daijr (3) gives:
「卸値の定価に対する割合」
「卸値の〜割合」 = “proportion of wholesale price”
「定価に対する」 = “with respect to list price”

Correct and elaborate “proportion of price” sense (which was backwards) – it’s *of* wholesale price, *as* proportion of list price.
That is, this is typically a number like 7, 8, or 9, indicating that the wholesale price is 70%, 80%, or 90% of list (retail) price. (Were it w/r/t wholesale price, it would be a number like 11, 12, 13, indicating markup.)
Used in business class, specifically in context of purchaser negotiations of wholesale price.

@@ -49,2 +49,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・3</xref>
-<gloss>proportion (as tenths of a wholesale price)</gloss>
+<gloss>proportion (of wholesale price, as tenths of list price)</gloss>
@@ -54,1 +53,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・2</xref>

koj, daij, prog, nc, gg5, meikyo

@@ -9,0 +9,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懸け</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懸</keb>
@@ -18,1 +27,3 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1207660">掛け売り</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821290">掛け買い</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +34,13 @@
+<gloss>money owed on an account</gloss>
+<gloss>bill</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821320">掛け蕎麦・かけそば</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821340">掛けうどん・かけうどん</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>hot noodles in broth</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,2 +48,17 @@
-<gloss>partially</gloss>
-<gloss>half</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・3</xref>
+<gloss>proportion (as tenths of a wholesale price)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2148680">掛け・がけ・2</xref>
+<s_inf>after a -masu stem</s_inf>
+<gloss>in the midst of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>after a noun</s_inf>
+<gloss>rest</gloss>
+<gloss>rack</gloss>
+<gloss>hanger</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Tidy-up. Added senses. Doesn't affect the sentences. (We only have sentences indexed to the first three senses.)

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -34 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>to prove to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn out</gloss>
+<gloss>to end up</gloss>
+<gloss>to prove (to be)</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +42,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as ...からなる or ...よりなる</s_inf>
@@ -40,0 +46 @@
+<gloss>to be made up of</gloss>
@@ -44,0 +51,3 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be completed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be realized</gloss>
@@ -46 +55,2 @@
-<gloss>to be complete</gloss>
+<gloss>to be attained</gloss>
+<gloss>to be accomplished</gloss>
@@ -51,2 +61,4 @@
-<gloss>to change into</gloss>
-<gloss>to be exchanged for</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to change (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>to transform</gloss>
@@ -57,2 +69,28 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1648720">成り済ます・1</xref>
-<gloss>to play a role</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow (to do)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come to</gloss>
+<gloss>to amount to</gloss>
+<gloss>to add up to</gloss>
+<gloss>to make</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to play (the part of)</gloss>
+<gloss>to act as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be used for</gloss>
+<gloss>to be useful for</gloss>
+<gloss>to serve as</gloss>
@@ -66,0 +105 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -69 +108,2 @@
-<s_inf>as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お + masu stem + になる or ご + noun+ になる</s_inf>

@@ -63 +63,2 @@
-<gloss>to be promoted (shogi)</gloss>
+<field>&shogi;</field>
+<gloss>to be promoted</gloss>

i don't think an x-ref between homonyms is a good idea unless there is 
widespread confusion even among native speakers (e.g. as evidenced by a note 
or an x-ref in a japanese-japanese dictionary)

See below.

I agree that you are correct in that my request is for a cross-reference to a homonym and that Rene is also correct in stating that the two words are not linked. That is why I requested a one-way link only.
The difficulty, as I see it, is a question about how one can help the user to get the greatest benefit out of all your hard work; as opposed to one being focused upon conformity with form.
As it seems to me, the predominant entry is based upon the verb “to do” something”, the other is based upon an old form of “being, i.e., なり equals です”.
It seemed to me at the time of researching, and then making the submission, that with so many entries for the reading “なる” it may be of great help to the researcher to have the cross-reference. Thus, when the  user makes a search, the result for “なる” is bound to hit on the predominant entry first . Thus, it seemed good to add a note (9) on that entry which states that there is the other entry without implying a relationship. A little bit like a Google search where sometimes it says, “were you really searching for 'X'”
As an incidental point, when one clicks on the cross-reference in “なる[i.e., 也]” one gets “なり 《形; 態》 (n,adj-no) (uk) (See なりに) style; way; shape; form; appearance; state”. Then one has to scroll up the page for “なり 《也》 (aux-v) (1) (uk) (arch) (meaning ～だ、～である) be (an affirmation); (2) (uk) (arch) (meaning ～にある、～にいる. Usu. なる) (See なる) be (location); (n,suf) (3) (usu. 也) sum of money (used to express an exact sum on a receipt, envelope, certificate, etc.)”. The link back to “なる” works all right. However, maybe that is just my browser, but I thought that I would mention it.

