jmdict
1410780
Active
(id:
2051804)
<entry id="2051804" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1410780</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>態度</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf02</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>たいど</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf02</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>attitude</gloss>
<gloss>manner</gloss>
<gloss>behaviour</gloss>
<gloss>demeanour</gloss>
<gloss>bearing</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>attitude (towards an issue, etc.)</gloss>
<gloss>position</gloss>
<gloss>stance</gloss>
<gloss>stand</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-11-30 00:39:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Hi, I like this dictionary and use it a lot for my study, but the profusion of multiple entries that have been appearing in recent times is a nuisance that detracts significantly from the user experience. I think it would be great if this problem could be fixed. For example, on this page I see:
態度 【たいど】 (n) attitude; mental attitude; JWN-06193203-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) attitude; JWN-13828343-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) behavior; behaviour; conduct; doings; JWN-01220984-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) demeanor; demeanour; behavior; behaviour; conduct; deportment; JWN-04897762-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) discussion; treatment; discourse; JWN-07138085-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) manner; (n) attitude; (n) bearing; (n) stance; LS [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W] [JW]
態度 【たいど】 (n) position; view; perspective; JWN-06208751-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) position; stance; posture; JWN-06196284-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n) side; position; JWN-06783265-n [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W]
態度 【たいど】 (n,adj-no) attitude; manner; behaviour; (P) [Edit][G][GI][S][A][W] [JW]
態度 【たいど】 attitudes; (BEH); FM [Promote][G][GI][S][A][W] [JW]</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-11-30 01:16:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Well, don't use the combined dictionary! You get a mass of entries from all over the place.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-11-30 06:38:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>this ongoing "combined dictionary" submission is somewhat bothersome. i wish they'd at least leave an email address</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-12-01 01:54:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I have put an alert message into WWWJDIC when any of the combined dictionaries is being used. Clunky, but maybe they'll get the message.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-12-01 12:35:55" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-11-13 19:45:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not adj-no.
The kokugos and prog have 2 senses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, prog, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21,9 @@
+<gloss>demeanour</gloss>
+<gloss>bearing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>attitude (towards an issue, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>position</gloss>
+<gloss>stance</gloss>
+<gloss>stand</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-11-13 22:25:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Only a couple of the 120+ sentences are sense 2.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>