afaict, the articles serve no purpose here

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>an armful</gloss>
-<gloss>(a) bundle</gloss>
+<gloss>armful</gloss>
+<gloss>bundle</gloss>

140k 一抱え
 20k ひと抱え (also in Anthy)

Add alt. spelling.
Same story.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひと抱え</keb>

shinmeikai, meikyo, obunsha, iwakoku also have [vt]

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Mk

I get a 403 error when logged in, what gives?

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

meikyo has it
2) [他サ変] あやまって抜けること。また、抜かすこと。「リストに―がある」

@@ -18,1 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>omission</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>omission</gloss>
+</sense>

enwiki

ぼた餅	42361
牡丹餅	27236
ぼたもち	61036
ボタモチ	8936
ボタもち	1238


just barely uk

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>adzuki bean covered mochi</gloss>
+<gloss>adzuki bean-covered mochi</gloss>
+<gloss>botamochi</gloss>

牡丹餅	27236
ぼた餅	42361
ぼたもち	61036

gg5 examples

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>牡丹餅</keb>
+<keb>ぼた餅</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>ぼた餅</keb>
+<keb>牡丹餅</keb>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>adzuki bean mochi</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>adzuki bean covered mochi</gloss>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>Adzuki bean mochi</gloss>
+<gloss>adzuki bean mochi</gloss>

adding "younger (e.g. daughter)" to match Jim's approved changes to 上, although in retrospect, i think in both cases it may actually be better placed in the "superior"/"inferior" sense where it was

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>younger (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -36,1 +37,0 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. 下の妹</s_inf>
@@ -39,1 +39,0 @@
-<gloss>younger (e.g. of family members of a given type, e.g. younger sisters)</gloss>

* Give example and clarify “younger sibling“ sense, e.g. 下の妹 (complementary to 上の妹)
* Also add PoS [adj-no]

@@ -35,0 +35,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>e.g. 下の妹</s_inf>
@@ -37,1 +39,1 @@
-<gloss>younger (e.g. of siblings)</gloss>
+<gloss>younger (e.g. of family members of a given type, e.g. younger sisters)</gloss>

Give precise gloss first: scholarly *ability*

@@ -18,0 +18,1 @@
+<gloss>scholarly ability</gloss>

@@ -19,1 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see">煩う</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481930">煩う</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481930">煩う</xref>

either that sense should be deleted in 煩う or else these should be merged with "esp." usage notes on each sense.  i vote for the latter

Link to alt kanji (with “illness” sense).
(Same story.)

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see">煩う</xref>
@@ -20,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>to be afflicted with</gloss>

I don't see any refs that say [vs]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 拳骨　　　　 │  21,080 │
│ 拳骨し　　　 │     100 │
│ 拳骨する　　 │      38 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ ゲンコツ　　 │  51,041 │
│ ゲンコツし　 │     695 │
│ ゲンコツする │     201 │
├─ーーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ げんこつ　　 │ 129,926 │
│ げんこつし　 │     333 │
│ げんこつする │     112 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

G n-grams:

拳骨で　　 3,400 32.5%
げんこつで 3,319 31.8%
ゲンコツで 3,730 35.7%

拳骨で殴ら　　 205 41.2%
げんこつで殴ら 113 22.7%
ゲンコツで殴ら 180 36.1%

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲンコツ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

GG5, etc.

4:1 for kana vs kanji.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>knuckles</gloss>

Somewhat violent connotations, seems esp. used for fist used for striking; “clenched” fist conveys this some.

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>fist</gloss>
+<gloss>(clenched) fist</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
252,214	 95.4%	見張る
  5,048	  1.9%	見はる
  7,182	  2.7%	瞠る
114,128	  n/a 	みはる

192,508	 85.5%	目を見張る
 26,018	 11.6%	目をみはる
  6,535	  2.9%	目を瞠る
    145	  0.1%	めをみはる

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>to open one's eyes wide</gloss>
+<gloss>to open (one's eyes) wide</gloss>

