GG5, ルミナス: "【日英比較】 日本語では特にビルなどの借用者をいうが, 英語では広く一般の土地･家･ビルの賃借人をいう."

Hmmmm. So GG5's "〔アパート･貸しビルなどの入居者〕 a tenant." is wrong when it mentions "アパート"?
Actually, it probably is. I'll trim it down a bit - it is rather tautological now.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<gloss>(commercial) tenant (esp. in an office block or shopping center)</gloss>
+<gloss>tenant (usu. office block, shopping center, etc.)</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/テナント

Ok, WP to the rescue – it does state that this is used for *commercial* use.
Specifically, it states (somewhat confusingly): “A tenant is a person who contracts to lease a dwelling to abode therein. But in modern-day Japan it is used exclusively to mean …[various kinds of] (shops).” (i.e., basically it’s a resident, but today it means a commercial tenant).

The specific line is:
「ただし、現代の日本では、。。。事業者（店舗）のこととして専ら用いる。」
Notably 「専ら用いる」 “exclusively used”, AFAICT.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<gloss>(commercial) tenant (esp. in an office block)</gloss>
+<gloss>(commercial) tenant (esp. in an office block or shopping center)</gloss>

広辞苑、GG5

Specify *commercial*.
I had vaguely assumed that テナント and 入居者 were synonyms (casual gloss is “tenant” and Japanese friends felt they were different but didn’t clarify much) until I saw a building with:
１Ｆテナント募集
２Ｆ入居者募集
…on it, explicitly contrasting them.
…and then more checking revealed that テナント is esp. commercial (it seems exclusively commercial), while 入居者 is primarily residential, but sometimes commercial.
I’ve tried to reflect this in amended entries.

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<gloss>tenant</gloss>
+<gloss>(commercial) tenant (esp. in an office block)</gloss>

Adding locked-out xref.

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1944870">入居者・にゅうきょしゃ</xref>

Syn

@@ -10,0 +10,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1944870">入居者</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1944870">入居者</xref>

adding "younger (e.g. daughter)" to match Jim's approved changes to 上, although in retrospect, i think in both cases it may actually be better placed in the "superior"/"inferior" sense where it was

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>younger (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -36,1 +37,0 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. 下の妹</s_inf>
@@ -39,1 +39,0 @@
-<gloss>younger (e.g. of family members of a given type, e.g. younger sisters)</gloss>

* Give example and clarify “younger sibling“ sense, e.g. 下の妹 (complementary to 上の妹)
* Also add PoS [adj-no]

@@ -35,0 +35,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>e.g. 下の妹</s_inf>
@@ -37,1 +39,1 @@
-<gloss>younger (e.g. of siblings)</gloss>
+<gloss>younger (e.g. of family members of a given type, e.g. younger sisters)</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>historical kana ortography</gloss>
+<gloss>historical kana orthography</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2150190">歴史的仮名遣い・れきしてきかなづかい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2150190">歴史的仮名遣い</xref>

wiki

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2150190">歴史的仮名遣い・れきしてきかなづかい</xref>

wiki uses "historical kana ortography"

simplifying

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>old kana orthography (as used prior to Japanese government reforms made in 1946)</gloss>
+<gloss>old kana orthography (used before 1946 reform)</gloss>
+<gloss>historical kana ortography</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

I think this split is fine.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2860121">合流点</xref>
-<gloss>flowing together (of rivers)</gloss>
+<gloss>confluence (of rivers)</gloss>
+<gloss>flowing together</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>meeting up (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>uniting (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>joining (of people, groups, parties, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>union</gloss>
+<gloss>linking up</gloss>
@@ -30,3 +32 @@
-<gloss>linking up</gloss>
-<gloss>coming together</gloss>
-<gloss>joining</gloss>
+<gloss>meeting (up)</gloss>

daijs is the same as sankoku.  1= literal rivers. 2 = everything else.
１ 二つ以上の川の流れが合わさって一つになること。「河口近くで—する」
２ 別々に行動していた人・集団・党派などが一つになること。「本隊に—する」

合流	2380190	  
合流し	899341	  verb
合流する	289060	  verb
合流点	84993	  
合流地点	45474	  
合流でき	43820	  verb

