Entries

<entry eid="2340767" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>2800540</ent_seq> <k_ele> <keb>ドが付く</keb> </k_ele> <k_ele> <keb>どが付く</keb> </k_ele> <r_ele> <reb>ドがつく</reb> <re_restr>ドが付く</re_restr> </r_ele> <r_ele> <reb>どがつく</reb> <re_restr>どが付く</re_restr> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&exp;</pos> <pos>&v5k;</pos> <pos>&adj-f;</pos> <xref type="see" seq="2252690" sno="1" xr="ド">ド[1]</xref> <misc>&uk;</misc> <gloss>to be (something) very much</gloss> <gloss>to be an extreme (something)</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2013-09-23 02:08:43" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>pupchurch</upd_uid> <upd_name>Paul Upchurch</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Proposing split from 2555430 (ど突く).</upd_detl> <upd_refs>n-grams</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2013-09-24 18:40:37" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>is there even a solid ref for this? the proposed in the original sub was: 言ってしまえば、ドがつくクラスの美女である which isn't in the ref provided and it gets 3 google hits, inc. 1 edict and 2 bulletin boards. the other ref is a chiebukuro link that explains どつく but has nothing to do with どがつく. is this just supposed to be 度がつく?</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2013-09-26 23:44:36" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_detl>ドがつくほど "(I'm) so much X that you could add the prefix ド to it" so I guess ドがつく would be "very much", "extremely"</upd_detl> <upd_refs>http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1164647476 "「ドがつくほど」という言葉を見かけることがあります。" _ http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11112717876 "ドがつくほどドMです！ 悩んでます！" _ http://dic.pixiv.net/no_article/%E3%83%89%E3%81%8C%E3%81%A4%E3%81%8F%E3%81%BB%E3%81%A9%E7%B4%A0%E4%B A%BA ドがつくほど素人 _ https://twitter.com/akko_chan_movie/status/238659110365696000 「ド！」がつくほどの仕事に対する生真面目さ、必死さでした。 _ ngram ドが付く 1869 ドがつく 2970 ドがつくほど 1082 ドが付くほど 622</upd_refs> </audit> <audit time="2013-10-01 02:31:20" stat="A"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>approve for now because it has been removed from its original entry</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2013-10-01 02:32:02" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>reopen. is this the best possible gloss? should it be glossed as a verb or as an adj-f?</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2013-10-03 05:19:53" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid> <upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_diff>@@ -22,1 +22,2 @@ -&lt;gloss&gt;to stand out&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;to be (something) very much&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;to be an extreme (something)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2013-10-09 15:34:39" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I think it's OK as is.</upd_detl> </audit> <audit time="2025-05-27 18:45:49" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_name>GM</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>Rene wrote in 2013: "should it be glossed as a verb or as an adj-f?" I think we can have both v5k and adj-f.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>ドがつく素人　　　 249 69.9% ドがつくほどの素人 107 30.1% massif example: https://massif.la/ja/search?q=%E3%83%89%E3%81%8C%E3%81%A4%E3%81%8F+%E8%B2%A7%E4%B9%8F</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@ +&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt; +&lt;xref type="see" seq="2252690"&gt;ド・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2025-05-27 23:28:12" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I don't mind, but I'm not sure it's needed.</upd_detl> </audit> </history> </entry>