss>
+<gloss>peasant</gloss>

what exactly is the supposed idiomatic meaning of その下?  "under that" = "under which" = "below that" = "whereunder".  those are  exactly what it means, and exactly what the parts suggest
-
unless you provide references to show the contrary, this is not a conjunction so far as i can see.

See below.

I apologize for returning on this one, but to the extent that Rene is correct in his reason for rejection, he gives the reason for inclusion by virtue of his "meaning".

Namely: "the difference is that その上 is idiomatic, whereas その下 has exactly the meaning expected from the sum of its parts".

Now [assuming that I am able enough to deduce that if a combination does not appear in a dictionary then it must have the expected meaning from the sum of its parts],  then, speaking as the novice in the matter, I thought that "その" meant "that [in the distance]" and that "下" meant "below". On the reasoning that "その下で" has the sum of its parts, I can deduce that is would mean "below that"

However, Rene states that the meaning given in eijiro is "whereunder", which is just an archaism for "under which".

Well, as the novice, it seems to me that if that meaning is correct and yet not idiomatic, then I am left wondering how to move forward on such matters.

However, I draw comfort from my dictionary which states that “その上” means “on top of that, besides, moreover” so I see that an idiomatic meaning of “whereunder, etc” is potentially all right for “その下”, ie., “under that”. Either way, it seems that both "その上" and "その下" should be included, or neither.

To be frank, I don't mind there being entries for その下で/その下に. One test I like to apply is the reverse direction, and I see リーダーズ+プラス has them for the glosses of thereunder/whereunder. Given that, and the very common nature of the expressions, I'm inclined to accept その下で and add one for その下に.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>whereunder</gloss>

See below.

I apologize for returning on this one, but to the extent that Rene is correct in his reason for rejection, he gives the reason for inclusion by virtue of his "meaning".

Namely: "the difference is that その上 is idiomatic, whereas その下 has exactly the meaning expected from the sum of its parts".

Now [assuming that I am able enough to deduce that if a combination does not appear in a dictionary then it must have the expected meaning from the sum of its parts],  then, speaking as the novice in the matter, I thought that "その" meant "that [in the distance]" and that "下" meant "below". On the reasoning that "その下で" has the sum of its parts, I can deduce that is would mean "below that"

However, Rene states that the meaning given in eijiro is "whereunder", which is just an archaism for "under which".

Well, as the novice, it seems to me that if that meaning is correct and yet not idiomatic, then I am left wondering how to move forward on such matters.

However, I draw comfort from my dictionary which states that “その上” means “on top of that, besides, moreover” so I see that an idiomatic meaning of “whereunder, etc” is potentially all right for “その下”, ie., “under that”. Either way, it seems that both "その上" and "その下" should be included, or neither.