jmdict
1535390
Active
(id:
2162329)
<entry id="2162329" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1535390</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>目撃</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf09</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>もくげき</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf09</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>witnessing</gloss>
<gloss>observing</gloss>
<gloss>sighting</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-09-30 09:47:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Jason Monti</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just making a suggested change for the sake of clarification and ease of comprehension.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,1 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>eye-witness</gloss>
+<gloss>eye-witness (See 目撃証言)</gloss>
+<gloss>first-hand (See 目撃談)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-10-01 04:22:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>this is a perfectly good noun from which the [vs] and [adj-f] are easily derived... i don't see why it's been omitted</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, eij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,7 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to observe</gloss>
-<gloss>to witness</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>eye-witness (See 目撃証言)</gloss>
-<gloss>first-hand (See 目撃談)</gloss>
+<gloss>witnessing</gloss>
+<gloss>observing</gloss>
+<gloss>sighting</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-10-01 04:30:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-18 01:04:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>