JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database


Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
jmdict 1258830 Active (id: 1075370)
<entry id="1075370" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<gloss>in the prefecture</gloss>
<audit time="2011-09-01 12:49:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>* Reorder pos, so [adj-no] first – generally used as *modifier*
* Reword so *in* or *of* the prefecture, not the prefecture itself.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, 大辞林、広辞苑</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
@@ -16,2 +17,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;in the prefecture&lt;/gloss&gt;
<audit time="2011-09-01 22:37:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not really comfortable with "adj-no,n". If it's a noun, I think that should be first. "adj-no" usually means "as well as being a noun, it works as an adjective with the genitive case particle", although there are cases where the word is really only an adjective.
In this case, I'm pretty sure it's not a noun, so I suggest dropping the "n", making it  stay as an adjective alone.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
<audit time="2011-09-02 02:22:41" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i'm okay with [adj-no,n] and i've submitted that way.  so those entries certainly exist already.  fwiw, meikyo and nikk call this word a noun (although its primary use is certainly adj-no)</upd_detl>
<audit time="2011-09-02 11:12:58" stat="A">
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, I'll put it back.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@

View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml