| 6. |
A 2024-07-30 22:48:27 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Anyway, good that it is an entry now. |
| 5. |
A* 2024-07-26 00:47:16 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
は婚式 20
の婚式 45
で婚式 21 |
| |
Comments: |
Unidic has 婚式 tagged as a noun, and MeCab/Unidic parse passages containing X婚式 as X+婚式. I see a sentence in the Reverso collection "このような婚式はありません、どうして私にあなたに嫁ぐようにする？" It seems like it is getting some free-standing nounish use. |
| 4. |
A* 2024-07-25 00:34:58 Robin Scott <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Not a noun.
I think this can be simplified. Looks like all the compounds are wedding anniversaries. 結婚式 is 結婚 + 式, not 婚 + 婚式. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1243520">銀婚式</xref>
-<s_inf>esp. as 金婚式, 銀婚式, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>wedding (ceremony, anniversary)</gloss>
+<gloss>wedding (anniversary)</gloss> |
| 3. |
A 2024-07-23 23:29:35 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Not sure we need both the note and xrefs. |
| 2. |
A* 2024-07-22 12:57:27 Syed Raza <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Comments: |
Good entry to have. Despite unidic, all web hits I see are in compounds. |
| |
Diff: |
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1242930">金婚式</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1243520">銀婚式</xref> |
|
(show/hide 1 older log entries)
|
| 1. |
A* 2024-07-22 04:26:55 Jim Breen <...address hidden...>
|
| |
Refs: |
Unidic, 新編英和活用大辞典
婚式 35316 |