Frieren：
１０年前に旅に出た死乳と合流することだ
1. To meet my friend who embarked on a journey 10 years ago.
2. Two reunite with my friend who departed 10 years ago.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=合流する
他動
join（川や道路などが～に）
join（人や集団などと）  <---- people and groups, etc.
句動

～と合流する
join up with
句動
hook up with
単語帳
～の影にいる（人）と合流する
join someone in the shade of
単語帳
～の真ん中で合流する
meet in the center of
数人のグループに合流する
join a small group

Came here to add clarity that this can apply to people(friends, etc.), saw some other things... (and created 合流点 as part of that)

I don't usually suggest this, but maybe one sense would be simpler for English speakers?  Note that *all* of the glosses in [2] can be used perfectly well in English for rivers.

If not, I've suggested a reorganization of the glosses to match the kokugos' split.

Sankoku has two senses. One is explicitly rivers. One is explicitly people. Neither covers metaphorical uses like "tech trends coming together", it's not clear that sankoku's "people" definition should cover armies joining forces, or why cars should be more like rivers than people (merging of traffic). Maybe cars are more of a "flow".  But this feels somewhat arbitrary.  daijs seems like a clearer split, [1] = rivers (etymological meaning), [2] = people, groups, and など, everything else...

I created the xref as one sense.  To keep this entry as two senses, it seems the xref should perhaps also be split in two.  The simplest split for me feels like "rivers" -> confluence, and "everything else" -> junction, meeting point, etc....  But again, all of the sense[2] glosses seem to work fine for rivers as well.

I'd rather put vehicular traffic in a 3rd sense than arbitrarily squeeze it into the "river" sense, just because cars "flow"(or whatever the justification might be, it's honestly not quite clear to me).
===

At minimum, 51% explicitly verbal. Not clear from the old glosses, which should probably have more gerunds.  Looking at the ngram numbers in the new proposal at the xref, it looks like we'd be better recommending the xref as a gloss for the noun "confluence".  Just giving the xref will also expose the word "confluence" in situations where that might be the right translation for 合流.

@@ -20,5 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>confluence (of rivers)</gloss>
-<gloss>merge (of traffic)</gloss>
-<gloss>conflux</gloss>
-<gloss>junction</gloss>
-<gloss>joining</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2860121">合流点</xref>
+<gloss>flowing together (of rivers)</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>union (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>meeting up (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>uniting (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>merging (e.g. of traffic)</gloss>
@@ -32 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>merging</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>joining</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

G n-grams 2380342

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

adding some additional glosses from gg5, prog, nc.  removing "recombining" as AFAIK 合流 doesn't suggest that they were ever together before

@@ -19,1 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>(traffic) merge</gloss>
+<gloss>merge (of traffic)</gloss>
+<gloss>conflux</gloss>
+<gloss>junction</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
@@ -25,1 +28,1 @@
-<gloss>union (of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>union (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>merge</gloss>
-<gloss>recombining</gloss>
+<gloss>merging</gloss>
+<gloss>coming together</gloss>

G n-grams:
手放す	322817
手離す	  7431
手ばなす	  1249
てばなす	   504

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手ばなす</keb>

GG5, KM n-grams:
手放す	9691
手離す	226
てばなす	15

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手離す</keb>

Yes, subtle. Daijirin has 4 senses and GG5 three.

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1621090">大振り・1</xref>
@@ -24,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>short swing of a bat, raquet, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>short swing of a bat, racquet, etc.</gloss>

新和英中辞典

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>short swing of a bat, raquet, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

Wording – add glosses, reorder

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss>smallish</gloss>
+<gloss>on the small side</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat small</gloss>
+<gloss>undersized</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>smallish</gloss>
-<gloss>undersized</gloss>

Forget to edit this note after I copied and pasted it.

@@ -79 +79 @@
-<s_inf>as ...上で(は)</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ...上は</s_inf>

Sorry, I did have it on my to-do list. They're correctly indexed now.

The index file is generated weekly, and downloaded into WWWJDIC on Sundays. I'll leave this open to remind me to check.

Just to confirm, was this reindexed? Dunno if it's not synced yet, but on WWWJDIC at least, I see "(6) 寒かったうえに、風も強かった。 It was cold, and, in addition, it was windy."

