Entries

<entry eid="2052621" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>2029100</ent_seq> <r_ele> <reb>わ</reb> <re_pri>spec1</re_pri> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&prt;</pos> <misc>&fem;</misc> <s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf> <gloss>indicates emotion or admiration</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&prt;</pos> <s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf> <dial>&ksb;</dial> <gloss>indicates emphasis</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&pn;</pos> <dial>&tsug;</dial> <gloss>I</gloss> <gloss>me</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <gloss>wah!</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <gloss>boo!</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2005-03-05 00:00:00" stat="A"> <upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2010-09-30 04:06:51" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>paul</upd_uid> <upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Maybe entries like this should have the proper [fem] tag to improve attempts by third-parties to classify words, etc. (See recent comment in Tatoeba http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/145938 )</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -10,1 +10,3 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;(sentence end, mainly fem.) indicates emotion or admiration&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;fem;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;mostly fem.&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;(sentence end) indicates emotion or admiration&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2010-09-30 06:25:07" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>this is also used quite a bit in kansai-ben by both men and women</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2010-09-30 20:47:56" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>paul</upd_uid> <upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>That doesn't really pertain to the main point I'm making. Namely that entries marked with gloss text without actual tags won't be recognized when third parties use Edict data. In this particular case this means that Japanese sentences using わ in Tatoeba didn't get the 'Female' tag.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2010-09-30 22:19:55" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>okay. my comment was more about the way this is labelled, than your point, which is certainly valid... that's why the tags exist. but this is not really feminine in a large part of the country. also the [fem] tag and the note seem a bit redundant.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BF%91%E7%95%BF%E6%96%B9%E8%A8%80#.E7.B5.82.E5.8A.A9.E8.A9.9E</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@ -&lt;s_inf&gt;mostly fem.&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;also used by men in Kansai dialect&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2010-09-30 23:30:44" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2014-03-15 23:05:09" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_detl>Hi, I understand that the pattern ...するわ...するわ is used to list actions, often with negative nuance. I can't seem to find exactly this meaning of わ in the dictionary.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2014-03-16 03:56:49" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>None of my references - dictionaries, books on particles, grammar references, etc. mention this. Not even Martin. We'll need some firm evidence before contemplating changing this entry.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2014-03-19 05:53:32" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_detl>I really think a gloss like "indicates emotion or admiration" should be marked as [expl], whether it's the first gloss or not.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>daijs etc.</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -11,2 +11,16 @@ -&lt;s_inf&gt;also used by men in Kansai dialect&lt;/s_inf&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;(sentence end) indicates emotion or admiration&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;at sentence end&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;indicates emotion or admiration&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;at sentence end&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;dial&gt;&amp;ksb;&lt;/dial&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;indicates emphasis&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;wah!&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;boo!&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2014-03-24 11:42:45" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>OK, I think. There are about 60 entries with glosses starting "indicates ..". I think we need to come up with a uniform approach for tagging them. Abandoning the するわ proposal.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-11-27 00:50:42" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_refs>https://woman.mynavi.jp/article/140708-79/</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@ +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;pn;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;dial&gt;&amp;tsug;&lt;/dial&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;I&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;me&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2019-11-27 02:14:16" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>They talk funny up there.</upd_detl> </audit> </history> </entry>