meikyo

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

It probably helps.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>(coming to) agreement</gloss>
+<gloss>(coming to an) agreement</gloss>

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/77824/whats-the-difference-between-合意-and-同意

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>agreement</gloss>
+<gloss>(coming to) agreement</gloss>

gg5

膃肭臍	564
オットセイ	61896

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>Alaskan fur sea</gloss>
+<gloss>Alaskan fur seal</gloss>

GG5

Gg5 has 膃肭獣, but Daij, Koj and the other JEs have 膃肭臍.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>膃肭獣</keb>
@@ -18,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>Alaskan fur sea</gloss>

襦袢	108005
じゅばん	11559
ジュバン	709
ジバン	27744

I don't think both じゅばん and ジュバン are needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>ジュバン</reb>
+<reb>ジバン</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>ジバン</reb>
+<reb>ジュバン</reb>

daij, koj

[nokanji] tags not needed for loan words.
All the kokugos have "gibão", not "jibão".
No need for the hiragana じばん. じゅばん is the Sino-Japanese reading of the ateji (襦袢) for ジバン.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<reb>じばん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +12,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -20 +15,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -24 +19 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="por">jibão</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="por">gibão</lsource>

daijr: "和装用の下着"
koj: "「襦袢」は当て字"

Worth mentioning that this is a piece of traditional Japanese clothing.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15,4 @@
+<reb>ジュバン</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -20 +25 @@
-<gloss>undershirt</gloss>
+<gloss>undershirt (worn under a kimono)</gloss>

Hmm. I feel those low percentages and absence from major dictionaries should gazump the counts. Not a big deal.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

We decided on a 1M n-grams threshold for spec1. 解る and 判る meet this easily (when inflected forms are included).
But I don't think we can adequately explain the nuances of these forms in a short usage note.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -29 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>解る is used for comprehending; 判る is used for distinguishing or judging</s_inf>

わかっ	14795258	55.8%
分かっ	9635157	36.3%
解っ	1114047	4.2%
判っ	966361	3.6%

While that information about 解る and 判る is interesting, it's also rather marginal. GG5 and ルミナス don't even show those kanji forms and the kokugos downplay them. (I'm dropping the "spec1" tags).
I suspect it's probably adding some unnecessary clutter to the entry.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -26 +23,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

* meikyo: 「判」は物事がそれと判別・判断される意で、「違い［善悪］が判る」「先のことは判らない」などと、「解」は理解できる意で、「英語が解る」「気持ちはよく解る」などと好まれるが、今は一般に「分」。「文学が 解る／判る」では、前者は単に理解する意だが、後者は傑作・駄作などをよく区別して理解する意となる。
* https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/117:
    分かる: understand, know (a concept, a fact, etc)
    判る: (think 判断できる) judge, discriminate (between right and wrong, between two similar things, etc)
    解る: (think 理解できる) comprehend (a concept, an answer, etc)
* https://hinative.com/questions/995550
    分かる　is a very common term for the word "understand" (the fact, the concept etc...)
    判る　if you will look at the kanji you will think the word 判断できる which means judgement, discriminate, knowing the right from wrong, knowing between two similar things,
    解る just think the word 理解できる which means to comprehend like knowing the answer of the problem etc...

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<s_inf>解る is used for comprehending; 判る is used for distinguishing or judging</s_inf>

GG5: 役人のはしくれ a 「petty [minor, lower-ranking] official.
これでも画家のはしくれです. I am a painter, though a humble one.
中辞典: これでも画家の端くれのつもりです. I regard myself as a painter, if not much of one.
ルミナス: 私はこれでも役人の端くれだ  I am a public servant, though not a very important one.

Not at all easy to turn into glosses.

