jmdict 2028960 Active (id#2054535)
<entry eid="2054535" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>2028960</ent_seq> <r_ele> <reb>や</reb> <re_pri>spec1</re_pri> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&prt;</pos> <s_inf>used for non-exhaustive lists related to a specific time and place</s_inf> <gloss>such things as ...</gloss> <gloss>and ... and</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&prt;</pos> <xref type="see" seq="2018190" sno="1" xk="や否や">や否や[1]</xref> <s_inf>after the dictionary form of a verb</s_inf> <gloss>the minute (that) ...</gloss> <gloss>no sooner than ...</gloss> <gloss>as soon as</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&cop;</pos> <xref type="see" seq="2089020" xr="だ">だ</xref> <dial>&ksb;</dial> <gloss>be</gloss> <gloss>is</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <s_inf>punctuational exclamation in haiku, renga, etc.</s_inf> <gloss>o</gloss> <gloss>oh</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <s_inf>interjection expressing surprise</s_inf> <gloss>huh</gloss> <gloss>what</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <misc>&male;</misc> <gloss>hi</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&int;</pos> <misc>&arch;</misc> <gloss>yes</gloss> <gloss>what?</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&prt;</pos> <misc>&arch;</misc> <s_inf>indicates a question</s_inf> <gloss>yes?</gloss> <gloss>no?</gloss> <gloss>is it?</gloss> <gloss>isn't it?</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2005-03-05 00:00:00" stat="A"> <upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2012-05-31 11:50:56" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus</upd_name> <upd_refs>daijr, daijs daijs doesn't mention the greeting (which I put down as "hi") being specifically male: "突然または偶然に出会った人に呼びかけるときに発 する語。「―、しばらく」", but daijr does.</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -24,0 +24,9 @@ +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;interjection expressing surprise&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;male;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;hi&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; @@ -29,0 +38,6 @@ +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;yes&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;what?&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2012-06-15 02:16:04" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2014-10-06 20:54:33" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Curtis Naito</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I sometimes see "ya" used in place of "ka" in older Japanese. For example Daijirin says, "体言およびそれに準ずる語に付く。「…やもしれない」の形で,軽い疑いの意を表す。 「近いうちに大地震がある-も知れない」" Also, on ejje.weblio.jp there is a sentence, "中学課程の範囲内において如何にして英語を完全に教授すべきや How best to teach English within the limits of the middle-school curriculum" which uses "subeki ya" instead of "subeki ka".</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -41,0 +42,5 @@ +&lt;sense&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;indicates a question&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2014-10-06 21:43:12" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2015-03-06 04:29:21" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Curtis Naito</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_refs>GG5</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@ +&lt;gloss&gt;as soon as&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2015-03-06 07:11:08" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2015-05-14 20:56:56" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_diff>@@ -16 +16,2 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;(after the dictionary form of a verb) the minute (that) ...&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;after the dictionary form of a verb&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;the minute (that) ...&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2015-05-31 09:02:34" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_diff>@@ -15 +15 @@ -&lt;xref type="see" seq="2018190"&gt;や否や&lt;/xref&gt; +&lt;xref type="see" seq="2018190"&gt;や否や・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-05 12:17:09" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>sense 1,3,4: moving usage note to [note] sense 3: I've seen "や" translated as "o" (Basho's 松島 haiku) sense 6: Aligning with だ. Really this isn't ksb but very widely used [western Japanese]</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -10 +10,2 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;such things as (non-exhaustive list related to a specific time and place)&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;used for non-exhaustive lists related to a specific time and place&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;such things as ...&lt;/gloss&gt; @@ -23 +24,3 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;punctuational exclamation in haiku, renga, etc.&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;punctuational exclamation in haiku, renga, etc.&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;o&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;oh&lt;/gloss&gt; @@ -27 +30,3 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;interjection expressing surprise&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;interjection expressing surprise&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;huh&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;what&lt;/gloss&gt; @@ -35 +40 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;aux;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;cop-da;&lt;/pos&gt; @@ -37,0 +43 @@ +&lt;s_inf&gt;plain copula&lt;/s_inf&gt; @@ -39 +45,2 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;plain copula&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;be&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;is&lt;/gloss&gt; @@ -50 +57,2 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;indicates a question&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;indicates a question&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;?&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-17 05:09:40" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-18 07:00:56" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Aligining with か. I realized by the way that we only have cop-da on very few entries (だ,そうだ and ニダ, and I'm the one adding it one ニダ). Is cop-da ok here? Are there conjugation tables somewhere for this which complicates things?</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -57 +57,4 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;?&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;yes?&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;no?&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;is it?&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;isn't it?&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-20 05:39:05" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I guess it's not a problem here.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-20 10:44:30" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Moved "be; is" sense 6 to place 3.</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +23,8 @@ +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;cop-da;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;xref type="see" seq="2089020"&gt;だ・1&lt;/xref&gt; +&lt;s_inf&gt;plain copula&lt;/s_inf&gt; +&lt;dial&gt;&amp;ksb;&lt;/dial&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;be&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;is&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;/sense&gt; +&lt;sense&gt; @@ -40,8 +47,0 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;cop-da;&lt;/pos&gt; -&lt;xref type="see" seq="2089020"&gt;だ・1&lt;/xref&gt; -&lt;s_inf&gt;plain copula&lt;/s_inf&gt; -&lt;dial&gt;&amp;ksb;&lt;/dial&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;be&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;is&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;/sense&gt; -&lt;sense&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2018-04-24 08:59:43" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>GG5 has a sense which it describes as "軽く言い放つ" and for which it gives two examples: もうどうなったっていいや. Hey, I don't care either way. そりゃいい. 一緒に行こうや. Good idea. Let's go together. I don't think we cover this, and it seems to match the Tanaka sentence tagged for sense 4: "これじゃあ、僕は一生結婚なんて出来やしないや。 I guess I'm never going to get married." Should we add another sense? Or tweak sense 5?</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-05-13 19:07:52" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>this is a copula, but not cop-da</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-05-14 03:17:59" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I agree. We don't have a "cop" PoS, I guess "unc" with the note works?</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -23 +23 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;cop-da;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;unc;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2018-05-14 04:00:42" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Should we mabe consider changing cop-da to cop? What's the point of specifying it's "-da" in the PoS in the first place?</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-05-14 04:25:15" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Also though changing the PoS abbreviation from [cop-da] to [cop] might be ideal, I wouldn't have a problem redefining [cop-da] to mean "the da copula" to "copula (such as the da copula)" - it's all about how we choose to describe it, isn't it?</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-06-06 04:40:22" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I'm closing this off to reduce clutter, then reopening. I intend to get to adding some extra POS. etc. tags soon, and it can be fixed up then.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2018-06-06 04:40:43" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Reopening.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-25 20:14:29" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Whew!</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -23 +23 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;unc;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;cop;&lt;/pos&gt; @@ -25 +24,0 @@ -&lt;s_inf&gt;plain copula&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> </history> </entry>
View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmdictdb xml

Notes

  • Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.       
  • ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
  • Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.