見張る	12386
見はる	314
瞠る	314

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見はる</keb>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<stagk>見はる</stagk>

https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15056060.html
4歳の孫が夫婦間での呼び方そのままに、父親の名前を呼び捨てにし、母親のことは「○○ちゃん」と呼んだ。
https://dot.asahi.com/dot/2019122000068.html?page=1
「くん」「ちゃん」をクリアしたら、次はいよいよ「呼び捨て」だ。
https://komachi.yomiuri.co.jp/topics/id/716134/
自分の子はちゃん付け、他人の子は呼び捨てのママの心理は？
https://w.grapps.me/love/286908/
今まで「呼び捨て」で呼んでいた彼氏が、「ちゃん」付けで呼ぶようになったとしたら、
https://www.sankei.com/article/20211016-QCE3KDYC4VKUFBKVVECAG6IZUQ/
小学校３年生の息子がいます。子供同士、呼び捨てで呼び合っているのがとても気になります。
... その友達のお母さんの前でも呼び捨てで呼ぶので、申し訳ない気持ちになったりします。男の子には「くん」を、女の子には「さん」をつけて、呼び合ってほしいと思う私は古い考えでしょうか？　息子も以前は「ちゃん」や「くん」で呼んでいたように思います。やめさせるにはどうすればいいでしょうか。
https://www.sankei.com/article/20161103-X3BDHZIHUNMXHB3NISUNZL5IZM/6/
先生　９月９日付の朝日新聞朝刊に「愛ちゃん　台湾・江選手と結婚」という記事があったが、読んだら「リオデジャネイロ五輪の卓球女子団体で銅メダルに輝いた福原愛（２７）＝ＡＮＡ＝が今月初め…」と、呼び捨てにしているんだ。

Well, the point you are making is plainly wrong, "-chan" is clearly among the suffixes that "yobisute" indicates you're not using. Daijisen says "「君」「様」「さん」_など_の敬称" (my emphasis). Koj mentions 殿・様・さん・君. That doesn't mean we need to include "殿" or さま here, it's not an exhaustive list.
The wording you're suggesting doesn't make sense to me either, "even '-sama'" seems to imply that "-sama" would be the least polite of the suffixes listed, when it's quite the opposite.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

〈呼（び）／よび／ヨビ〉〈捨（て）／すて／ステ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 呼び捨て │ 270,111 │ 97.5% │
│ 呼びすて │   3,284 │  1.2% │ - add, sK
│ 呼捨て　 │   1,605 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ 呼び捨　 │     412 │  0.1% │
│ 呼びステ │     104 │  0.0% │
│ 呼捨　　 │      71 │  0.0% │
│ よび捨て │      48 │  0.0% │
│ よびすて │   1,111 │  0.4% │
│ ヨビステ │     169 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>呼びすて</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

Not necessarily honorofic - 君, ちゃん
I think the "such as" was helpful

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

I think this split is fine.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2860121">合流点</xref>
-<gloss>flowing together (of rivers)</gloss>
+<gloss>confluence (of rivers)</gloss>
+<gloss>flowing together</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>meeting up (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>uniting (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>joining (of people, groups, parties, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>union</gloss>
+<gloss>linking up</gloss>
@@ -30,3 +32 @@
-<gloss>linking up</gloss>
-<gloss>coming together</gloss>
-<gloss>joining</gloss>
+<gloss>meeting (up)</gloss>

daijs is the same as sankoku.  1= literal rivers. 2 = everything else.
１ 二つ以上の川の流れが合わさって一つになること。「河口近くで—する」
２ 別々に行動していた人・集団・党派などが一つになること。「本隊に—する」

合流	2380190	  
合流し	899341	  verb
合流する	289060	  verb
合流点	84993	  
合流地点	45474	  
合流でき	43820	  verb

Frieren：
１０年前に旅に出た死乳と合流することだ
1. To meet my friend who embarked on a journey 10 years ago.
2. Two reunite with my friend who departed 10 years ago.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=合流する
他動
join（川や道路などが～に）
join（人や集団などと）  <---- people and groups, etc.
句動

～と合流する
join up with
句動
hook up with
単語帳
～の影にいる（人）と合流する
join someone in the shade of
単語帳
～の真ん中で合流する
meet in the center of
数人のグループに合流する
join a small group

Came here to add clarity that this can apply to people(friends, etc.), saw some other things... (and created 合流点 as part of that)

I don't usually suggest this, but maybe one sense would be simpler for English speakers?  Note that *all* of the glosses in [2] can be used perfectly well in English for rivers.

If not, I've suggested a reorganization of the glosses to match the kokugos' split.

Sankoku has two senses. One is explicitly rivers. One is explicitly people. Neither covers metaphorical uses like "tech trends coming together", it's not clear that sankoku's "people" definition should cover armies joining forces, or why cars should be more like rivers than people (merging of traffic). Maybe cars are more of a "flow".  But this feels somewhat arbitrary.  daijs seems like a clearer split, [1] = rivers (etymological meaning), [2] = people, groups, and など, everything else...