OK.Leave it as-is.

i don't think the two なる entries are equivalent.  (one is a verb, the other is the 
rentaikei of the "auxiliary verb" なり)

You are asking for an xref to a  homonym. That's not usual in dictionaries. There may be a case for merging that other なる into this entry (Dajirin keeps them apart, but then it also splits 為る and 成る.)
I think either we merge them (I'm comfortable with that), or we leave it as it is.

See below.

I have not amended the above, but I am wondering if you could add a [9] with a cross-link to the following:-

なる (suf,adj-f) (1) (arch) (See なり) that is in; (2) who is called; that is called; (3) that is

This very useful entry for the use of "なる" as a suffix is potentially overlooked as the searcher reads through the main entry above and reads all that entry has to say, but does not think to search elsewhere. With such text as "王なる者", this entry explains all.

I am not suggesting that there is a reverse link back to the main entry above. Simply, the suggested link to help the seacher, especially with "鳴る" following the main entry above.

Seems OK.

koj, meikyo, etc.

note could probably use some work

@@ -65,0 +65,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do ...</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -109 +109 @@
-<s_inf>as お + masu stem + になる or ご + noun+ になる</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as お + verb -masu stem + になる, or ご + noun + になる</s_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

Tidy-up. Added senses. Doesn't affect the sentences. (We only have sentences indexed to the first three senses.)

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -34 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>to prove to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn out</gloss>
+<gloss>to end up</gloss>
+<gloss>to prove (to be)</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +42,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as ...からなる or ...よりなる</s_inf>
@@ -40,0 +46 @@
+<gloss>to be made up of</gloss>
@@ -44,0 +51,3 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be completed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be realized</gloss>
@@ -46 +55,2 @@
-<gloss>to be complete</gloss>
+<gloss>to be attained</gloss>
+<gloss>to be accomplished</gloss>
@@ -51,2 +61,4 @@
-<gloss>to change into</gloss>
-<gloss>to be exchanged for</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to change (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>to turn (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>to transform</gloss>
@@ -57,2 +69,28 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1648720">成り済ます・1</xref>
-<gloss>to play a role</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow (to do)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to come to</gloss>
+<gloss>to amount to</gloss>
+<gloss>to add up to</gloss>
+<gloss>to make</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to play (the part of)</gloss>
+<gloss>to act as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be used for</gloss>
+<gloss>to be useful for</gloss>
+<gloss>to serve as</gloss>
@@ -66,0 +105 @@
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -69 +108,2 @@
-<s_inf>as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お + masu stem + になる or ご + noun+ になる</s_inf>

@@ -63 +63,2 @@
-<gloss>to be promoted (shogi)</gloss>
+<field>&shogi;</field>
+<gloss>to be promoted</gloss>

i don't think an x-ref between homonyms is a good idea unless there is 
widespread confusion even among native speakers (e.g. as evidenced by a note 
or an x-ref in a japanese-japanese dictionary)

See below.

I agree that you are correct in that my request is for a cross-reference to a homonym and that Rene is also correct in stating that the two words are not linked. That is why I requested a one-way link only.
The difficulty, as I see it, is a question about how one can help the user to get the greatest benefit out of all your hard work; as opposed to one being focused upon conformity with form.
As it seems to me, the predominant entry is based upon the verb “to do” something”, the other is based upon an old form of “being, i.e., なり equals です”.
It seemed to me at the time of researching, and then making the submission, that with so many entries for the reading “なる” it may be of great help to the researcher to have the cross-reference. Thus, when the  user makes a search, the result for “なる” is bound to hit on the predominant entry first . Thus, it seemed good to add a note (9) on that entry which states that there is the other entry without implying a relationship. A little bit like a Google search where sometimes it says, “were you really searching for 'X'”
As an incidental point, when one clicks on the cross-reference in “なる[i.e., 也]” one gets “なり 《形; 態》 (n,adj-no) (uk) (See なりに) style; way; shape; form; appearance; state”. Then one has to scroll up the page for “なり 《也》 (aux-v) (1) (uk) (arch) (meaning ～だ、～である) be (an affirmation); (2) (uk) (arch) (meaning ～にある、～にいる. Usu. なる) (See なる) be (location); (n,suf) (3) (usu. 也) sum of money (used to express an exact sum on a receipt, envelope, certificate, etc.)”. The link back to “なる” works all right. However, maybe that is just my browser, but I thought that I would mention it.

OK.Leave it as-is.

i don't think the two なる entries are equivalent.  (one is a verb, the other is the 
rentaikei of the "auxiliary verb" なり)

You are asking for an xref to a  homonym. That's not usual in dictionaries. There may be a case for merging that other なる into this entry (Dajirin keeps them apart, but then it also splits 為る and 成る.)
I think either we merge them (I'm comfortable with that), or we leave it as it is.

See below.

