| 8. |
A 2025-09-17 06:04:26 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| 7. |
A* 2025-09-16 17:59:28 Sombrero1
|
| |
Comments: |
Applying them has been the norm recently. I think this is fine and better, at least until the github issue rises from the dead with a strong counterargument. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf> |
| 6. |
A 2024-10-02 12:10:43 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Messy too as both kanji have ためら.う as KUN readings. |
| 5. |
A* 2024-10-02 02:29:29 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Only 躊躇 has a gikun reading here. I don't think we should be using [gikun] for verbs until we have a way of marking particular kanji. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf> |
| 4. |
A* 2024-09-30 22:21:11
|
| |
Refs: |
sankoku, daijr, etc. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf> |
|
(show/hide 3 older log entries)
|
| 3. |
A 2017-07-26 11:30:26 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
gg5, prog |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to waver</gloss> |
| 2. |
A 2015-07-22 05:10:50 Rene Malenfant <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
? |
| 1. |
A* 2015-07-21 12:47:47
|
| |
Comments: |
テストでコメント |