I created the xref as one sense.  To keep this entry as two senses, it seems the xref should perhaps also be split in two.  The simplest split for me feels like "rivers" -> confluence, and "everything else" -> junction, meeting point, etc....  But again, all of the sense[2] glosses seem to work fine for rivers as well.

I'd rather put vehicular traffic in a 3rd sense than arbitrarily squeeze it into the "river" sense, just because cars "flow"(or whatever the justification might be, it's honestly not quite clear to me).
===

At minimum, 51% explicitly verbal. Not clear from the old glosses, which should probably have more gerunds.  Looking at the ngram numbers in the new proposal at the xref, it looks like we'd be better recommending the xref as a gloss for the noun "confluence".  Just giving the xref will also expose the word "confluence" in situations where that might be the right translation for 合流.

@@ -20,5 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>confluence (of rivers)</gloss>
-<gloss>merge (of traffic)</gloss>
-<gloss>conflux</gloss>
-<gloss>junction</gloss>
-<gloss>joining</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2860121">合流点</xref>
+<gloss>flowing together (of rivers)</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,3 @@
-<gloss>union (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>meeting up (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>uniting (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>merging (e.g. of traffic)</gloss>
@@ -32 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>merging</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>joining</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

G n-grams 2380342

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

adding some additional glosses from gg5, prog, nc.  removing "recombining" as AFAIK 合流 doesn't suggest that they were ever together before

@@ -19,1 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>(traffic) merge</gloss>
+<gloss>merge (of traffic)</gloss>
+<gloss>conflux</gloss>
+<gloss>junction</gloss>
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
@@ -25,1 +28,1 @@
-<gloss>union (of forces)</gloss>
+<gloss>union (e.g. of forces)</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>merge</gloss>
-<gloss>recombining</gloss>
+<gloss>merging</gloss>
+<gloss>coming together</gloss>

G n-grams:
手放す	322817
手離す	  7431
手ばなす	  1249
てばなす	   504

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手ばなす</keb>

GG5, KM n-grams:
手放す	9691
手離す	226
てばなす	15

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手離す</keb>

Yes, subtle. Daijirin has 4 senses and GG5 three.

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1621090">大振り・1</xref>
@@ -24,1 +26,1 @@
-<gloss>short swing of a bat, raquet, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>short swing of a bat, racquet, etc.</gloss>

新和英中辞典

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>short swing of a bat, raquet, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

Wording – add glosses, reorder

@@ -16,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss>smallish</gloss>
+<gloss>on the small side</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat small</gloss>
+<gloss>undersized</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>smallish</gloss>
-<gloss>undersized</gloss>

Forget to edit this note after I copied and pasted it.

@@ -79 +79 @@
-<s_inf>as ...上で(は)</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ...上は</s_inf>

Sorry, I did have it on my to-do list. They're correctly indexed now.

The index file is generated weekly, and downloaded into WWWJDIC on Sundays. I'll leave this open to remind me to check.

Just to confirm, was this reindexed? Dunno if it's not synced yet, but on WWWJDIC at least, I see "(6) 寒かったうえに、風も強かった。 It was cold, and, in addition, it was windy."

Yes, reindexing is needed.

doesn't need an e.g., imo

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>plant pot (e.g. garden shrubs)</gloss>
+<gloss>plant pot</gloss>

GG5

Add sense “plant pot“ (also “garden shrubs”, not just flowers)

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>plant pot (e.g. garden shrubs)</gloss>

gg5, wisdom, daij

Definitely a noun. All the examples are 随所に/で.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>all over the place</gloss>
+<gloss>here and there</gloss>

随所	714104
随処	4235

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

大辞林、広辞苑

* Add alt spelling 随処
* Add “at every turn“ gloss – used esp. in ad copy and tourism, and this catches the feel

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>随処</keb>
@@ -17,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>at every turn</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

GG5, etc.

@@ -13,3 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>treating a friend as though they were a stranger (in one's manners)</gloss>
-<gloss>being unduly distant or formal</gloss>
-<gloss>reserved manners</gloss>
+<gloss>standing on formality</gloss>
+<gloss>in a reserved manner</gloss>
+<gloss>treating a friend as a stranger</gloss>
+<gloss>unduly distant</gloss>
+<gloss>formal</gloss>

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

Elaborate – this is specifically treating someone as a stranger (hence 他人).
(Same story.)

