daij, meikyo

Splitting into senses.
I don't think "youth" or "lad' is needed.

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. in legal contexts</s_inf>
@@ -20,3 +24 @@
-<gloss>young boy</gloss>
-<gloss>youth</gloss>
-<gloss>lad</gloss>
+<gloss>child</gloss>

Why the plural? Strange that it was never corrected.

@@ -18,2 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>boys</gloss>
-<gloss>juveniles</gloss>
+<gloss>boy</gloss>
+<gloss>juvenile</gloss>
+<gloss>young boy</gloss>
+<gloss>youth</gloss>
+<gloss>lad</gloss>

gg5, prog

more usefully glossed as adjectives.  since 軽率 is glossed as adjectives, changing this to adj also means that we aren't saying that the antonym of the noun "caution" is the adjective "rash", which seems odd to me

@@ -19,4 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>discretion</gloss>
-<gloss>prudence</gloss>
-<gloss>caution</gloss>
-<gloss>care</gloss>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1252910">軽率</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1252910">軽率</xref>
+<gloss>careful</gloss>
+<gloss>cautious</gloss>
+<gloss>prudent</gloss>
+<gloss>discreet</gloss>
+<gloss>deliberate</gloss>

The kokugos have "切羽詰（ま）る", and the JEs 切羽詰まる, which is the modern form.  I think the latter should lead.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>切羽詰る</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切羽詰る</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 切羽詰る　　 │   5,764 │ 45.3% │ 🡠 adding (daijr/s, shinmeikai)
│ 切羽詰まる　 │   3,862 │ 30.3% │
│ せっぱ詰まる │   1,157 │  9.1% │
│ 切羽つまる　 │     526 │  4.1% │
│ せっぱ詰る　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ せっぱつまる │   1,416 │ 11.1% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 切羽詰っ　　 │ 111,369 │ 49.6% │
│ 切羽詰まっ　 │  60,238 │ 26.8% │
│ せっぱ詰まっ │  24,947 │ 11.1% │
│ 切羽つまっ　 │   6,942 │  3.1% │
│ せっぱ詰っ　 │     409 │  0.2% │
│ せっぱつまっ │  20,522 │  9.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>切羽詰る</keb>
+</k_ele>

https://grammarist.com/spelling/at-wits-end/

Both are OK but I prefer "wits'".

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to be at one's wit's end</gloss>
+<gloss>to be at one's wits' end</gloss>

@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2670880">切羽・せっぱ・2</xref>
-<gloss>to be at one's wits' end</gloss>
+<gloss>to be at one's wit's end</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,4 @@
+<gloss>to be in a fix</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in a desperate situation</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in a pinch</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in a predicament</gloss>

This is a "fork", so it has to be rejected.

The couple and sexual relationship part in that case would come from 関係. As previously stated, 男女 does not imply a couple or relationship.

男女の関係になった means "they had sex"

@@ -25,0 +26,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>couple</gloss>
+<gloss>man and woman (in a sexual relationship)</gloss>
+</sense>

なんにょ from all kokugos

no source has two senses.  i'm happy with it like this

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんにょ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -23,5 +26,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>a man and a woman</gloss>
-<gloss>a couple</gloss>
-</sense>

Frazer Robinson (in a fork) added: "The couple and sexual relationship part in that case would come from 関係. As previously stated, 男女 does not imply a couple or relationship."
This supports my view.

It does, but the ...の関係 is important. Without that I don't think there's an implied relationship.

@@ -26,5 +25,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>couple</gloss>
-<gloss>man and woman (in a sexual relationship)</gloss>
-</sense>

男女の関係になった means "they had sex"

@@ -25,0 +26,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>couple</gloss>
+<gloss>man and woman (in a sexual relationship)</gloss>
+</sense>

なんにょ from all kokugos

no source has two senses.  i'm happy with it like this

@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんにょ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -23,5 +26,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>a man and a woman</gloss>
-<gloss>a couple</gloss>
-</sense>

i don't think we ever labelled expressions as either vi or vt

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Reopening.

Again, I am uncomfortable with this sort of expression being labelled "vt". I'll approve it pro tem, then reopen.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る・1</xref>

* Add [vt]
* Link to [vi] form

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2670990">力が入る</xref>

I don't think the x-refs are needed/helpful.

@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2671000">力をつける・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1585200">力づく</xref>
@@ -24 +22 @@
-<gloss>to give someone a charge</gloss>
+<gloss>to give (someone) a charge</gloss>

I suspect it's leaked into usage from 力尽く. Probably wrong, and [sK] is appropriate.

力づける	7525	63.4%
力づけられる	3005	25.3%

力付けられる	384	3.2%
力付ける	958	8.1%

力尽けられる	0	0.0%
力尽ける	0	0.0%

Couldn't find any dictionary evidence for 力尽ける, seems like the wrong kanji to me.  But it's on twitter here and there, so I guess [sK] doesn't hurt.

(られる is the 2nd-most common inflection, just checked against that form as well as a double-check)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

瞑瞑 from meikyo, daijs, nikk

all kokugos list as adj-t,adv-to.  only nikk has as a noun, and only gg5 has as adj-no.  not sure about "divine"

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>瞑々</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>瞑瞑</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,1 +20,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,1 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,1 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>divine</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス, Kagaku jiten

Merging in submission for 断裁器.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>断裁器</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダンサイキ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>guillotine</gloss>

Daijr: 蛍の光窓の雪 に同じ。 (i.e. the first line of the song.)

I agree that it's probably not needed.

without Auld Lang Syne, I'm not sure this needs to be an entry

Auld Lang Syne moved to enamdict.

