daij, gg5

not io, "cut off" > "cut down"

@@ -11,1 +11,6 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切落す</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切落とす</keb>
@@ -21,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>to cut down</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut off</gloss>

rejecting this branch

-because ん isn't being applied to all senses, it would make a mess of restrictions.  ん has its own entry that used to redirect here, but the x-ref seems to have been lost
-as the past participle, i think that 'written' is sufficiently vague about timing.  and they are still used today depending on context (tombstones, etc.)

shouldn't "ん" be a headword/reading? rather than just a note?
"sometimes written 乃 or 之" should maybe be rephrased too 
(it's not the case of "sometimes" as much as it's the case of 
"back in the good ol' days")

We probably need to regularize whether these "sentence end" annotations go at the start of end of the gloss. At present they are all over the place.

daijr

* Move “at sentence-end” into text, instead of [note], since Latin characters
* Add “at sentence-end” to [4] “confident conclusion”
* Add notes on tone (rising, falling)

@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>indicates a confident conclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end, falling tone) indicates a confident conclusion</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +31,1 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates emotional emphasis</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end) indicates emotional emphasis</gloss>
@@ -36,2 +35,1 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates question</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end, rising tone) indicates question</gloss>

The "sometimes" might better be "originally".
As for ん, that's already a headword in 2139720, where sense 3 says "abbr. of particle "no"". So searching for it gets you to the right place. The entry for の is complicated enough already, and we've split 乃/之 to declutter it. I think keeping ん apart too is appropriate.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<s_inf>occasionally ん, sometimes written 乃 or 之</s_inf>
+<s_inf>occasionally ん, orig. written 乃 or 之</s_inf>

shouldn't "ん" be a headword/reading? rather than just a note?
"sometimes written 乃 or 之" should maybe be rephrased too 
(it's not the case of "sometimes" as much as it's the case of 
"back in the good ol' days")

We probably need to regularize whether these "sentence end" annotations go at the start of end of the gloss. At present they are all over the place.

daijr

* Move “at sentence-end” into text, instead of [note], since Latin characters
* Add “at sentence-end” to [4] “confident conclusion”
* Add notes on tone (rising, falling)

@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>indicates a confident conclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end, falling tone) indicates a confident conclusion</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +31,1 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates emotional emphasis</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end) indicates emotional emphasis</gloss>
@@ -36,2 +35,1 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates question</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence-end, rising tone) indicates question</gloss>

〈湧（き）／沸（き）／涌（き）／わき〉〈上（が）／あが〉る

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 湧き上がる │ 87,361 │ 54.7% │
│ 沸き上がる │ 24,921 │ 15.6% │
│ わき上がる │ 14,978 │  9.4% │
│ 沸きあがる │  9,427 │  5.9% │ - sK
│ 湧きあがる │  8,849 │  5.5% │ - sK
│ 湧き上る　 │  1,455 │  0.9% │ - sK
│ 涌き上がる │    712 │  0.4% │ - add rK (daijr/s, meikyo)
│ 沸き上る　 │    313 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ 涌きあがる │    246 │  0.2% │ - add sK
│ 湧上る　　 │    212 │  0.1% │ - add sK
│ 湧上がる　 │     66 │  0.0% │
│ わき上る　 │     63 │  0.0% │
│ 沸上がる　 │     39 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 涌き上る　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - drop
│ わきあがる │ 11,085 │  6.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<keb>涌き上がる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +27 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +31 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26 +34,6 @@
-<keb>涌き上る</keb>
+<keb>涌きあがる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>湧上る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,0 +43 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

n-grams
沸き上がる	2620
湧き上がる	3468
湧き上る	107
わき上がる	1122
沸き上る	44
涌き上る	1
沸上がる	8
湧きあがる	654
沸きあがる	385

added 湧きあがる and 沸きあがる

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>湧き上がる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,7 @@
-<keb>湧き上がる</keb>
+<keb>わき上がる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>湧きあがる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>沸きあがる</keb>
@@ -12,3 +20,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>わき上がる</keb>

i'm tempted to call it io based on the daij rule

Google (3,000,000+ results for "両想い")

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>両想い</keb>

gg5, prog, nc, eij.  all have 'vine'

wikipedia defines 'bine' as the ~opposite~ of what was given as the original definition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bine_(botany)

the original amendment to remove 'vine', etc. and replace it with a confusing definition was unreferenced and should be reversed, IMO

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>vine</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>shoots which grow in a helix around a support and climb with tendrils or suckers as opposed to vines; esp. hops, bindweed, runner bean, French bean and honeysuckles</gloss>
+<gloss>tendril</gloss>
+<gloss>runner</gloss>
@@ -18,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>temple (part of a pair of glasses that goes over the ear)</gloss>
+<gloss>bow</gloss>
@@ -22,1 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>bow</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">part of a pair of glasses that goes over the ear</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>bine</gloss>

GG5

"Temple" is new to me.