@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>treating a friend as though they were a stranger (in one's manners)</gloss>
+<gloss>being unduly distant or formal</gloss>

肌着	650697
膚着	20
肌衣	10120

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>膚着</keb>
+<keb>肌衣</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<keb>肌衣</keb>
+<keb>膚着</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I think "underwear" covers it. The note is being unnecessarily literal.

@@ -28,1 +28,1 @@
-<gloss>underwear (worn directly against the skin)</gloss>
+<gloss>underwear</gloss>

headwords and readings from daij/koj

merge.  not sure the note is necessary

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>膚着</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>肌衣</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +22,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はだぎぬ</reb>
+<re_restr>肌衣</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +29,1 @@
+<gloss>underclothes</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +31,1 @@
+<gloss>chemise</gloss>
@@ -21,1 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>chemise</gloss>

大辞林、広辞苑、新解さん

Specify “worn directly against the skin” (hence 肌).

@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-<gloss>underwear</gloss>
+<gloss>underwear (worn directly against the skin)</gloss>

merged into 患う

大辞林 unifies 患う／煩う
GG5, 広辞苑, 新解さん separate them

* Split out “illness” sense from “worry” sense
* Link “illness” sense to alt. kanji.

It’s debatable whether we should separate 患う／煩う (per our style);
it would be as consistent to unify them (with [1] suffer from), and specify a [restr=煩う] on a [2] “worry” sense.
I tend to favor splitting, and these are currently split, so I don’t see a strong reason to merge them, but I wanted to flag this.

@@ -17,0 +17,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1212200">患う</xref>

百日せき/ひゃくにちせき not in the major refs, but plenty of examples on the web

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20170405/k10010938161000.html?utm_int=news_contents_news-main_001
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/百日咳

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>百日せき</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>百日咳</re_restr>
+<re_restr>百日ぜき</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひゃくにちせき</reb>
+<re_restr>百日咳</re_restr>
+<re_restr>百日せき</re_restr>

2,300,000 百日咳 – uses 表外字
  150,000 百日ぜき

Add 交ぜ書き 「百日ぜき」
(Same story.)

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>百日ぜき</keb>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>fruit grown near the top end of the vine (hence stunted and unripe)</gloss>
+<gloss>fruit grown near the tip of the vine (hence stunted and unripe)</gloss>

matching headword and sense ordering given by all dictionaries

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>末成</keb>
+<keb>末生り</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<keb>末生り</keb>
+<keb>末成</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2669240">本生り</xref>
+<gloss>fruit grown near the top end of the vine (hence stunted and unripe)</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -23,4 +29,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fruit grown near the top end of the vine (hence stunted and unripe)</gloss>
-</sense>

GG5

* Gloss “fruit” sense to clarify parallel with “weak fellow” sense.
* Add other “pale” senses, commonly used in English

@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>pasty-faced man</gloss>
+<gloss>pallid man</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +25,1 @@
-<gloss>fruit grown near the top end of the vine</gloss>
+<gloss>fruit grown near the top end of the vine (hence stunted and unripe)</gloss>

daij, koj

Sense 2 applies to つかねる as well.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<stagr>たばねる</stagr>
@@ -39,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>to put together (one's hands)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -23,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>to bundle</gloss>
+<gloss>to sheathe</gloss>

GG5

Examples of bundles – notably, used both for strands (straw, hair) and flats (bills, letters).

@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>to tie up in a bundle</gloss>
+<gloss>to tie up in a bundle (e.g. straw, hair, bills, letters)</gloss>

Sorry, I started making these edits on the はみ出る entry before copying them over to here and I forgot to change the PoS tags.

出す = v1???

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>

I agree with this. I'll align the はみ出る entry.

daij, prog, gg5, ウィズダム和英辞典

I think this is clearer as 3 senses (even though most refs only have one or two).
はみ出す is definitely the more common form.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>食み出す</keb>
+<keb>はみ出す</keb>
@@ -9 +9 @@
-<keb>はみ出す</keb>
+<keb>食み出す</keb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to jut out</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to jut out</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>to overflow</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>to be pushed out</gloss>
@@ -26 +30,6 @@
-<gloss>to be pushed out</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to go over (e.g. a budget)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go beyond</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +36,0 @@
-<gloss>to go over</gloss>
-<gloss>to go beyond</gloss>

I agree. No refs that I have checked split them.

