@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>often 私の方, あなたの方, etc.</s_inf>

OK, thanks.

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/all/方/m1u/
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/all/ほう/m1u/

FWIW, currently the [S]anseido link for this entry doesn't 'work' since its dictionaries only have the word listed in kana; you need to manually search for ほう to find the correct page.

Doubt it matters but thought I'd mention.

gg5 uses kana for all its senses. prog uses kanji for all its senses.

see rejected amendments to 方がいい and した方がいい.  some may indeed be uk, but it's borderline and tough to show.  in those two cases specifically, ngrams don't support it.  of course it's virtually impossible to check for 方 vs ほう using a google search

Tanaka corpus:
Out of the 646 sentences tagged
- 246 have ほう
- 400 have 方

raw text search on tanaka corpus:
- ほう 611 hits
- 方  not searchable (too many false positives)

From a prescriptive point of view, some of these glosses should be [uk], but descriptively, I'm not sure.

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/+deposition     [sense 2]
----
also, the OED does not attempt to be a source for the most recent usage of a word, rather AFAIK, they track to track down the original usage and any development over time.  the sense in question is not marked as archaic, disused, or even rare

i really don't think there's anything wrong with keeping 'deposition' here as a secondary gloss.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>deposition</gloss>

Notwithstanding the fact that "deposition" is in GG5's definition of 預託, I don't think it's helpful to use that word. 
.
Although the OED does have, in its entry for "deposition", one sense relating to the depositing of money or valuables,* the most recent usage example in OED for that sense is dated 1817.

* OED: depositon
[...] 
(7) 7. The placing of something in a repository, or in charge of a person, for safe keeping; concr. a deposit.
1817   T. R. Malthus Ess. Princ. Population (ed. 5) III. vi. vii. 279   Every fresh deposition [in a savings bank].
[There are also two older examples, dated 1592 and 1651.]
.
The following dictionaries do not include a "depositing money" sense in their entries for "deposition":
Encarta
Merriam-Webster
Wiktionary

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>depositing</gloss>
-<gloss>deposition (of money, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>depositing (of money, valuables, etc.)</gloss>

gg5

i don't think it's an NA english thing, but yes, this should be altered to indicate that 'deposition' means 'deposit', not 'depose'

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>deposit</gloss>
+<gloss>depositing</gloss>

Let's make the example specific.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (e.g. the Yamanote area in Tokyo)</gloss>
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (e.g. the Yamate area in Kōbe)</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (e.g. Tokyo, Kobe, Yokohama)</gloss>
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (e.g. the Yamanote area in Tokyo)</gloss>

@@ -22,0 +22,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手</xref>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典, Sanseido GC

I think we need both. ルミナス says やまのて too, while 新和英中辞典 and the GC say: "the Bluff (横浜･神戸の)", and the GC also has "the hilly section".

@@ -20,0 +20,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (e.g. Tokyo, Kobe, Yokohama)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, daij

Yes.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・2</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>working-class accent</gloss>
-<gloss>working-class dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class dialect of the Shitamachi area of Tokyo</gloss>

Isn't it more specific, though?

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>working-class accent or dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class accent</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class dialect</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2412850">山の手言葉</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2412850">山の手言葉</xref>

Not my favourite word.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて・2</xref>
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・2</xref>
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. upscale residential)</gloss>

I see the したまち entry is split this way.

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて・2</xref>
@@ -24,2 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1658020">山手・やまて</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・したまち・2</xref>

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>hilly section of a city (usu. residential)</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>Yamanote (hilly residential section of western Tokyo, inc. Yotsuya, Aoyama, Koishikawa, Hongo, Ichigaya, Akasaka, Azabu and surrounds)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yamanote (hilly residential section of western Tokyo, incl. Yotsuya, Aoyama, Koishikawa, Hongo, Ichigaya, Akasaka, Azabu and surrounds)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

pretty sure the xref is pointing at the wrong thing

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1718880">下町言葉</xref>

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>くろとがりざめ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くろとがりざめ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2613510">シルキーシャーク</xref>
@@ -18 +17 @@
-<gloss>silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, species of circumtropical requiem shark)</gloss>
+<gloss>silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2613510">シルキー・シャーク</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2613510">シルキーシャーク</xref>

Splitting off シルキーシャーク, etc.