@@ -19,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>arm</gloss>
+<gloss>sidepiece</gloss>
+<gloss>lug arm</gloss>

daijr, daijs, Wiki
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=蔓&dtype=3&dname=2na&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=02858800

I think having the explanatory bit in sense 2 will be helpful, since none of the English terms I found and listed here sounded all that familiar to me.

@@ -15,0 +15,15 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>temple (part of a pair of glasses that goes over the ear)</gloss>
+<gloss>temple arm</gloss>
+<gloss>arm</gloss>
+<gloss>bow</gloss>
+<gloss>earpiece</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>connections</gloss>
+<gloss>contacts</gloss>
+<gloss>influence</gloss>
+<gloss>financial supporter</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5 sense 1 "〈所有･所属〉 —'s; of; belonging to"

Need to be broader - "'s" is the wrong register in many situations.
I still want to keep this distinct from the everyday の - these kanji forms are real outliers, and are not in most dictionaries.
We still need to resolve the handling of explanatory "meanings".

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>possessive particle; 之 used esp. on tombs</s_inf>
+<s_inf>indicates possessive; 之 used esp. on tombs</s_inf>
@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>of</gloss>
+<gloss>belonging to</gloss>

I get there's a lot of history to this discussion but I think it's only confusing to have this separate from the main の entry with an 
[arch]. I think it'd be better to add these to the kanji field of the other の entry and tag them as oK

Better? "possessive article" just isn't right, that's not what の means, it's what の is.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1469800">の・1</xref>
@@ -18,2 +17,2 @@
-<s_inf>之 used esp. on tombs, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>possessive particle</gloss>
+<s_inf>possessive particle; 之 used esp. on tombs</s_inf>
+<gloss>'s</gloss>

OK.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>之</keb>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<s_inf>之 used esp. on tombs, etc.</s_inf>

It's the act of clipping. It used to be tagged "comp" but it's used elsewhere.

What's the source/rationale for having 
"clippings" as a separate sense?

Daijr, GG5, etc. all say scraps, end pieces, etc. I'll leave the shaved there.

https://www.kroger.com/p/kroger-beef-shaved-steak/0001111034567
http://www.oldneighborhoodfoods.com/company-news/old-neighborhood-shaved-steak-and-shaved-pork-now-in-canada/

"切り落とし" is sold in supermarkets. As a product name, the better translation would be "shaved beef/pork"

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>shaved meat</gloss>

No ref that I can find.

@@ -26,1 +26,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

The newest edition of sankoku (but not the older ones) has this as [vs,vt].

It also has a new colloquial sense ('to buy / purchase something important') that it says became popular in the 2010s. We might want to see if it sticks around before adding it, though.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 　お迎えし　 │ 556,675 │
│ をお迎えし　 │ 296,414 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ 　お迎えする │ 121,007 │
│ をお迎えする │  70,101 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

迎え is not vs in kokugos

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5 (迎え)
prog: お迎えが参りました  A man has come to fetch you.

Daijs's definition isn't saying that it refers to the person, only that it shows respect for the person. The shinmeikai definition is for 迎え, not お迎え. But there's no reason to think that the polite form isn't used in the same way. Prog also has an example.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>person coming to meet, receive, pick up</gloss>
+<gloss>person sent to meet or pick up someone</gloss>

daijisen: また、迎える人を敬って、その人を迎えることをいう語。
shinmeikai: また、迎えに行く人。

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>person coming to meet, receive, pick up</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Agree. A pity, though.

@@ -7,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>負けないくらい</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +9,0 @@
-<re_restr>負けないぐらい</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まけないくらい</reb>
-<re_restr>負けないくらい</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2672130">負けないくらい・まけないくらい</xref>

actually, i think this entry fails 2/3 now.  needs to be split?

Seems OK, 12k hits.

英辞郎

Same article.
Term is used (in 英辞郎) in the medical sense of “hyperactivity”; in the article, it is used as plain “excess activity”, here to describe panic.