Yes, reindexing is needed.

GG5, Koj.

A bit wordy.

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>tenant (esp. in contrast to or from point of view of landlord)</gloss>
+<gloss>tenant (esp. in contrast to a landlord)</gloss>

ジーニアス (for たなご reading – also lots of Google hits)
広辞苑、新解さん (for specific “contrast with landlord”)

* Clarify usage – specifically in *contrast* to landlord. E.g., I’ve never seen 「店子募集」 but I’ve been *called* a 店子.
* Add alt. pronunciation with 連濁 – seems rarer, but is used

(This is part of looking into テナント、入居者。)

Also, this seems a somewhat dated or dialectical term, perhaps 関西弁／京都弁 – Kyoto residents in 40s use it casually, while some people from elsewhere find it a bit funny, and 新解さん flags it as especially 江戸時代. I haven’t listed it as [ksb] – can’t tell for sure (and probably remains in legal usage at least), but wanted to note it here.

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たなご</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>tenant</gloss>
+<gloss>tenant (esp. in contrast to or from point of view of landlord)</gloss>
+<gloss>renter</gloss>

褌	92050	29.6%
犢鼻褌	265	0.1%
ふんどし	218918	70.3%
とくびこん	40	0.0%

I think とうさぎ is also ok

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daij

This refers specifically to the Japanese garment.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<reb>たふさぎ</reb>
+<reb>たふさ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -29,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>fundoshi</gloss>
@@ -31,3 +35 @@
-<gloss>breechcloth</gloss>
-<gloss>breechclout</gloss>
-<gloss>traditional Japanese male underwear</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditional Japanese men's undergarment made from a length of cotton</gloss>

@@ -47,1 +47,1 @@
-<gloss>sumo wrestler's ornamental apron</gloss>
+<gloss>wrestler's ornamental apron</gloss>

@@ -46,0 +46,1 @@
+<field>&sumo;</field>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daij

我家 should be considered [io].  adding an entry for it with some different readings

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<keb>我家</keb>
+<keb>わが家</keb>
@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<keb>わが家</keb>
+<keb>我家</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

GG5, ルミナス, Daijr, Koj

@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>わが家</keb>
@@ -24,2 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>our house</gloss>
-<gloss>our home</gloss>
+<gloss>one's house</gloss>
+<gloss>one's home</gloss>
+<gloss>one's family</gloss>

i think that's an incorrect (or at least non-standard) spelling of 'racquet'

@@ -31,1 +31,1 @@
-<gloss>large swing (bat, raquet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>large swing (bat, racquet, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1348340">小振り・1</xref>

Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス

@@ -22,1 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +27,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>large swing (bat, raquet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>long sweeping stroke</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

Wording – it’s specifically “*somewhat* large”.

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<gloss>large</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat large</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,1 @@
+<gloss>on the large size</gloss>

i think it could easily be merged.  i've added it there

炻 is not a JIS208 or JIS212 kanji (it's in JIS213), so it can't be in an entry yet.
I think this should be merged with 1703290 and restricted to the second sense. I could be persuaded otherwise.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>炻器</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see">石器</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1703290">石器</xref>

大辞林、広辞苑

(Need to approve edit of 石器 before this one.)
* Add kanji 炻器
* Reorder – stoneware is the usual gloss, AFAICT (that’s the corresponding English WP page, say)
* Link to 石器, which is also used in this sense (as per 国語辞書)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>炻器</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see">石器</xref>
+<gloss>stoneware</gloss>
@@ -13,1 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>stoneware</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>greening (planting to increase greenery)</gloss>
+<gloss>greening (i.e. planting to increase greenery)</gloss>

GG5

* Add “greenery” – that’s the better translation of this term (saw in park today with “greening” as translation) – it’s the exact translation and used in the same sense.
植林 is the term for tree-planting specifically (read in an article last week), e.g., for environmental protection.

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>greening (planting to increase greenery)</gloss>

Yes, splitting.

