なければならない
[spec1]
；
なければなりません
[spec1]
；
なければいけない
[spec1]
；
なければいけません
[sk]
；
ねばならぬ
[sk]
；
ねばならない
[sk]
；
ねばなりません
[sk]
；
なければならぬ
[sk]
；
なけばならない
[sk]
-
[exp]
- have to do
- must
- should
- ought to
Cross references:- ⇐ see: 2037145 無きゃ【なきゃ】 3. have to ...; must ...
- ⇐ see: 2037140 無ければ【なければ】 3. have to ...; must ...
- ⇐ see: 2576160 ざるべからず 1. must (do, be)
- ⇐ see: 2142120 でなければならない 1. having to be; must be; should be; ought to be
- ⇐ see: 2098150 無くてはならない【なくてはならない】 2. have to do
- ⇐ see: 2210120 ねばなるまい 1. ought to (verb); should (verb)
- ⇐ see: 2785220 せねばならない 1. ought to do; have to do; must do; feel obliged to
History:
-
A 2023-02-25 20:37:17 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> (id#2222816)
-
A* 2023-02-25 15:25:28 dom <...address hidden...> (id#2222787) - Refs
Google N-gram Corpus Counts なければならない 15755700 64.2% なければなりません 2903247 11.8% なければいけない 2578274 10.5% なければいけません 583781 2.4% ねばならぬ 320639 1.3% ねばならない 1511774 6.2% ねばなりません 365218 1.5% なければならぬ 517718 2.1% なけばならない 5639 0.0%
- Diff
@@ -17,0 +18 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> @@ -20,0 +22 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> @@ -23,0 +26 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> @@ -26,0 +30 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> @@ -29,0 +34 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf> @@ -32,0 +38 @@ +<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-
A 2019-04-14 16:10:09 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> - Comments
They're very useful for text glossing.
-
A* 2019-04-14 12:15:22 Johan Råde <...address hidden...> - Comments
Do we really need the ～ません forms? Aren't they implied by the ～ない forms?
-
A 2018-08-03 05:25:52 Jim Breen <...address hidden...> - Comments
I came across 無ければならない so I thought it possibly should be added. When I opened this entry I saw it would create an awful mess, so I thought I'd just add this note and creep away.
- Refs
なければならない 15755700 無ければならない 11716
- (show/hide 3 older history records)
Notes
- Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.
- ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
- Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.