jmdict 1557630 Active (id#2007816)
[ichi1,news2,nf37] [spec1] [spec1]
れい [spec1,ichi1,news2,nf37]
  1. [n]
    • zero
    • nought
    Cross references:
    • ⇐ see: 2839962 0【ゼロ】 1. zero; 0; nought; nil
History:
    • A 2019-05-28 00:47:54 Jim Breen
    • A* 2019-05-27 22:23:59 Rene Malenfant
    • Comments
      reopen
    • A 2019-05-27 22:23:46 Rene Malenfant
    • Comments
      i agree. merging english & japanese entries is not how we handle things.  also 零 is ateji for ゼロ, so it's not a proper merge.  split out and temp approve
    • Diff
      @@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
      -<k_ele>
      -<keb>0</keb>
      -<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
      -</k_ele>
      @@ -14,0 +11,4 @@
      +<keb>0</keb>
      +<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
      +</k_ele>
      +<k_ele>
      @@ -15,0 +16 @@
      +<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
      @@ -22,5 +23 @@
      -</r_ele>
      -<r_ele>
      -<reb>ゼロ</reb>
      -<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
      -<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
      +<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
      @@ -30 +26,0 @@
      -<misc>&uk;</misc>
    • A* 2019-05-21 09:58:46 Marcus Richert
    • Comments
      Not sure the ゼロ/零 merge was the best choice. If they stay together, I don't think ゼロ should be nokanji (and I don't think ぜろ is 
      valid)
    • Diff
      @@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
      +<k_ele>
      +<keb>0</keb>
      +<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
      +</k_ele>
      @@ -8,0 +13,3 @@
      +</k_ele>
      +<k_ele>
      +<keb>〇</keb>
      @@ -17,3 +23,0 @@
      -<reb>ぜろ</reb>
      -</r_ele>
      -<r_ele>
      @@ -21 +24,0 @@
      -<re_nokanji/>
      @@ -27 +29,0 @@
      -<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
    • A 2016-09-23 10:58:24 Jim Breen
  1. (show/hide 3 older history records)
View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmdictdb xml

Notes

  • Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.       
  • ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
  • Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.