| 8. |
A 2022-07-10 11:59:54 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Yes, we thrashed that around with 麦酒/ビール some years ago. I've never been comfortable with loanwords (and names) being called gikun but I can live with it.
I've fiddled the 桑港 entry. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -4,5 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>桑港</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele> |
| 7. |
A* 2022-07-10 10:58:06 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
If it's not ateji, it's gikun. It can't be neither.
I wasn't proposing that we delete this entry. By adding サンフランシスコ to 桑港/そうこう, we could drop any mention of 桑港 from this entry. 桑港 is more or less obsolete, no matter how it's read. |
| 6. |
A* 2022-07-10 04:33:51 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
I don't think it's an ateji (桑港 derived from 桑方西斯哥 + 港) and I don't think it's a gikun reading either. I really think it was best the way it was as two entries. |
| 5. |
A* 2022-06-30 20:14:11 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Then again, it's not ateji in the strict sense. Maybe better to add サンフランシスコ as a gikun reading to 桑港/そうこう? |
| 4. |
A* 2022-06-30 20:08:58 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
See ロンドン, パリ, ニューヨーク, etc. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -3,0 +4,5 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>桑港</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13 +17,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written as 桑港</s_inf> |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
| 3. |
A 2014-12-13 21:50:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 2. |
A* 2014-12-13 20:33:03 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
daijr, daijs |
| |
Comments: |
see comments on 2826285 |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>also written as 桑港</s_inf> |
| 1. |
A 2013-05-11 08:01:52 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*- |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サン・フランシスコ</reb>
+</r_ele> |