@@ -8,4 +8,0 @@
-<reb>クロトガリザメ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -15,5 +11,1 @@
-<reb>シルキー・シャーク</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>シルキーシャーク</reb>
+<reb>クロトガリザメ</reb>
@@ -24,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2613510">シルキー・シャーク</xref>

尾黒目白鮫	0	0.0%
オグロメジロザメ	1103	100.0%
おぐろめじろざめ	0	0.0%

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おぐろめじろざめ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +12,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おぐろめじろざめ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2613520">グレイリーフシャーク</xref>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>blacktail reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, species of Indo-Pacific requiem shark)</gloss>
+<gloss>blacktail reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos)</gloss>

Splitting off グレイリーフシャーク, etc.
I can find no Japanese reference for ハイイロメジロザメ. There are two WWW hits on "Haiiromejirozame", both in English language documents. Very dubious.

@@ -8,4 +8,0 @@
-<reb>オグロメジロザメ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -15,9 +11,1 @@
-<reb>グレイ・リーフ・シャーク</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>グレイリーフシャーク</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハイイロメジロザメ</reb>
+<reb>オグロメジロザメ</reb>
@@ -28,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2613520">グレイリーフシャーク</xref>

Removing stray NL.

@@ -29,1 +29,1 @@
-<gloss>blacktail reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, species of Indo-Pacific 
requiem shark)</gloss>
+<gloss>blacktail reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, species of Indo-Pacific requiem shark)</gloss>

Seems fine. I added "uk".

@@ -28,0 +28,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Split カリビアンリーフシャーク into its own entry.

@@ -8,4 +8,0 @@
-<reb>ペレスメジロザメ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -15,5 +11,1 @@
-<reb>カリビアン・リーフ・シャーク</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カリビアンリーフシャーク</reb>
+<reb>ペレスメジロザメ</reb>
@@ -24,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2613530">カリビアンリーフシャーク</xref>

fishbase
Wiki J & E

gg5

Not sure the x-ref is needed.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1321110">実際・じっさい・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1321110">実際・1</xref>
@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>de facto</gloss>
-<gloss>in fact</gloss>
+<gloss>true</gloss>

実際にあった	96963
実際に有った	1016

The recent edit to 実際 makes this clearer.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>実際にある</keb>
+<keb>実際にあった</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>実際に有る</keb>
+<keb>実際に有った</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>じっさいにある</reb>
+<reb>じっさいにあった</reb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1321110">実際・じっさい・1</xref>

Then I think we should revert to the 実際にあった form. These glosses only work for prenominal usage.

実際にあった	96963
Tanaka: それは実際にあった事だ。 That is an actual fact. 
Plenty of GG5 examples, e.g. この小説は実際にあった誘拐事件がモデルになっている． This novel is based on a real-life kidnapping case.

I think it's one of those expressions that's easy to decode, but it's handy to check for its validity when wanting to use it. I think it's worth keeping.

実際にある	62365	  
実際にあるの	8980	  
実際にあるん	5634	  
実際にあるか	4219	  
実際にあるんです	3269	  
実際にあると	3027	  
実際にあるのか	2383
Tanaka sentence: アーノルドは物を実際にあるがままに見よと教える。 Arnold teaches us to see the object as it really is.

I don't think we need this entry. It isn't always prenominal. 
It could be glossed as "to actually exist" but I feel it's kind of obvious.

koj, daij

koj, meikyo, etc.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>シルキー・シャーク</reb>
+<reb>シルキーシャーク</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>シルキーシャーク</reb>
+<reb>シルキー・シャーク</reb>

Putting this in its own entry

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オグロメジロザメ

Splitting from 尾黒目白鮫

Splitting from 2554230.