Agreed.

I don't think this is needed, especially if we're keeping it so general.

Reverso, WWW pages.

I see examples of it being used for entrance tests to educational institutions. It's far too broad to try and use field tags.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<field>&engr;</field>
-<field>&agric;</field>
@@ -15 +13 @@
-<gloss>standard test (i.e. against official material standards, safety standards, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>standard test</gloss>

eijiro
基準試験に受かる
pass a standard test

ベンチマーク	234252	99.6%
基準試験	825	0.4%

https://www.weblio.jp/content/基準試験
材料や機械が使えるかどうかを確かめ、配合を決定し、また管理する上で必要な基準になる数値を得る為に実施する試験。

https://doboku.ezwords.net/yougo/基準試験.html
ぴったり土木用語
基準試験とは　（きじゅんしけん）
（standard test）<1>使用材料や使用機械が施工可能か否かを確認する試験。<2>アスファルト混合物の配合を決定し、管理基準値を確認する試験。

I believe this could be related:
https://www.aimil.com/blog/what-is-asphalt-testing-and-why-is-it-necessary/#The_Different_Types_of_Asphalt_Tests_How_They_Work
(a lot of on-site tests to evaluate if the materials meet certain standards)

Materials Testing: Should You Change from the Standard Test Method Approach?
https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=20070

https://seidoublog.com/construction-management2/
使用材料の基準試験
材料の基準試験の項目は、工種ごとに定められています。

I question whether this was ever used in computing, and whether it needs a gloss or xref to ベンチマーク. 　Book results seem to be compatible with the weblio definition, usually having 工事 in the title.

I gave it a go, and I've left what I've found in the refs.  I'm feel "medium" about this gloss.  Just wanted to strip "benchmark".  I put a good amount of effort in, but there's no silver-bullet conclusive reference I can find.  It seems a bit "A+B", where different contexts might yield different, simple-enough interpretations.  This might be one of those "better to delete it than have an incorrect gloss" situations.  

Not in the kokugos that I can see, but eijiro has it in a few places with the simple-but-wholly-ambiguous gloss.

This alignment give a good hint as to one possible sense:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/idenshi/codex/06/dl/cac_gl72.pdf
選定された基準試験所（reference laboratory)

And here's a good string (which might be a different sense).  I don't have an alignment, but you can kind of see what it is:
「無線LAN等の欧米基準試験データの活用の在り方に関する検討会」
https://twitter.com/MIC_JAPAN/status/1641750016669921280

@@ -12,2 +12,4 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>benchmark (test)</gloss>
+<field>&engr;</field>
+<field>&agric;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>standard test (i.e. against official material standards, safety standards, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created