や
[spec1]
-
[prt]
《used for non-exhaustive lists related to a specific time and place》
- such things as ...
- and ... and
-
[prt]
《after the dictionary form of a verb》
- the minute (that) ...
- no sooner than ...
- as soon as
Cross references:- ⇒ see: 2018190 や否や 1. the minute (that) ...; no sooner than ...; as soon as
-
[cop]
Dialect: ksb
- be
- is
-
[int]
《punctuational exclamation in haiku, renga, etc.》
- o
- oh
Cross references:- ⇐ see: 2749980 かや 1. indicates emotion, admiration, etc.
-
[int]
《interjection expressing surprise》
- huh
- what
-
[int]
[male]
- hi
-
[int]
[arch]
- yes
- what?
-
[prt]
[arch]
《indicates a question》
- yes?
- no?
- is it?
- isn't it?
History:
-
A 2019-12-25 20:14:29 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> - Comments
Whew!
- Diff
@@ -23 +23 @@ -<pos>&unc;</pos> +<pos>&cop;</pos> @@ -25 +24,0 @@ -<s_inf>plain copula</s_inf>
-
A* 2018-06-06 04:40:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> - Comments
Reopening.
-
A 2018-06-06 04:40:22 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> - Comments
I'm closing this off to reduce clutter, then reopening. I intend to get to adding some extra POS. etc. tags soon, and it can be fixed up then.
-
A* 2018-05-14 04:25:15 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> - Comments
Also though changing the PoS abbreviation from [cop-da] to [cop] might be ideal, I wouldn't have a problem redefining [cop-da] to mean "the da copula" to "copula (such as the da copula)" - it's all about how we choose to describe it, isn't it?
-
A* 2018-05-14 04:00:42 Marcus Richert <...address hidden...> - Comments
Should we mabe consider changing cop-da to cop? What's the point of specifying it's "-da" in the PoS in the first place?
- (show/hide 17 older history records)
Notes
- Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.
- ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
- Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.