jmdict
1605020
Active
(id:
2281852)
<entry id="2281852" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1605020</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>女々しい</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>女女しい</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>めめしい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
<gloss>effeminate</gloss>
<gloss>unmanly</gloss>
<gloss>cowardly</gloss>
<gloss>sissy</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-08-04 14:41:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E3%82%81%E3%82%81%E3%81%97%E3%81%84</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>cowardly</gloss>
+<gloss>unmanly</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-08-04 17:20:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>unmanly</gloss>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>unmanly</gloss>
+<gloss>sissy</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-31 13:08:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>sankoku</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-31 19:07:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Is that tag needed? It's a bit obvious.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-31 20:57:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>To me it sounds more [derog] than [sens].
I don't think we normally use either tag when the glosses are plainly disparaging.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>sankoku: 偏見をふくんだ言い方。</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-31 21:57:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just to be clear, the point being made by sankoku is that the word contains a sexist nuance in addition to being disparaging.
I think the question is whether this deserves special mention in jmdict or if it's already clear from the glosses.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-11-01 00:46:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's clear from the glosses.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>