@@ -27,4 +27,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

目にあう	101,836	45.7%	
目に遭う	94,635	42.5%	
目に会う	24,358	10.9%	
めに遭う	1,055	0.5%	
めに会う	715	0.3%

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>めに遭う</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +15,4 @@
+<keb>めに遭う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2179070">目を見る</xref>
+<gloss>to experience (something unpleasant)</gloss>
@@ -30 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>to experience (something unpleasant)</gloss>

placing the [iK] forms last

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>めに遭う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>めに遭う</keb>

koj 7
○目に遭う [めにあう]
（修飾語句を伴って）ある体験に遭遇する。「つらい―」「ひどい―」
 多く、好ましくない場合に用いる。

kojien 7th ed. has only 目に遭う, the same as daijs/daijr.  i suggest leaving it

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

koj has 目に会う
G n-grams:
 目にあう	101836
 目に遭う	 94635
 目に会う	 24358
 めにあう	  5438
 めに遭う	  1055
 めに会う	   715

dropping [iK] from 目に会う
adding めに会う	
reordering

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>目に会う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14,2 +17 @@
-<keb>目に会う</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>めに会う</keb>

i think that's an incorrect (or at least non-standard) spelling of 'racquet'

@@ -31,1 +31,1 @@
-<gloss>large swing (bat, raquet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>large swing (bat, racquet, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1348340">小振り・1</xref>

Daijr, GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス

@@ -22,1 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +27,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>large swing (bat, raquet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>long sweeping stroke</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑

Wording – it’s specifically “*somewhat* large”.

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<gloss>large</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat large</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26,1 @@
+<gloss>on the large size</gloss>

gg5, prog, nc, eij

i think sense 1 should be made into a more general "until then" sense (which is really all this means as a farewell)

@@ -5,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>其れまで</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +9,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>其れ迄</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>其迄</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,1 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -14,3 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>That's the end of the matter</gloss>
-<gloss>That's it (esp. sad end, e.g. death, dashed plans, ruined marriage)</gloss>
-<gloss>That's the end of that</gloss>
+<gloss>until then</gloss>
+<gloss>till then</gloss>
+<gloss>up to that time</gloss>
@@ -19,1 +28,1 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -21,1 +30,7 @@
-<gloss>Until then</gloss>
+<gloss>to that extent</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>the end of it</gloss>
+<gloss>all there is to it</gloss>

GG5

Split out literal “until then” sense, add more glosses and examples

@@ -15,1 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>That's it</gloss>
+<gloss>That's it (esp. sad end, e.g. death, dashed plans, ruined marriage)</gloss>
+<gloss>That's the end of that</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

大辞林、広辞苑

Duplicate of 随所 (usual 所／処 alternation) – added kanji over there, so no need for it here.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>a single wall</gloss>
+<gloss>single wall</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

hard by?

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>hard by</gloss>
+<gloss>a single wall</gloss>

gg5

Thank you for your suggestion. "punctually" is an adverb, not an adjective, so if we did include that gloss it'd be as "punctual", as the PoS of the word is [adj-i]. You might find our editorial policy useful: http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy
However, no part of the Daijisen entry you've quoted refers to punctuality or keeping time. Daijirin, Kojien or GG5 don't mention it either.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>punctually</gloss>
+<gloss>polite</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/折り目正しい
態度がきちんとしているさま。
行儀作法にかなっているさま。
礼儀正しい。

https://www.weblio.jp/content/折り目正しい
態度がきちんとしているさま。
行儀作法にかなっているさま。
礼儀正しい。

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>punctually</gloss>

i have never once heard of "well-creased manners" as is suggested by the gloss.  i don't think it's appropriate here.

changing gloss one to an adjective and adding 折目正しい from koj/daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>折目正しい</keb>
@@ -12,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>good manners</gloss>
+<gloss>well-mannered</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>well-creased (manners)</gloss>

Give literal meaning, which is sometimes used in English – think “well-creased trousers”.

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>well-creased (manners)</gloss>

Duplicate of 手をつける
着ける is here just an alternative spelling (along with 付ける – identical meaning) – I’ve added alt. spelling and wording over there.

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

GG5, 大辞林

Add sense of “embarrassed (with praise)” – given in references, and senior teacher used it in class (same story).

@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>embarrassed</gloss>
+<gloss>awkward</gloss>
+<gloss>ill at ease (esp. when receiving public praise)</gloss>
+</sense>

From deleted 点の打ち所が無い.

