jmnedict
5725976
Deleted
(id:
2277169)
<entry id="2277169" stat="D" corpus="jmnedict" type="jmnedict">
<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>5725976</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>柬埔寨</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>柬蒲寨</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>カンボジア</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<misc>&place;</misc>
<gloss>Cambodia</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-09-12 02:27:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Adding the "correct" ateji form, and merging 5023924. 柬埔寨/カンボジア is in JMdict.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>柬埔寨 363 100.0%
柬蒲寨 0 0.0%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柬埔寨</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>かんぼじあ</reb>
+<reb>カンボジア</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-12 23:29:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Do we need rare ateji in jmnedict? We already have it on the jmdict entry. There's no way to mark it as rare here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-16 09:09:29" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've been mulling this over, and I agree that rare ateji forms like this are best kept in JMdict. I might draft an issue on the topic.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>カンボジア 1072007</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>