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>Auld Lang Syne</gloss>

Koj, Daijr, ルミナス

Merging 1779790.

@@ -6,0 +6,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金敷</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鉄敷き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鉄敷</keb>

Merged with 1682520.

Since we have an entry for 切羽詰まる, I can't see this is needed.

GG5, etc.

Clearly has a specific context.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>interior light</gloss>
+<gloss>interior light (train, etc.)</gloss>

A bit wordy, but I can't think of a suitable trim.

https://dictionary.sanseido-
publ.co.jp/column/sankok18
なかなかマッチョ（男性的）なせりふです。「漢」の字は、
「熱血漢」「硬骨漢」のように、大人のおとこの意味で使わ
れ、ときに力強さを感じさせます。「痴漢」「酔漢」などもあ
りますが、これも大人のおとこです。一方、「男」は、「男
児」「男声」「男優」などと使われますが、これらの場合は、
単に性別のおとこを示しています。

If you search our database for entries ending 
w 漢 then negative words certainly seem to 
dominate. The word that immediately comes to 
my mind is 痴漢 of course. The xref is weird 
though.

Notr can be improved

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative or aggressively masculine nuance</s_inf>

Is the note on sense 4 correct/needed? The cross-referenced example certainly doesn't have a negative nuance.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>usu. used in compounds</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. in compounds</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (of China; 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<s_inf>often negative nuance</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. negative nuance</s_inf>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BC-220 AD)</gloss>
+<gloss>Han dynasty (China, 202 BCE-220 CE)</gloss>

meikyo:
けい‐そつ【軽率】
...
俗に「軽卒」とも書くが、誤用とされることが多い。
kenkyusha nihongo hyogen katsuyo jiten:
【軽率・軽卒】
［1］ 軽率な（人、言動、行為、対応、振る舞い、考え、断定、判断、発言、プレー）
［2］ 軽率に（答える、振る舞う、動く）

i think it's worth having in the entry for 軽率 as iK given the refs above

I think your textbook has a typo. All the refreences are quite clear on the differences between 軽率 and 軽卒. That said, it is likely that some people are using 軽卒 when they mean 軽率 (typical 変換ミス). The question is whether to add 軽卒 to the 軽率 with an "iK" tag.

Hi, further to my recent comment about this, I'm wondering if 軽卒 in the sense of "haste, carelessness, etc." is a typo for 軽率. Google translate gives a meaning of "rash" for 軽卒, and it is definitely printed as 軽卒 in my textbook; however, as I say, I am not sure now if it is a typo or a legitimate variant.

Hi, as far as I can gather, this also (more usually?) means carelessness, haste, thoughtlessness.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>edition (e.g., morning, evening, special)</gloss>
+<gloss>edition (e.g. morning, evening, special)</gloss>

More details on usage, esp. publication year (e.g., 1953刊)

@@ -13,1 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>edition</gloss>
+<gloss>edition (e.g., morning, evening, special)</gloss>
+<gloss>published in (year)</gloss>
+<gloss>publication frequency (e.g. daily, monthly)</gloss>

Entry created

Kanji not kana.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

daijs:
"小児の疳を起こすと考えられていた虫。「―がおこる」「―封じ」"
nikk:
"小児の疳の病を起こすといわれる虫。また、その病気。食物をむやみにとって、消化
不良を起こし、腹ばかりふくらんでやせる。紙などの異物を食べたりする。脾疳（ひか
ん）。"
wiki:
"疳の虫（かんのむし）とは乳児の異常行動を指していう俗称。 ... 「癇の虫」
「勘の虫」などの表記もあるが正しくない。"
__
http://komachi.yomiuri.co.jp/t/2013/0420/587567.htm

sense 2 is definitely not arch, something some old people 
still believe in. of course not marked as arch but I thought 
it might be worthy to mention.
also i'm sort of wondering if there's a good way to mention 
the origin in sense 1? as it says in nikk: "小児の疳の病を起こすとい
われる虫。また、その病気". Maybe it's superfluous though.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>

http://wkp.fresheye.com/wikipedia/ハミウリ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hami_melon

@@ -7,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>哈密瓜</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハミうり</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,3 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハミうり</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -16,1 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>Hami melon/Chinese Hami melon</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>Hami melon (Cucumis melo var. inodorus)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese Hami melon</gloss>
+<gloss>snow melon</gloss>

daijs, Wiki

Daijr, GG5

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>to look daggers at somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>to look daggers at someone</gloss>

on that note, i don't see any reason to make the english translation so unnatural.  all it's really done is change the tense

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>to be looking daggers at somebody</gloss>
+<gloss>to look daggers at somebody</gloss>

in general, edict hasn't seemed to include vi/vt for expressions anyway.  safer without it

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

Reopening.

Hits:
"りきが入る" 31k
"力（りき）が入る" 2.7k

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>りきがはいる</reb>

@@ -28,1 +28,1 @@
-<gloss>be tired (ironic)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be tired (ironic)</gloss>

@@ -27,1 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>be tired (in sumo, ironic)</gloss>
+<field>&sumo;</field>
+<gloss>be tired (ironic)</gloss>

afaik, we have never really labelled expressions with either vi or vt.

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,1 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29,1 +27,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>力を付ける</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,1 +16,6 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to build up one's strength</gloss>
+<gloss>to get stronger</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

Same story.
Original form of 力づける (with particle).

GG5, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, EIjiro

GG5

web hits suggest it is chinese for 'razor'.  i see nothing suggesting it is japanese

koj, daij, gg5, meikyo