| 4. |
R 2013-08-19 23:10:16 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
relatively unambiguous merge. rejecting here, leaving suggested amendment to 2251160 open |
| 3. |
A* 2013-08-19 02:41:43 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
koj |
| |
Comments: |
2251160 is the べん in question for べんとう. i've suggested a merge there |
| 2. |
A* 2013-08-18 05:17:35 Richard Warmington <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Sorry ... it was Kojien, not Kodansha. |
| 1. |
A* 2013-08-18 02:44:40 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
See 2685630: "Kodansha says 弁: 弁当の略" |
| |
Comments: |
I am putting this up for discussion. We have already:
弁(P);辯(oK) [べん] /(n) (1) speech/(n-suf) (2) dialect/
弁;辨(oK) [べん] /(n) (See 太政官,弁官) Oversight Department...
弁;瓣(oK) [べん] /(n) (1) petal/(2) valve/
They really can't be merged as in each case they derive from distinct kanji (辯, etc.) which have all simplified to 弁.
Do we want a 4th 弁/べん entry (this one doesn't really belong in any of the other 3), or do we do a messy merge, perhaps with those old kanji as comments? |