I have not amended the above, but I am wondering if you could add a [9] with a cross-link to the following:-

なる (suf,adj-f) (1) (arch) (See なり) that is in; (2) who is called; that is called; (3) that is

This very useful entry for the use of "なる" as a suffix is potentially overlooked as the searcher reads through the main entry above and reads all that entry has to say, but does not think to search elsewhere. With such text as "王なる者", this entry explains all.

I am not suggesting that there is a reverse link back to the main entry above. Simply, the suggested link to help the seacher, especially with "鳴る" following the main entry above.

Seems OK.

koj, meikyo, etc.

note could probably use some work

@@ -65,0 +65,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お+masu-stem+になる, ご+noun+になる, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do ...</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc. say it's the lunar calendar, but Daijirin and Kojien make it clear it's the solar calendar in this case.

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>first day of spring (approx. Feb. 4)</gloss>
+<gloss>first day of spring (according to the solar calendar, approx. Feb. 4)</gloss>

prog, gg5, nc

@@ -22,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to drop</gloss>
+<gloss>to shed (tears)</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>to complain</gloss>
@@ -31,1 +34,1 @@
-<gloss>to shed (tears)</gloss>
+<gloss>to let one's feelings show</gloss>

http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?p=こぼす&stype=0&dtype=3

namida wo kobosu

@@ -28,0 +28,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to shed (tears)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<s_inf>賭けする should be 賭けをする or 賭する(とする)</s_inf>

a note rarely hurts

I agree too. I think the 賭けする should be 賭けをする or 賭する. Perhaps a note about that?
Moved the more common 賭け to the front and tidied the frequency tags.

@@ -5,1 +5,2 @@
-<keb>賭</keb>
+<keb>賭け</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -10,2 +11,1 @@
-<keb>賭け</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>賭</keb>
@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1854680">賭する・とする</xref>

i largely agree, but 「賭けする」 gets many legitimate hits on the web

See below.

have not amended the above because I may have missed a point. However, is the classification correct? It seems to me that is should be [n] and not [n,vs]. In addition, "する" cannot be added to "かけ" and the "と" to which "する" would be added is not present. 
 
"かけ" is the bet or the wager. The verb would be either "とする" or "かける". Elsewhere you have the following entry which also covers the [vs]:-

賭する 【とする】 (vs-s) to stake; to risk; to bet; to wager 
In addition, you have another entry:-

賭ける 【かける】 (v1,vt) (also written 懸ける or 掛ける) to wager; to bet; to risk; to stake; to gamble; (P)

With this entry, whilst I can see the relationship with “懸ける or 掛ける”, the concept of gambling does not seem to be a main feature of “懸ける or 掛ける”, ie., in so far as to make it an obvious substitute for “賭” in the written form [as opposed to the spoken “kakeru” homonym where the kanji is not relevant]. However, that usage of “懸ける or 掛ける” may be quite customary in Japanese text and not yet discovered by a novice like me.

Also, in relation to extent that “懸ける or 掛ける” may be a normal substitute in the written word, I was thinking that there should be a cross-reference included for ease of searching.

I did, but then I was able to renumber the index OK, so I moved that sense up.

@@ -49,0 +49,7 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1511940">編み目</xref>
+<gloss>stitch</gloss>
+<gloss>texture</gloss>
+<gloss>weave</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -57,7 +64,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1511940">編み目</xref>
-<gloss>stitch</gloss>
-<gloss>texture</gloss>
-<gloss>weave</gloss>
-</sense>

i think you nicked an 'h' there.  should this (n) go before the (suf) entries (makes sense to me), or would that cause too much havoc for Paul's example indexing?

@@ -54,1 +54,1 @@
-<gloss>-is</gloss>
+<gloss>-ish</gloss>

GG5

@@ -54,1 +54,8 @@
-<gloss>-ish</gloss>
+<gloss>-is</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1511940">編み目</xref>
+<gloss>stitch</gloss>
+<gloss>texture</gloss>
+<gloss>weave</gloss>

Entry created

i still wonder about the reading.  neither one would really surprise me

http://dic.search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UTF-8&p=priestess&fr=dic&stype=prefix

The above ref quotes the Random House EJ:
1. priest・ess-ランダムハウス英和大辞典
n. (特にキリスト教以外の宗教で)祭式を執行する女の聖職者，女祭司，巫女みこ.⇒-ESS【語法】［1693］ ...

I have emailed Winnie asking for refs. I am mainly concerned about the reading - I think 女祭司 is valid. I see enough pages using it.

see rejected 'amendment' to 祭司

no references given, appears to be largely chinese.  cannot confirm reading 
given.  one hit for おんなさいし from here: 
http://hi.baidu.com/xial1030/blog/item/c577944af2f2a92609f7efd7.html
but that's a chinese site so i suspect that they don't necessarily know 
japanese too well.  suggest rejection until references can be supplied