Entries

<entry eid="2359407" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>2755350</ent_seq> <k_ele> <keb>じゃ無い</keb> <ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> </k_ele> <k_ele> <keb>ぢゃ無い</keb> <ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf> </k_ele> <r_ele> <reb>じゃない</reb> <re_pri>spec1</re_pri> </r_ele> <r_ele> <reb>ぢゃない</reb> <re_inf>&ik;</re_inf> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&exp;</pos> <pos>&adj-i;</pos> <s_inf>from ではない</s_inf> <gloss>is not</gloss> <gloss>am not</gloss> <gloss>are not</gloss> </sense> <sense> <pos>&exp;</pos> <pos>&adj-i;</pos> <gloss>isn't it?</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2012-10-26 12:53:47" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_detl>don't know if this is really necessary, I just assumed there'd be an entry for じゃない so I figured I'd add the popular alt. spelling ぢゃない to it. turns out it does have an entry in daijr</upd_detl> <upd_refs>daijr ぢゃない 492k bing</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2012-10-29 04:04:17" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I'm not opposed to it, partly because it all helps text glossing. (I have じゃない in the special glossing kana dictionary, but not ぢゃない.) Perhaps ではない should be here too as a headword?</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@ +&lt;s_inf&gt;from ではない&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2012-10-29 10:27:02" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_refs>daijr has ではない in a separate entry.　daijs has "でない" with the usage note "◆「ではない」「でもない」という形でも用いられ、「ではない」 は、日常会話では「じゃない」となることが多い。" (but not じゃない)</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2012-10-30 08:16:29" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>では and じゃ appear to be separate, so for consistency's sake, these should be too. (although i'm not necessarily opposed to merging では and じゃ)</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-04-02 07:25:12" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@ +&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2019-04-02 20:13:13" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2019-10-08 22:35:00" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Given the number of hits, the kanji forms should probably be included. Probably should be split, but I see no harm doing it this way.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>じゃない 72991758 じゃ無い 399899 ぢゃない 140601 ぢゃ無い 11231</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@ +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;じゃ無い&lt;/keb&gt; +&lt;/k_ele&gt; +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;ぢゃ無い&lt;/keb&gt; +&lt;/k_ele&gt; @@ -5,0 +12 @@ +&lt;re_restr&gt;じゃ無い&lt;/re_restr&gt; @@ -9,0 +17 @@ +&lt;re_restr&gt;ぢゃ無い&lt;/re_restr&gt; @@ -14,0 +23 @@ +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt; @@ -22,0 +32 @@ +&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2019-10-24 21:42:35" stat="A"> <upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid> <upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-02 10:33:44" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name> <upd_detl>Common colloquial variants</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20,8 @@ +&lt;r_ele&gt; +&lt;reb&gt;じゃねー&lt;/reb&gt; +&lt;re_nokanji/&gt; +&lt;/r_ele&gt; +&lt;r_ele&gt; +&lt;reb&gt;じゃねぇ&lt;/reb&gt; +&lt;re_nokanji/&gt; +&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-02 11:11:50" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>As these are more colloquial, perhaps they should go in their own entry?</upd_detl> <upd_refs>じゃ無い 399899 ぢゃ無い 11231 じゃない 72991758 ぢゃない 140601 じゃねー 1458222 じゃねぇ 1103887</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-02 12:57:03" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>ぢゃない is pronounces the same way as じゃ ない so I don't think it should be split out together with じゃねー.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-02 15:47:31" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>even though it is "nokanji", i don't think we would normally keep a reading merged together with a headword with which it cannot possibly correspond. じゃねー/じゃねぇ cannot match じゃ無い, so i don't think they should be in here. i am more indifferent on ぢゃない, but given that it's marked ik, and corresponds to only one of the headwords, i think it should be split out</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2019-12-03 11:11:00" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I've split off the kana-only more-colloquial versions. I think the "ik" was in the wrong place.</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; @@ -18,9 +18,0 @@ -&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt; -&lt;/r_ele&gt; -&lt;r_ele&gt; -&lt;reb&gt;じゃねー&lt;/reb&gt; -&lt;re_nokanji/&gt; -&lt;/r_ele&gt; -&lt;r_ele&gt; -&lt;reb&gt;じゃねぇ&lt;/reb&gt; -&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2023-09-20 09:41:24" stat="A"> <upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; @@ -9 +10 @@ -&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; @@ -13 +13,0 @@ -&lt;re_restr&gt;じゃ無い&lt;/re_restr&gt; @@ -18 +18 @@ -&lt;re_restr&gt;ぢゃ無い&lt;/re_restr&gt; +&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2026-02-03 05:37:21" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Remove uk tags -*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -23 +22,0 @@ -&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt; @@ -32 +30,0 @@ -&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> </history> </entry>