jmdict 1345600 Active (id#2304092)
<entry eid="2304092" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>1345600</ent_seq> <k_ele> <keb>徐々</keb> </k_ele> <k_ele> <keb>徐徐</keb> </k_ele> <r_ele> <reb>じょじょ</reb> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&adj-t;</pos> <pos>&adv-to;</pos> <misc>&arch;</misc> <gloss>slow</gloss> <gloss>gradual</gloss> <gloss>steady</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&adj-t;</pos> <pos>&adv-to;</pos> <misc>&arch;</misc> <gloss>calm</gloss> <gloss>composed</gloss> <gloss>relaxed</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2010-05-30 04:59:44" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Josh</upd_name> <upd_detl>I didn't change anything above, but I noticed there are two entries for this word: 徐々 and 徐々に. They could be consolidated into one. JB: I agree.</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@ +&lt;gloss&gt;little by little&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2011-01-05 15:37:23" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Jonathan U Beltz</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Added an additional form of the kanji which is frequently used.</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +12,6 @@ +&lt;/k_ele&gt; +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;除々&lt;/keb&gt; +&lt;/k_ele&gt; +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;除除&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2011-01-05 20:54:27" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>"frequently used" but nevertheless wrong</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; @@ -18,0 +19,1 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2014-10-05 02:04:45" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>updating usage tags to match the higher ones of the deleted 徐々に entry</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -6,3 +6,2 @@ -&lt;ke_pri&gt;news2&lt;/ke_pri&gt; -&lt;ke_pri&gt;nf34&lt;/ke_pri&gt; -&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt; +&lt;ke_pri&gt;news1&lt;/ke_pri&gt; +&lt;ke_pri&gt;nf05&lt;/ke_pri&gt; @@ -11,0 +11 @@ +&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/ke_pri&gt; @@ -23,3 +23,3 @@ -&lt;re_pri&gt;news2&lt;/re_pri&gt; -&lt;re_pri&gt;nf34&lt;/re_pri&gt; -&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt; +&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt; +&lt;re_pri&gt;news1&lt;/re_pri&gt; +&lt;re_pri&gt;nf05&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2014-10-05 03:31:30" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2019-03-23 12:15:50" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Not sure the merge of 徐々 and 徐々に was such a great idea. N-grams show that it is used with に 99% of the time. daijs has two separate entries, the one without に is marked[文]. I think that technically 徐々に is not even covered by our current entry.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>gg5 koj daijs G n-grams 徐々 33526 徐々に 3906658</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2019-04-09 13:23:11" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Nobody has commented on this. My point is that 1. 徐々 is usually used as 徐々に 2. 徐々[adv] does not imply 徐々に[adv]</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-04-09 21:40:25" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid> <upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I agree. 徐々 is taru adjective (not an adverb) and appears to be archaic. It's not in meikyo or the JEs. I'll bring back the 徐々に entry. I don't know where the "soon" sense came from. The sentences will need to be moved.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>daij, koj</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -13,8 +12,0 @@ -&lt;k_ele&gt; -&lt;keb&gt;除々&lt;/keb&gt; -&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; -&lt;/k_ele&gt; -&lt;k_ele&gt; -&lt;keb&gt;除除&lt;/keb&gt; -&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; -&lt;/k_ele&gt; @@ -28 +20 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-t;&lt;/pos&gt; @@ -30,6 +22,4 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;gradually&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;steadily&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;quietly&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;slowly&lt;/gloss&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;little by little&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;slow&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;gradual&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;steady&lt;/gloss&gt; @@ -38,2 +28,6 @@ -&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt; -&lt;gloss&gt;soon&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-t;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv-to;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;calm&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;composed&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;relaxed&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2019-04-10 05:11:57" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>OK</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2022-07-21 18:30:12" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Looks like the [news1] and [ichi1] priority tags were added when this was merged with 徐々に. Now that this entry only contains archaic senses, I think the tags should be removed.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2022-07-21 23:03:46" stat="A"> <upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid> <upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Indeed.</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@ -&lt;ke_pri&gt;news1&lt;/ke_pri&gt; -&lt;ke_pri&gt;nf05&lt;/ke_pri&gt; @@ -11 +8,0 @@ -&lt;ke_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/ke_pri&gt; @@ -15,3 +11,0 @@ -&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt; -&lt;re_pri&gt;news1&lt;/re_pri&gt; -&lt;re_pri&gt;nf05&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2024-06-11 14:32:59" stat="A" unap="true"> </audit> <audit time="2024-06-11 15:00:50" stat="A"> <upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid> <upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> </history> </entry>
View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmdictdb xml

Notes

  • Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.       
  • ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
  • Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.