JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1202170 Active (id: 1912488)
<entry id="1912488" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1202170</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>皆さん</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf06</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>みなさん</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf06</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hon;</misc>
<gloss>all</gloss>
<gloss>everyone</gloss>
<gloss>everybody</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2015-02-27 02:46:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>みんなさん is not an irregular form. It's an unacceptable form.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;みんなさん&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-02-27 04:46:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Certainly みんなさん is comparatively rare (&lt;0.02%), and incorrect, but should it be expunged completely? We include quite a few not uncommon misspellings. Is it more unacceptable than こんにちわ?
(I remember being asked to remove the 部落民 entry on the grounds that the word was unacceptable. I didn't.)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>N-grams:
皆さん	29968760
みなさん	19114666
みんなさん	26820</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-03-02 09:41:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, I have discussed this offline with the OP, and I think みんなさん is probably best in its own entry with clear labelling of its status. We did the same for こんにちわ/こにちは/etc.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml