5. |
A 2010-07-31 22:20:21 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
good enough |
4. |
A* 2010-07-31 20:18:05 Paul Blay <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
As Jim might say, we don't have to worry about the dictionary being too heavy to pick up so I don't see why it can't stay. |
3. |
A* 2010-07-31 18:21:54 Scott
|
|
Comments: |
it's in gg5. Not completely obvious. |
2. |
A* 2010-07-31 07:14:42 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
|
Comments: |
another expression that may not need to stay. only 370 real google hits, simple construction, obvious meaning. delete? |
1. |
A* 2010-07-30 09:19:07 Jean-Luc Léger <...address hidden...>
|
|
Diff: |
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>nutritious</gloss>
-<gloss>delicious</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<gloss>to be nutritious</gloss>
+<gloss>to be delicious</gloss> |