<entry id="2279995" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1601230</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>繁忙</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf33</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>煩忙</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>はんぼう</reb>
<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf33</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>busy</gloss>
<gloss>high-stress</gloss>
<gloss>hectic</gloss>
<gloss>pressed (with business)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-11-09 05:44:31" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec2&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-12 00:50:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suppose the [ichi1] tag should be downgraded to [ichi2] or removed altogether</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5
Glossing as an adjective

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 煩忙　　 │     351 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │ 99.8% │
│ はんぼう │     453 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │
│ 繁忙の　 │   4,164 │
│ 繁忙に　 │   3,190 │
│ 繁忙な　 │   2,730 │
│ 繁忙を　 │   2,124 │
│ 繁忙と　 │     744 │
│ 繁忙が　 │     513 │
│ 繁忙さ　 │     465 │
│ 繁忙は　 │     216 │
│ 繁忙して │      73 │
│ 繁忙する │      54 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;煩忙&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -12,0 +9,5 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;煩忙&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;pressure of business&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -25,0 +26,3 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;high-stress&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;hectic&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;pressed (with business)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-12 06:37:49" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Downgrade. It's still in the ichiman collection.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec2&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi2&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt;
+&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi2&lt;/re_pri&gt;
@@ -20 +20 @@
-&lt;re_pri&gt;spec2&lt;/re_pri&gt;
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-12 23:59:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not sure what the reason for the downgrade is. We don't usually amend/drop (non-spec) freq tags unless there's an obvious error in the data. They're not based on Google n-grams. Plenty of ichi1-tagged terms have fewer n-grams than this. 
This doesn't meet the spec1/spec2 threshold.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi2&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -8 +8,0 @@
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi2&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-13 13:28:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"ichi2" used not to rate a P in the edict edition. For years I've changed ichi1 to ichi2 when the term or form was obviously uncommon. There are about 100 of them.
The old ichi/news/spec tagging is a mess, and sorely needs revising.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>