jmdict
1551840
Active
(id:
2352296)
<entry id="2352296" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1551840</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>立法</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf04</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>りっぽう</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf04</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>(enactment of) legislation</gloss>
<gloss>lawmaking</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
<gloss>legislative</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-10-08 05:05:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Shabadaba Doo</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Frequently contrasted to the other branches, adj-no doesn't seem appropriate and added vt and vi.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>三省堂国語辞典 第八版
新明解国語辞典 第八版</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +19,7 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1300280">三権</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1282010">行政</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1282010">行政・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1306680">司法</xref>
+<field>&law;</field></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-10-09 07:49:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's a general term, not one tied to the legal profession. The xrefs are not appropriate.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21,6 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1300280">三権</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1282010">行政・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1306680">司法</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1306680">司法</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1306680">司法</xref>
-<field>&law;</field></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2025-11-19 03:49:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Compare with 法律 = legislation = laws
Open to other ideas. Reverso shows "legislation" is the best gloss(after "legislative"...), and "lawmaking" is hardly ever used. However the primary meaning of "legislation" is as an uncountable noun for "laws". Putting it next to "lawmaking" does not erase that.
It would be nice to remove the ambiguity. (I just recently botched this myself).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95
legislative 1420
legislation 851
law-making 18
lawmaking 11
legislating 5
立法 669684
立法の 66051
立法府 58491
立法措置 27132
立法院 22185
立法権 18544
立法者 16575
立法機関 15911
立法趣旨 13827
立法委員 11702
立法措置を 9516
立法論 8670
立法政策 8058
立法過程 7211
立法例 6395
立法審査 5860
Chatgpt:
立法府 legislative body
立法措置 legislative measures
立法権 legislative power / authority
立法機関 legislative body / organ
立法趣旨 legislative intent / purpose
立法論 theory of legislation / legislative theory
立法政策 legislative policy
立法過程 legislative process
立法例 legislative example / statutory example “Legislative” works; could also use “statutory” in legal texts.
立法審査 legislative review
立法委員 legislator / legislative committee member</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>legislation</gloss>
+<gloss>legislation (i.e. the process of making laws)</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>legislative</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2025-11-20 00:51:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>legislation (i.e. the process of making laws)</gloss>
+<gloss>(enactment of) legislation</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>