@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>above reproach</gloss>
+<gloss>beyond reproach</gloss>

i find that phrasing to be confusing, to be honest (may make object appear like subject)

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -23,1 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>cannot find fault with</gloss>

GG5

* Alt glosses – emphasize “cannot find fault with” expression
* Alt spellings （どころ）

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>非の打ちどころがない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>非の打ちどころが無い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +21,5 @@
+<gloss>impeccable</gloss>
+<gloss>unimpeachable</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot find fault with</gloss>
+<gloss>cannot be faulted</gloss>
+<gloss>faultless</gloss>
@@ -16,1 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>faultless</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

* Wording – more precisely the *dots* on the i’s and *crosses* on the t’s
* link to phrase – primarily used in “not neglecting” sense

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>the i's and the t's</gloss>
-<gloss>(not neglecting) the slightest detail</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2668940">一点一画もおろそかにしない</xref>
+<gloss>the dots of i's and the crosses of t's</gloss>
+<gloss>(not neglecting) the slightest details</gloss>

Entry created

GG5: 癇癪を起こす lose one's temper 《with sb》; fly into a rage; vent [give way to] one's anger; throw a tantrum; 《口》 flare up 《at sb》; get 「mad [sore] 《at sb》; bite sb's head off; fly off the handle; get worked up 《about [over]…》; 《米》get one's dander up; hit [go through] the 「ceiling [roof]; 《口》 blow one's top; get ticked off; 《英》《口》 get the hump; get [have] one's monkey up
中辞典: lose one's temper; fly into a passion [tantrum]

I really don't see the need for both "to throw a tantrum" and "to have a temper tantrum (esp. of children)".,  especially when we already have "to lose one's temper". I also think the original order was better.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to lose one's temper</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>to lose one's temper</gloss>
-<gloss>to have a temper tantrum (esp. of children)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fly into a rage</gloss>

かんしゃくを起こすって英語でなんて言うの？
「癇癪を起こす」は
to throw a fit
to have a fit
to have a temper tantrum
のような言い方があります。

例：
He didn't like the referee's call so he had a temper tantrum in front of everyone.
「彼は審判の判定が気に入らず、みんなの前で癇癪を起こした。」

「かんしゃくを起こす」はthrow a tantrumと言います(^_^)
例）
The girl is throwing a tantrum.
「少女はかんしゃくを起こしている」

Also added to 癇癪. 

I'd like to squeeze "temper tantrum" in here, and the mix of "throw"/"have" in this expression is one chance to do that. (Could xref to 癇癪 with extra glosses too).

sankoku's definition is literally 腹を立てる. That seems a bit lacking in nuance.

*news* results are all articles about parenting and children.

Searching wikipedia does see this used as adult males becoming violent (towards wives, etc.).

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to throw a tantrum</gloss>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>to throw a tantrum</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a temper tantrum (esp. of children)</gloss>

formatting, please

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>throw a tantrum</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw a tantrum</gloss>

400k Google hits (vs. 700k with 癇癪)
GG5 (alt glosses)

* Alt. spelling with かんしゃく as kana.
* Add “tantrum” gloss

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かんしゃくを起こす</keb>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>throw a tantrum</gloss>

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<s_inf>From わからない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from わからない</s_inf>

Brief etyl note (pretty clear, but らな＞んな is pretty irregular/uncommon, hence seems to deserve a note).

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<s_inf>From わからない</s_inf>

Probably not.

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to not understand</gloss>
-<gloss>to not know</gloss>
+<gloss>not understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>not knowing</gloss>

should this be glossed as "to ..."?

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1606560">分かる・1</xref>

GG5 has the sex/affair sense.

@@ -31,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>to approach with intention of eating (e.g. trying to pick fruit)</gloss>
-<gloss>to start at (grab at food)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have sexual relations</gloss>
+<gloss>to have an affair</gloss>

Used in this sense (AFAICT) in 向田邦子「字のないはがき」 as:
「小さいのに手をつけるとしかる父も、この日は何も言わなかった。」
“Though (the pumpkins were) small, even father, who would scold when *we went to pick/eat them*, that day said not a word.”

新解さん gives:
「(三)食べようとして、それに向かう。」
…which seems the closest (sense of *eat*, rather than “steal” per se).

* Add “intend to eat” sense.
* Not sure about wording of gloss,
* but seems a distinct sense (if perhaps literary or old).