Daijr, daijs. (造り込み: 日本刀の刀身の造形。)
ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (作り込み: その模型は細部の作り込みが見事だった. The detailed craftsmanship that went into (making) that model was amazing. | That model was crafted with superb attention to detail.)

造り込み gets a lot of non-sword hits, and I think it's being used for 作り込み (craftsmanship, build, manufacturing.) I'm

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>作り込み</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,1 +15,8 @@
-<gloss>buil up</gloss>
+<gloss>manufacturing</gloss>
+<gloss>craftsmanship</gloss>
+<gloss>build</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>造り込み</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>molding a sword blade</gloss>

WWW pages

Seems to be often just glossed as "behavior".

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>(appropriate) responding behavior (esp. in an emergency)</gloss>
+<gloss>behavior (esp. in response to an emergency, medical situation, etc.)</gloss>

60,000 hits

Same article; seems commonly used in emergency situations (fire, SARS, etc.)

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Split from 負けないぐらい

Fair enough.

can't hurt to add the word "cake" or "pastry", i guess.  i would not have known what it was otherwise.

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>religieuse</gloss>
+<gloss>religieuse (pastry)</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス

Should we mention it's the cake; not a nun?

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2595300">注意欠陥多動性障害・ちゅういけっかんたどうせいしょうがい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2595300">注意欠陥多動性障害</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>

LSD, GG5, etc.

リーダーズ+プラス, Eijiro, Kagaku jiten

LSD, Kagaku jiten, Igaku jiten

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

GG5

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>sacred tree</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1044880">クリスマスツリー</xref>

大辞林

* 大辞林 gives definition “Christmas tree” in entry 聖樹
…and I saw it used as such today (at sweet shop, one sweet was called 聖夜 (Holy night, Christmas eve), while another was 聖樹 (Holy tree, Christmas tree), clearly in the holiday theme)
* …but word is clearly used more broadly to mean “holy tree”, as some searching reveals. E.g., the 大辞林 entry on Ficus religiosa (Sacred fig tree) （印度菩提樹　インド菩提樹　インドぼだいじゅ） contains the line
「仏教では聖樹とされている」 (roughly “a holy tree in Buddhism”)
…which cannot sensibly be interpreted as “Christmas tree”.

…and merry Christmas! 良いクリスマスを！

I should have mentioned that the sites I quoted were dug up by the good people in the Deep in Japan FB group.

Thanks. Meikyo has 語源未詳 too. Perhaps we could add ("product name"), or just leave it alone.

can't find any evidence of a babybjörn product outside of Japan called stye/sty/staj and I'm not aware od any Swedish word pronounced like that either. the theory doesn't strike me as likely because it appears to be very recently coined - I found no relevant 20th century hits on google books - and if it were originallh a product name then surely it'd be trademarked abd easily traceable.

https://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/8524989/
赤ちゃんのよだれかけを日本では「スタイ」と呼びますが、これはいったい何語なんでしょう?　実はこれはスウェーデンの大手ベビー用品メーカーのベイビービヨルン社のプラスティック製よだれかけの商品名で、これが日本で大ヒットしたことから「スタイ」の名が定着したようです。英語では「Bib」といいます。「sty」は「豚小屋」または「ものもらい」の意味になるので、間違っても使わないようにしましょう。
Also: https://www.psling.net/bib/

So, should we have Swedish as the lsrc? Over to Marcus et al.

When I dug deeper they were mostly Japanese items being sold. Very odd.

Not in any serious references, Unihan, etc. If it ever had that meaning it has long lost it.

@@ -22,4 +21,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&num;</pos>
-<gloss>seven</gloss>
-</sense>

https://www.benricho.org/kanji/kansuji.html

Might be better off as a separate entry

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&num;</pos>
+<gloss>seven</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr (sense 2): "約束を実行する保証として相手に預けておくもの。"

Splitting into senses.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>collateral</gloss>
-<gloss>pledge</gloss>
+<gloss>pawn</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pledge</gloss>
+<gloss>security</gloss>
+<gloss>guarantee</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1853380">質に入れる・しちにいれる</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>pledge</gloss>
+<gloss>pawned article</gloss>

GG5, Eijiro, LSD

we don't allow ~的 entries without a dictionary reference, let alone obvious constructions built upon them.  (and this one only gets 53 google hits.)  i don't think this entry can be accepted

新船 is the main entry.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>新船</keb>
+</k_ele>

Daijisen, Daijirin