@@ -18,2 +18,4 @@
-<s_inf>oft. refers humbly to oneself, as ～の端くれ</s_inf>
-<gloss>unimportant person (esp. within a group)</gloss>
+<s_inf>often self-reference as ～の端くれ</s_inf>
+<gloss>unimportant (person)</gloss>
+<gloss>petty (official)</gloss>
+<gloss>barely (in a role)</gloss>

it's not really a good translation for most cases
女の端くれ for example means someone who is not yet a woman (=still a girl)

someone who is only (can only be called) barely something?

koj, daijr/s, etc.
端くれ	88275
の端くれ	81210

Tried to make the gloss and note more descriptive.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<s_inf>often refers humbly to oneself</s_inf>
-<gloss>unimportant person</gloss>
+<s_inf>oft. refers humbly to oneself, as ～の端くれ</s_inf>
+<gloss>unimportant person (esp. within a group)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>scrap</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>often refers humbly to oneself</s_inf>
+<gloss>unimportant person</gloss>
+</sense>

See comments on 1328320.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>juggler</gloss>

gg5, eij

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>magician</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>magician</gloss>
+<gloss>illusionist</gloss>

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<s_inf>From わからない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from わからない</s_inf>

Brief etyl note (pretty clear, but らな＞んな is pretty irregular/uncommon, hence seems to deserve a note).

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<s_inf>From わからない</s_inf>

Probably not.

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to not understand</gloss>
-<gloss>to not know</gloss>
+<gloss>not understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>not knowing</gloss>

should this be glossed as "to ..."?

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>

わからん	4213151	73.7%
分からん	1503348	26.3%

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">わかる・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<s_inf>col form of 分からない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>colloquial form of わからない</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>I don't understand</gloss>

@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>

Entry created

GG5, http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/鰓弁, 
http://www009.upp.so-net.ne.jp/nana/mypage2.htm

LSD, 医学英和辞典, Wikip.

58,800 germ rice
27,100 half-milled rice
16,700 semi-polished rice

* Add idiomatic glosses “germ rice”, “half-milled rice” and “semi-polished rice” – these appear to be how people idiomatically translate haigamai/haiga-mai into English; half-milled seems pretty common (from some searching – used on ChowHound and eGullet, major foodie forums, for instance)
* OTOH, “whole rice” (as given in 研究社中) is incorrect (or at least abuse of language), as that means “includes the bran”, which is instead brown rice
* Add [fld=food] (this is a processed food item, not a plant part etc.)

@@ -12,1 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>milled rice with embryo buds</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>germ rice</gloss>
+<gloss>half-milled rice</gloss>
+<gloss>semi-polished rice</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>milled rice with embryo buds</gloss>

Daij, GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

We have this note on い形容詞 and な形容詞.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>テけい</reb>
-<re_restr>テ形</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>て形</re_restr>
@@ -20,2 +15,3 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
-<gloss>-te form (e.g. of a verb)</gloss>
+<field>&gramm;</field>
+<s_inf>esp. in JSL contexts</s_inf>
+<gloss>-te form (of a verb or adjective)</gloss>

I don't think so.

I think this is one of those expressions only used in JLS 
teaching (a brief google seems to confirm this) - do we 
want to mention that in a note?

It gets a lot of hits - some false but enough to confirm this.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>て形</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>テ形</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>てけい</reb>
+<re_restr>て形</re_restr>

GG5,ルミナス和英辞典

GG5, Daijirin

Seems to be specifically Biblical.

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>pastoral letter</gloss>
-<gloss>pastoral epistle</gloss>
+<gloss>Pastoral Epistles (i.e. Timothy 1 and 2, Titus)</gloss>

See below.

This gets some 20k Google hits. It seems to be all right and matches text used in that context.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

〈通（し）／とおし／トオシ〉〈稽／げい／ゲイ〉〈古／こ／コ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 通し稽古　　 │ 43,532 │ 98.2% │
│ 通しげいこ　 │    594 │  1.3% │ - sK
│ とおし稽古　 │     68 │  0.2% │
│ 通しゲイコ　 │     56 │  0.1% │
│ 通稽古　　　 │     35 │  0.1% │
│ とおしげいこ │     37 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5 too.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>通しげいこ</keb>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=通し稽古&dtype=0&dname=0na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=15972422477200
http://eow.alc.co.jp/通し稽古/UTF-8/?ref=sa