* It’s also apparently used as “have an affair with/carnal relations with (a woman of lower status); (sexual) slumming”, though I’ve not seen it in that sense.

@@ -28,0 +28,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to approach with intention of eating (e.g. trying to pick fruit)</gloss>
+<gloss>to start at (grab at food)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>to (start) work on</gloss>
+<gloss>to start work on</gloss>

GG5

* Add closely parallel expression in English
* Add alt spelling 着ける (and suggest alt. entry be deleted).

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手を着ける</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>to set one's hand to</gloss>

Entry created

Trimming a little

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>connecting passageway (e.g. between two buildings)</gloss>
+<gloss>(connecting) passageway</gloss>
@@ -14,1 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>passageway</gloss>

GG5, 英辞郎
Google images

* Add rather idiomatic direct translation “connecting passageway”, and gloss to clarify
* Add “skyway” etc. – common use

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<gloss>connecting passageway (e.g. between two buildings)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>skyway</gloss>
+<gloss>sky bridge</gloss>

Entry created

merged into entry 1053240

Entry created

actual description is more helpful than examples here  (e.g. so people know it's not just evacuating children from schools)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>evacuation of school children (in wartime) (esp. during WWII strategic bombing, e.g. Tokyo, London)</gloss>
+<gloss>evacuation of school children (from major cities to more rural areas, esp. during late World War II)</gloss>

大辞林、広辞苑

* Specify and give examples
Specifically refers to WWII bombing of cities; in Japanese this is generally evacuation of Japanese cities (esp. Tokyo), though I’ve also added London as an example more familiar to English-speakers.
(Same story.)

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>evacuation of school children (in wartime)</gloss>
+<gloss>evacuation of school children (in wartime) (esp. during WWII strategic bombing, e.g. Tokyo, London)</gloss>

Koj, Daij, GG5, ルミナス

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>(wartime) evacuation of school children</gloss>
+<gloss>evacuation of school children (in wartime)</gloss>

http://kaken.nii.ac.jp/d/p/05451053

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijs

add お志, note to tag

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お志</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,1 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>kindness, courtesy (in reference, and deference, to that of another person)</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>kindness</gloss>
+<gloss>courtesy</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/30633/m0u/おこ/

nikk

Moved to enamdict.

newspapers

http://www.eba.europa.eu/

Moved to enamdict.

newspapers

http://www.iif.com/about/

Moved to enamdict.

newspapers

別名：欧州金融安定ファシリティ
http://www.efsf.europa.eu/about/index.htm

gg5

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to leave one's home (behind one)</gloss>
+<gloss>to leave home</gloss>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to be out on one's own</gloss>
+<gloss>to go out on one's own</gloss>

please watch formatting

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>leave one's home (behind one)</gloss>
-<gloss>leave one's parental roof</gloss>
-<gloss>leave the nest</gloss>
-<gloss>be out on one's own</gloss>
+<gloss>to leave one's home (behind one)</gloss>
+<gloss>to leave one's parental roof</gloss>
+<gloss>to leave the nest</gloss>
+<gloss>to be out on one's own</gloss>

GG5、広辞苑、新解さん

Same 向田邦子 story.

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

GG5

I think GG5 is saying it's an imperative.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>dotting the i's and crossing the t's</gloss>
-<gloss>not neglecting the slightest detail</gloss>
+<gloss>always dot the i's and cross the t's</gloss>
+<gloss>don't neglect the slightest detail</gloss>
+<gloss>be punctilious</gloss>

GG5, 広辞苑

Same story.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2830557">ふんどし一丁・ふんどしいっちょう</xref>

N-grams:
パンツ一枚	16874
パンツ一丁	53304
褌一つ	447
ふんどし一つ	502
褌一枚	239
褌一丁	2443
ふんどし一枚	620
ふんどし一丁	5729

I'll add an entry for 褌一丁/ふんどし一丁 as well.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>Esp. 〜で、〜の、〜になり</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 〜で、〜の、〜になり</s_inf>

just pointing out that the modern equivalent is パンツ一枚 (not an entry) or パンツ一丁 (2266560)
I'll submit パンツ一枚 but these three entries should have matching glosses

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2266560">パンツ一丁</xref>

GG5

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,1 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>(wearing nothing but) a loincloth</gloss>
+<gloss>(wearing) a loincloth alone</gloss>
+<gloss>nothing but a loincloth</gloss>

100,000s of Google hits
GG5 example in ふんどし

Same story: ふんどし一つで。。。(walked around the house in) just a loincloth
Seems a v. common phrase: in just one’s underwear, stripped to one’s underwear, etc.

