jmdict
2838960
Active
(id:
2003168)
<entry id="2003168" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2838960</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>利用方法</keb>
<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>りようほうほう</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>how to use</gloss>
<gloss>method for using</gloss>
<gloss>way of using</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-03-31 03:58:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Glosses can be improved.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>12 eij thingies, among them
"~の利用方法
method for utilization of"
and
"いろいろな利用方法がある
have many uses"
利用方法 3992502 - spec1
ご利用方法 3185529
利用法 474855
ご利用法 9719
https://www.post.japanpost.jp/int/use/publication/food.html
"ご利用方法
内容品の英語訳"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-02 01:41:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>obviously extremely common, but i'm tempted to pass on this because it's A+B and 方法 is so productive. also, the "use" and "usage" glosses are potentially misleading.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-02 02:20:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>NINJAL-LWP frequency / ngrams for the NINJAL's top 10 方法 constructions (in that order):
支払い方法 7254/ 12746801
治療方法 5045/ 472050
使用方法 4012/ 1186168
解決方法 3982/ 445151
利用方法 3827/ 3992502
計算方法 3665/ 316555
対処方法 2721/ 333040
操作方法 2501/ 612185
評価方法 2497/ 272948
表現方法 2479/ 263718
Fifth most common ~方法 construction in the NINJAL-LWP corpus, and (likely) the 2nd most common ~方法 construction in the google ngram corpus.
Sure, 方法 may be productive, but this is especially so and to me obviously worth having.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-02 17:45:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm with Marcus here. If a prefix or suffix is very productive,
then I think we should include a few representative examples.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams
支払い方法 12746801
利用方法 3992502
使用方法 1186168
操作方法 612185
治療方法 472050
解決方法 445151
対処方法 333040
計算方法 316555
評価方法 272948
表現方法 263718</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-03 01:13:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, letting it in.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-03 03:36:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>maybe better</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5 (利用 and 方法)
eij
examples on the web (mostly instructions for how to use various things)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>use</gloss>
-<gloss>usage</gloss>
+<gloss>method for using</gloss>
+<gloss>way of using</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-03 03:47:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>