| 6. |
A 2023-09-14 02:39:08 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think that works. |
| 5. |
A* 2023-09-14 00:09:54 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
All the JEs have pluralised glosses.
I think this works. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>child or infant not yet in school</gloss>
+<gloss>babies and preschool children</gloss> |
| 4. |
A* 2023-09-12 22:49:16 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
infant is usually defined as 0-1. This is specifically a combination of 乳児 (infants) and 幼児 "child over 1 but not yet of school" so "infant" is clearly wrong. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>infants</gloss>
-<gloss>babies and very young children</gloss>
+<gloss>child or infant not yet in school</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2017-12-24 21:12:47 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I think it's worth being explicit because "infant" conjures up images of babies for most people.
I wouldn't describe a 4 year old as an infant. |
| 2. |
A 2017-12-24 18:20:16 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
new oxford american dictionary:
infant | ˈinfənt |
noun
a very young child or baby. |
| |
Comments: |
this is literally the definition of infant. (as giving in gg5). not sure anything more than 'infant' is even needed |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>infants</gloss> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2017-12-24 15:42:47 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5, prog
daijr: "乳児と幼児。小学校入学前の子供の総称" |
| |
Comments: |
Not just babies. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>infants</gloss>
-<gloss>babies</gloss>
+<gloss>babies and very young children</gloss> |