<entry id="2283672" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2859258</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>サッカー</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>sacker (at a supermarket)</gloss>
<gloss>bagger</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>bagging</gloss>
<gloss>sacking</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-11-15 04:40:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5: 〔商品の袋詰め〕 sacking; 〔袋詰め係〕 a 《supermarket》 「sacker [bagger, packer].
サッカー台   2300</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-11-15 05:08:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Might be better to lead with "sacker" if only because that's the source word</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr/s only mention the 人 / 店員.
sankoku has 〈こと／人〉.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;bagging (at a supermarket)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;sacking&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;sacker (at a supermarket)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;bagger&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;sacker&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;bagger&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;bagging&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;sacking&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-11-15 11:35:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We don't usually separate the action from the person doing it into different senses. (with some exceptions)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-11-15 18:32:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think we do that when it's natural to do so (奸邪: wicked person; evil thing). You can find some examples by searching the "Refs text" field for "また、その人" in the advanced search.

In this case I think it's more natural to split. Especially since the source word doesn't refer to bagging/sacking, the split helps to make this unexpected distinction clear.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-11-17 06:16:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think splitting works best here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>