@@ -9,6 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>せっ器</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>炻器</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -21,1 +15,0 @@
-<stagk>石器</stagk>
@@ -26,5 +19,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stoneware</gloss>
-<gloss>ceramics fired at a high temperature</gloss>
-</sense>

* Adding spelling 炻器 (is this ok now?)
As per earlier comments, and seeing that partial JIS0213 is apparently ok now, should we add back 炻器?
…and if so, as per Rene’s earlier comment (Comment 6 of 2012-03-16 06:18:28), we should split entries (b/c not merging on iK etc.)
(Not doing this myself b/c wanted to leave up to editors.)

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>炻器</keb>

no changes have been made.  rolling in rather than rejecting so that comments remain on the main branch.

removing 炻器 for now, as Jim mentioned on the mailing list.  based on my reasoning above about 石器 being iK for sense 2, i'm now not sure these should be merged even without 炻器.

@@ -11,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>炻器</keb>

if 炻器 is added, these two entries should no longer be merged.  石器 is iK for 炻器 and we have a 'policy' based on not merging based on iK or io, etc.
=
entries should be:
石器[せっき]
[1][n]
  stone implement (e.g. stone age arrowheads); stone tool
=
and:
=
せっ器;炻器;石器[iK][せっき]
[1][n]
  stoneware; ceramics fired at a high temperature

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<keb>炻器</keb>
+<keb>せっ器</keb>
@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<keb>せっ器</keb>
+<keb>炻器</keb>

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1956450">小降り</xref>

not necessarily.  see nikkoku:
古事記〔７１２〕下「其の焼遺（やけのこれ）る木を取りて琴に作りしに」

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>to escape being burned (e.g. a building not burning down, books surviving in a burned down building)</gloss>
+<gloss>to escape being burned (esp. of a building or the items in it)</gloss>

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

Add examples to clarify that this is about a *building* fire.

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to escape being burned</gloss>
+<gloss>to escape being burned (e.g. a building not burning down, books surviving in a burned down building)</gloss>
+<gloss>to survive a fire</gloss>

genius: 〔老人ホームなどの〕inhabitant; resident

Only seeing "inmate" in gg5.

reverso

In modern English, "inmate" refers to someone in a prison or psychiatric hospital. I don't think 入居者 is used for that.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1079990">テナント</xref>
-<gloss>tenant (esp. residential tenant in apartment block)</gloss>
+<gloss>tenant (esp. of an apartment)</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>inhabitant</gloss>
-<gloss>inmate</gloss>
+<gloss>resident (e.g. of a nursing home)</gloss>

GG5, リーダーズ+プラス

@@ -14,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>occupant</gloss>
+<gloss>inhabitant</gloss>
+<gloss>inmate</gloss>

See comments at テナント – this is especially residential, but not exclusively, AFAICT. (テナント seems (almost?) exclusively commercial though.)

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>tenant</gloss>
+<gloss>tenant (esp. residential tenant in apartment block)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1786120">大降り</xref>

the adv deserves to go first

@@ -11,5 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>be quiet!</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +15,5 @@
+<gloss>peacefully</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>be quiet!</gloss>

The problem is that it can also mean: "calmly, quietly, etc."

@@ -14,0 +14,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>calmly</gloss>
+<gloss>quietly</gloss>
+<gloss>gently</gloss>
+</sense>

eij

may do more harm than good, but i guess it can stay

Not the best entry.

Entry created

Not really an abbreviation.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

俺ん家	26959
俺家	1710

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>家</keb>
+<keb>ん家</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ん家</keb>
+<keb>家</keb>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

"俺ん家" 74k (b)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>家</keb>
+</k_ele>

Merged with 1070880.

Entry created

wiki
aligning with 2150180 and 1230460

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2150180">現代仮名遣い・げんだいかなづかい</xref>
@@ -20 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>new kana orthography (as laid out by the Japanese government in 1946)</gloss>
+<gloss>new kana orthography (1946 reform, amended 1986)</gloss>
+<gloss>modern kana orthography</gloss>