See 呼び捨て

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama"</gloss>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Again, refer to the 呼び捨て entry. No need to make the exact same argument in different entries.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama"</gloss>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

呼びすてにし　440

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>呼びすてにする</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 呼び捨てにし │ 35,508 │ 99.3% │
│ 呼捨てにし　 │    198 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ よびすてにし │     36 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Sounds like 和製 to me, but on checking it seems it's 米製.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワイン・オープナー</reb>

600,000+ Google hits

Apparently favored by youth over コルク抜き (which is now a bit old-fashioned).

I'm happy for it to go in.

i don't think this adds much.  期間 can be added to so many things

100,000+ Google hits

Seems pretty common phrase. (Same story.)

"to ..."

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>stays in one's heart</gloss>
-<gloss>enduringly memorable</gloss>
-<gloss>unforgettably touching</gloss>
+<gloss>to stay in one's heart</gloss>
+<gloss>to be enduringly memorable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unforgettable</gloss>

大辞林、広辞苑、GG5 心（こころ） defn. #3

Same story.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>

GG5

As in 東京大空襲 or ロンドン大空襲, esp. used as a suffix.

N-grams: 4561

Hard to get a definitive definition.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>entire family</gloss>
-<gloss>whole family is affected (by a disease, etcetera)</gloss>
+<gloss>entire family is affected (disease, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>whole family</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>whole family</gloss>
+<gloss>whole family is affected (by a disease, etcetera)</gloss>

I'll stick my neck out here.

@@ -11,1 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>annihilate an entire family</gloss>
-<gloss>wipe out an entire family</gloss>
+<gloss>entire family</gloss>
+<gloss>whole family</gloss>

GG5 has: "流感でわが家は一家全滅だ. My whole family is down with the flu."  That seems to be a figurative use of 全滅, and doesn't really support your gloss. I'm not saying it's wrong, but GG5 isn't supporting it.

GG5 全滅

Same story, seem common construction.

GG5

I agree. Trimming.

@@ -15,5 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>to put indecision aside and firmly decide to do</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -22,1 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>to be married to</gloss>

formatting please. we use "to ..."

i don't see any evidence of this being two senses

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>resolve to do</gloss>
-<gloss>make up one's mind to do</gloss>
-<gloss>put indecision aside and firmly decide to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to resolve to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to make up one's mind to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to put indecision aside and firmly decide to do</gloss>
@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>set one's heart on</gloss>
-<gloss>have one's heart set on</gloss>
-<gloss>be married to</gloss>
+<gloss>to set one's heart on</gloss>
+<gloss>to have one's heart set on</gloss>
+<gloss>to be married to</gloss>

GG5 心（こころ） sense 3, 広辞苑

Same story.

i don't think this adds much.  just like "local", you can pop 地元 in front of many things

70,000+ Google hits

Same story, seems common construction.

i think this is of pretty questionable merit.  standard application of 用, not idiomatic english and not even eijiro bothers with an entry for it.  i've added an entry for 防火用水 instead

396,000 hits

V. common construction, found ubiquitously on fire-fighting buckets, for instance.

More spitting sounds.

@@ -11,0 +11,2 @@
+<gloss>ptew</gloss>
+<gloss>ptooey</gloss>

also ptoo/ptooie in english

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>sound of spitting something out</gloss>
+<gloss>ptoo (i.e. spitting sound)</gloss>

大辞林

Same story (spitting out 梅干しのたね).

eij too

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>シラミだらけ</reb>
+<reb>しらみだらけ</reb>
@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<reb>しらみだらけ</reb>
+<reb>シラミだらけ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -15,0 +16,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5

Regular construction, but set phrase, with specialized terms in English.

Same story.

x-ref target swapped to sense 2

@@ -9,2 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008120">つつ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008120">つつ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008120">つつ・2</xref>

not in kojien as far as i can tell.  is in daijirin

@@ -10,2 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>(after masu stem) even though</gloss>
-<gloss>despite (e.g. despite knowing)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>even though</gloss>
+<gloss>despite</gloss>

GG5, 広辞苑

Saw this in some reading the other day.

pretty sure liquids like sweat are always 'damp'

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>damp sweat caused by fear or stress</gloss>
+<gloss>sweat caused by fear, stress, etc.</gloss>

nikk