<entry id="1983238" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1255810</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>月並み</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf42</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>月並</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>月次</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>つきなみ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf42</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>げつじ</reb>
<re_restr>月次</re_restr>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>every month</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<stagr>つきなみ</stagr>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<s_inf>orig. used as an insult towards old-fashioned poets who would meet monthly to write poetry</s_inf>
<gloss>trite</gloss>
<gloss>commonplace</gloss>
<gloss>conventional</gloss>
<gloss>hackneyed</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-08-12 13:47:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daij, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-na;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -29,0 +29 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -38 +38,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;common&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;commonplace&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;conventional&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;hackneyed&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 08:39:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -36,0 +37,2 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;id;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;orig. used as an insult towards old-fashioned poets who would meet monthly to write poetry&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 15:19:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>a single word cannot be an idiom.  the tag for [id] says it is defined as "idiomatic expression".  if an entry doesn't take [exp] then it can't take [id]

correct restriction is つきなみ; also applies to 月次 with that reading</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-&lt;stagk&gt;月並み&lt;/stagk&gt;
-&lt;stagk&gt;月並&lt;/stagk&gt;
+&lt;stagr&gt;つきなみ&lt;/stagr&gt;
@@ -37 +35,0 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;id;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-11 04:09:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Point taken. But the usage is idiomatic, though? "Not apparent from its constituent parts." Wouldn't it better to change the definition in 
the help file to "idiomatic usage"?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-12 06:27:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Here the only "constituent parts" are the kanji. That doesn't make it idiomatic, any more than 魂柱 is.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-12 09:11:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think the constituent parts are just kanji - 月並み is a compound of two words, 魂柱 isn't. Surely "leg-pulling" is just as 
idiomatic in usage as "pulling one's leg"?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-25 19:27:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>only an [exp] can be marked as [id].  in any case, the mailing list is the place for conversation</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>