Google hits:
新仮名遣い:  12k
新仮名遣:　  800
新仮名使い:  1k

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>新仮名遣い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>新仮名遣い</keb>
+<keb>新仮名使い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +20 @@
-<gloss>modern kana usage (as laid out by the Japanese government in 1946)</gloss>
+<gloss>new kana orthography (as laid out by the Japanese government in 1946)</gloss>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1230460">旧仮名遣い</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1230460">旧仮名遣い</xref>

copying from 旧仮名遣い for consistency's sake

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>new kana spelling (after 1946)</gloss>
+<gloss>modern kana usage (as laid out by the Japanese government in 1946)</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>アイ・ティー・シー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

koj, daij, eij

many of these may be better off in enamdict

Yes, enamdict.

koj, daij, gg5

perhaps enamdict

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>founder</gloss>

nikk

Yes, -> enamdict

daij

->enamdict

Done

daij

->enamdict

wiki

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>old kana orthography</gloss>
+<gloss>old kana orthography (used before 1946 reform)</gloss>
+<gloss>historical kana orthography</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>旧かな</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>きゅうがな</reb>
+<reb>きゅうかな</reb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>former (i.e. before the post-WWII reforms) kana usage in writing the readings of kanji</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1230460">旧仮名遣い</xref>
+<gloss>old kana orthography</gloss>

nikk

i think it needs to be copied, otherwise it implies the forms of the kana themselves have changed

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>old kana</gloss>
+<gloss>former (i.e. before the post-WWII reforms) kana usage in writing the readings of kanji</gloss>

Moved to enamdict.

newspapers

http://www.eba.europa.eu/

Moved to enamdict.

newspapers

別名：欧州金融安定ファシリティ
http://www.efsf.europa.eu/about/index.htm

More spitting sounds.

@@ -11,0 +11,2 @@
+<gloss>ptew</gloss>
+<gloss>ptooey</gloss>

also ptoo/ptooie in english

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>sound of spitting something out</gloss>
+<gloss>ptoo (i.e. spitting sound)</gloss>

大辞林

Same story (spitting out 梅干しのたね).

daij, wiki

Yes -> enamdict.

daij

perhaps enamdict

GG5, ルミナス

The refs have it as a a sub-entry. I think it's useful.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>undervalued (stock)</gloss>
+<gloss>sense that something is relatively inexpensive or undervalued</gloss>

standard application of ~感.  i'm not sure it really needs an entry.  it really just means "a sense of something being comparatively cheap", or "seeming cheap". (eijiro has it in an example sentence, as does gg5)

http://m-words.jp/w/E589B2E5AE89E6849F.html

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/19598e8867d1ab4494b6009e4a550c0c70d7c300
政府、濃厚接触者の待機期間を１０日に短縮…社会機能維持
(another example of the sense 2 usage, for the record)

https://www.melbourne.au.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_ja/COVID-19info_j.html

Seems to be used in that context. Poss ephemeral.

koj: 準備をととのえて機会の来るのを待つこと。
prog? (sakura-paris): watch and wait;await 
orders.

I mention this on the 待機 entry too but I 
don't think 待機 is normally used for fixed 
periods of waiting  (like this quarantine is) 
but a stand-by wait. 
Is quarantining a period of waiting? Sure, but 
that's not all it is, it has a specific 
purpose and also includes various restrictions 
on movement and behavior. If a translator 
translated the below mhlw.go.jp use of the 
word as "waiting time" rather than 
"quarantine" I don't think they should be 
working as a translator.

Isn't quarantine just one example of waiting? I don't really see it as a separate sense.

https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000121431_00263.html
日本へ入国・帰国した皆さまへ「14日間の待機期間中」のルール(入国者健康確認センター)

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>quarantine period</gloss>

ストーンウエア	2522
ストーンウェア	13807

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ストーンウエア</reb>
+<reb>ストーンウェア</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ストーン・ウエア</reb>
+<reb>ストーンウエア</reb>

Daijr, Eijiro

http://blog.livedoor.jp/shinwafudosan/archives/2972519.html
200k+ hits, Mainichi: "住まいは、仮設住宅を経て復興住宅に移った。"

GG5, 新和英中辞典, LSD, etc.

koj, daijs

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スロープ・カー</reb>

A brand name of Kaho Manufacturing

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<gloss>small automated monorail</gloss>

wiki

Oops.

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>keeping in custody (e.e. of a court)</gloss>
+<gloss>keeping in custody (e.g. of a court)</gloss>

->e.g.?

Koj, Daijr, GG5

daijs