JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1344620 Active (id: 2050320)
<entry id="2050320" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1344620</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>助産婦</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf20</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じょさんぷ</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2149000">助産師</xref>
<s_inf>former term</s_inf>
<gloss>midwife</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-10-19 20:51:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Do we want to mark this as obsolete, or with a note like "former name"? I suspect it's still used in day-to-day conversation but it might be worth indicating that it's no longer the official term.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr: "助産師の旧称"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-19 21:14:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>A note is probably best.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 too.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;former term&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml